LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


March 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

答复: [TN] Reflowing CBGA component (wit h high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste (1 message)
+AFs-TN+AF0- About PTH solder joint strength (1 message)
36 hr E-mail Delay on IPC Forums (3 messages)
A PCB Designer position (looking for employment opportunity) (1 message)
A provacative 18 minute talk by Juan Enriquez (Some TC) (1 message)
About PTH solder joint strength (4 messages)
ACF Inforamation (5 messages)
Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder (13 messages)
Antwort: [TN] Thomas Ahrens (1 message)
AW: [TN] Thomas Ahrens (1 message)
Bath Salts (7 messages)
Cable Pull Test specifications (5 messages)
Ceramic Core PCBs (6 messages)
Cleaning equipment validation. (6 messages)
Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course (19 messages)
Comformal Coating vs Potting (8 messages)
Contract Manufacturer Levels (5 messages)
Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture (18 messages)
DEHP and/or BPAs (4 messages)
DEK Horizon (1 message)
Design standard reglementing PCB flatness (1 message)
Detection of potential cracked capacitors and resistors (8 messages)
EN61326 ESD requirements (5 messages)
ENIG Question (13 messages)
Failure Data Analysis Techniques (4 messages)
flex rigid (2 messages)
footgear for clean room (4 messages)
Friday NTC question: is Vinyl really vinyl (6 messages)
Future SHALLs (IPC-2610) (13 messages)
Gerber (5 messages)
Gloved Hands (4 messages)
Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles (28 messages)
hello! (1 message)
High Quality Flex Vendor Request (6 messages)
Industrial Water Purification source in Europe (2 messages)
IPC-2610 (Thou Shalt Document) (1 message)
LGA acceptance (9 messages)
Low temp RoHS solder paste (6 messages)
Max height of components acceptable for wave pallets (4 messages)
Max height of components acceptable for wave pallets/Pallet design tips (1 message)
Need a Failure Analysis Lab (3 messages)
Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200 (8 messages)
No traffic?! (3 messages)
NTC English (2 messages)
NTC: Not to be opened until Friday (6 messages)
Overview electronic Package Types requested (3 messages)
pcb brokers (1 message)
PCBA Marking Inks (4 messages)
PTH resistors arcing to LPI covered etch (4 messages)
PTV to Ground Clearance (3 messages)
Reflowing CBGA component (with high Pb content balls) using Eutectic solder paste (3 messages)
Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste (1 message)
removing some silkscreen notation (2 messages)
ROHS and Service Spares (1 message)
ROL1 RUMOR (18 messages)
safety glasses (11 messages)
Selective Soldering design rules (2 messages)
Silver whiskers (1 message)
solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles (9 messages)
Solderability fluxes (2 messages)
Solderballing service? (4 messages)
Survey on counterfeit components (1 message)
Test message (4 messages)
Thank You All! High Quality Flex Vendor Request (1 message)
Thomas Ahrens (1 message)
Thou Shalt Document (3 messages)
Titanium (14 messages)
To Grid or Not To Grid (3 messages)
Torque Value for fastener used on electronic printed circuit board / chassis (2 messages)
Traces and vias under components (8 messages)
UL Logos (9 messages)
Underfill Application (9 messages)
Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder? (28 messages)
V-Score Standards? (6 messages)
Water tank foaming inhibitor (5 messages)
What chemicals are given off by a burning FR4 circuit board? (7 messages)
What kind of ORT does the CM offer? (2 messages)
Wrong flux used (12 messages)
[DC] Future SHALLs (IPC-2610) (1 message)
[LF] No traffic?! (8 messages)
[spam] One of the emails for the Titanium string was filtered (1 message)
[spam] Re: [TN] [spam] One of the emails for the Titanium string was filtered (1 message)
[spam] RE: [TN] [spam] Re: [TN] [spam] One of the emails for the Titanium string was filtered (3 messages)
{Spam?} Re: [TN] solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles (4 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

答复: [TN] Reflowing CBGA component (wit h high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

答复: [TN] Reflowing CBGA component (wit h high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

陈昆 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:56:28 +0800

140 lines

New Thread

+AFs-TN+AF0- About PTH solder joint strength

Re: +AFs-TN+AF0- About PTH solder joint strength

+Z05OSQ- <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 17:30:01 +0800

130 lines

New Thread

36 hr E-mail Delay on IPC Forums

36 hr E-mail Delay on IPC Forums

Keach Sasamori <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:23:24 -0500

45 lines

Re: 36 hr E-mail Delay on IPC Forums

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:01:15 -0400

81 lines

Re: 36 hr E-mail Delay on IPC Forums

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:07:45 -0400

127 lines

New Thread

A PCB Designer position (looking for employment opportunity)

A PCB Designer position (looking for employment opportunity)

Jenny Prosmitsky <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:04:01 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

A provacative 18 minute talk by Juan Enriquez (Some TC)

A provacative 18 minute talk by Juan Enriquez (Some TC)

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:51:50 EST

25 lines

New Thread

About PTH solder joint strength

About PTH solder joint strength

+Z05OSQ- <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:54:11 +0800

39 lines

Re: About PTH solder joint strength

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 03:02:09 -0500

73 lines

Re: About PTH solder joint strength

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:11:57 -0500

120 lines

Re: About PTH solder joint strength

李义 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:39:49 +0800

98 lines

New Thread

ACF Inforamation

ACF Inforamation

weiner, mickey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:28:07 +0200

61 lines

Re: ACF Inforamation

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:02:54 -0400

96 lines

Re: ACF Inforamation

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:47:42 +0000

141 lines

Re: ACF Inforamation

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:12:13 -0700

94 lines

Re: ACF Inforamation

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:35:17 -0700

140 lines

New Thread

Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

john <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:04:21 -0000

64 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

Carl Proescholdt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:36:56 -0500

109 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:21:57 -0500

136 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

Terry L. Munson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:37:32 EDT

168 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

Carl Proescholdt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:59:01 -0500

166 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:10:25 -0500

188 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

Carl Proescholdt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:33:54 -0500

217 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

mp3 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:22:22 +0530

192 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:27:53 +0000

225 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:53:09 -0500

253 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

john <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:05:44 -0000

300 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:43:23 +0000

263 lines

Re: Additive to reduce dross in Wave solder

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:36:48 -0000

314 lines

New Thread

Antwort: [TN] Thomas Ahrens

Antwort: [TN] Thomas Ahrens

Frank Kriesch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:16:58 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Thomas Ahrens

AW: [TN] Thomas Ahrens

Neifer, Gebhard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:53:49 +0100

83 lines

New Thread

Bath Salts

Bath Salts

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:20:59 -0400

45 lines

Re: Bath Salts

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:13:46 -0700

75 lines

Re: Bath Salts

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:36:38 -0700

112 lines

Re: Bath Salts

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:31:51 +0200

150 lines

Re: Bath Salts

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:17:19 -0700

177 lines

Re: Bath Salts

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:53:27 +0200

211 lines

Re: Bath Salts

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:25:08 -0000

234 lines

New Thread

Cable Pull Test specifications

Cable Pull Test specifications

Forrester, Michael (H USA) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:59:57 -0400

94 lines

Re: Cable Pull Test specifications

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:23:48 -0700

106 lines

Re: Cable Pull Test specifications

Jean-François Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:06:48 -0400

153 lines

Re: Cable Pull Test specifications

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:34:05 -0400

107 lines

Re: Cable Pull Test specifications

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:34:30 -0400

184 lines

New Thread

Ceramic Core PCBs

Re: Ceramic Core PCBs

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:32:15 -0500

28 lines

Re: Ceramic Core PCBs

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:35:22 -0500

72 lines

Re: Ceramic Core PCBs

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:13:54 -0800

49 lines

Re: Ceramic Core PCBs

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:34:41 -0500

107 lines

Re: Ceramic Core PCBs

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:39:09 -0000

70 lines

Re: Ceramic Core PCBs

legg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 20:38:56 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

Cleaning equipment validation.

Cleaning equipment validation.

Juan T. Marugán <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:44:53 -0600

36 lines

Re: Cleaning equipment validation.

Rizzo, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:31:27 -0500

76 lines

Re: Cleaning equipment validation.

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:01:27 -0500

93 lines

Re: Cleaning equipment validation.

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:04:34 -0500

121 lines

Re: Cleaning equipment validation.

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:20:32 -0800

147 lines

Re: Cleaning equipment validation.

Juan T. Marugá¡n <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:37:30 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:35:01 -0600

39 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:43:01 -0500

76 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:45:45 -0400

66 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:51:01 -0600

95 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:52:15 -0500

84 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:17:17 -0400

111 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:41:40 -0500

138 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

ALLEN, LOA <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:13:18 -0800

179 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:00:46 -0500

67 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:01:27 -0500

98 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

李义 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:17:09 +0800

119 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:36:10 -0500

160 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:03:16 -0700

99 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:19:12 -0600

135 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:44:23 -0700

166 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:50:58 -0700

30 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:02:36 -0500

160 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:10:52 -0000

159 lines

Re: Coatings, epoxies, etc crash course

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:00:12 +0000

207 lines

New Thread

Comformal Coating vs Potting

Comformal Coating vs Potting

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:50:38 -0500

60 lines

Re: Comformal Coating vs Potting

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:24:37 -0500

107 lines

Re: Comformal Coating vs Potting

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:38:12 -0600

71 lines

Re: Comformal Coating vs Potting

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:17:21 -0500

105 lines

Re: Comformal Coating vs Potting

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:44:12 -0600

147 lines

Re: Comformal Coating vs Potting

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:34:19 +0200

170 lines

Re: Comformal Coating vs Potting

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:02:48 -0500

142 lines

Re: Comformal Coating vs Potting

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:44:27 -0500

179 lines

New Thread

Contract Manufacturer Levels

Contract Manufacturer Levels

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:06:37 -0500

33 lines

Re: Contract Manufacturer Levels

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:29:03 -0500

98 lines

Re: Contract Manufacturer Levels

Stephen Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:39:35 -0800

58 lines

Re: Contract Manufacturer Levels

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:04:36 -0500

84 lines

Re: Contract Manufacturer Levels

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:33:18 -0500

93 lines

New Thread

Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:44:55 -0400

37 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:01:23 +0100

66 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:09:51 -0400

98 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:37:02 -0400

130 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:46:04 -0400

152 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:50:31 +0100

113 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:03:15 -0400

177 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:59:25 +0100

204 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:04:09 -0500

144 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:41:20 +0100

170 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:32:31 +0100

171 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Eric Kalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:53:10 -0400

231 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:58:43 +0100

227 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:20:28 -0700

276 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:41:09 +0100

290 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:50:33 -0500

324 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:50:55 -0500

317 lines

Re: Custom Heat Sink Design / Manufacture

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:45:11 +0100

335 lines

New Thread

DEHP and/or BPAs

DEHP and/or BPAs

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:19:32 -0400

26 lines

Re: DEHP and/or BPAs

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:58:14 -0400

65 lines

Re: DEHP and/or BPAs

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:09:02 -0400

112 lines

Re: DEHP and/or BPAs

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:05:28 -0500

138 lines

New Thread

DEK Horizon

DEK Horizon

Yannick Brisson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:44:28 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

Design standard reglementing PCB flatness

Design standard reglementing PCB flatness

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:21:56 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

Detection of potential cracked capacitors and resistors

Detection of potential cracked capacitors and resistors

Jim West <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:28:30 -0400

35 lines

Re: Detection of potential cracked capacitors and resistors

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:41:22 +0000

43 lines

Re: Detection of potential cracked capacitors and resistors

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:27:25 -0700

79 lines

Re: Detection of potential cracked capacitors and resistors

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:56:06 -0400

64 lines

Re: Detection of potential cracked capacitors and resistors

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 18:27:47 -0700

82 lines

Re: Detection of potential cracked capacitors and resistors

Jim West <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:53:06 -0400

115 lines

Re: Detection of potential cracked capacitors and resistors

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 22:21:58 -0400

110 lines

Re: Detection of potential cracked capacitors and resistors

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:44:22 -0700

130 lines

New Thread

EN61326 ESD requirements

EN61326 ESD requirements

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:02:47 -0400

38 lines

Re: EN61326 ESD requirements

Juan T. Marugán <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:04:00 -0500

31 lines

Re: EN61326 ESD requirements

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:31:34 -0000

84 lines

Re: EN61326 ESD requirements

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:43:34 -0700

103 lines

Re: EN61326 ESD requirements

Gene Felder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:01:47 -0400

128 lines

New Thread

ENIG Question

ENIG Question

Dave Connitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:09:02 -0500

39 lines

Re: ENIG Question

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:50:33 -0500

77 lines

Re: ENIG Question

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:51:07 -0500

92 lines

Re: ENIG Question

Thomas E Kemp <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:51:51 -0600

85 lines

Re: ENIG Question

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 21:42:27 +0000

47 lines

Re: ENIG Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:00:28 -0600

117 lines

Re: ENIG Question

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:00:31 -0500

74 lines

Re: ENIG Question

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:04:59 -0800

82 lines

Re: ENIG Question

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:09:41 -0600

92 lines

Re: ENIG Question

stephen gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:48:50 -0800

94 lines

Re: ENIG Question

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:29:39 +0000

81 lines

Re: ENIG Question

Scott Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:49:17 -0500

85 lines

Re: ENIG Question

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:17:40 -0800

68 lines

New Thread

Failure Data Analysis Techniques

Failure Data Analysis Techniques

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:48:57 -0500

55 lines

Re: Failure Data Analysis Techniques

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:23:14 +0100

104 lines

Re: Failure Data Analysis Techniques

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 09:49:02 -0500

223 lines

Re: Failure Data Analysis Techniques

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:30:17 -0600

57 lines

New Thread

flex rigid

flex rigid

Hollevoet, Mia <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:27:03 +0100

64 lines

Re: flex rigid

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:18:28 -0400

92 lines

New Thread

footgear for clean room

footgear for clean room

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:19:10 -0500

33 lines

Re: footgear for clean room

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:27:14 -0500

68 lines

Re: footgear for clean room

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:54:02 -0500

88 lines

Re: footgear for clean room

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:11:06 -0500

86 lines

New Thread

Friday NTC question: is Vinyl really vinyl

Friday NTC question: is Vinyl really vinyl

Craig Cullum <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:11:22 -0500

39 lines

Re: Friday NTC question: is Vinyl really vinyl

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:44:49 -0800

63 lines

Re: Friday NTC question: is Vinyl really vinyl

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:20:26 -0700

72 lines

Re: Friday NTC question: is Vinyl really vinyl

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:27:30 -0400

102 lines

Re: Friday NTC question: is Vinyl really vinyl

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:34:42 -0400

88 lines

Re: Friday NTC question: is Vinyl really vinyl

SUBSCRIBE technet legg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:18:18 -0500

135 lines

New Thread

Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:00:53 -0500

101 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:07:04 -0700

111 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:13:47 -0700

135 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:24:54 -0400

136 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Frank Kimmey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:36:45 -0700

178 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Wolfe, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:14:03 -0400

188 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:41:36 -0700

243 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:45:56 -0400

233 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:24:33 -0500

71 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:19:17 -0000

63 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:13:33 -0500

104 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:46:20 -0000

53 lines

Re: Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:09:03 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Gerber

Re: Gerber

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:41:15 -0700

87 lines

Re: Gerber

Matthias Mansfeld <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:40:18 +0100

46 lines

Re: Gerber

Smith, Rick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:01:56 -0400

70 lines

Re: Gerber

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:31:55 -0400

120 lines

Re: Gerber

Smith, Rick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:39:48 -0400

144 lines

New Thread

Gloved Hands

Re: Gloved Hands

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:46:43 -0800

45 lines

Re: Gloved Hands

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:01:28 +0200

66 lines

Re: Gloved Hands

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:19:37 +0000

80 lines

Re: Gloved Hands

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:41:12 +0300

113 lines

New Thread

Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:26:49 -0500

36 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:39:20 -0000

73 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:00:13 -0500

71 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:06:42 +0200

57 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:07:16 -0500

122 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:19:13 -0500

79 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:44:19 -0600

124 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:50:07 -0600

158 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Roberts, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:14:54 -0600

187 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:29:57 -0600

231 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:33:19 -0600

32 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 08:34:59 -0700

267 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:37:10 -0500

272 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:41:08 -0600

298 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:45:39 -0600

92 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:04:58 -0500

265 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:06:05 -0500

63 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:10:41 -0400

331 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:20:40 EST

355 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:12:27 -0700

120 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:39:37 -0600

51 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:31:41 -0000

127 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:19:14 +0000

231 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:24:11 +0000

165 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:31:11 +0000

103 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:19:34 +0200

208 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:38:14 +0200

299 lines

Re: Gloved Hands / Fingerprints / Failure Articles

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:01:39 EDT

34 lines

New Thread

hello!

hello!

陈昆 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:41:18 +0800

56 lines

New Thread

High Quality Flex Vendor Request

High Quality Flex Vendor Request

David Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:18:59 -0700

33 lines

Re: High Quality Flex Vendor Request

Stewart, Dougal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:25:15 -0000

78 lines

Re: High Quality Flex Vendor Request

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 10:43:07 -0800

80 lines

Re: High Quality Flex Vendor Request

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:00:52 -0000

76 lines

Re: High Quality Flex Vendor Request

Ido Mashall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:12:32 +0200

74 lines

Re: High Quality Flex Vendor Request

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:43:31 -0800

85 lines

New Thread

Industrial Water Purification source in Europe

Industrial Water Purification source in Europe

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:09:11 -0500

29 lines

Re: Industrial Water Purification source in Europe

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:55:01 +0200

50 lines

New Thread

IPC-2610 (Thou Shalt Document)

IPC-2610 (Thou Shalt Document)

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:31:35 -0500

121 lines

New Thread

LGA acceptance

LGA acceptance

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:00:20 +0800

27 lines

Re: LGA acceptance

Leif Erik Laerum <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:33:24 -0500

50 lines

Re: LGA acceptance

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:23:08 +0800

91 lines

Re: LGA acceptance

Bob Willis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:33:22 -0000

80 lines

Re: LGA acceptance

Paul Lotosky <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:03:11 -0400

76 lines

Re: LGA acceptance

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:02:08 -0700

74 lines

Re: LGA acceptance

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:01:36 +0800

91 lines

Re: LGA acceptance

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:46:39 -0700

120 lines

Re: LGA acceptance

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:32:01 +0800

132 lines

New Thread

Low temp RoHS solder paste

Low temp RoHS solder paste

Douglas Erb <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:59:21 -0700

50 lines

Re: Low temp RoHS solder paste

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:26:29 -0400

88 lines

Re: Low temp RoHS solder paste

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:08:25 -0400

80 lines

Re: Low temp RoHS solder paste

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:22:13 -0400

124 lines

Re: Low temp RoHS solder paste

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:53:05 +0000

115 lines

Re: Low temp RoHS solder paste

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:57:45 -0400

174 lines

New Thread

Max height of components acceptable for wave pallets

Max height of components acceptable for wave pallets

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:46:25 -0400

40 lines

Re: Max height of components acceptable for wave pallets

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:37:56 -0500

83 lines

Re: Max height of components acceptable for wave pallets

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:04:38 -0700

70 lines

Re: Max height of components acceptable for wave pallets

Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:03:12 +0800

105 lines

New Thread

Max height of components acceptable for wave pallets/Pallet design tips

Re: Max height of components acceptable for wave pallets/Pallet design tips

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:41:47 +0000

228 lines

New Thread

Need a Failure Analysis Lab

Need a Failure Analysis Lab

Donald Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:13:17 -0500

23 lines

Re: Need a Failure Analysis Lab

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:50:36 -0500

58 lines

Re: Need a Failure Analysis Lab

Reliability Resources <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:04:32 -0700

94 lines

New Thread

Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:50:52 +0200

36 lines

Re: Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:07:00 +0000

47 lines

Re: Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:15:34 +0200

89 lines

Re: Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:37:38 -0500

79 lines

Re: Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:48:49 -0400

91 lines

Re: Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:59:05 +0200

100 lines

Re: Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:05:53 +0200

124 lines

Re: Nikon microscope camera DXM-1200

Bush, Jeffrey D. (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:19:27 -0400

131 lines

New Thread

No traffic?!

No traffic?!

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:27:25 -0400

27 lines

Re: no traffic?!

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:13:12 -0500

119 lines

Re: No traffic?!

Anil kher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:38:35 +0530

71 lines

New Thread

NTC English

Re: NTC English

Gunawan, Arif <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:11:01 +0800

30 lines

Re: NTC English

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:23:36 -0400

54 lines

New Thread

NTC: Not to be opened until Friday

NTC: Not to be opened until Friday

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:14:13 +0100

52 lines

Re: NTC: Not to be opened until Friday

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:55:12 -0400

101 lines

Re: NTC: Not to be opened until Friday

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:29:11 -0500

93 lines

Re: NTC: Not to be opened until Friday

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:03:22 -0400

123 lines

Re: NTC: Not to be opened until Friday

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:25:40 -0500

165 lines

Re: NTC: Not to be opened until Friday

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:34:52 -0400

187 lines

New Thread

Overview electronic Package Types requested

Overview electronic Package Types requested

Jeremias, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:45:28 +0100

161 lines

Re: Overview electronic Package Types requested

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:06:27 -0500

197 lines

Re: Overview electronic Package Types requested

Bob METCALF <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 04:17:20 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

pcb brokers

pcb brokers

Stewart, Dougal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:53:13 -0000

42 lines

New Thread

PCBA Marking Inks

PCBA Marking Inks

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:01:50 -0500

31 lines

Re: PCBA Marking Inks

Rizzo, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:14:12 -0400

71 lines

Re: PCBA Marking Inks

John Koleszar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:21:18 -0400

65 lines

Re: PCBA Marking Inks

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:39:02 -0500

95 lines

New Thread

PTH resistors arcing to LPI covered etch

PTH resistors arcing to LPI covered etch

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:43:26 -0400

38 lines

Re: PTH resistors arcing to LPI covered etch

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:40:17 +0100

80 lines

Re: PTH resistors arcing to LPI covered etch

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:40:17 -0700

76 lines

Re: PTH resistors arcing to LPI covered etch

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:02:14 -0500

115 lines

New Thread

PTV to Ground Clearance

PTV to Ground Clearance

GRIVON Arnaud <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 04:38:10 -0600

41 lines

Re: PTV to Ground Clearance

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:33:31 -0500

78 lines

Re: PTV to Ground Clearance

kwood716 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:25:19 -0500

79 lines

New Thread

Reflowing CBGA component (with high Pb content balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Pb content balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:02:42 -0800

144 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Pb content balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Joe Macko <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:38:32 -0800

220 lines

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Pb content balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:18:26 -0500

177 lines

New Thread

Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Re: Reflowing CBGA component (with high Sn balls) using Eutectic solder paste

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:46:10 -0600

181 lines

New Thread

removing some silkscreen notation

removing some silkscreen notation

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:16:26 -0700

39 lines

Re: removing some silkscreen notation

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:29:24 -0400

64 lines

New Thread

ROHS and Service Spares

ROHS and Service Spares

Forrester, Michael (H USA) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:59:04 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

ROL1 RUMOR

ROL1 RUMOR

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:31:07 -0400

37 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:59:46 -0500

68 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:01:42 -0700

93 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:00:36 -0500

88 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:00:17 -0500

114 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:03:45 -0400

134 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:14:54 -0700

134 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:39:18 -0400

127 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:46:05 -0500

216 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:50:45 -0400

219 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:51:43 -0500

159 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:59:38 -0400

197 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:00:32 -0400

186 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:09:55 -0500

212 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:14:31 -0300

63 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:35:12 -0000

121 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:46:16 -0500

148 lines

Re: ROL1 RUMOR

Paul Lotosky <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:51:41 -0400

116 lines

New Thread

safety glasses

safety glasses

Roger Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:05:49 -0600

51 lines

Re: safety glasses

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:34:04 -0600

101 lines

Re: safety glasses

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:34:36 -0600

96 lines

Re: safety glasses

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:39:30 -0500

53 lines

Re: safety glasses

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:27:24 +0100

80 lines

Re: safety glasses

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 08:13:48 -0500

121 lines

Re: safety glasses

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 17:24:57 +0200

77 lines

Re: safety glasses

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 01:07:06 +0000

134 lines

Re: safety glasses

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 06:58:00 -0500

135 lines

Re: safety glasses

Roger Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:52:05 -0500

205 lines

Re: safety glasses

Rex Waygood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:01:56 +0000

271 lines

New Thread

Selective Soldering design rules

Re: Selective Soldering design rules

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:39:15 +0000

120 lines

Re: Selective Soldering design rules

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:20:48 -0500

148 lines

New Thread

Silver whiskers

Silver whiskers

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:20:02 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Nieznanski, John A - SSD <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:05:20 -0400

69 lines

Re: solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:09:54 -0400

103 lines

Re: solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:03:19 -0400

117 lines

Re: solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:11:18 -0400

193 lines

Re: solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:28:26 +0200

123 lines

Re: solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:01:18 -0400

198 lines

Re: solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Nieznanski, John A - SSD <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:35:13 -0400

269 lines

Re: solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:12:19 -0400

179 lines

Re: solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 00:42:04 -0400

552 lines

New Thread

Solderability fluxes

Solderability fluxes

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:08:31 -0500

28 lines

Re: Solderability fluxes

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:31:21 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

Solderballing service?

Solderballing service?

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:10:37 -0700

24 lines

Re: Solderballing service?

Stewart, Dougal <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:16:05 -0000

67 lines

Re: Solderballing service?

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:39:54 -0700

74 lines

Re: Solderballing service?

John Goulet <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:16:31 +0000

86 lines

New Thread

Survey on counterfeit components

Survey on counterfeit components

Kim Sterling <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:16:10 -0500

85 lines

New Thread

Test message

Test message

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:57:26 -0500

28 lines

Re: Test message

Paul Lotosky <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:30:09 -0400

32 lines

Re: Test message

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:36:22 -0400

61 lines

Re: Test message

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:51:16 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

Thank You All! High Quality Flex Vendor Request

Thank You All! High Quality Flex Vendor Request

David Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:29:32 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

Thomas Ahrens

Thomas Ahrens

Werner engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:11:52 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

Thou Shalt Document

Thou Shalt Document

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:54:12 -0600

50 lines

Re: Thou Shalt Document

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:23:50 +0200

73 lines

Re: Thou Shalt Document

James Head <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:51:58 -0000

59 lines

New Thread

Titanium

Titanium

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:01:47 +0100

34 lines

Re: Titanium

Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:43:36 -0400

78 lines

Re: Titanium

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:18:49 -0700

42 lines

Re: Titanium

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:58:18 +0200

85 lines

Re: Titanium

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:27:36 -0700

114 lines

Re: Titanium

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:57:12 +0200

143 lines

Re: Titanium

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:04:18 +0300

187 lines

Re: Titanium

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:05:18 +0200

221 lines

Re: Titanium

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:40:02 +0300

331 lines

Re: Titanium

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:49:54 -0700

351 lines

Re: Titanium

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:53:23 -0800

319 lines

Re: Titanium

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:24:15 -0700

147 lines

Re: Titanium

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:09:08 +0200

344 lines

Re: Titanium

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:56:35 +0300

451 lines

New Thread

To Grid or Not To Grid

To Grid or Not To Grid

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:38:36 -0600

69 lines

Re: To Grid or Not To Grid

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:03:27 -0500

38 lines

Re: To Grid or Not To Grid

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:58:19 -0700

67 lines

New Thread

Torque Value for fastener used on electronic printed circuit board / chassis

Torque Value for fastener used on electronic printed circuit board / chassis

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:44:01 +0800

35 lines

Re: Torque Value for fastener used on electronic printed circuit board / chassis

Blomberg, Rainer (FL51) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:48:23 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

Traces and vias under components

Traces and vias under components

wheels <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:00:33 -0500

40 lines

Re: Traces and vias under components

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:53:30 -0400

58 lines

Re: Traces and vias under components

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:59:16 -0400

63 lines

Re: Traces and vias under components

Thayer, Wayne <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:17:14 -0400

112 lines

Re: Traces and vias under components

Wilson, Bob <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:20:33 -0700

160 lines

Re: Traces and vias under components

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:13:03 -0500

31 lines

Re: Traces and vias under components

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:37:18 -0500

75 lines

Re: Traces and vias under components

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:50:13 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

UL Logos

UL Logos

Rolfe, David <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:38:49 -0500

35 lines

Re: UL Logos

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:53:42 -0800

46 lines

Re: UL Logos

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:55:58 -0500

80 lines

Re: UL Logos

Scott Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:41:54 -0500

83 lines

Re: UL Logos

Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 08:32:37 -0600

36 lines

Re: UL Logos

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:32:35 -0500

71 lines

Re: UL Logos

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:41:44 -0500

64 lines

Re: UL Logos

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:56:29 -0500

109 lines

Re: UL Logos

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:05:25 -0500

126 lines

New Thread

Underfill Application

Underfill Application

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:48:17 -0400

60 lines

Re: Underfill Application

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:23:06 -0400

111 lines

Re: Underfill Application

Rick Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:50:26 -0500

118 lines

Re: Underfill Application

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:18:56 -0400

160 lines

Re: Underfill Application

Rick Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:31:41 -0500

703 lines

Re: Underfill Application

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:58:57 -0400

888 lines

Re: Underfill Application

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:31:03 -0400

101 lines

Re: Underfill Application

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:30:45 -0400

194 lines

Re: Underfill Application

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:44:44 -0400

146 lines

New Thread

Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Honsowetz, Eric <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:59:23 -0400

64 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:08:06 -0400

109 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Honsowetz, Eric <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:17:04 -0400

191 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:24:09 -0400

210 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:30:17 -0400

244 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Honsowetz, Eric <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:47:06 -0400

337 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:05:23 -0400

277 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:30:09 -0500

290 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

roland jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:57:50 +0100

96 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Honsowetz, Eric <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:59:07 -0400

159 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:21:44 -0400

164 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:33:30 -0400

215 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:09:20 -0400

242 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:26:10 -0400

294 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:40:39 -0500

158 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:49:59 -0500

287 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Honsowetz, Eric <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:02:41 -0400

400 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:40:53 -0800

62 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:38:47 -0400

380 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:58:20 -0500

130 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:29:57 -0800

140 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:41:20 -0500

75 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:14:38 -0500

210 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:22:31 -0400

213 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:01:08 -0400

379 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:57:05 -0400

390 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:06:20 -0400

253 lines

Re: Using CEM-1 in Pb-free Wave Solder?

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:48:17 -0500

1495 lines

New Thread

V-Score Standards?

V-Score Standards?

Brian Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:58:27 -0600

30 lines

Re: V-Score Standards?

James Mahoney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:31:29 -0500

72 lines

Re: V-Score Standards?

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:48:54 -0500

56 lines

Re: V-Score Standards?

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:51:47 -0500

75 lines

Re: V-Score Standards?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:43:17 -0600

60 lines

Re: V-Score Standards?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:59:03 -0600

102 lines

New Thread

Water tank foaming inhibitor

Water tank foaming inhibitor

Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:29:20 -0400

44 lines

Re: Water tank foaming inhibitor

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:41:22 -0500

76 lines

Re: Water tank foaming inhibitor

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:37:05 -0700

77 lines

Re: Water tank foaming inhibitor

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:44:39 +0200

72 lines

Re: Water tank foaming inhibitor

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:20:48 -0700

105 lines

New Thread

What chemicals are given off by a burning FR4 circuit board?

What chemicals are given off by a burning FR4 circuit board?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:06:24 -0400

26 lines

Re: What chemicals are given off by a burning FR4 circuit board?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:45:21 +0200

45 lines

Re: What chemicals are given off by a burning FR4 circuit board?

Geoff Layhe of Lamar Group <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:03:06 -0000

67 lines

Re: What chemicals are given off by a burning FR4 circuit board?

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:24:49 -0400

55 lines

Re: What chemicals are given off by a burning FR4 circuit board?

Geoff Layhe of Lamar Group <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:51:13 -0000

97 lines

Re: What chemicals are given off by a burning FR4 circuit board?

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:21:20 -0700

37 lines

Re: What chemicals are given off by a burning FR4 circuit board?

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:23:30 -0400

82 lines

New Thread

What kind of ORT does the CM offer?

What kind of ORT does the CM offer?

Rudolph yu <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 17:56:35 +0000

46 lines

Re: What kind of ORT does the CM offer?

Reliability Resources <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:01:04 -0700

97 lines

New Thread

Wrong flux used

Wrong flux used

Jim West <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:44:40 -0400

57 lines

Re: Wrong flux used

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:49:24 -0000

101 lines

Re: Wrong flux used

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:26:00 -0500

106 lines

Re: Wrong flux used

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:43:29 -0500

113 lines

Re: Wrong flux used

Terry L. Munson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:40:35 EDT

145 lines

Re: Wrong flux used

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:45:34 -0500

195 lines

Re: Wrong flux used

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:12:37 -0000

152 lines

Re: Wrong flux used

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:23:17 -0400

202 lines

Re: Wrong flux used

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:40:31 -0500

221 lines

Re: Wrong flux used

Temkin, Gregg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:09:48 -0700

88 lines

Re: Wrong flux used

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:08:23 -0400

181 lines

Re: Wrong flux used

Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:21:29 -0500

135 lines

New Thread

[DC] Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Re: [DC] Future SHALLs (IPC-2610)

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:09:48 -0500

110 lines

New Thread

[LF] No traffic?!

Re: [LF] No traffic?!

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:38:50 -0500

52 lines

Re: [LF] No traffic?!

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:41:17 -0700

56 lines

Re: [LF] No traffic?!

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:04:08 -0400

81 lines

Re: [LF] No traffic?!

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:33:16 -0500

117 lines

Re: [LF] No traffic?!

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:38:33 -0400

120 lines

Re: [LF] No traffic?!

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:14:06 -0500

84 lines

Re: [LF] No traffic?!

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:24:58 +0100

109 lines

Re: [LF] No traffic?!

SUBSCRIBE technet legg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:33:21 -0500

110 lines

New Thread

[spam] One of the emails for the Titanium string was filtered

[spam] One of the emails for the Titanium string was filtered

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:53:40 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

[spam] Re: [TN] [spam] One of the emails for the Titanium string was filtered

[spam] Re: [TN] [spam] One of the emails for the Titanium string was filtered

stephen gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:17:01 -0700

63 lines

New Thread

[spam] RE: [TN] [spam] Re: [TN] [spam] One of the emails for the Titanium string was filtered

[spam] RE: [TN] [spam] Re: [TN] [spam] One of the emails for the Titanium string was filtered

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:29:23 -0400

94 lines

[spam] Re: [TN] [spam] Re: [TN] [spam] One of the emails for the Titanium string was filtered

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:35:04 +0200

99 lines

[spam] RE: [TN] [spam] Re: [TN] [spam] One of the emails for the Titanium string was filtered

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:52:58 -0500

92 lines

New Thread

{Spam?} Re: [TN] solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Re: {Spam?} Re: [TN] solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:38:07 +0200

243 lines

Re: {Spam?} Re: [TN] solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Werner Engelmaier /* <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:46:00 -0400

266 lines

Re: {Spam?} Re: [TN] solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:40:46 -0500

363 lines

Re: {Spam?} Re: [TN] solder fatigue predictions for highly asymmetrical duty cycles

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:53:19 +0200

344 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager