LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


May 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

回复:Re: [TN] Silver Embrittlement? (1 message)
"bake-able" type UR conformal coatings (1 message)
(2) What is the difference between Fused SnPb and HASL? (8 messages)
(2) [TN] Farewell (11 messages)
<No subject> (2 messages)
??: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder (6 messages)
AC Outlets in China (11 messages)
Antw: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder (1 message)
BGA device carrier trimming (router) (2 messages)
BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report (135 messages)
Bob Willis contact (3 messages)
Changing BGA solderballs from SAC405 to SAC105 (8 messages)
chip heatsinks (4 messages)
Cleanliness Paper by Kirk Bonner (2 messages)
Clinched Leads (2 messages)
Component removal (2 messages)
Conductive Cooling thru Pre-Prig material (6 messages)
conductive via fill drill drawing note (3 messages)
Data I/O Pathmaster 3000 (1 message)
Definition of Eutectic Solder (20 messages)
Dow Corning Primer (2 messages)
Embedded Components (2 messages)
ENIG in Vias (6 messages)
ENIG vs. IG over Copper DIG. (2 messages)
Exposed copper (space applications) (3 messages)
Farewell (23 messages)
Flux residue, burnt flux (23 messages)
Flux residue, burnt flux (heart pacemakers) (1 message)
Flux residue, burnt flux NTC (5 messages)
Flux residue, burnt flux NTC...REALLY NTC (1 message)
Friday TechnoTopic (26 messages)
FW: Announcement: The next meeting of the IPC Designers Council, San Diego Chapter (1 message)
FW: BGA device carrier trimming (router) (1 message)
Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria (12 messages)
FW: Subsidiary Korea RoHS legislations under the official public consultation (1 message)
Fw: [TN] Flux residue, burnt flux NTC (1 message)
Gold content in solder joints (4 messages)
Henry Rekers is out of the office. (1 message)
how to bend 10-layer bonded flex (5 messages)
How to enhance (probe contact) ICT testing for PCA on OSP finishing ? (1 message)
How would you repair this flex tear? (8 messages)
Insulation Resistance (2 messages)
IPC B-36 Image (3 messages)
IPC Compliant Electronics for EU Applications workshop, May 8 & 9, 2007, Philadelphia, PA (1 message)
IPC International Conference on Flexible Circuits, June 12 & 13, 2007, in Minneapolis, MN (2 messages)
IPC is offering innovative workshops in Singapore, SG - don't miss out! (1 message)
IPC TM-650 # 2.6.6 (Temperature cycling -PWB-) (2 messages)
IPC Workshop: Design & Build a Board w/Embedded Passive Components, June 19-20, 2007, Crane, IN (1 message)
IPC Workshop: Design and Build a Board w/Embedded Passive Components and HDI/Microvia, June 19 & 20, 2007, Crane, IN (1 message)
Joel Alexander is out of the office. (1 message)
Laminate damage (3 messages)
Lead test kits (2 messages)
LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking (15 messages)
LF forum (1 message)
LF HASL Skip Plating (Thin) (1 message)
Looking for 3 mil PTFE Tape (2 messages)
mass percentage of copper (3 messages)
Measuring oxidation of the spheres in solder paste (5 messages)
MELF Experiment (3 messages)
Metalized Poly Caps (2 messages)
Metallurgists, need assistance (4 messages)
Metallurgists, need assistance, closing this one (6 messages)
Metalurgists, need assistance (16 messages)
Mfg of long Board (5 messages)
Mil assemblies & No Clean (4 messages)
Missing copper/HASL finish in many spots on the ground planes (3 messages)
MLCCC caps (1 message)
More of Inge's Images... (2 messages)
New printer, surprise (17 messages)
no clean flux (2 messages)
Notes on Official Request for Your Input Regarding the Impact of RoHS/WEEE Directives on Electronics Industry (6 messages)
NTC (1 message)
NTC - Engineers... (11 messages)
NTC Doug's comments on pig wrestling (8 messages)
NTC Lead, Romans and other interesting stuff (3 messages)
NTC RE: [TN] Exposed copper (space applications) (1 message)
NTC RE: [TN] SV: [TN] SMT connectors (4 messages)
NTC RoHS compliant car? (1 message)
NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure (30 messages)
NTC RoHS testing lab (1 message)
NTC The spread of the Envirus (2 messages)
NTC: Definition of Eutectic Solder (3 messages)
Parylene coating (4 messages)
PCB assembly for medical devices (10 messages)
pcb fabricator qualification (2 messages)
PCB Flatness (5 messages)
PCB stiffners (5 messages)
PTH sizing (5 messages)
PWB Moisture Diffusion Rates (4 messages)
Question on "semi additive" process (1 message)
Recommended Nitrogen Levels for Lead-free Reflow (2 messages)
Register for IPC's Designing with your 'Thumbs' workshop, May 21, 2007, in Bannockburn, IL (1 message)
RF fences, materials (1 message)
RF fences, oldering (11 messages)
RF shields (5 messages)
RoHS compliant laptop with early failure (34 messages)
SAC to purchase! (1 message)
SAC/ENIG report (7 messages)
Separated soldermask (1 message)
Silver Embrittlement? (21 messages)
SMT connectors (80 messages)
SMT connectors (NTC) (1 message)
SN100C vs. SAC305 (15 messages)
SnPb paste - PbFree BGA (1 message)
Solder Joint Analysis Lab Recommendations? (5 messages)
Solder terminal to polyimide PCB for mechanical strength (2 messages)
solder wire alloy 96.5% Tin, 3.5% silver (2 messages)
Space for marking board assembly (1 message)
Strange one.......continued! (2 messages)
Strange one? (6 messages)
SV: SV: [TN] RoHS compliant laptop with early failure (1 message)
SV: SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder (2 messages)
SV: [TN] AC Outlets in China (6 messages)
SV: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder (10 messages)
SV: [TN] Exposed copper (space applications) (1 message)
SV: [TN] Farewell (1 message)
SV: [TN] Friday TechnoTopic (3 messages)
SV: [TN] Metallurgists, need assistance (3 messages)
SV: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance (6 messages)
SV: [TN] Mil assemblies & No Clean (1 message)
SV: [TN] NTC RE: [TN] SV: [TN] SMT connectors (2 messages)
SV: [TN] RoHS compliant laptop with early failure (6 messages)
SV: [TN] SMT connectors (4 messages)
SV: [TN] Strange one? (6 messages)
SV: [TN] SV: [TN] AC Outlets in China (6 messages)
SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder (18 messages)
SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Metallurgists, need assistance (1 message)
SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance (12 messages)
SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Strange one? (1 message)
SV: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Metallurgists, need assistance (7 messages)
SV: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Metallurgists, need assistance NTC (1 message)
SV: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Metalurgists, need assistance (7 messages)
To MELF or not to MELF (4 messages)
unsymetrically masked vias (8 messages)
Used Equipment dealers (5 messages)
Using up old components? (5 messages)
What is the difference between Fused SnPb and HASL? (15 messages)
Where I can find the Large Size BGA (3 messages)
X-ray machines (3 messages)
Your IPC Annual Technology Trends for Rigid PCB Survey - Invitation to Participate (2 messages)
[BULK] Re: [TN] New printer, surprise (2 messages)
[BULK] [TN] NTC The spread of the Envirus (1 message)
[LF] [TN] RoHS compliant laptop with early failure (3 messages)
[LF] [TN] RoHS compliant laptop with early failure -- ntc (1 message)
[NTC] Flux residue, burnt flux (3 messages)
[SPAM-HD] - [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] AC Outlets in China - Number of numbers in MIME From exceeds maximum threshold (6 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

回复:Re: [TN] Silver Embrittlement?

回复:Re: [TN] Silver Embrittlement?

liusang 22726 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 23:16:45 +0800

284 lines

New Thread

"bake-able" type UR conformal coatings

"bake-able" type UR conformal coatings

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 07:25:38 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

(2) What is the difference between Fused SnPb and HASL?

Re: (2) What is the difference between Fused SnPb and HASL?

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 16:02:30 -0700

602 lines

Re: (2) What is the difference between Fused SnPb and HASL?

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:26 -0700

623 lines

Re: (2) What is the difference between Fused SnPb and HASL?

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 08:16:07 +0800

640 lines

Re: (2) What is the difference between Fused SnPb and HASL?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 11:14:38 +0300

678 lines

Re: (2) What is the difference between Fused SnPb and HASL?

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 07:33:14 -0700

758 lines

Re: (2) What is the difference between Fused SnPb and HASL?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 11:00:06 -0400

716 lines

Re: (2) What is the difference between Fused SnPb and HASL?

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 11:55:33 -0400

759 lines

Re: (2) What is the difference between Fused SnPb and HASL?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 13:34:08 -0400

661 lines

New Thread

(2) [TN] Farewell

Re: (2) [TN] Farewell

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 07:02:22 -0700

156 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Farewell

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 07:08:28 -0700

185 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Farewell

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 09:25:07 -0500

34 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Farewell

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 07:46:59 -0700

64 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Farewell

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 09:48:38 -0500

59 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Farewell

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 18:01:17 +0100

94 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Farewell

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 16:45:13 EDT

33 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Farewell

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 14:33:29 -0700

58 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Farewell

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 17:39:59 EDT

31 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Farewell

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 14:51:14 -0700

60 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Farewell

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 15:33:03 -0700

99 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Pat Diamond <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 12:05:41 +0100

35 lines

<No subject>

Pat Diamond <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 12:08:14 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

??: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder

??: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder

WTSJ-Willis Tam <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 08:57:32 +0800

284 lines

Re: ??: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder

Tan, Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 10:29:37 +0800

220 lines

Re: ??: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder

Rueda, Ernesto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 06:52:24 -0700

241 lines

Re: ??: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 25 May 2007 16:03:36 EDT

53 lines

Re: ??: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2007 09:05:36 +0200

221 lines

Re: ??: [TN] SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder

weiner, mickey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2007 10:49:22 +0300

311 lines

New Thread

AC Outlets in China

AC Outlets in China

James Verrette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 02:54:49 -0400

33 lines

Re: AC Outlets in China

James Verrette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 03:24:48 -0400

56 lines

Re: AC Outlets in China

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 08:27:52 -0400

91 lines

Re: AC Outlets in China

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 09:13:29 -0400

119 lines

Re: AC Outlets in China

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 09:42:16 -0400

155 lines

Re: AC Outlets in China

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 06:45:08 -0700

185 lines

Re: AC Outlets in China

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 07:53:59 -0700

68 lines

Re: AC Outlets in China

P. Langeveld <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 17:26:48 +0200

32 lines

Re: AC Outlets in China

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 11:55:44 -0400

184 lines

Re: AC Outlets in China

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 14:06:14 -0400

219 lines

Re: AC Outlets in China

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 16:01:20 -0400

224 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder

Antw: [TN] Definition of Eutectic Solder

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 10:45:59 +0200

107 lines

New Thread

BGA device carrier trimming (router)

BGA device carrier trimming (router)

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 08:34:54 -0500

27 lines

Re: BGA device carrier trimming (router)

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 08:05:35 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

131 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

144 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

145 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

145 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

144 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

207 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

227 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

262 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

250 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

159 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

159 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

159 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

159 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

157 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

319 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

157 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

144 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

219 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

157 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

157 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

219 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

218 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

241 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

241 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

276 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

333 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

264 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

233 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

240 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

218 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

275 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

263 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

332 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

144 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

157 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

157 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

218 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

240 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

263 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

275 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

332 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

255 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

264 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

276 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

333 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

233 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

233 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

232 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

157 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

232 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

232 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

254 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

254 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

231 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

289 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

346 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

stephen gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:57:50 -0700

281 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

255 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

290 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

278 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

347 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

277 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

232 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

157 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

254 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

232 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

231 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

254 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

289 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

277 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

346 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

231 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

253 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

288 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

276 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

157 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

345 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

347 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

158 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

289 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

254 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

278 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

255 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

232 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

232 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

232 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

254 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

346 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

346 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

255 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

253 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

290 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

276 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

288 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

277 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

345 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

346 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

289 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

stephen gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:57:50 -0700

294 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

277 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

277 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

289 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

290 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

253 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

231 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

288 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

278 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

347 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

276 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

233 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

stephen gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:57:50 -0700

295 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

345 lines

BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:12:27 -0700

157 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

231 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:25:29 -0400

231 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Craig Sullivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:27:04 -0400

253 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

276 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

288 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

345 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:54 -0400

289 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:30:46 -0700

277 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:31:27 -0400

346 lines

Re: BGA solderballs SAC105 Sanmina Report

stephen gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:57:50 -0700

294 lines

New Thread

Bob Willis contact

Bob Willis contact

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 21:09:51 EDT

33 lines

Re: Bob Willis contact

Alistair Murray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 08:19:45 +0100

60 lines

Re: Bob Willis contact

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 10:31:19 -0700

92 lines

New Thread

Changing BGA solderballs from SAC405 to SAC105

Changing BGA solderballs from SAC405 to SAC105

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 May 2007 17:30:59 -0700

38 lines

Re: Changing BGA solderballs from SAC405 to SAC105

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 07:57:39 -0400

83 lines

Re: Changing BGA solderballs from SAC405 to SAC105

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 08:27:41 -0500

104 lines

Re: Changing BGA solderballs from SAC405 to SAC105

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 09:48:18 -0400

121 lines

Re: Changing BGA solderballs from SAC405 to SAC105

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 09:10:10 -0500

144 lines

Re: Changing BGA solderballs from SAC405 to SAC105

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 10:36:06 -0400

193 lines

Re: Changing BGA solderballs from SAC405 to SAC105

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 10:50:17 -0500

251 lines

Re: Changing BGA solderballs from SAC405 to SAC105

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 09:49:26 -0700

303 lines

New Thread

chip heatsinks

chip heatsinks

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 14:42:14 -0700

27 lines

Re: chip heatsinks

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 08:09:31 -0400

72 lines

Re: chip heatsinks

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 07:17:28 -0500

79 lines

Re: chip heatsinks

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 08:20:30 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

Cleanliness Paper by Kirk Bonner

Cleanliness Paper by Kirk Bonner

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 08:58:22 -0500

34 lines

Re: Cleanliness Paper by Kirk Bonner

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 May 2007 16:09:57 EDT

38 lines

New Thread

Clinched Leads

Clinched Leads

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 09:08:17 -0400

38 lines

Re: Clinched Leads

Jones, Evamaria <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 10:12:39 -0400

103 lines

New Thread

Component removal

Component removal

Aspinall, Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 15:42:54 +0100

45 lines

Re: Component removal

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 11:55:26 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

Conductive Cooling thru Pre-Prig material

Conductive Cooling thru Pre-Prig material

Terry Kozlyk <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 05:02:24 -0600

62 lines

Re: Conductive Cooling thru Pre-Prig material

Roger Tingler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 07:31:25 -0400

112 lines

Re: Conductive Cooling thru Pre-Prig material

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 06:57:51 -0500

101 lines

Re: Conductive Cooling thru Pre-Prig material

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 08:02:33 -0400

158 lines

Re: Conductive Cooling thru Pre-Prig material

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 08:14:45 -0400

184 lines

Re: Conductive Cooling thru Pre-Prig material

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 08:20:02 -0400

100 lines

New Thread

conductive via fill drill drawing note

Re: conductive via fill drill drawing note

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 10:51:25 -0500

171 lines

Re: conductive via fill drill drawing note

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 08:56:00 -0700

181 lines

Re: conductive via fill drill drawing note

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 11:06:14 -0500

209 lines

New Thread

Data I/O Pathmaster 3000

Data I/O Pathmaster 3000

Dan Mauro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 15:31:37 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

Definition of Eutectic Solder

Definition of Eutectic Solder

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 08:08:24 +0800

30 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 17:51:14 -0700

66 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 11:15:43 +0300

74 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 07:37:26 -0500

107 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 08:56:42 EDT

28 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 09:03:11 EDT

34 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 08:36:21 -0500

83 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 15:44:23 +0200

113 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 08:46:57 -0500

132 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 09:53:47 EDT

32 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 09:55:15 EDT

31 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 17:14:05 +0300

112 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 07:21:24 -0700

37 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 09:23:46 -0500

119 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 10:45:16 -0400

97 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 10:53:27 EDT

33 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 19:03:46 +0300

144 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 12:04:47 -0500

145 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 11:10:56 -0700

64 lines

Re: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 17:45:02 EDT

40 lines

New Thread

Dow Corning Primer

Dow Corning Primer

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 15:21:30 -0500

28 lines

Re: Dow Corning Primer

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:39:03 -0700

57 lines

New Thread

Embedded Components

Embedded Components

Black, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 10:30:54 -0400

33 lines

Re: Embedded Components

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:46:13 EDT

57 lines

New Thread

ENIG in Vias

ENIG in Vias

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 10:51:34 EDT

37 lines

Re: ENIG in Vias

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 11:04:20 -0400

76 lines

Re: ENIG in Vias

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 11:33:09 EDT

32 lines

Re: ENIG in Vias

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 12:21:34 EDT

29 lines

Re: ENIG in Vias

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 09:25:27 -0700

57 lines

Re: ENIG in Vias

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 14:23:22 -0700

68 lines

New Thread

ENIG vs. IG over Copper DIG.

Re: ENIG vs. IG over Copper DIG.

Bob Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 09:17:14 -0700

63 lines

Re: ENIG vs. IG over Copper DIG.

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 10:36:55 -0600

87 lines

New Thread

Exposed copper (space applications)

Exposed copper (space applications)

Gary Bremer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 20:29:00 -0700

39 lines

Re: Exposed copper (space applications)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 21:07:52 -0700

81 lines

Re: Exposed copper (space applications)

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 09:36:56 +0300

74 lines

New Thread

Farewell

Farewell

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 09:01:57 -0700

48 lines

Re: Farewell

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 11:04:15 -0500

74 lines

Re: Farewell

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:05:52 -0600

72 lines

Re: Farewell

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 11:07:49 -0500

78 lines

Re: Farewell

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 30 May 2007 16:17:07 +0000

49 lines

Re: Farewell

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 12:19:00 -0400

40 lines

Re: Farewell

Charlie McMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 12:19:37 -0400

88 lines

Re: Farewell

Joe Russeau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 12:24:24 -0400

84 lines

Re: Farewell

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 12:26:01 -0400

75 lines

Re: Farewell

Kelly Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 11:32:45 -0500

81 lines

Re: Farewell

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 09:40:36 -0700

86 lines

Re: Farewell

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 12:52:00 -0400

71 lines

Re: Farewell

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 18:02:03 +0100

80 lines

Re: Farewell

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 13:11:52 -0400

89 lines

Re: Farewell

Bob Arciolla <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 13:19:25 -0500

75 lines

Re: Farewell

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 12:02:43 -0700

76 lines

Re: Farewell

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:15 -0400

79 lines

Re: Farewell

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 16:00:41 -0400

105 lines

Re: Farewell

Black, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 17:34:58 -0400

85 lines

Re: Farewell

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 17:39:35 EDT

31 lines

Re: Farewell

Alcorn, Brent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 17:40:52 -0400

87 lines

Re: Farewell

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 18:37:36 -0700

84 lines

Re: Farewell

Calhoun, Keith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 06:21:35 -0400

145 lines

New Thread

Flux residue, burnt flux

Flux residue, burnt flux

Sue Powers-hartman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 15:54:53 -0500

44 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 16:17:16 -0600

87 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 18:27:14 -0400

110 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 10:38:16 +0300

77 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 10:11:27 +0200

122 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 12:06:46 +0300

187 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 12:25:41 +0200

231 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 08:13:21 -0400

224 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 15:34:23 +0300

269 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 07:37:49 -0500

115 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 08:14:02 -0500

355 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 10:32:55 -0400

179 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 13:52:01 -0500

159 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:20 -0500

214 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 29 May 2007 22:25:24 EDT

38 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 20:57:34 +0800

252 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 09:53:33 -0500

316 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:32:27 -0500

289 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:44:02 -0500

359 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 30 May 2007 22:22:01 EDT

45 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 07:21:37 -0500

115 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 13:40:02 -0400

116 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 13:40:02 -0400

128 lines

New Thread

Flux residue, burnt flux (heart pacemakers)

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux (heart pacemakers)

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 30 May 2007 22:39:13 EDT

41 lines

New Thread

Flux residue, burnt flux NTC

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux NTC

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 08:47:15 -0400

165 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux NTC

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 08:55:33 -0400

190 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux NTC

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 07:56:40 -0500

190 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux NTC

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 09:10:31 -0400

214 lines

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux NTC

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 17:25:39 +0300

179 lines

New Thread

Flux residue, burnt flux NTC...REALLY NTC

Re: Flux residue, burnt flux NTC...REALLY NTC

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 08:56:36 -0500

512 lines

New Thread

Friday TechnoTopic

Friday TechnoTopic

Tom Stearns <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 21:37:42 -0400

43 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 10:17:10 -0400

77 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 10:21:26 -0400

84 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 07:22:16 -0700

104 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 07:27:14 -0700

73 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 10:41:39 -0400

125 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 18 May 2007 10:56:31 EDT

47 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 18:27:03 -0700

116 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 13:50:04 -0400

171 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

David Fowler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 13:57:56 -0400

225 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 11:13:35 -0700

259 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 18 May 2007 16:35:34 EDT

40 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 18:08:00 -0400

210 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 20:01:15 -0500

98 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 May 2007 10:50:39 +0300

274 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Michael Kirschner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 May 2007 16:01:49 -0500

342 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 06:44:02 -0700

372 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 17:09:16 +0300

406 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 07:30:13 -0700

392 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Michael Kirschner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 09:39:08 -0500

455 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 10:54:46 -0400

468 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 17:10:44 +0200

454 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 08:38:52 -0700

474 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 18:44:46 +0300

490 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 09:00:01 -0700

487 lines

Re: Friday TechnoTopic

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 May 2007 15:32:44 EDT

33 lines

New Thread

FW: Announcement: The next meeting of the IPC Designers Council, San Diego Chapter

FW: Announcement: The next meeting of the IPC Designers Council, San Diego Chapter

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 09:44:53 -0700

59 lines

New Thread

FW: BGA device carrier trimming (router)

FW: BGA device carrier trimming (router)

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 14:21:38 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Joel Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 09:18:37 -0400

151 lines

Re: Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 09:51:39 -0500

181 lines

Re: Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Jones, Evamaria <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 09:25:43 -0400

195 lines

Re: Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Joel Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 12:19:45 -0400

219 lines

Re: Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 11:53:38 -0500

222 lines

Re: Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Jones, Evamaria <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 13:38:02 -0400

257 lines

Re: Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Jones, Evamaria <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 14:11:02 -0400

317 lines

Re: Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Jones, Evamaria <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 14:11:02 -0400

351 lines

Re: Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 20:26:40 EDT

38 lines

Re: Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Irving Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 09:27:33 +0800

58 lines

Re: Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 07:27:43 -0500

67 lines

Re: Fw: Status of IPC Solder Inspection Criteria

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 17:17:18 EDT

33 lines

New Thread

FW: Subsidiary Korea RoHS legislations under the official public consultation

FW: Subsidiary Korea RoHS legislations under the official public consultation

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 08:01:44 -0700

123 lines

New Thread

Fw: [TN] Flux residue, burnt flux NTC

Fw: [TN] Flux residue, burnt flux NTC

Joe Russeau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 09:11:26 -0400

202 lines

New Thread

Gold content in solder joints

Gold content in solder joints

Dan Skweres <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 11:25:20 -0400

26 lines

Re: Gold content in solder joints

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 12:45:29 -0400

57 lines

Re: Gold content in solder joints

P. Langeveld <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 22:03:19 +0200

50 lines

Re: Gold content in solder joints

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2007 08:26:09 +0200

58 lines

New Thread

Henry Rekers is out of the office.

Henry Rekers is out of the office.

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 14 May 2007 16:02:11 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

how to bend 10-layer bonded flex

how to bend 10-layer bonded flex

Şefika ÖZKAL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 11:41:01 +0300

60 lines

Re: how to bend 10-layer bonded flex

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 06:18:16 EDT

35 lines

Re: how to bend 10-layer bonded flex

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:46:49 EDT

39 lines

Re: how to bend 10-layer bonded flex

Şefika ÖZKAL <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 08:59:35 +0300

129 lines

Re: how to bend 10-layer bonded flex

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 08:40:24 -0400

171 lines

New Thread

How to enhance (probe contact) ICT testing for PCA on OSP finishing ?

How to enhance (probe contact) ICT testing for PCA on OSP finishing ?

Irving Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 00:09:31 +0800

23 lines

New Thread

How would you repair this flex tear?

How would you repair this flex tear?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 16:01:00 -0500

44 lines

Re: How would you repair this flex tear?

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 14:12:55 -0700

30 lines

Re: How would you repair this flex tear?

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 17:25:35 EDT

43 lines

Re: How would you repair this flex tear?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 17:42:33 EDT

33 lines

Re: How would you repair this flex tear?

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 15:46:56 -0700

74 lines

Re: How would you repair this flex tear?

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 21:59:06 -0400

78 lines

Re: How would you repair this flex tear?

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 08:39:37 -0400

29 lines

Re: How would you repair this flex tear?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 08:51:43 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

Insulation Resistance

Insulation Resistance

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 08:50:46 -0400

42 lines

Re: Insulation Resistance

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 09:47:01 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

IPC B-36 Image

IPC B-36 Image

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 10:04:34 -0500

25 lines

Re: IPC B-36 Image

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 10:11:03 -0500

53 lines

Re: IPC B-36 Image

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 11:54:33 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

IPC Compliant Electronics for EU Applications workshop, May 8 & 9, 2007, Philadelphia, PA

IPC Compliant Electronics for EU Applications workshop, May 8 & 9, 2007, Philadelphia, PA

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 08:30:54 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

IPC International Conference on Flexible Circuits, June 12 & 13, 2007, in Minneapolis, MN

IPC International Conference on Flexible Circuits, June 12 & 13, 2007, in Minneapolis, MN

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:52:25 -0500

52 lines

IPC International Conference on Flexible Circuits, June 12 & 13, 2007, in Minneapolis, MN

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 10:41:24 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

IPC is offering innovative workshops in Singapore, SG - don't miss out!

IPC is offering innovative workshops in Singapore, SG - don't miss out!

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 12:16:20 -0500

108 lines

New Thread

IPC TM-650 # 2.6.6 (Temperature cycling -PWB-)

IPC TM-650 # 2.6.6 (Temperature cycling -PWB-)

Juan T. Marugan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 11:11:56 -0500

36 lines

Re: IPC TM-650 # 2.6.6 (Temperature cycling -PWB-)

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 18 May 2007 18:08:16 EDT

37 lines

New Thread

IPC Workshop: Design & Build a Board w/Embedded Passive Components, June 19-20, 2007, Crane, IN

IPC Workshop: Design & Build a Board w/Embedded Passive Components, June 19-20, 2007, Crane, IN

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 09:55:04 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

IPC Workshop: Design and Build a Board w/Embedded Passive Components and HDI/Microvia, June 19 & 20, 2007, Crane, IN

IPC Workshop: Design and Build a Board w/Embedded Passive Components and HDI/Microvia, June 19 & 20, 2007, Crane, IN

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 15:45:29 -0500

86 lines

New Thread

Joel Alexander is out of the office.

Joel Alexander is out of the office.

Joel Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 14:05:57 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Laminate damage

Laminate damage

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 16:12:35 -0600

50 lines

Re: Laminate damage

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 15:34:46 -0700

82 lines

Re: Laminate damage

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 16:39:30 -0600

111 lines

New Thread

Lead test kits

Lead test kits

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:06:44 -0400

34 lines

Re: Lead test kits

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 07:41:39 -0700

91 lines

New Thread

LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Rojas, Juan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 12:36:23 -0400

61 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 13:14:49 -0400

99 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 13:08:14 -0500

85 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 11:12:34 -0700

108 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Rojas, Juan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 14:54:17 -0400

109 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 14:09:14 -0500

126 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 12:59:48 -0700

157 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Rojas, Juan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 16:06:11 -0400

200 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 13:33:37 -0700

232 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 15:36:31 -0500

231 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 07:27:29 -0700

151 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 10:42:17 -0400

277 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 14:05:28 -0400

59 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Rojas, Juan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 14:19:31 -0400

307 lines

Re: LeadFree - ICT FPY Benchmarking

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 14:44:29 -0400

327 lines

New Thread

LF forum

LF forum

pras chop <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 06:48:27 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

LF HASL Skip Plating (Thin)

LF HASL Skip Plating (Thin)

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 13:09:43 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Looking for 3 mil PTFE Tape

Looking for 3 mil PTFE Tape

Alan Kreplick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 08:58:57 -0400

41 lines

Re: Looking for 3 mil PTFE Tape

ekalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 09:56:51 -0400

88 lines

New Thread

mass percentage of copper

mass percentage of copper

Şefika ÖZKAL <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 12:15:32 +0300

50 lines

Re: mass percentage of copper

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 08:15:34 -0400

82 lines

Re: mass percentage of copper

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 08:38:42 EDT

47 lines

New Thread

Measuring oxidation of the spheres in solder paste

Measuring oxidation of the spheres in solder paste

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 12:02:39 -0400

48 lines

Re: Measuring oxidation of the spheres in solder paste

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 17:15:11 +0100

80 lines

Re: Measuring oxidation of the spheres in solder paste

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 13:03:41 -0400

144 lines

Re: Measuring oxidation of the spheres in solder paste

Liang Yin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 02:16:41 +0000

129 lines

Re: Measuring oxidation of the spheres in solder paste

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 07:39:13 -0400

197 lines

New Thread

MELF Experiment

MELF Experiment

Black, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 10:27:41 -0400

37 lines

Re: MELF Experiment

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 10:19:17 -0500

65 lines

Re: MELF Experiment

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 09:11:12 -0400

90 lines

New Thread

Metalized Poly Caps

Re: Metalized Poly Caps

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 12:56:18 -0400

118 lines

Re: Metalized Poly Caps

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 15:54:59 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

Metallurgists, need assistance

Re: Metallurgists, need assistance

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 16:55:51 -0500

206 lines

Re: Metallurgists, need assistance

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 18:05:17 -0400

129 lines

Re: Metallurgists, need assistance

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 18:10:13 -0400

132 lines

Re: Metallurgists, need assistance

Judy Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 15:13:25 -0700

229 lines

New Thread

Metallurgists, need assistance, closing this one

Metallurgists, need assistance, closing this one

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 21:41:51 +0200

615 lines

Re: Metallurgists, need assistance, closing this one

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 15:50:03 -0500

651 lines

Re: Metallurgists, need assistance, closing this one

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 18:03:51 -0400

418 lines

Re: Metallurgists, need assistance, closing this one

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 06:33:24 -0500

750 lines

Re: Metallurgists, need assistance, closing this one

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 15:01:48 +0200

745 lines

Re: Metallurgists, need assistance, closing this one

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 09:16:08 EDT

35 lines

New Thread

Metalurgists, need assistance

Metalurgists, need assistance

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 19:21:47 +0200

42 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 13:41:49 -0400

43 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 13:44:33 -0400

76 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 13:45:14 -0500

80 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 15:34:32 EDT

43 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 14:38:04 -0500

71 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 16:01:25 -0400

125 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 21:03:33 -0700

71 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 21:37:20 -0700

161 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 15:45:09 -0500

132 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 17:07:54 -0400

122 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 17:12:53 -0400

103 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 20:56:02 -0400

139 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 18:08:43 -0700

248 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 07:22:50 -0500

259 lines

Re: Metalurgists, need assistance

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 09:00:17 EDT

35 lines

New Thread

Mfg of long Board

Mfg of long Board

Sona Sitapara <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 15:42:51 -0400

32 lines

Re: Mfg of long Board

Nilesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 15:46:48 -0400

55 lines

Re: Mfg of long Board

Sona Sitapara <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 15:52:41 -0400

78 lines

Re: Mfg of long Board

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 15:55:34 -0400

60 lines

Re: Mfg of long Board

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 16:24:18 -0400

107 lines

New Thread

Mil assemblies & No Clean

Mil assemblies & No Clean

Robert Coburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 08:55:51 -0400

37 lines

Re: Mil assemblies & No Clean

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 09:15:00 -0400

68 lines

Re: Mil assemblies & No Clean

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 09:30:27 -0400

69 lines

Re: Mil assemblies & No Clean

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 09:31:45 -0400

102 lines

New Thread

Missing copper/HASL finish in many spots on the ground planes

Missing copper/HASL finish in many spots on the ground planes

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 16:39:19 -0400

50 lines

Re: Missing copper/HASL finish in many spots on the ground planes

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 07:42:40 -0400

77 lines

Re: Missing copper/HASL finish in many spots on the ground planes

paulh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 10:22:01 -0500

107 lines

New Thread

MLCCC caps

MLCCC caps

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 15:59:45 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

More of Inge's Images...

More of Inge's Images...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 07:22:11 -0500

46 lines

Re: More of Inge's Images...

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 09:27:24 -0400

78 lines

New Thread

New printer, surprise

New printer, surprise

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 20:40:57 +0200

29 lines

New printer, surprise

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 20:40:57 +0200

42 lines

New printer, surprise

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 20:40:57 +0200

41 lines

Re: New printer, surprise

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 08:01:40 -0400

66 lines

New printer, surprise

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 20:40:57 +0200

55 lines

New printer, surprise

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 20:40:57 +0200

54 lines

New printer, surprise

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 20:40:57 +0200

53 lines

New printer, surprise

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 20:40:57 +0200

54 lines

Re: New printer, surprise

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 16:17:31 +0200

89 lines

Re: New printer, surprise

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 18:01:10 +0300

112 lines

Re: New printer, surprise

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 17:38:15 +0200

139 lines

Re: New printer, surprise

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 11:45:12 -0400

189 lines

Re: New printer, surprise

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 11:45:32 -0500

215 lines

Re: New printer, surprise

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 18:54:40 +0300

202 lines

Re: New printer, surprise

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 18:03:47 +0200

231 lines

Re: New printer, surprise

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 09:39:52 -0700

263 lines

Re: New printer, surprise

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 19:01:29 +0200

300 lines

New Thread

no clean flux

no clean flux

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 08:32:21 -0700

32 lines

no clean flux

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 08:33:45 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

Notes on Official Request for Your Input Regarding the Impact of RoHS/WEEE Directives on Electronics Industry

Notes on Official Request for Your Input Regarding the Impact of RoHS/WEEE Directives on Electronics Industry

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 19:13:46 -0700

57 lines

Re: Notes on Official Request for Your Input Regarding the Impact of RoHS/WEEE Directives on Electronics Industry

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 07:45:02 -0400

129 lines

Re: Notes on Official Request for Your Input Regarding the Impact of RoHS/WEEE Directives on Electronics Industry

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 10:01:24 -0400

163 lines

Re: Notes on Official Request for Your Input Regarding the Impact of RoHS/WEEE Directives on Electronics Industry

paulh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 10:32:56 -0500

80 lines

Re: Notes on Official Request for Your Input Regarding the Impact of RoHS/WEEE Directives on Electronics Industry

Gary Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 09:30:22 -0600

47 lines

Re: Notes on Official Request for Your Input Regarding the Impact of RoHS/WEEE Directives on Electronics Industry

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 11:29:31 -0700

114 lines

New Thread

NTC

NTC

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 12:19:22 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

NTC - Engineers...

NTC - Engineers...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 11:16:53 -0500

246 lines

Re: NTC - Engineers...

Dharma Kemp-Bresett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 12:31:12 -0400

285 lines

Re: NTC - Engineers...

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 10:03:06 -0700

302 lines

Re: NTC - Engineers...

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 16:07:02 EDT

29 lines

Re: NTC - Engineers...

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 13:28:07 -0700

333 lines

Re: NTC - Engineers...

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 16:34:54 EDT

38 lines

Re: NTC - Engineers...

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 14:05:15 -0700

347 lines

Re: NTC - Engineers...

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 7 May 2007 17:30:46 +0000

175 lines

Re: NTC - Engineers...

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 7 May 2007 17:33:24 +0000

176 lines

Re: NTC - Engineers...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 13:06:03 -0500

281 lines

Re: NTC - Engineers...

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 7 May 2007 18:14:20 +0000

202 lines

New Thread

NTC Doug's comments on pig wrestling

NTC Doug's comments on pig wrestling

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 20:37:22 -0700

49 lines

Re: NTC Doug's comments on pig wrestling

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 06:31:31 -0500

94 lines

Re: NTC Doug's comments on pig wrestling

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 11:46:42 -0700

130 lines

Re: NTC Doug's comments on pig wrestling

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 13:36:42 -0700

169 lines

Re: NTC Doug's comments on pig wrestling

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 15:38:37 -0500

211 lines

Re: NTC Doug's comments on pig wrestling

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 15:47:54 -0500

257 lines

Re: NTC Doug's comments on pig wrestling

Bob Barr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 May 2007 14:20:04 -0700

41 lines

Re: NTC Doug's comments on pig wrestling

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 08:50:44 +0300

228 lines

New Thread

NTC Lead, Romans and other interesting stuff

NTC Lead, Romans and other interesting stuff

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 08:11:02 -0400

737 lines

Re: NTC Lead, Romans and other interesting stuff

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 13:37:51 +0100

697 lines

Re: NTC Lead, Romans and other interesting stuff

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 08:37:37 -0400

489 lines

New Thread

NTC RE: [TN] Exposed copper (space applications)

NTC RE: [TN] Exposed copper (space applications)

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 07:44:36 +0100

77 lines

New Thread

NTC RE: [TN] SV: [TN] SMT connectors

NTC RE: [TN] SV: [TN] SMT connectors

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 13:06:35 -0700

351 lines

Re: NTC RE: [TN] SV: [TN] SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 15:20:23 -0500

366 lines

Re: NTC RE: [TN] SV: [TN] SMT connectors

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 16:23:41 -0400

391 lines

Re: NTC RE: [TN] SV: [TN] SMT connectors

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 16:12:56 -0500

364 lines

New Thread

NTC RoHS compliant car?

Re: NTC RoHS compliant car?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 06:15:02 -0400

244 lines

New Thread

NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 11:16:59 -0400

328 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 11:30:32 -0400

260 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 16:48:07 +0100

178 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 16:53:37 +0100

233 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 12:00:51 -0400

260 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 11:04:27 -0500

379 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 12:26:50 -0400

465 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 11:29:53 -0500

26 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 12:23:07 -0500

426 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 13:34:56 -0400

452 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:20:41 +0300

180 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 09:59:46 +0200

219 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 13:49:36 +0300

259 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 09:36:41 -0400

229 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 07:03:58 -0700

258 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:12:38 -0400

288 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:12:02 -0400

317 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 17:24:34 +0300

249 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 17:31:40 +0300

331 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:45:58 -0400

287 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Haynes, Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 09:45:28 -0500

404 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:54:54 -0400

335 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:58:58 -0400

428 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 11:10:21 -0700

417 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 17:25:42 +0300

156 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

weiner, mickey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 17:40:05 +0300

204 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 07:50:05 -0700

195 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 16:47:19 EDT

32 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 15:49:02 -0500

62 lines

Re: NTC RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 17:10:14 EDT

31 lines

New Thread

NTC RoHS testing lab

NTC RoHS testing lab

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 09:12:31 -0700

49 lines

New Thread

NTC The spread of the Envirus

NTC The spread of the Envirus

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 11:16:00 -0700

68 lines

Re: NTC The spread of the Envirus

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 14:20:53 EDT

30 lines

New Thread

NTC: Definition of Eutectic Solder

NTC: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 09:49:39 -0400

122 lines

Re: NTC: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 08:53:09 -0500

165 lines

Re: NTC: Definition of Eutectic Solder

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 15:57:13 +0200

196 lines

New Thread

Parylene coating

Parylene coating

Terry Quinn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 07:45:38 -0500

36 lines

Re: Parylene coating

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 21:08:25 +0800

69 lines

Re: Parylene coating

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 09:31:08 -0400

61 lines

Re: Parylene coating

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 17:53:49 +0100

75 lines

New Thread

PCB assembly for medical devices

PCB assembly for medical devices

BADRI <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 18:31:07 +0530

86 lines

Re: PCB assembly for medical devices

Yordan Venev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 16:31:35 +0300

150 lines

Re: PCB assembly for medical devices

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 08:45:09 -0700

145 lines

Re: PCB assembly for medical devices

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 09:10:32 -0700

74 lines

Re: PCB assembly for medical devices

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 12:30:50 -0400

109 lines

Re: PCB assembly for medical devices

Louis, Edwin @ CSE <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 12:56:30 -0400

141 lines

Re: PCB assembly for medical devices

Louis, Edwin @ CSE <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 13:05:53 -0400

148 lines

Re: PCB assembly for medical devices

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 12:46:45 -0500

180 lines

Re: PCB assembly for medical devices

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 14:06:13 EDT

46 lines

Re: PCB assembly for medical devices

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 14:12:13 -0400

207 lines

New Thread

pcb fabricator qualification

pcb fabricator qualification

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 15:21:30 -0700

28 lines

Re: pcb fabricator qualification

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 18:41:43 EDT

44 lines

New Thread

PCB Flatness

PCB Flatness

Tim Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 14:18:05 -0500

45 lines

Re: PCB Flatness

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 15:32:20 -0400

95 lines

Re: PCB Flatness

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 15:37:57 -0400

80 lines

Re: PCB Flatness

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 May 2007 16:18:05 -0400

78 lines

Re: PCB Flatness

Juan T. Marugán <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 06:40:08 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

PCB stiffners

PCB stiffners

Dominic Boudreau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 16:45:41 -0400

40 lines

Re: PCB stiffners

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 08:34:56 -0400

75 lines

Re: PCB stiffners

Black, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 08:41:59 -0400

115 lines

Re: PCB stiffners

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 07:58:21 -0500

74 lines

Re: PCB stiffners

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 10:51:15 -0400

94 lines

New Thread

PTH sizing

PTH sizing

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 09:04:41 -0400

30 lines

Re: PTH sizing

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 09:20:56 -0400

74 lines

Re: PTH sizing

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 09:20:25 -0400

52 lines

Re: PTH sizing

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 09:51:17 -0500

62 lines

Re: PTH sizing

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 May 2007 12:11:37 -0400

87 lines

New Thread

PWB Moisture Diffusion Rates

PWB Moisture Diffusion Rates

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 08:16:15 -0400

34 lines

Re: PWB Moisture Diffusion Rates

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 09:52:41 -0500

70 lines

Re: PWB Moisture Diffusion Rates

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 10:11:25 -0500

96 lines

Re: PWB Moisture Diffusion Rates

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 07:11:18 -0400

129 lines

New Thread

Question on "semi additive" process

Re: Question on "semi additive" process

Adam Seychell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 17:46:49 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

Recommended Nitrogen Levels for Lead-free Reflow

Recommended Nitrogen Levels for Lead-free Reflow

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 15:20:51 -0500

35 lines

Re: Recommended Nitrogen Levels for Lead-free Reflow

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 May 2007 07:13:25 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Register for IPC's Designing with your 'Thumbs' workshop, May 21, 2007, in Bannockburn, IL

Register for IPC's Designing with your 'Thumbs' workshop, May 21, 2007, in Bannockburn, IL

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 14:16:02 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

RF fences, materials

RF fences, materials

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 May 2007 15:55:55 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

RF fences, oldering

RF fences, oldering

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 13:02:20 -0400

33 lines

Re: RF fences, oldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 15:18:03 -0500

74 lines

Re: RF fences, oldering

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 16:32:17 -0400

113 lines

Re: RF fences, oldering

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 13:33:06 -0700

101 lines

Re: RF fences, oldering

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 15:49:21 -0500

142 lines

Re: RF fences, oldering

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 13:59:20 -0700

176 lines

Re: RF fences, oldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 16:06:51 -0500

135 lines

Re: RF fences, oldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 16:07:42 -0500

173 lines

Re: RF fences, oldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 16:09:46 -0500

190 lines

Re: RF fences, oldering

Scott Decker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 14:25:34 -0700

203 lines

Re: RF fences, oldering

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 May 2007 14:45:28 -0700

205 lines

New Thread

RF shields

RF shields

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 08:06:02 -0400

34 lines

Re: RF shields

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 08:09:08 -0400

79 lines

Re: RF shields

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 08:20:20 -0400

125 lines

Re: RF shields

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 07:21:24 -0500

67 lines

Re: RF shields

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 08:30:52 -0500

79 lines

New Thread

RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2007 16:25:08 EDT

47 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2007 20:16:01 EDT

45 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2007 19:41:50 -0500

100 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2007 20:42:33 EDT

32 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 May 2007 20:50:13 EDT

31 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 May 2007 07:06:34 -0700

62 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

David Hudson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2007 18:02:26 +0100

84 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2007 13:11:06 -0400

122 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2007 14:00:10 EDT

31 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2007 19:38:41 -0400

139 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 08:40:05 +0200

164 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Wolfe, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 10:26:56 -0400

165 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 10:33:30 -0400

214 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 10:51:24 -0400

172 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 10:53:26 -0400

282 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 16:57:55 +0200

274 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 11:41:31 -0400

212 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

ekalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 12:01:35 -0400

250 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 11:01:17 -0500

243 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 09:50:16 -0700

218 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 17:50:38 EDT

37 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 18:09:12 EDT

44 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 19:16:40 -0400

66 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 01:13:42 EDT

50 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 01:19:04 EDT

36 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 08:48:05 +0200

84 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 07:37:58 -0500

91 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 08:50:37 -0400

133 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 16:07:59 +0300

178 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 09:44:40 -0500

23 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 10:40:38 -0500

46 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 May 2007 17:30:10 EDT

37 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 10:35:31 +0300

84 lines

Re: RoHS compliant laptop with early failure

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 May 2007 06:21:48 EDT

39 lines

New Thread

SAC to purchase!

SAC to purchase!

al shirazi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 May 2007 15:46:29 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

SAC/ENIG report

Re: SAC/ENIG report

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2007 08:58:39 +0200

99 lines

Re: SAC/ENIG report

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2007 09:19:56 -0400

150 lines

Re: SAC/ENIG report

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 May 2007 08:44:54 -0700

127 lines

Re: SAC/ENIG report

Sylvain Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 09:49:15 +0200

166 lines

Re: SAC/ENIG report

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 07:02:16 -0500

123 lines

Re: SAC/ENIG report

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 07:35:55 -0500

198 lines

Re: SAC/ENIG report

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 May 2007 09:51:35 -0700

194 lines

New Thread

Separated soldermask

Separated soldermask

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 May 2007 11:45:17 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

Silver Embrittlement?

Silver Embrittlement?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 07:44:40 -0500

55 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 08:53:31 -0400

82 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 09:45:24 -0400

120 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 10:28:36 -0400

94 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 10:27:12 -0400

98 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 09:55:51 -0500

158 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 12:36:37 -0500

203 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 14:38:56 EDT

37 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 14:41:23 EDT

33 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 16:18:38 -0400

76 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 17:23:24 EDT

34 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 May 2007 22:39:14 -0400

154 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 08:36:08 -0400

53 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 09:12:23 EDT

31 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 09:43:54 -0400

66 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 12:45:04 EDT

31 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 11:51:04 -0500

89 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 13:33:06 -0400

54 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 14:50:00 -0400

108 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 14:25:14 -0500

224 lines

Re: Silver Embrittlement?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 May 2007 15:26:16 EDT

49 lines

New Thread

SMT connectors

SMT connectors

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 12:04:40 -0400

35 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 11:16:01 -0500

68 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 09:27:19 -0700

98 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 13:05:55 EDT

33 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 14:15:12 -0500

89 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 16:48:02 -0400

118 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 16:48:54 -0400

131 lines

Re: SMT connectors

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 07:18:51 -0500

139 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 May 2007 08:54:11 -0400

118 lines

Re: SMT connectors

- bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 May 2007 12:03:07 -0400

145 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 09:33:56 -0700

203 lines

Re: SMT connectors

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 10:14:48 -0700

235 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 08:55:08 -0500

214 lines

Re: SMT connectors

pearl petras <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 13:42:55 -0400

26 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 12:47:51 -0500

261 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 12:52:26 -0500

270 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 14:02:04 EDT

33 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 11:07:03 -0700

310 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 14:30:11 -0400

289 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 13:37:06 -0500

64 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 13:58:29 -0500

328 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 May 2007 22:11:10 +0300

360 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 May 2007 12:04:25 -0700

321 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

368 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

380 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

379 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

379 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

379 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

380 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

393 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

393 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

393 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

393 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

379 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

392 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 May 2007 12:21:31 -0500

391 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Braddock, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 12:50:34 +0100

423 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 08:06:51 -0400

409 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 09:38:43 -0500

435 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 10:52:20 -0400

464 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 09:55:45 -0500

463 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 10:54:14 -0500

512 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 12:06:35 -0400

527 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Jones, Evamaria <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 12:33:37 -0400

564 lines

Re: SMT connectors

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 18 May 2007 16:48:43 +0000

414 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 12:10:50 -0500

601 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 13:53:40 -0400

63 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 May 2007 14:00:32 -0400

87 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Braddock, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 09:43:54 +0100

561 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Tan, Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 17:06:37 +0800

599 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 08:34:27 -0400

623 lines

Re: SMT connectors

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 May 2007 09:34:18 -0500

622 lines

New Thread

SMT connectors (NTC)

Re: SMT connectors (NTC)

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 May 2007 13:12:59 EDT

41 lines

New Thread

SN100C vs. SAC305

Re: SN100C vs. SAC305

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 May 2007 07:32:17 -0500

146 lines