LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


March 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Greenish colour on traces" (10 messages)
(2) [TN] Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact (4 messages)
<List>[TN] immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias (1 message)
<No subject> (3 messages)
Alpha 5003 flux (1 message)
AlSiC (11 messages)
AlSiC conclusion (4 messages)
Alternative SAC (4 messages)
Alternative SAC (NTC) (10 messages)
An IPC webcast you shouldn't miss - Embedded Passive Components - Costs More or Costs Less? (1 message)
Anybody else have trouble getting things from Pace? (5 messages)
APEX NTC (2 messages)
Approved Substitute for Mil-P-13949/7 (GR) (2 messages)
A_50 SIR Phoenix Board (3 messages)
BGA Die Attach Criteria (2 messages)
BGA footprint (9 messages)
Call for registration - IPC Lead Free workshops - 4/17/07 & 4/18/07, in Bannockburn, IL (1 message)
Call for Registration - IPC REACH Webcast Series (1 message)
CC fixture issue (3 messages)
Chip Capacitor Reliability Question (6 messages)
Chip Scale Packagine (CSP) (6 messages)
cleaning conformally coated boards (1 message)
Cofired gold (6 messages)
Cognex Vision Card Repair Update... (1 message)
COMPATIBILITY (7 messages)
component orientation (1 message)
Component Orientation Survey (23 messages)
Comps on opposite side of PCB sharing GND vias (3 messages)
conformal coating repair (1 message)
copper deterioration (NTC?) (7 messages)
Darrel Therriault is out of the office until 11/27/06. (1 message)
Double sided reflow (11 messages)
Double sided reflow... clarification (1 message)
Dry Film Thickness (5 messages)
EN 1000015 vs. ESD 20.20 (2 messages)
Engineering Question  [NTC] (1 message)
Engineering Question (20 messages)
Engineering Question [NTC] (2 messages)
Environmental Tests For PCB (2 messages)
ESD charges in conformal coatings (6 messages)
ESD charges in conformal coatings (conclusion) (4 messages)
ESD control and fans (4 messages)
ESD question (12 messages)
Explanation of Cpk (Ppk) (8 messages)
Flex Circuit Scratch... (5 messages)
Flip-flop panels (12 messages)
Footprint standards for Polarized components (Diodes) (3 messages)
FPGA (DSP) (14 messages)
FR408 vs. FR-4 in RoHS Compliant SMT Process (7 messages)
Friday Poem NTC (1 message)
FW: [TN] BGA Die Attach Criteria (2 messages)
FW: [TN] immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias (1 message)
FW: [TN] Solderability problems on through holes only. (1 message)
Gold % (7 messages)
Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness (34 messages)
Good books to read? (3 messages)
Hardness Characterization of a PCB Surface Finish (4 messages)
HEAT SINKS (11 messages)
high temp adhesive film (1 message)
I know it's not Friday but... NTC (3 messages)
I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC] (20 messages)
immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias (18 messages)
immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias NTC (1 message)
immersion silver and exposed copper in small viasNTC (3 messages)
IPC 6012 : Outgassing Criteria (7 messages)
IPC 6012 versus 6013 (1 message)
IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION (18 messages)
IPC International Conference on Lead Free Materials & Surface Finishes, May 8-9, 2007, in San Jose, CA (1 message)
IPC Surface Finish Inspection - ENIG (1 message)
IPC Workshop: Compliant Electronics for EU Applications on 3/13-14/07 in Dallas, TX (1 message)
IPC's Design for Manufacture workshop on April 17, 2007 - Leeds, UK (1 message)
IPC's Designing with your 'Thumbs' - May 21, 2007, Bannockburn, IL (1 message)
IPC-4101/101 vs /121 (1 message)
IPC/JEDEC Global Conference on Lead Free Reliability & Reliability Testing for RoHS Lead Free Electronics, April 10-12, 2007, in Boston, MA (1 message)
IPC/JEDEC Global Conference on LF Reliability & Reliability Testing for RoHS LF Electronics - April 10-12, 2007 in Boston, MA (1 message)
Join IPC's REACH Webcast Series April 11 & 18, 2007 (1 message)
Join IPC, in Singapore, for a series of workshops! Register today! (1 message)
Laminate material selection (7 messages)
Laminate Qualification. (6 messages)
Lead coating meniscus cracking (4 messages)
Lead-free Foxtor connector removal (1 message)
Legend Ink and ENIG (3 messages)
Metal-core PCBs (3 messages)
new roadmap (1 message)
NiAu Specification for Al Wedge Wire Bonding (5 messages)
Nickel Foot (8 messages)
NTC Alternative lead free soldering reviewed (1 message)
NTC: Anrufen: Trikeman (1 message)
NTC: Double Posting (3 messages)
NTC: The Silicon Zoo (1 message)
Number of allowed X-outs? (2 messages)
number topics? (2 messages)
Pad damage (9 messages)
Panel tab breakoff burrs (2 messages)
Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact (10 messages)
PCB Cleanliness (3 messages)
PCB Cleanliness/Soft Water (1 message)
PCB laminate and immersion silver (2 messages)
PCB PACKAGING MATERIAL & Baking Question (4 messages)
PCB plating Qualification (8 messages)
PCB Temp Guidelines (3 messages)
Polymer Core BGA Balls (2 messages)
Post Assembly Bow and Twist (8 messages)
Prediction comes true (1 message)
Prediction comes true (NTC) (7 messages)
Press-fit Soldering (3 messages)
Qualification Testing for H1 Flux (3 messages)
REACH Webcast Series - April 11 & 18, 2007 (1 message)
Reflow Solder fixtures (11 messages)
Register Now for IPC's Design for Manufacture Workshop (1 message)
Register Now! (1 message)
Register Today - Lead Free Materials and Surface Finishes Conference (1 message)
Remember to Register for IPC's workshops on April 17 & 18, 2007! (1 message)
Renewed respect for copper (non-technical content) (4 messages)
Rigid flex PCB manufacturer (2 messages)
Rigid Flex routing (3 messages)
ROHS lead free question (7 messages)
ROHS lead free question (NTC) (2 messages)
Seam resistance pulse welding (3 messages)
Seeking PCB proto manufacturers (3 messages)
Small volume quick turn custom cable supplier (1 message)
SMT Solder Joint Strength (24 messages)
Solder Purity (6 messages)
Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads (19 messages)
Solderability problems on through holes only. (19 messages)
Soldering to Beryillum Copper (21 messages)
Soldering using Sn96 (10 messages)
Soldermask Blisters (7 messages)
structural adhesive (4 messages)
Surface finish inspection (1 message)
SV: [TN] Cofired gold (4 messages)
SV: [TN] Component Orientation Survey (2 messages)
SV: [TN] Good books to read? (1 message)
SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC) (10 messages)
SV: [TN] ROHS lead free question (NTC) (1 message)
SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Cofired gold (1 message)
SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC) (1 message)
T260 tests (5 messages)
TEST (1 message)
Thick BT board Suppliers (1 message)
Toolings and Fixture checklist required (1 message)
Toolings and Fixture checklist required --- (URGENT) (2 messages)
unsubscribe (2 messages)
Use of Type AR Conformal Coating for Military PCBs (8 messages)
UV Bump (5 messages)
Via aspect ratio in mixed dielectric PCB's (8 messages)
Via in Pad question (2 messages)
Weather coating (2 messages)
weather coatings (3 messages)
Whisker contamination is solder pot (8 messages)
whodunit? (22 messages)
[LF] Polymer Core BGA Balls (8 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Greenish colour on traces"

"Greenish colour on traces"

Tan, Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:06:10 +0800

33 lines

Re: "Greenish colour on traces"

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:43:58 EDT

36 lines

Re: "Greenish colour on traces"

Tan, Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:49:22 +0800

61 lines

Re: "Greenish colour on traces"

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Mar 2007 09:47:53 +0100

89 lines

Re: "Greenish colour on traces"

Tan, Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:27:45 +0800

122 lines

Re: "Greenish colour on traces"

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:30:49 -0500

86 lines

Re: "Greenish colour on traces"

Tan, Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:27:52 +0800

112 lines

Re: "Greenish colour on traces"

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:57:25 +0100

155 lines

Re: "Greenish colour on traces"

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:06:16 -0700

56 lines

Re: "Greenish colour on traces"

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:46:38 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

(2) [TN] Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Re: (2) [TN] Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:12:58 -0700

239 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Matt Kehoe-SIPAD Systems <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:19:05 -0400

299 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:52:14 -0700

366 lines

Re: (2) [TN] Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:42:24 -0600

418 lines

New Thread

<List>[TN] immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Re: <List>[TN] immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Gary Warner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:48:00 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:31:22 -0400

46 lines

<No subject>

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:50:04 -0500

98 lines

<No subject>

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:11:59 EDT

44 lines

New Thread

Alpha 5003 flux

Alpha 5003 flux

James TerVeen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:39:06 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

AlSiC

AlSiC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:39:20 +0100

33 lines

Re: AlSiC

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:15:31 -0400

73 lines

Re: AlSiC

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:21:55 -0400

111 lines

Re: AlSiC

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:04:57 +0100

103 lines

Re: AlSiC

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:07:55 +0100

135 lines

Re: AlSiC

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:20:01 -0400

180 lines

Re: AlSiC

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:26:33 -0400

215 lines

Re: AlSiC

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:30:23 -0400

246 lines

Re: AlSiC

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:38:15 -0400

285 lines

Re: AlSiC

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:19:00 -0700

233 lines

Re: AlSiC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:03:39 +0100

260 lines

New Thread

AlSiC conclusion

Re: AlSiC conclusion

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:55:57 +0100

210 lines

Re: AlSiC conclusion

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:10:16 -0500

246 lines

Re: AlSiC conclusion

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:16:58 -0400

278 lines

Re: AlSiC conclusion

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:22:22 -0400

291 lines

New Thread

Alternative SAC

Alternative SAC

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:17:48 +0200

28 lines

Re: Alternative SAC

arnaud grivon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:29:53 +0200

66 lines

Re: Alternative SAC

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:45:54 +0200

111 lines

Re: Alternative SAC

Christopher Nash <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:00:37 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

Alternative SAC (NTC)

Re: Alternative SAC (NTC)

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:16:06 -0400

67 lines

Re: Alternative SAC (NTC)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:30:36 -0700

96 lines

Re: Alternative SAC (NTC)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:49:03 -0500

121 lines

Re: Alternative SAC (NTC)

Drew meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:54:48 -0600

26 lines

Re: Alternative SAC (NTC)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:56:40 -0700

130 lines

Re: Alternative SAC (NTC)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:00:03 -0700

148 lines

Re: Alternative SAC (NTC)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:41:14 -0700

174 lines

Re: Alternative SAC (NTC)

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:45:12 -0500

224 lines

Re: Alternative SAC (NTC)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:49:26 -0700

243 lines

Re: Alternative SAC (NTC)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:26:39 -0700

307 lines

New Thread

An IPC webcast you shouldn't miss - Embedded Passive Components - Costs More or Costs Less?

An IPC webcast you shouldn't miss - Embedded Passive Components - Costs More or Costs Less?

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:25:37 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

Anybody else have trouble getting things from Pace?

Anybody else have trouble getting things from Pace?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:19:40 -0600

39 lines

Re: Anybody else have trouble getting things from Pace?

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:32:13 -0800

54 lines

Re: Anybody else have trouble getting things from Pace?

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:56:56 -0500

75 lines

Re: Anybody else have trouble getting things from Pace?

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:14:32 -0800

86 lines

Re: Anybody else have trouble getting things from Pace?

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:26:23 -0800

70 lines

New Thread

APEX NTC

Re: APEX NTC

Wrobel, Clayton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:40:55 -0500

132 lines

Re: APEX NTC

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:44:00 -0800

161 lines

New Thread

Approved Substitute for Mil-P-13949/7 (GR)

Approved Substitute for Mil-P-13949/7 (GR)

Marty W. Sheppard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:47:28 -0600

33 lines

Re: Approved Substitute for Mil-P-13949/7 (GR)

ekalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:27:20 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

A_50 SIR Phoenix Board

A_50 SIR Phoenix Board

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:03:00 -0700

40 lines

Re: A_50 SIR Phoenix Board

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:47:22 -0500

98 lines

Re: A_50 SIR Phoenix Board

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:01:47 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

BGA Die Attach Criteria

BGA Die Attach Criteria

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 06:55:42 -0500

27 lines

Re: BGA Die Attach Criteria

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:44:42 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

BGA footprint

BGA footprint

Bob Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:36:18 -0800

38 lines

Re: BGA footprint

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 22:05:56 -0500

82 lines

Re: BGA footprint

David Greig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:31:09 -0000

71 lines

Re: BGA footprint

Terry Kozlyk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 05:00:56 -0700

113 lines

Re: BGA footprint

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:03:40 -0600

142 lines

Re: BGA footprint

Haynes, Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:41:34 -0600

75 lines

Re: BGA footprint

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:09:22 -0600

98 lines

Re: BGA footprint

David Greig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:35:19 -0000

110 lines

Re: BGA footprint

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:25:03 -0600

154 lines

New Thread

Call for registration - IPC Lead Free workshops - 4/17/07 & 4/18/07, in Bannockburn, IL

Call for registration - IPC Lead Free workshops - 4/17/07 & 4/18/07, in Bannockburn, IL

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:19:40 -0500

116 lines

New Thread

Call for Registration - IPC REACH Webcast Series

Call for Registration - IPC REACH Webcast Series

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:56:49 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

CC fixture issue

CC fixture issue

Jeff Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:10:36 -0600

45 lines

Re: CC fixture issue

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:25:09 -0600

95 lines

Re: CC fixture issue

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:55:01 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

Chip Capacitor Reliability Question

Chip Capacitor Reliability Question

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:22:27 -0600

46 lines

Re: Chip Capacitor Reliability Question

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:27:49 -0800

87 lines

Re: Chip Capacitor Reliability Question

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 21:12:36 -0500

105 lines

Re: Chip Capacitor Reliability Question

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:11:13 +0100

87 lines

Re: Chip Capacitor Reliability Question

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:52:11 EST

38 lines

Re: Chip Capacitor Reliability Question

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:16:23 -0700

128 lines

New Thread

Chip Scale Packagine (CSP)

Chip Scale Packagine (CSP)

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:50:39 -0400

36 lines

Re: Chip Scale Packagine (CSP)

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:09:45 +0000

54 lines

Re: Chip Scale Packagine (CSP)

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:30:13 -0400

56 lines

Re: Chip Scale Packagine (CSP)

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:08:16 -0400

75 lines

Re: Chip Scale Packagine (CSP)

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:40:22 -0400

118 lines

Re: Chip Scale Packagine (CSP)

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:48:34 -0400

48 lines

New Thread

cleaning conformally coated boards

cleaning conformally coated boards

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:10:23 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

Cofired gold

Cofired gold

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:38:32 +0200

28 lines

Re: Cofired gold

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:13:48 -0400

74 lines

Re: Cofired gold

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:57:32 -0400

152 lines

Re: Cofired gold

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:18:18 -0400

197 lines

Re: Cofired gold

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:55:59 -0400

247 lines

Re: Cofired gold

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:48:24 -0500

237 lines

New Thread

Cognex Vision Card Repair Update...

Re: Cognex Vision Card Repair Update...

prakash <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:29:56 +0800

221 lines

New Thread

COMPATIBILITY

COMPATIBILITY

BADRI <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:37:18 +0530

63 lines

Re: COMPATIBILITY

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:57:44 -0400

146 lines

Re: COMPATIBILITY

Louis, Edwin @ CSE <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:57:14 -0400

171 lines

Re: COMPATIBILITY

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:19:35 EDT

33 lines

Re: COMPATIBILITY

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:49:01 -0400

197 lines

Re: COMPATIBILITY

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:37:17 -0400

78 lines

Re: COMPATIBILITY

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:26:09 -0400

115 lines

New Thread

component orientation

component orientation

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:26:13 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Component Orientation Survey

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:53:26 -0500

77 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:02:50 -0600

101 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 06:47:18 -0700

61 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:53:41 -0500

91 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:55:26 -0600

116 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:02:01 -0500

73 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:03:20 -0500

129 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:10:07 -0700

111 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Steve Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:10:33 -0500

117 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:25:19 -0500

140 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:30:09 -0500

78 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:34:22 -0500

46 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:40:19 -0600

115 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:43:25 -0500

146 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:59:25 -0600

177 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:27:57 -0500

69 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:32:05 -0500

110 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:10:25 -0600

134 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:20:18 -0500

139 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:24:43 -0600

166 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Greg Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:39:28 -0800

53 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:54:06 -0500

195 lines

Re: Component Orientation Survey

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:56:31 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

Comps on opposite side of PCB sharing GND vias

Comps on opposite side of PCB sharing GND vias

Terry Kozlyk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 05:10:17 -0600

36 lines

Re: Comps on opposite side of PCB sharing GND vias

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:25:10 -0400

57 lines

Re: Comps on opposite side of PCB sharing GND vias

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:43:43 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

conformal coating repair

conformal coating repair

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 06:30:17 -0800

44 lines

New Thread

copper deterioration (NTC?)

copper deterioration (NTC?)

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:15:54 -0500

32 lines

Re: copper deterioration (NTC?)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:24:45 -0800

64 lines

Re: copper deterioration (NTC?)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:38:06 -0700

65 lines

Re: copper deterioration (NTC?)

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:16:42 +0200

54 lines

Re: copper deterioration (NTC?)

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:25:16 +0100

92 lines

Re: copper deterioration (NTC?)

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:45:43 +0100

124 lines

Re: copper deterioration (NTC?)

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:58:28 -0500

154 lines

New Thread

Darrel Therriault is out of the office until 11/27/06.

Darrel Therriault is out of the office until 11/27/06.

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:12:50 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

Double sided reflow

Double sided reflow

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:42:32 -0400

39 lines

Re: Double sided reflow

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:44:49 +0800

65 lines

Re: Double sided reflow

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:13:01 -0400

121 lines

Re: Double sided reflow

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:27:32 -0400

145 lines

Re: Double sided reflow

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:33:53 -0800

172 lines

Re: Double sided reflow

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:53:32 -0400

196 lines

Re: Double sided reflow

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:56:08 -0400

72 lines

Re: Double sided reflow

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:12:37 +0800

181 lines

Re: Double sided reflow

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:41:09 -0500

135 lines

Re: Double sided reflow

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:44:46 -0500

203 lines

Re: Double sided reflow

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:07:59 -0400

264 lines

New Thread

Double sided reflow... clarification

Re: Double sided reflow... clarification

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:12:04 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

Dry Film Thickness

Dry Film Thickness

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:22:10 -0400

25 lines

Re: Dry Film Thickness

Chezhian, Krishnan (Radhakrishnan) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:33:46 +0800

133 lines

Re: Dry Film Thickness

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:29:45 -0700

81 lines

Re: Dry Film Thickness

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:54:10 -0700

49 lines

Re: Dry Film Thickness

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:46:16 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

EN 1000015 vs. ESD 20.20

EN 1000015 vs. ESD 20.20

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:29:38 -0600

32 lines

Re: EN 1000015 vs. ESD 20.20

Juan T. Marugán <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 01:09:02 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

Engineering Question  [NTC]

Re: Engineering Question  [NTC]

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:44:37 EDT

32 lines

New Thread

Engineering Question

Engineering Question

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:48:59 -0700

35 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:08:06 EDT

33 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:16:56 -0700

68 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:22:26 -0500

89 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:22:49 -0400

81 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:30:50 -0600

89 lines

Re: Engineering Question

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:36:26 -0700

70 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:40:47 -0400

114 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:43:51 -0700

40 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:51:44 EDT

41 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:55:16 EDT

33 lines

Re: Engineering Question

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:07:12 -0700

66 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:21:08 -0500

61 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:22:27 -0500

92 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:33:34 EDT

32 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:41:01 -0400

64 lines

Re: Engineering Question

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:43:12 -0700

63 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:49:56 EDT

40 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Wood, Kenneth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:53:38 -0400

84 lines

Re: Engineering Question

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:58:09 EDT

33 lines

New Thread

Engineering Question [NTC]

Re: Engineering Question [NTC]

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:34:47 -0600

121 lines

Re: Engineering Question [NTC]

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:57:03 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Environmental Tests For PCB

Environmental Tests For PCB

Clayton @ Reliability Resources <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:36:54 -0700

36 lines

Re: Environmental Tests For PCB

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:00:08 EDT

31 lines

New Thread

ESD charges in conformal coatings

ESD charges in conformal coatings

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:09:18 +0200

40 lines

Re: ESD charges in conformal coatings

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:25:47 -0400

72 lines

Re: ESD charges in conformal coatings

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:33:03 -0400

72 lines

Re: ESD charges in conformal coatings

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:34:15 +0200

95 lines

Re: ESD charges in conformal coatings

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:53:32 +0200

92 lines

Re: ESD charges in conformal coatings

James Verrette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:52:35 -0400

128 lines

New Thread

ESD charges in conformal coatings (conclusion)

Re: ESD charges in conformal coatings (conclusion)

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:08:24 +0200

172 lines

Re: ESD charges in conformal coatings (conclusion)

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:30:52 +0800

213 lines

Re: ESD charges in conformal coatings (conclusion)

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:57:42 +0200

271 lines

Re: ESD charges in conformal coatings (conclusion)

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:37:02 -0400

295 lines

New Thread

ESD control and fans

ESD control and fans

Joel Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:52:19 -0500

33 lines

Re: ESD control and fans

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:39:22 +0200

60 lines

Re: ESD control and fans

Gene Felder <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:08:00 -0700

135 lines

Re: ESD control and fans

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:19:11 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

ESD question

ESD question

Bob Arciolla <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:57:11 -0500

35 lines

Re: ESD question

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:11:49 -0500

75 lines

Re: ESD question

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:18:14 +0100

67 lines

Re: ESD question

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:22:03 -0500

90 lines

Re: ESD question

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:23:45 -0600

127 lines

Re: ESD question

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:21:48 -0500

82 lines

Re: ESD question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:51:33 -0600

125 lines

Re: ESD question

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:17:22 +0100

115 lines

Re: ESD question

Gene Felder <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:17:07 -0800

149 lines

Re: ESD question

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 12:58:31 +0100

136 lines

Re: ESD question

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:40:54 -0500

158 lines

Re: ESD question

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:07:54 -0500

198 lines

New Thread

Explanation of Cpk (Ppk)

Explanation of Cpk (Ppk)

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:39:06 -0600

38 lines

Re: Explanation of Cpk (Ppk)

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:45:53 -0400

78 lines

Re: Explanation of Cpk (Ppk)

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:57:49 +0100

115 lines

Re: Explanation of Cpk (Ppk)

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:20:06 -0400

93 lines

Re: Explanation of CpK (Ppk)

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:51:11 -0500

72 lines

Re: Explanation of Cpk (Ppk)

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:12:38 -0500

69 lines

Re: Explanation of Cpk (Ppk)

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:48:19 -0400

78 lines

Re: Explanation of Cpk (Ppk)

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:52:03 -0600

138 lines

New Thread

Flex Circuit Scratch...

Flex Circuit Scratch...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:35:14 -0500

42 lines

Re: Flex Circuit Scratch...

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:22:25 EDT

48 lines

Re: Flex Circuit Scratch...

Kerry McMullen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:25:45 -0500

106 lines

Re: Flex Circuit Scratch...

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:55:56 -0400

71 lines

Re: Flex Circuit Scratch...

ZLATKO BIJEDIC <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:04:31 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

Flip-flop panels

Flip-flop panels

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:23:13 -0500

46 lines

Re: Flip-flop panels

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:51:18 -0800

74 lines

Re: Flip-flop panels

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:09:25 -0600

108 lines

Re: Flip-flop panels

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:15:33 -0500

143 lines

Re: Flip-flop panels

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:29:34 -0800

172 lines

Re: Flip-flop panels

Frank Kimmey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:32:01 -0800

192 lines

Re: Flip-flop panels

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:19:59 -0500

202 lines

Re: Flip-flop panels

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:58:41 -0600

232 lines

Re: Flip-flop panels

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:15:27 -0700

247 lines

Re: Flip-flop panels

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:31:19 -0700

259 lines

Re: Flip-flop panels

Sherif Refaat <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 16:31:32 -0500

262 lines

Re: Flip-flop panels

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:35:06 -0600

283 lines

New Thread

Footprint standards for Polarized components (Diodes)

Footprint standards for Polarized components (Diodes)

Gary Bremer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:47:22 -0700

39 lines

Re: Footprint standards for Polarized components (Diodes)

Al Onderick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:27:30 -0500

91 lines

Footprint standards for Polarized components (Diodes)

Bob Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:48:19 -0700

81 lines

New Thread

FPGA (DSP)

FPGA (DSP)

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:04:38 +0100

38 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2007 09:59:47 -0500

91 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:07:12 +0100

125 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:12:23 +0100

122 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:14:32 +0100

177 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:56:57 -0400

248 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

- bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:31:59 -0500

206 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:02:12 +0100

250 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:28:17 +0100

283 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:33:09 +0100

300 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:56:21 -0400

93 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:16:15 +0100

128 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:09:49 -0500

77 lines

Re: FPGA (DSP)

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:52:27 +0100

101 lines

New Thread

FR408 vs. FR-4 in RoHS Compliant SMT Process

FR408 vs. FR-4 in RoHS Compliant SMT Process

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:21:41 -0600

33 lines

Re: FR408 vs. FR-4 in RoHS Compliant SMT Process

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:22:11 -0500

73 lines

Re: FR408 vs. FR-4 in RoHS Compliant SMT Process

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:48:03 -0500

110 lines

Re: FR408 vs. FR-4 in RoHS Compliant SMT Process

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:03:45 EDT

36 lines

Re: FR408 vs. FR-4 in RoHS Compliant SMT Process

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:12:26 EDT

36 lines

Re: FR408 vs. FR-4 in RoHS Compliant SMT Process

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:53:01 -0500

128 lines

Re: FR408 vs. FR-4 in RoHS Compliant SMT Process

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:43:25 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

Friday Poem NTC

Friday Poem NTC

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:50:25 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] BGA Die Attach Criteria

FW: [TN] BGA Die Attach Criteria

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2007 06:46:34 -0500

111 lines

Re: FW: [TN] BGA Die Attach Criteria

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:18:29 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Re: FW: [TN] immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 19:06:55 EST

31 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Solderability problems on through holes only.

Re: FW: [TN] Solderability problems on through holes only.

Donald Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Mar 2007 13:15:14 -0500

277 lines

New Thread

Gold %

Gold %

Christopher Nash <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:41:39 -0400

136 lines

Re: Gold %

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:29:16 -0400

215 lines

Re: Gold %

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:33:56 -0500

234 lines

Re: Gold %

P. Langeveld <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:39:16 +0200

231 lines

Re: Gold %

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:58:33 -0500

185 lines

Re: Gold %

Christopher Nash <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:09:33 -0400

205 lines

Re: Gold %

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:04:42 EST

34 lines

New Thread

Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:25:17 -0500

27 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:36:03 -0400

65 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:23:07 +0100

92 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:48:00 -0500

131 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:51:10 -0400

171 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:26:18 -0500

200 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:18:22 +0100

150 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:31:26 +0100

227 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:30:14 -0500

257 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:35:18 -0500

282 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:47:37 -0500

225 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:12:21 -0400

200 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:38:28 -0500

251 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:02:27 +0100

237 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:18:11 -0700

325 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:21:24 -0400

284 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:06:25 +0100

313 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:40:42 -0500

357 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:07:34 +0100

312 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:39:42 -0500

344 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:40:25 +0100

402 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:02:28 -0400

340 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:47:13 -0500

379 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:59:34 +0100

368 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

arnaud grivon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:35:32 +0100

394 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 06:43:40 -0500

454 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:02:32 -0500

429 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:13:19 -0400

436 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:38:37 -0500

522 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:31:41 +0100

494 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:38:49 EDT

30 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:12:32 +0100

445 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:28:23 +0100

59 lines

Re: Gold Ball Bond attaching surface roughness

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:32:05 -0700

506 lines

New Thread

Good books to read?

Good books to read?

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:12:10 -0400

51 lines

Re: Good books to read?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:25:18 -0500

170 lines

Re: Good books to read?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:08:34 +0300

67 lines

New Thread

Hardness Characterization of a PCB Surface Finish

Hardness Characterization of a PCB Surface Finish

arnaud grivon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:18:59 +0100

30 lines

Re: Hardness Characterization of a PCB Surface Finish

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:42:32 -0000

82 lines

Re: Hardness Characterization of a PCB Surface Finish

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:23:33 -0400

65 lines

Re: Hardness Characterization of a PCB Surface Finish

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:51:18 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

HEAT SINKS

HEAT SINKS

Dan Skweres <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:55:35 -0600

27 lines

Re: HEAT SINKS

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:03:23 -0400

67 lines

Re: HEAT SINKS

Dan Skweres <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:28:40 -0600

98 lines

Re: HEAT SINKS

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:48:57 -0400

140 lines

Re: HEAT SINKS

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:10:56 -0500

132 lines

Re: HEAT SINKS

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:25:11 +0100

62 lines

Re: HEAT SINKS

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:32:40 -0400

96 lines

Re: HEAT SINKS

Dan Skweres <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:40:15 -0600

126 lines

Re: HEAT SINKS

Dan Skweres <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:42:02 -0600

163 lines

Re: HEAT SINKS

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:45:16 -0500

157 lines

Re: HEAT SINKS

Dan Skweres <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:50:12 -0600

185 lines

New Thread

high temp adhesive film

high temp adhesive film

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:20:08 +0800

30 lines

New Thread

I know it's not Friday but... NTC

I know it's not Friday but... NTC

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:36:02 EDT

81 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but... NTC

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:52:36 -0400

138 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but... NTC

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:14:31 -0500

116 lines

New Thread

I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:54:05 EDT

89 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:20:56 -0500

114 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:43:16 EDT

100 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:29:26 +0100

143 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:23:06 -0600

110 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:49:53 -0500

132 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:12:01 -0400

145 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:25:02 -0400

164 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Scott Decker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:02:52 -0700

124 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:31:41 -0700

161 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Joe Russeau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:37:38 -0600

156 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:45:58 EDT

33 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:48:32 EDT

52 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:06:46 -0500

57 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:15:22 -0400

77 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:43:15 +0100

145 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:55:19 EDT

30 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:43:33 +0100

43 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:00:14 EDT

33 lines

Re: I know it's not Friday but...close enough [NTC]

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:39:05 -0400

72 lines

New Thread

immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Fran Juliot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:57:56 -0600

31 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Alistair Murray <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:10:08 -0000

73 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:51:42 -0500

110 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:20:17 -0500

124 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:26:11 -0500

169 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:24:24 -0600

172 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:43:50 -0500

204 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:34:16 -0700

194 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:58:11 -0500

145 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 19:05:19 EST

38 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:40:52 -0500

242 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:53:37 -0800

327 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:01:36 -0500

361 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:39:56 -0700

358 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:30:30 -0800

416 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:03:25 -0700

434 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:43:51 EST

47 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:31:13 -0800

468 lines

New Thread

immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias NTC

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small vias NTC

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 11:57:19 -0000

207 lines

New Thread

immersion silver and exposed copper in small viasNTC

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small viasNTC

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:47:45 -0600

502 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small viasNTC

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:58:39 -0800

522 lines

Re: immersion silver and exposed copper in small viasNTC

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:41:31 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

IPC 6012 : Outgassing Criteria

IPC 6012 : Outgassing Criteria

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:17:26 +0800

38 lines

Re: IPC 6012 : Outgassing Criteria

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:59:47 -0400

81 lines

Re: IPC 6012 : Outgassing Criteria

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:23:35 -0500

107 lines

Re: IPC 6012 : Outgassing Criteria

Hans Shin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:35:56 -0700

135 lines

Re: IPC 6012 : Outgassing Criteria

Louis, Edwin @ CSE <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:01:52 -0400

73 lines

Re: IPC 6012 : Outgassing Criteria

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:42:52 -0400

97 lines

Re: IPC 6012 : Outgassing Criteria

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:34:58 -0400

127 lines

New Thread

IPC 6012 versus 6013

IPC 6012 versus 6013

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:55:02 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:30:34 -0500

28 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:26:18 -0400

58 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 06:04:00 -0400

79 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 06:32:09 -0500

95 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:06:53 EDT

32 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Joel Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:19:24 -0400

80 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:28:43 -0400

86 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:36:09 -0500

40 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:52:21 -0500

107 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:27:25 EDT

32 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:27:04 -0600

21 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:30:23 EDT

32 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:46:51 -0700

158 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:53:00 EDT

42 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:51:49 -0500

69 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:04:44 EDT

39 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:47:58 -0500

68 lines

Re: IPC ENIG SPECIFICATION

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:45:42 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

IPC International Conference on Lead Free Materials & Surface Finishes, May 8-9, 2007, in San Jose, CA

IPC International Conference on Lead Free Materials & Surface Finishes, May 8-9, 2007, in San Jose, CA

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:06:41 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

IPC Surface Finish Inspection - ENIG

IPC Surface Finish Inspection - ENIG

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:59:00 -0400

51 lines

New Thread

IPC Workshop: Compliant Electronics for EU Applications on 3/13-14/07 in Dallas, TX

IPC Workshop: Compliant Electronics for EU Applications on 3/13-14/07 in Dallas, TX

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:01:40 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

IPC's Design for Manufacture workshop on April 17, 2007 - Leeds, UK

IPC's Design for Manufacture workshop on April 17, 2007 - Leeds, UK

Michelle Michelotti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:57:38 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

IPC's Designing with your 'Thumbs' - May 21, 2007, Bannockburn, IL

IPC's Designing with your 'Thumbs' - May 21, 2007, Bannockburn, IL

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:42:11 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

IPC-4101/101 vs /121

IPC-4101/101 vs /121

Thomas A. Frayda <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:50:03 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

IPC/JEDEC Global Conference on Lead Free Reliability & Reliability Testing for RoHS Lead Free Electronics, April 10-12, 2007, in Boston, MA

IPC/JEDEC Global Conference on Lead Free Reliability & Reliability Testing for RoHS Lead Free Electronics, April 10-12, 2007, in Boston, MA

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:40:24 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

IPC/JEDEC Global Conference on LF Reliability & Reliability Testing for RoHS LF Electronics - April 10-12, 2007 in Boston, MA

IPC/JEDEC Global Conference on LF Reliability & Reliability Testing for RoHS LF Electronics - April 10-12, 2007 in Boston, MA

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:12:46 -0600

51 lines

New Thread

Join IPC's REACH Webcast Series April 11 & 18, 2007

Join IPC's REACH Webcast Series April 11 & 18, 2007

Michelle Michelotti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:38:04 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

Join IPC, in Singapore, for a series of workshops! Register today!

Join IPC, in Singapore, for a series of workshops! Register today!

Michelle Michelotti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:31:13 -0500

144 lines

New Thread

Laminate material selection

Laminate material selection

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:31:01 -0400

50 lines

Re: Laminate material selection

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 07:12:56 -0700

40 lines

Re: Laminate material selection

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:45:39 -0700

132 lines

Re: Laminate material selection

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:58:57 -0400

163 lines

Re: Laminate material selection

valerie St. Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:00:32 -0400

85 lines

Re: Laminate material selection

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:00:05 -0400

90 lines

Re: Laminate material selection

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:05:49 -0700

159 lines

New Thread

Laminate Qualification.

Laminate Qualification.

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:26:14 -0500

85 lines

Re: Laminate Qualification.

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:46:20 -0500

157 lines

Re: Laminate Qualification.

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:32:31 -0600

177 lines

Re: Laminate Qualification.

Tan, Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:34:12 +0800

211 lines

Re: Laminate Qualification.

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:26:43 -0500

176 lines

Re: Laminate Qualification.

Stephen Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:23:27 -0800

113 lines

New Thread

Lead coating meniscus cracking

Lead coating meniscus cracking

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:12:50 -0500

52 lines

Re: Lead coating meniscus cracking

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:16:32 EST

41 lines

Re: Lead coating meniscus cracking

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:42:34 -0500

96 lines

Re: Lead coating meniscus cracking

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:09:02 -0700

92 lines

New Thread

Lead-free Foxtor connector removal

Lead-free Foxtor connector removal

Eric Castonguay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:49:57 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

Legend Ink and ENIG

Legend Ink and ENIG

Ralph Richart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:26:46 -0700

25 lines

Re: Legend Ink and ENIG

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:28:03 -0400

67 lines

Re: Legend Ink and ENIG

ZLATKO BIJEDIC <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:32:47 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

Metal-core PCBs

Metal-core PCBs

Grant Emandien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:41:39 +0200

35 lines

Re: Metal-core PCBs

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:00:13 -0500

92 lines

Re: Metal-core PCBs

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:33:30 +0100

122 lines

New Thread

new roadmap

new roadmap

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:19:33 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

NiAu Specification for Al Wedge Wire Bonding

NiAu Specification for Al Wedge Wire Bonding

arnaud grivon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:01:28 +0100

32 lines

Re: NiAu Specification for Al Wedge Wire Bonding

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:45:22 +0100

61 lines

Re: NiAu Specification for Al Wedge Wire Bonding

arnaud grivon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:50:53 +0100

73 lines

Re: NiAu Specification for Al Wedge Wire Bonding

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:07:19 -0500

108 lines

Re: NiAu Specification for Al Wedge Wire Bonding

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:56:48 +0100

125 lines

New Thread

Nickel Foot

Nickel Foot

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:22:31 -0400

70 lines

Re: Nickel Foot

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:30:51 -0700

95 lines

Re: Nickel Foot

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:31:37 EDT

55 lines

Re: Nickel Foot

Tony Steinke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:23:39 -0500

99 lines

Re: Nickel Foot

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:51:54 -0400

107 lines

Re: Nickel Foot

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:59:45 -0400

124 lines

Re: Nickel Foot

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:12:53 +0200

97 lines

Re: Nickel Foot

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:15:26 EDT

33 lines

New Thread

NTC Alternative lead free soldering reviewed

NTC Alternative lead free soldering reviewed

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:13:26 -0700

59 lines

New Thread

NTC: Anrufen: Trikeman

NTC: Anrufen: Trikeman

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:26:39 +0100

228 lines

New Thread

NTC: Double Posting

NTC: Double Posting

ekalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:51:21 -0400

44 lines

Re: NTC: Double Posting

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:52:34 -0400

104 lines

Re: NTC: Double Posting

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:29:00 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

NTC: The Silicon Zoo

NTC: The Silicon Zoo

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:34:36 EDT

30 lines

New Thread

Number of allowed X-outs?

Re: Number of allowed X-outs?

Sherif Refaat <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:23:57 -0500

86 lines

Re: Number of allowed X-outs?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:47:09 -0600

114 lines

New Thread

number topics?

number topics?

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:46:20 -0700

29 lines

Re: number topics?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:51:58 -0400

58 lines

New Thread

Pad damage

Pad damage

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:07:04 -0400

71 lines

Re: Pad damage

Jones, Evamaria <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:10:33 -0400

113 lines

Re: Pad damage

Garry Foskett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:23:49 -0000

144 lines

Re: Pad damage

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:31:10 -0500

138 lines

Re: Pad damage

Fran Juliot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:50:07 -0500

101 lines

Re: Pad damage

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:12:27 -0800

180 lines

Re: Pad damage

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:13:45 -0400

133 lines

Re: Pad damage

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:16:35 +0100

101 lines

Re: Pad damage

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:50:08 -0400

109 lines

New Thread

Panel tab breakoff burrs

Panel tab breakoff burrs

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 01:01:07 +0800

32 lines

Re: Panel tab breakoff burrs

Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:35:52 -0500

78 lines

New Thread

Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Matt Kehoe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:00:46 -0600

44 lines

Re: Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Bill Coleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:50:39 -0700

76 lines

Re: Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Bill Kunkle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:11:13 -0500

70 lines

Re: Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:39:04 -0500

88 lines

Re: Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:14:07 -0700

110 lines

Re: Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

BADRI <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Mar 2007 08:51:22 +0530

81 lines

Re: Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Matt Kehoe-SIPAD Systems <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:52:11 -0400

151 lines

Re: Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Matt Kehoe-SIPAD Systems <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:56:54 -0400

135 lines

Re: Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Matt Kehoe-SIPAD Systems <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:50:23 -0400

122 lines

Re: Paste Volume, off contact vs non off contact

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:49:46 -0400

171 lines

New Thread

PCB Cleanliness

PCB Cleanliness

Chafin, Ken G. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 17:12:52 -0400

35 lines

Re: PCB Cleanliness

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:53:53 -0700

61 lines

Re: PCB Cleanliness

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:09:30 +0300

103 lines

New Thread

PCB Cleanliness/Soft Water

Re: PCB Cleanliness/Soft Water

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:28:02 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

PCB laminate and immersion silver

PCB laminate and immersion silver

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:39:55 -0600

27 lines

Re: PCB laminate and immersion silver

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:48:25 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

PCB PACKAGING MATERIAL & Baking Question

PCB PACKAGING MATERIAL & Baking Question

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:58:20 -0700

53 lines

Re: PCB PACKAGING MATERIAL & Baking Question

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:00:05 -0500

85 lines

Re: PCB PACKAGING MATERIAL & Baking Question

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:33:25 EDT

26 lines

Re: PCB PACKAGING MATERIAL & Baking Question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 06:43:10 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

PCB plating Qualification

PCB plating Qualification

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 07:18:07 -0400

46 lines

Re: PCB plating Qualification

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:27:10 EDT

35 lines

Re: PCB plating Qualification

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:01:14 -0700

132 lines

Re: PCB plating Qualification

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:03:42 -0400

55 lines

Re: PCB plating Qualification

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:23:44 EDT

34 lines

Re: PCB plating Qualification

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:27:09 +0000

87 lines

Re: PCB plating Qualification

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:13:12 -0700

158 lines

Re: PCB plating Qualification

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:57:20 -0400

136 lines

New Thread

PCB Temp Guidelines

PCB Temp Guidelines

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:10:48 -0400

38 lines

Re: PCB Temp Guidelines

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:23:20 -0500

62 lines

Re: PCB Temp Guidelines

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:31:47 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

Polymer Core BGA Balls

Polymer Core BGA Balls

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:50:25 EST

33 lines

Re: Polymer Core BGA Balls

Kerry McMullen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:11:17 -0500

84 lines

New Thread

Post Assembly Bow and Twist

Post Assembly Bow and Twist

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 07:04:50 -0500

43 lines

Re: Post Assembly Bow and Twist

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 08:36:05 -0500

71 lines

Re: Post Assembly Bow and Twist

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:07:46 -0500

76 lines

Re: Post Assembly Bow and Twist

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 07:11:27 -0700

112 lines

Re: Post Assembly Bow and Twist

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:12:38 -0500

104 lines

Re: Post Assembly Bow and Twist

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 09:26:20 EST

33 lines

Re: Post Assembly Bow and Twist

Scott Decker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 08:24:12 -0700

74 lines

Re: Post Assembly Bow and Twist

Smith, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:52:32 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

Prediction comes true

Re: Prediction comes true

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 07:06:00 -0600

141 lines

New Thread

Prediction comes true (NTC)

Re: Prediction comes true (NTC)

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:12:34 -0500

68 lines

Re: Prediction comes true (NTC)

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:29:59 -0000

65 lines

Re: Prediction comes true (NTC)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:33:16 -0700

110 lines

Re: Prediction comes true (NTC)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:59:34 -0600

130 lines

Re: Prediction comes true (NTC)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:13:35 -0700

156 lines

Re: Prediction comes true (NTC)

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:33:15 EST

35 lines

Re: Prediction comes true (NTC)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 06:52:28 -0700

68 lines

New Thread

Press-fit Soldering

Press-fit Soldering

Bob Barr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:07:23 -0600

75 lines

Re: Press-fit Soldering

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:33:08 -0500

103 lines

Re: Press-fit Soldering

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:30:27 -0400

115 lines

New Thread

Qualification Testing for H1 Flux

Qualification Testing for H1 Flux

Paul Baine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:17:28 -0500

71 lines

Re: Qualification Testing for H1 Flux

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:56:57 -0700

182 lines

Re: Qualification Testing for H1 Flux

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:47:17 -0500

151 lines

New Thread

REACH Webcast Series - April 11 & 18, 2007

REACH Webcast Series - April 11 & 18, 2007

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:00:19 -0500

78 lines

New Thread

Reflow Solder fixtures

Reflow Solder fixtures

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:13:20 -0400

35 lines

Re: Reflow Solder fixtures

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:23:50 -0500

70 lines

Re: Reflow Solder fixtures

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:33:52 -0500

92 lines

Re: Reflow Solder fixtures

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:33:30 -0500

60 lines

Re: Reflow Solder fixtures

Matt Kehoe-SIPAD Systems <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:52:22 -0400

97 lines

Re: Reflow Solder fixtures

Stephen Pence <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:02:37 -0400

129 lines

Re: Reflow Solder fixtures

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:40:37 EDT

26 lines

Re: Reflow Solder fixtures

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:31:57 -0700

57 lines

Re: Reflow Solder fixtures

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:04:12 EDT

36 lines

Re: Reflow Solder fixtures

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:51:28 -0700

53 lines

Re: Reflow Solder fixtures

Ells Berkowitz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:03:14 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

Register Now for IPC's Design for Manufacture Workshop

Register Now for IPC's Design for Manufacture Workshop

Michelle Michelotti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:29:50 -0600

76 lines

New Thread

Register Now!

Register Now!

Michelle Michelotti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:45:44 -0600

84 lines

New Thread

Register Today - Lead Free Materials and Surface Finishes Conference

Register Today - Lead Free Materials and Surface Finishes Conference

Alexandra Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:52:17 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Remember to Register for IPC's workshops on April 17 & 18, 2007!

Remember to Register for IPC's workshops on April 17 & 18, 2007!

Michelle Michelotti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:10:34 -0500

104 lines

New Thread

Renewed respect for copper (non-technical content)

Renewed respect for copper (non-technical content)

Craig Cullum <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:05:40 -0600

43 lines

Re: Renewed respect for copper (non-technical content)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:41:42 -0800

78 lines

Re: Renewed respect for copper (non-technical content)

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 05:54:25 -0500

43 lines

Re: Renewed respect for copper (non-technical content)

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 07:27:26 -0500

95 lines

New Thread

Rigid flex PCB manufacturer

Rigid flex PCB manufacturer

Ted Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:01:01 -0700

41 lines

Re: Rigid flex PCB manufacturer

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:17:50 -0400

71 lines

New Thread

Rigid Flex routing

Rigid Flex routing

mp3 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:18:05 +0530

37 lines

Re: Rigid Flex routing

mp3 <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:27:20 +0530

56 lines

Re: Rigid Flex routing

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:38:23 EDT

44 lines

New Thread

ROHS lead free question

ROHS lead free question

David Harman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:04:03 -0700

39 lines

Re: ROHS lead free question

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:23:03 -0000

94 lines

Re: ROHS lead free question

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:56:44 -0600

77 lines

Re: ROHS lead free question

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:53:25 +0100

137 lines

Re: ROHS lead free question

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:08:15 -0000

111 lines

Re: ROHS lead free question

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:49:25 EDT

48 lines

Re: ROHS lead free question

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:23:47 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

ROHS lead free question (NTC)

Re: ROHS lead free question (NTC)

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:31:18 +0100

143 lines

Re: ROHS lead free question (NTC)

Upton, Shawn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:59:44 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

Seam resistance pulse welding

Seam resistance pulse welding

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:08:04 +0100

50 lines

Re: Seam resistance pulse welding

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:37:33 -0400

105 lines

Re: Seam resistance pulse welding

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:21:58 -0000

148 lines

New Thread

Seeking PCB proto manufacturers

Seeking PCB proto manufacturers

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:42:59 +0100

43 lines

Re: Seeking PCB proto manufacturers

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:11:41 EST

40 lines

Re: Seeking PCB proto manufacturers

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:57:15 +0100

90 lines

New Thread

Small volume quick turn custom cable supplier

Small volume quick turn custom cable supplier

James Verrette <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:18:57 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

SMT Solder Joint Strength

SMT Solder Joint Strength

Gregg A. Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:05:25 -0700

34 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:26:40 -0400

82 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:53:40 EDT

52 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Gregg A. Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:58:30 -0700

82 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:04:01 EDT

31 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:21:16 +0200

66 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:25:22 EDT

34 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:28:45 EDT

34 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:43:43 +0200

74 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:04:05 EDT

34 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:17:38 +0200

72 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:37:01 -0500

119 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:39:01 -0500

98 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:50:30 EDT

38 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:02:03 -0500

67 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Clayton @ Reliability Resources <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:56:14 -0700

72 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

al shirazi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:11:39 -0700

94 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:31:12 EDT

29 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:34:26 EDT

31 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:37:41 EDT

35 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

al shirazi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:40:07 -0700

44 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:57:51 EDT

37 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

al shirazi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:03:20 -0700

59 lines

Re: SMT Solder Joint Strength

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:40:22 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

Solder Purity

Solder Purity

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:21:54 -0500

32 lines

Solder Purity

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:39:32 -0400

48 lines

Re: Solder Purity

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:55:08 -0400

100 lines

Re: Solder Purity

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:03:14 -0400

96 lines

Re: Solder Purity

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:17:13 -0000

167 lines

Re: Solder Purity

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:58:20 -0500

141 lines

New Thread

Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:02:13 -0400

42 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:15:47 -0500

66 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:26:11 -0500

93 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:26:18 -0600

47 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:37:30 -0400

72 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:44:32 -0700

81 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:15:26 -0400

133 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:50:47 -0500

162 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:53:55 -0700

151 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:45:23 -0400

128 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:05:27 -0500

154 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:17:55 -0500

189 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:23:32 -0400

186 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:11:22 -0500

215 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:19:32 -0400

205 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:23:16 EDT

33 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:25:09 EDT

30 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:36:48 -0400

80 lines

Re: Solder Resist Encroachment onto BGA pads

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:58:10 EDT

32 lines

New Thread

Solderability problems on through holes only.

Solderability problems on through holes only.

Peter Wong <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:17:55 -0700

72 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:26:08 -0500

99 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:28:47 -0700

96 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:40:15 -0500

125 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:01:52 -0400

206 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:14:56 -0400

117 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Miguel Vallejo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:21:13 -0700

228 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:25:15 -0500

215 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Peter Wong <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:48:25 -0700

270 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:44:49 EDT

30 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:49:08 -0400

110 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:32:21 -0400

490 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:49:31 -0700

251 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:04:43 -0500

277 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:43:03 EDT

32 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:36:27 EDT

39 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:39:49 EDT

28 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Mar 2007 08:49:51 -0400

85 lines

Re: Solderability problems on through holes only.

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:43:09 -0500

131 lines

New Thread

Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:58:51 -0400

231 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:29:03 -0700

307 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:36:16 -0400

348 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:40:17 -0400

47 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:04:41 -0400

87 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:08:55 -0400

392 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:16:36 -0400

435 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:24:33 -0400

470 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:36:54 -0400

497 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:46:51 -0700

464 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:09:20 EDT

34 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:15:23 EDT

32 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:22:53 -0400

74 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:45:49 -0700

508 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:53:50 -0700

537 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:04:10 -0400

568 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:19:01 -0700

552 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:52:56 -0700

565 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:52:11 +0200

268 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:07:21 -0400

302 lines

Re: Soldering to Beryillum Copper

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:09:51 -0400

306 lines

New Thread

Soldering using Sn96

Soldering using Sn96

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:46:19 -0400

45 lines

Re: Soldering using Sn96

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:58:12 -0500

74 lines

Re: Soldering using Sn96

Donald Kyle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:12:10 -0500

98 lines

Re: Soldering using Sn96

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:20:52 -0400

138 lines

Re: Soldering using Sn96

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:25:21 -0500

100 lines

Re: Soldering using Sn96

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:39:09 -0400

85 lines

Re: Soldering using Sn96

Christopher Nash <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:43:23 -0400

183 lines

Re: Soldering using Sn96

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 08:14:12 -0700

199 lines

Re: Soldering using Sn96

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:40:16 +0100

139 lines

Re: Soldering using Sn96

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:41:42 EDT

42 lines

New Thread

Soldermask Blisters

Soldermask Blisters

Ralph Richart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 08:58:06 -0700

27 lines

Re: Soldermask Blisters

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:06:20 -0700

92 lines

Re: Soldermask Blisters

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:12:50 -0400

61 lines

Re: Soldermask Blisters

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:43:37 -0500

83 lines

Re: Soldermask Blisters

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:40:55 +0200

53 lines

Re: Soldermask Blisters

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:23:27 EDT

40 lines

Re: Soldermask Blisters

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:25:52 -0700

75 lines

New Thread

structural adhesive

structural adhesive

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:25:45 -0400

48 lines

Re: structural adhesive

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:40:51 -0400

105 lines

Re: structural adhesive

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:04:00 -0400

94 lines

Re: structural adhesive

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:01:11 +0100

76 lines

New Thread

Surface finish inspection

Surface finish inspection

Paymon Sani <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:13:40 -0400

50 lines

New Thread

SV: [TN] Cofired gold

SV: [TN] Cofired gold

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:33:39 +0200

113 lines

SV: [TN] Cofired gold

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:27:58 +0200

267 lines

SV: [TN] Cofired gold

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:48:23 +0200

279 lines

Re: SV: [TN] Cofired gold

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:10:51 -0400

326 lines

New Thread

SV: [TN] Component Orientation Survey

SV: [TN] Component Orientation Survey

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:30:55 +0100

101 lines

Re: SV: [TN] Component Orientation Survey

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:59:38 -0500

130 lines

New Thread

SV: [TN] Good books to read?

SV: [TN] Good books to read?

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:37:37 +0200

198 lines

New Thread

SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:48:01 +0100

83 lines

SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:05:19 +0100

133 lines

SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 22:08:12 +0100

156 lines

Re: SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:24:13 -0500

205 lines

Re: SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:33:26 -0700

231 lines

Re: SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 13:42:15 -0800

272 lines

Re: SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:53:35 -0700

299 lines

Re: SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:39:09 -0800

337 lines

Re: SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 06:43:32 -0700

350 lines

Re: SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:34:07 EST

30 lines

New Thread

SV: [TN] ROHS lead free question (NTC)

SV: [TN] ROHS lead free question (NTC)

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:42:53 +0200

78 lines

New Thread

SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Cofired gold

SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Cofired gold

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:25:54 +0200

378 lines

New Thread

SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

SV: [TN] SV: [TN] Prediction comes true (NTC)

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2007 23:11:23 +0100

281 lines

New Thread

T260 tests

T260 tests

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:19:29 -0400

72 lines

Re: T260 tests

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:21:26 -0400

107 lines

Re: T260 tests

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:52:10 EDT

45 lines

Re: T260 tests

Louis, Edwin @ CSE <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:27:58 -0400

65 lines

Re: T260 tests

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:15:53 EDT

46 lines

New Thread

TEST

TEST

Dan Skweres <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:57:47 -0600

232 lines

New Thread

Thick BT board Suppliers

Thick BT board Suppliers

Rolfe, David <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:41:41 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Toolings and Fixture checklist required

Toolings and Fixture checklist required

pras chop <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 06:46:41 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Toolings and Fixture checklist required --- (URGENT)

Toolings and Fixture checklist required --- (URGENT)

pras chop <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:42:57 +0000

54 lines

Re: Toolings and Fixture checklist required --- (URGENT)

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:57:57 -0600

96 lines

New Thread

unsubscribe

unsubscribe

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:21:30 -0400

21 lines

Re: unsubscribe

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:27:03 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

Use of Type AR Conformal Coating for Military PCBs

Use of Type AR Conformal Coating for Military PCBs

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 05:55:07 -0500

28 lines

Re: Use of Type AR Conformal Coating for Military PCBs

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 07:36:28 -0600

95 lines

Re: Use of Type AR Conformal Coating for Military PCBs

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:50:33 +0100

146 lines

Re: Use of Type AR Conformal Coating for Military PCBs

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:14:48 -0500

173 lines

Re: Use of Type AR Conformal Coating for Military PCBs

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:18:18 -0600

173 lines

Re: Use of Type AR Conformal Coating for Military PCBs

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:25:26 -0500

217 lines

Re: Use of Type AR Conformal Coating for Military PCBs

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:43:55 -0600

262 lines

Re: Use of Type AR Conformal Coating for Military PCBs

Phil Kinner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:39:37 -0000

208 lines

New Thread

UV Bump

UV Bump

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:12:38 -0700

50 lines

Re: UV Bump

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:45:27 -0500

78 lines

Re: UV Bump

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:50:54 -0700

92 lines

Re: UV Bump

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:02:57 -0700

117 lines

Re: UV Bump

Phil Kinner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:10:19 +0100

144 lines

New Thread

Via aspect ratio in mixed dielectric PCB's

Via aspect ratio in mixed dielectric PCB's

Pasquito, Helena <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:38:24 -0400

67 lines

Re: Via aspect ratio in mixed dielectric PCB's

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:59:48 EDT

31 lines

Re: Via aspect ratio in mixed dielectric PCB's

Pasquito, Helena <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:11:07 -0400

69 lines

Re: Via aspect ratio in mixed dielectric PCB's

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:22:10 -0500

91 lines

Re: Via aspect ratio in mixed dielectric PCB's

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:23:49 EDT

39 lines

Re: Via aspect ratio in mixed dielectric PCB's

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:37:03 -0500

117 lines

Re: Via aspect ratio in mixed dielectric PCB's

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:33:52 EDT

38 lines

Re: Via aspect ratio in mixed dielectric PCB's

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:51:23 -0400

105 lines

New Thread

Via in Pad question

Re: Via in Pad question

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:17:59 -0700

186 lines

Re: Via in Pad question

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Mar 2007 06:38:12 -0600

209 lines

New Thread

Weather coating

Weather coating

Mark Eckert <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:24:10 -0600

34 lines

Re: Weather coating

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:57:34 -0700

68 lines

New Thread

weather coatings

weather coatings

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:00:57 -0700

41 lines

Re: weather coatings

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:30:03 -0500

79 lines

Re: weather coatings

Mark Eckert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:58:23 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

Whisker contamination is solder pot

Whisker contamination is solder pot

Jack Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:57:21 -0600

50 lines

Re: Whisker contamination is solder pot

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:54:34 -0400

71 lines

Re: Whisker contamination is solder pot

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:58:44 -0700

107 lines

Re: Whisker contamination is solder pot

Jack Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:04:14 -0600

91 lines

Re: Whisker contamination is solder pot

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:14:50 -0400

116 lines

Re: Whisker contamination is solder pot

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:00:08 -0400

124 lines

Re: Whisker contamination is solder pot

Evans, Jack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:57:04 -0700

85 lines

Re: Whisker contamination is solder pot

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:13:36 -0700

167 lines

New Thread

whodunit?

whodunit?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:39:37 -0500

70 lines

Re: whodunit?

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:44:09 -0500

97 lines

Re: whodunit?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:12:26 -0500

130 lines

Re: whodunit?

Dan Skweres <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:15:56 -0600

97 lines

Re: whodunit?

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 16:13:53 -0000

142 lines

Re: whodunit?

Jim Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:47:00 -0500

112 lines

Re: whodunit?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:48:11 -0600

101 lines

Re: whodunit?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:55:00 EST

36 lines

Re: whodunit?

Kerry McMullen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:17:07 -0500

152 lines

Re: whodunit?

Kolmodin, Todd <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:27:09 -0500

221 lines

Re: whodunit?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:35:10 -0500

185 lines

Re: whodunit?

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:41:04 -0800

134 lines

Re: whodunit?

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:53:48 EST

28 lines

Re: whodunit?

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 12:18:27 -0500

143 lines

Re: whodunit?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:00:23 -0500

71 lines

Re: whodunit?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:08:55 -0500

120 lines

Re: whodunit?

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Mar 2007 19:29:36 +0100

29 lines

Re: whodunit?

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]