LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


January 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(2)Temporary peelable solder masks (3 messages)
3 Step Method to Recognizing a Stroke (NTC) (9 messages)
421-pin Connector Trimming...solved. (3 messages)
<No subject> (1 message)
any idea about standart panel application (3 messages)
Assemble question (16 messages)
Axial component Tape and Reel Machines... (3 messages)
Best ROSE Tester (29 messages)
CAM Software (2 messages)
China RoHS - Integrated Q&A Document by AeA (1 message)
Chip Bonding (3 messages)
Cleaning (16 messages)
Component qualification! (5 messages)
Conformal coated Tantalum Cap - Placement issues? (2 messages)
Contract support for rework/mod (1 message)
Cut sheet laminator (1 message)
Cyberclean Series 6000; Model 7883CCD (1 message)
Descaling of Water Wash Systems (12 messages)
Downloads of Presentations (2 messages)
DRK package (1 message)
Dropped PCB Advice Request (5 messages)
Edge conveyor belts (2 messages)
EMMI Chamber (3 messages)
EU Environmental Product Information report (1 message)
Friday - Article Taiwan Earthquake Paralyzes Asian Communication (7 messages)
FW: test please ignore (5 messages)
FW: [LF] New ASTM Standard Announcement (1 message)
FW: [TN] Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways) (2 messages)
FW: [TN] Temporary peelable solder masks (4 messages)
Heat sensitive components (4 messages)
High Tin Alloys for wave soldering (1 message)
Immersion silver tarnishing (2 messages)
IPC "Solder Joint Microvoiding: How Reliable is Your Information?" webcast in January 2007 (1 message)
IPC 2524 rating sheet (1 message)
IPC upcoming webcast on Solder Joint Microvoiding - 1/25/07 (1 message)
IPC webcast - Chemical Testing Criteria in China - January 24, 2007 (1 message)
IPC webcast - Solder Joint microvoiding: How Reliable is your Information? (1 message)
IPC webcast series on China RoHS (1 message)
IPC workshop - "Compliant Electronics for EU Applications" in Dallas, TX & San Jose, CA (1 message)
IPC-9253 & IPC-9254 (3 messages)
IPC/JEDEC Global Conference on LF Reliability & reliability Testing for RoHS LF Electronics - Boston, MA - April 10-12, 2007 (1 message)
IPC/SOLDERTEC Global Conference on Lead Free Reliability - 28 February 2007, in San Sebastian, Spain (1 message)
IPC/Soldertec Global Conference on Lead Free Reliability in San Sebastian, Spain (1 message)
IPC/SOLDERTEC Global International Conference on Lead Reliability - 28 February 2007, San Sebastian, Spain (1 message)
Is there an OSP finish PCB packaging standard? (2 messages)
Is this CAF? (10 messages)
Lead-Finish Question (5 messages)
Leaded and unleaded BGAs (10 messages)
Manual Visual Inspection of PCB Assemblies (4 messages)
MATTE TIN AND SOLDERABLILITY REQUIREMENTS (3 messages)
Maximum Au lead plating thickness (11 messages)
maximum recommended compression force (3 messages)
Minimum solder reflow temperatures for ENIG board finish (8 messages)
New links added (1 message)
NTC (2 messages)
NTC - RoHS et al (4 messages)
NTC - Strange E-mail bouncebacks from [log in to unmask] (1 message)
NTC - Strange E-mails from ttmtech.com (1 message)
NTC Friday Post... (2 messages)
NTC Strange emails... (14 messages)
Old,old way (5 messages)
panellisation query (5 messages)
PCB FAB Question (Fusion Bonding) (1 message)
PCB's: White spots (7 messages)
Price Per Square inch for production boards (8 messages)
PWB Rework - Adding traces (5 messages)
QFN lead smear (1 message)
Qualification of ROHS Comonents with tin/lead Solder (2 messages)
Qualification of ROHS Components with tin/lead Solder (5 messages)
Question (1 message)
Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways) (13 messages)
Questions on ENIG VS gold plating (4 messages)
REACH question (1 message)
Reflowing different sized BGAs without exceeding manufac turer's p eak body temperatures? (1 message)
Reflowing different sized BGAs without exceeding manufacturer's p eak body temperatures? (3 messages)
Reflowing different sized BGAs without exceeding manufacturer's peak body temperatures? (1 message)
Reliability 6012 Cl2 vs. Cl3 (3 messages)
Resistor Substitutions (5 messages)
Rework of circuit packs with MSL Parts (9 messages)
ROSE test (1 message)
Round 6 exemption requests - RoHS (1 message)
salt water spray and flex coverlays (1 message)
SELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE (3 messages)
SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE (10 messages)
SMD Capacitor Shear Strength (24 messages)
SMT equipment comparison (5 messages)
SMT Jumpers? (2 messages)
Sn63 or Sn62 (4 messages)
SnPb HASL min thickness (2 messages)
Solder Designations (5 messages)
Soldering to Pt/Ag component terminations. (3 messages)
Soldering to Pt/Ag conponent terminations. (2 messages)
Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A (12 messages)
Spacing Requirement for Adjacent PFP pads carrying 70V (1 message)
standart panel application (3 messages)
State of Being Peter Pan (2 messages)
TECHNET article (1 message)
TECHNET article. (1 message)
Temporary peelable solder masks (19 messages)
test disregard (1 message)
test please ignore-ga (1 message)
Test Technician's Friday Surprise! (7 messages)
The 5th International Conference on Design and Manufacture for Sustainable Development - abstract deadline extended (1 message)
The Peter Pan Priciple (3 messages)
Tin-whisker mitigation for tin-plated bus bars (1 message)
tombstoning of 0508 ceramic capacitors (6 messages)
Underfiller for space appliaction/Solithane stress (1 message)
Upcoming IPC webcast series on Implementing China RoHS & Chemical Testing Criteria (1 message)
Very special PCB (1 message)
VOC free legislation for fluxes (5 messages)
VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC (15 messages)
WHMA-A-602 (5 messages)
[LF] NTC China RoHS EFUP calculation? (1 message)
[LF] State of Being Peter Pan (1 message)
[NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise! (10 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

(2)Temporary peelable solder masks

Re: (2)Temporary peelable solder masks

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 07:41:11 -0800

433 lines

Re: (2)Temporary peelable solder masks

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:48:40 -0500

121 lines

Re: (2)Temporary peelable solder masks

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:11:40 -0800

171 lines

New Thread

3 Step Method to Recognizing a Stroke (NTC)

3 Step Method to Recognizing a Stroke (NTC)

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:04:51 EST

75 lines

Re: 3 Step Method to Recognizing a Stroke (NTC)

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:39:39 +0200

157 lines

Re: 3 Step Method to Recognizing a Stroke (NTC)

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:34:23 -0500

184 lines

Re: 3 Step Method to Recognizing a Stroke (NTC)

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:15:46 -0000

215 lines

Re: 3 Step Method to Recognizing a Stroke (NTC)

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:28:34 -0500

221 lines

Re: 3 Step Method to Recognizing a Stroke (NTC)

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:55:38 EST

37 lines

Re: 3 Step Method to Recognizing a Stroke (NTC)

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:21:23 -0500

73 lines

Re: 3 Step Method to Recognizing a Stroke (NTC)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:14:46 -0600

98 lines

Re: 3 Step Method to Recognizing a Stroke (NTC)

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:18:56 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

421-pin Connector Trimming...solved.

421-pin Connector Trimming...solved.

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:09:33 -0600

51 lines

Re: 421-pin Connector Trimming...solved.

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:41:58 -0600

77 lines

Re: 421-pin Connector Trimming...solved.

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:45:04 -0600

76 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

ZLATKO BIJEDIC <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:41:45 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

any idea about standart panel application

any idea about standart panel application

Ali Koca <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:52:57 +0200

53 lines

Re: any idea about standart panel application

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:00:00 -0600

88 lines

Re: any idea about standart panel application

David Duross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:24:45 -0500

99 lines

New Thread

Assemble question

Assemble question

Bill Dworak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:01:23 -0800

67 lines

Re: Assemble question

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:19:54 -0500

91 lines

Re: Assemble question

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:22:43 -0600

95 lines

Re: Assemble question

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:27:57 -0600

110 lines

Re: Assemble question

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:31:26 -0500

126 lines

Re: Assemble question

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:29:30 -0500

112 lines

Re: Assemble question

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:26:21 -0500

137 lines

Re: Assemble question

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:49:48 -0500

183 lines

Re: Assemble question

Bill Dworak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:57:51 -0800

156 lines

Re: Assemble question

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:11:05 -0500

192 lines

Re: Assemble question

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:15:21 -0600

211 lines

Re: Assemble question

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:21:31 -0500

222 lines

Re: Assemble question

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:43:23 -0500

231 lines

Re: Assemble question

Wolfe, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:38:29 -0500

257 lines

Re: Assemble question

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:06:14 -0500

221 lines

Re: Assemble question

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:59:11 -0500

247 lines

New Thread

Axial component Tape and Reel Machines...

Axial component Tape and Reel Machines...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:01:31 -0600

48 lines

Re: Axial component Tape and Reel Machines...

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:40:08 -0600

76 lines

Re: Axial component Tape and Reel Machines...

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:57:57 -0500

84 lines

New Thread

Best ROSE Tester

Best ROSE Tester

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:16:30 -0800

32 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:02:02 -0500

67 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Joel Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:47:31 -0500

115 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:02:42 EST

25 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:08:29 -0800

74 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:09:21 -0800

37 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Joe Russeau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:36:22 -0500

69 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:17:51 -0500

164 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:52:32 -0600

194 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:14:35 -0600

59 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:33:17 -0800

100 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:08:16 EST

26 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:25:04 -0600

50 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:35:27 -0800

46 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:19:48 -0500

102 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:46:25 -0500

118 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:48:52 EST

24 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:23:26 -0600

48 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:43:07 +0200

147 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:36:44 -0500

215 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:38:45 +0200

259 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:11:59 +0000

275 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 07:16:33 -0600

301 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:07:09 -0600

25 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:31:36 -0600

49 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Burtt, Nigel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:48:05 -0000

48 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:40:09 -0700

77 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:59:37 -0800

117 lines

Re: Best ROSE Tester

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:08:19 -0500

151 lines

New Thread

CAM Software

CAM Software

arnaud grivon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:51:52 +0100

31 lines

Re: CAM Software

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:36:35 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

China RoHS - Integrated Q&A Document by AeA

China RoHS - Integrated Q&A Document by AeA

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:32:04 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Chip Bonding

Chip Bonding

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:57:00 -0600

32 lines

Re: Chip Bonding

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:19:24 -0600

59 lines

Re: Chip Bonding

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:11:38 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

Cleaning

Cleaning

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:39:19 -0000

55 lines

Re: Cleaning

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:54:59 -0800

87 lines

Re: Cleaning

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:33:09 -0000

111 lines

Re: Cleaning

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:39:36 -0600

82 lines

Re: Cleaning

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:43:05 +0200

75 lines

Re: Cleaning

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:01:59 -0800

117 lines

Re: Cleaning

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:05:45 -0700

157 lines

Re: Cleaning

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:12:16 -0500

174 lines

Re: Cleaning

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:18:08 -0500

72 lines

Re: Cleaning

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:17:16 -0500

133 lines

Re: Cleaning

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:44:56 -0600

198 lines

Re: Cleaning

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:51:11 -0600

98 lines

Re: Cleaning

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:42:46 -0600

126 lines

Re: Cleaning

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:57:53 -0500

181 lines

Re: Cleaning

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:17:50 -0600

211 lines

Re: Cleaning

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:29:17 -0500

233 lines

New Thread

Component qualification!

Component qualification!

Braddock, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:52:54 -0000

49 lines

Re: Component qualification!

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:34:01 EST

28 lines

Re: Component qualification!

Braddock, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:33:17 -0000

69 lines

Re: Component qualification!

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:42:25 EST

30 lines

Re: Component qualification!

Braddock, Iain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 17:58:05 -0000

35 lines

New Thread

Conformal coated Tantalum Cap - Placement issues?

Conformal coated Tantalum Cap - Placement issues?

Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:38:26 -0800

30 lines

Re: Conformal coated Tantalum Cap - Placement issues?

Tan, Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:46:21 +0800

57 lines

New Thread

Contract support for rework/mod

Contract support for rework/mod

Kevin Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:32:32 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

Cut sheet laminator

Cut sheet laminator

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:35:04 -0000

63 lines

New Thread

Cyberclean Series 6000; Model 7883CCD

Cyberclean Series 6000; Model 7883CCD

Dan Mauro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:58:36 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Descaling of Water Wash Systems

Descaling of Water Wash Systems

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:23:57 -0600

29 lines

Re: Descaling of Water Wash Systems

Dee Stover <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:51:59 -0700

54 lines

Re: Descaling of Water Wash Systems

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:58:20 -0600

70 lines

Re: Descaling of Water Wash Systems

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:04:31 -0800

103 lines

Re: Descaling of Water Wash Systems

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:23:01 -0500

88 lines

Re: Descaling of Water Wash Systems

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:32:14 -0600

69 lines

Re: Descaling of Water Wash Systems

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:43:13 -0800

97 lines

Re: Descaling of Water Wash Systems

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:31:11 -0800

94 lines

Re: Descaling of Water Wash Systems

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:56:42 +0200

60 lines

Re: Descaling of Water Wash Systems

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:23:39 -0500

94 lines

Re: Descaling of Water Wash Systems

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:50:49 +0200

132 lines

Re: Descaling of Water Wash Systems

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:28:38 -0600

56 lines

New Thread

Downloads of Presentations

Downloads of Presentations

Terry Kozlyk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:02:06 -0700

57 lines

Re: Downloads of Presentations

Gary Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:21:44 -0700

92 lines

New Thread

DRK package

Re: DRK package

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jan 2007 08:40:57 -0600

131 lines

New Thread

Dropped PCB Advice Request

Dropped PCB Advice Request

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:10:33 -0500

38 lines

Re: Dropped PCB Advice Request

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:22:58 -0800

61 lines

Re: Dropped PCB Advice Request

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:27:52 -0600

86 lines

Re: Dropped PCB Advice Request

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:34:57 -0500

98 lines

Re: Dropped PCB Advice Request

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:46:00 -0500

120 lines

New Thread

Edge conveyor belts

Edge conveyor belts

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:20:02 -0600

28 lines

Re: Edge conveyor belts

Martin Butcher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:39:25 -0800

50 lines

New Thread

EMMI Chamber

EMMI Chamber

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:58:03 -0600

30 lines

Re: EMMI Chamber

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:31:32 -0800

64 lines

Re: EMMI Chamber

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:00:27 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

EU Environmental Product Information report

EU Environmental Product Information report

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:18:52 -0800

68 lines

New Thread

Friday - Article Taiwan Earthquake Paralyzes Asian Communication

Friday - Article Taiwan Earthquake Paralyzes Asian Communication

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:25:07 -0500

104 lines

Re: Friday - Article Taiwan Earthquake Paralyzes Asian Communication

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:32:13 -0600

132 lines

Re: Friday - Article Taiwan Earthquake Paralyzes Asian Communication

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:19:02 -0800

154 lines

Re: Friday - Article Taiwan Earthquake Paralyzes Asian Communication

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:34:43 -0500

127 lines

Re: Friday - Article Taiwan Earthquake Paralyzes Asian Communication

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:53:32 EST

36 lines

Re: Friday - Article Taiwan Earthquake Paralyzes Asian Communication

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:10:32 +0200

104 lines

Re: Friday - Article Taiwan Earthquake Paralyzes Asian Communication

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:25:52 -0800

111 lines

New Thread

FW: test please ignore

FW: test please ignore

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:35:03 -0800

40 lines

Re: FW: test please ignore

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:00:26 -0800

29 lines

Re: FW: test please ignore

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:47:29 EST

39 lines

Re: FW: test please ignore

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:24:20 -0600

64 lines

Re: FW: test please ignore

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:25:18 EST

36 lines

New Thread

FW: [LF] New ASTM Standard Announcement

FW: [LF] New ASTM Standard Announcement

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 13:11:52 -0800

96 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

FW: [TN] Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:38:02 -0600

160 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:07:54 -0600

186 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Temporary peelable solder masks

FW: [TN] Temporary peelable solder masks

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 09:47:42 -0600

349 lines

FW: [TN] Temporary peelable solder masks

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:53:15 -0600

393 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Temporary peelable solder masks

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:57:32 -0000

435 lines

Re: FW: [TN] Temporary peelable solder masks

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:00:38 -0600

458 lines

New Thread

Heat sensitive components

Heat sensitive components

Dominic Boudreau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:57:38 -0500

42 lines

Re: Heat sensitive components

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:24:42 -0600

79 lines

Re: Heat sensitive components

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:28:02 -0700

82 lines

Re: Heat sensitive components

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 06:41:38 -0800

71 lines

New Thread

High Tin Alloys for wave soldering

High Tin Alloys for wave soldering

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:34:49 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Immersion silver tarnishing

Immersion silver tarnishing

Dominic Boudreau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:50:15 -0500

61 lines

Re: Immersion silver tarnishing

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:06:19 -0600

93 lines

New Thread

IPC "Solder Joint Microvoiding: How Reliable is Your Information?" webcast in January 2007

Re: IPC "Solder Joint Microvoiding: How Reliable is Your Information?" webcast in January 2007

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:15:51 -0500

106 lines

New Thread

IPC 2524 rating sheet

IPC 2524 rating sheet

mickey weiner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:55:05 +0200

64 lines

New Thread

IPC upcoming webcast on Solder Joint Microvoiding - 1/25/07

IPC upcoming webcast on Solder Joint Microvoiding - 1/25/07

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:14:10 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

IPC webcast - Chemical Testing Criteria in China - January 24, 2007

IPC webcast - Chemical Testing Criteria in China - January 24, 2007

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:55:12 -0600

64 lines

New Thread

IPC webcast - Solder Joint microvoiding: How Reliable is your Information?

IPC webcast - Solder Joint microvoiding: How Reliable is your Information?

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:48:53 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

IPC webcast series on China RoHS

IPC webcast series on China RoHS

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:15:36 -0600

61 lines

New Thread

IPC workshop - "Compliant Electronics for EU Applications" in Dallas, TX & San Jose, CA

IPC workshop - "Compliant Electronics for EU Applications" in Dallas, TX & San Jose, CA

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:53:57 -0600

55 lines

New Thread

IPC-9253 & IPC-9254

IPC-9253 & IPC-9254

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:02:47 -0500

44 lines

Re: IPC-9253 & IPC-9254

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:44:16 -0500

92 lines

Re: IPC-9253 & IPC-9254

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:43:20 -0500

122 lines

New Thread

IPC/JEDEC Global Conference on LF Reliability & reliability Testing for RoHS LF Electronics - Boston, MA - April 10-12, 2007

IPC/JEDEC Global Conference on LF Reliability & reliability Testing for RoHS LF Electronics - Boston, MA - April 10-12, 2007

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:02:59 -0600

49 lines

New Thread

IPC/SOLDERTEC Global Conference on Lead Free Reliability - 28 February 2007, in San Sebastian, Spain

IPC/SOLDERTEC Global Conference on Lead Free Reliability - 28 February 2007, in San Sebastian, Spain

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:59:22 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

IPC/Soldertec Global Conference on Lead Free Reliability in San Sebastian, Spain

IPC/Soldertec Global Conference on Lead Free Reliability in San Sebastian, Spain

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:45:29 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

IPC/SOLDERTEC Global International Conference on Lead Reliability - 28 February 2007, San Sebastian, Spain

IPC/SOLDERTEC Global International Conference on Lead Reliability - 28 February 2007, San Sebastian, Spain

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:05:24 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

Is there an OSP finish PCB packaging standard?

Is there an OSP finish PCB packaging standard?

Nilesh Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:24:25 -0500

36 lines

Re: Is there an OSP finish PCB packaging standard?

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:45:41 EST

43 lines

New Thread

Is this CAF?

Is this CAF?

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:26:15 -0500

46 lines

Re: Is this CAF?

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:33:31 -0800

79 lines

Re: Is this CAF?

David Duross <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:44:35 -0600

68 lines

Re: Is this CAF?

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:13:33 -0600

63 lines

Re: Is this CAF?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:57:03 -0500

87 lines

Re: Is this CAF?

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:01:54 -0500

115 lines

Re: Is this CAF?

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:10:17 -0500

88 lines

Re: Is this CAF?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:08:54 -0500

123 lines

Re: Is this CAF?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:40:33 -0500

71 lines

Re: Is this CAF?

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:52:36 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

Lead-Finish Question

Lead-Finish Question

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:24:46 -0800

37 lines

Re: Lead-Finish Question

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:34:48 -0800

72 lines

Re: Lead-Finish Question

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:15:01 -0500

94 lines

Re: Lead-Finish Question

Charles Dennehy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:14:28 -0500

68 lines

Re: Lead-Finish Question

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:03:42 -0500

106 lines

New Thread

Leaded and unleaded BGAs

Leaded and unleaded BGAs

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:20:02 -0800

34 lines

Re: Leaded and unleaded BGAs

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:05:38 EST

29 lines

Re: Leaded and unleaded BGAs

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:12:29 -0800

36 lines

Re: Leaded and unleaded BGAs

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:15:07 EST

27 lines

Re: Leaded and unleaded BGAs

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:48:22 -0600

62 lines

Re: Leaded and unleaded BGAs

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:17:15 -0800

113 lines

Re: Leaded and unleaded BGAs

Christopher Nash <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:28:07 -0500

155 lines

Re: Leaded and unleaded BGAs

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:32:43 -0500

214 lines

Re: Leaded and unleaded BGAs

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:46:33 -0500

63 lines

Re: Leaded and unleaded BGAs

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:02:10 -0600

206 lines

New Thread

Manual Visual Inspection of PCB Assemblies

Manual Visual Inspection of PCB Assemblies

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 03:35:01 -0800

36 lines

Re: Manual Visual Inspection of PCB Assemblies

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 07:22:50 -0600

83 lines

Re: Manual Visual Inspection of PCB Assemblies

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:51:50 EST

33 lines

Re: Manual Visual Inspection of PCB Assemblies

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:26:38 -0800

59 lines

New Thread

MATTE TIN AND SOLDERABLILITY REQUIREMENTS

MATTE TIN AND SOLDERABLILITY REQUIREMENTS

Jon Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:12:50 -0600

30 lines

Re: MATTE TIN AND SOLDERABLILITY REQUIREMENTS

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:22:27 -0000

77 lines

Re: MATTE TIN AND SOLDERABLILITY REQUIREMENTS

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:26:26 -0600

84 lines

New Thread

Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Karen Walters Ebner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:01:13 -0600

27 lines

Re: Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:31:33 -0500

80 lines

Re: Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:57:39 -0600

104 lines

Re: Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Louis, Edwin @ CSE <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:25:52 -0500

109 lines

Re: Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:19 -0600

130 lines

Re: Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:41 -0600

132 lines

Re: Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Sauer, Steve (Xetron) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:53:50 -0500

105 lines

Re: Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:05:15 -0600

164 lines

Re: Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Karen Ebner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:16:07 -0500

149 lines

Re: Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:18:16 -0600

130 lines

Re: Maximum Au lead plating thickness

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:56:58 EST

36 lines

New Thread

maximum recommended compression force

maximum recommended compression force

Dharma Kemp-Bresett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:24:18 -0500

59 lines

Re: maximum recommended compression force

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:28:43 -0800

89 lines

Re: maximum recommended compression force

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:43:34 -0600

191 lines

New Thread

Minimum solder reflow temperatures for ENIG board finish

Minimum solder reflow temperatures for ENIG board finish

Gervascio, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:05:17 -0500

33 lines

Re: Minimum solder reflow temperatures for ENIG board finish

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:19:30 -0600

65 lines

Re: Minimum solder reflow temperatures for ENIG board finish

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:08:54 -0500

126 lines

Re: Minimum solder reflow temperatures for ENIG board finish

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:13:35 EST

27 lines

Re: Minimum solder reflow temperatures for ENIG board finish

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:22:18 EST

30 lines

Re: Minimum solder reflow temperatures for ENIG board finish

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:48:17 -0600

43 lines

Re: Minimum solder reflow temperatures for ENIG board finish

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:32:46 EST

23 lines

Re: Minimum solder reflow temperatures for ENIG board finish

Gervascio, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:43:33 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

New links added

New links added

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:26:50 -0800

42 lines

New Thread

NTC

NTC

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:50:02 -0500

23 lines

Re: NTC

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:55:24 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

NTC - RoHS et al

NTC - RoHS et al

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:06:50 -0800

49 lines

Re: NTC - RoHS et al

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:35:08 -0800

80 lines

Re: NTC - RoHS et al

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:15:10 -0800

109 lines

Re: NTC - RoHS et al

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:30:04 -0600

144 lines

New Thread

NTC - Strange E-mail bouncebacks from [log in to unmask]

NTC - Strange E-mail bouncebacks from [log in to unmask]

Keach Sasamori <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 16:07:44 -0600

35 lines

New Thread

NTC - Strange E-mails from ttmtech.com

NTC - Strange E-mails from ttmtech.com

Keach Sasamori <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:25:33 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday Post...

NTC Friday Post...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:41:57 -0600

45 lines

NTC Friday Post...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:13:58 -0600

35 lines

New Thread

NTC Strange emails...

NTC Strange emails...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:00:36 -0600

39 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:03:10 -0500

83 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:09:29 -0500

71 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:10:21 -0800

71 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:17:53 -0500

65 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:15:49 -0600

64 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

Kerry McMullen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:24:22 -0500

110 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:36:30 EST

32 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:26:04 EST

38 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:28:23 -0600

67 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:55:58 -0500

67 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:06:03 -0500

92 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:12:54 -0500

125 lines

Re: NTC Strange emails...

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jan 2007 12:02:31 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

Old,old way

Old,old way

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:51:49 EST

27 lines

Re: Old,old way

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:00:36 -0500

59 lines

Re: Old,old way

Karl Hunsinger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:06:23 -0500

60 lines

Re: Old,old way

Dan Skweres <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:40:21 -0600

57 lines

Re: Old,old way

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:18:45 -0800

61 lines

New Thread

panellisation query

panellisation query

pras chop <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:19:08 +0000

44 lines

Re: panellisation query

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:51:33 -0600

134 lines

Re: panellisation query

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:09:09 -0500

161 lines

Re: panellisation query

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:58:55 -0600

162 lines

Re: panellisation query

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:13:50 -0500

93 lines

New Thread

PCB FAB Question (Fusion Bonding)

PCB FAB Question (Fusion Bonding)

Frank Kimmey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:04:34 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

PCB's: White spots

PCB's: White spots

Juan T. Marugán <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:06:32 -0600

35 lines

Re: PCB's: White spots

Juan T. Marugán <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:18:26 -0600

24 lines

Re: PCB's: White spots

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:51:03 -0600

48 lines

Re: PCB's: White spots

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:06:22 -0600

73 lines

Re: PCB's: White spots

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:03:35 -0000

115 lines

Re: PCB's: White spots

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:54:49 -0500

64 lines

Re: PCB's: White spots

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:07:18 -0700

100 lines

New Thread

Price Per Square inch for production boards

Price Per Square inch for production boards

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:12:00 -0800

35 lines

Re: Price Per Square inch for production boards

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:25:51 EST

33 lines

Re: Price Per Square inch for production boards

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:12:29 -0800

73 lines

Re: Price Per Square inch for production boards

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:35:26 -0800

100 lines

Re: Price Per Square inch for production boards

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:44:24 -0500

165 lines

Re: Price Per Square inch for production boards

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:58:55 -0600

216 lines

Re: Price Per Square inch for production boards

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:02:24 -0500

116 lines

Re: Price Per Square inch for production boards

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:06:18 -0800

132 lines

New Thread

PWB Rework - Adding traces

PWB Rework - Adding traces

Kevin Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:39:13 -0600

51 lines

Re: PWB Rework - Adding traces

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:53:06 -0500

110 lines

Re: PWB Rework - Adding traces

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:57:43 -0500

105 lines

Re: PWB Rework - Adding traces

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:34:08 -0500

97 lines

Re: PWB Rework - Adding traces

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:40:44 -0600

81 lines

New Thread

QFN lead smear

QFN lead smear

Eli Dallal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:04:14 +0200

63 lines

New Thread

Qualification of ROHS Comonents with tin/lead Solder

Qualification of ROHS Comonents with tin/lead Solder

Donald Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 08:54:52 -0600

27 lines

Re: Qualification of ROHS Comonents with tin/lead Solder

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 03:22:46 -0600

47 lines

New Thread

Qualification of ROHS Components with tin/lead Solder

Re: Qualification of ROHS Components with tin/lead Solder

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:08:24 -0800

66 lines

Re: Qualification of ROHS Components with tin/lead Solder

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:35:36 -0600

104 lines

Re: Qualification of ROHS Components with tin/lead Solder

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:01:13 -0600

29 lines

Re: Qualification of ROHS Components with tin/lead Solder

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:28:23 -0800

96 lines

Re: Qualification of ROHS Components with tin/lead Solder

Burtt, Nigel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:58:59 -0000

76 lines

New Thread

Question

Question

kwood716 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:35:47 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Joel Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:03:57 -0500

38 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:13:33 -0600

74 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:19:56 -0500

80 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:16:23 -0600

31 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:45:55 -0500

82 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Eddie Rocha <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:49:48 -0700

67 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:25:30 -0500

99 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:34:10 -0600

128 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:17:45 EST

27 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:11:35 -0500

172 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:14:27 -0600

202 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 06:05:13 -0600

234 lines

Re: Question about cracker holes (panel breakaways)

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:46:06 -0500

269 lines

New Thread

Questions on ENIG VS gold plating

Re: Questions on ENIG VS gold plating

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jan 2007 07:46:45 -0600

223 lines

Re: Questions on ENIG VS gold plating

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jan 2007 08:52:53 -0500

269 lines

Re: Questions on ENIG VS gold plating

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:42:31 -0500

308 lines

Re: Questions on ENIG VS gold plating

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:44:06 EST

25 lines

New Thread

REACH question

REACH question

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:40:40 -0800

55 lines

New Thread

Reflowing different sized BGAs without exceeding manufac turer's p eak body temperatures?

Re: Reflowing different sized BGAs without exceeding manufac turer's p eak body temperatures?

Martin Butcher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:35:45 -0800

124 lines

New Thread

Reflowing different sized BGAs without exceeding manufacturer's p eak body temperatures?

Reflowing different sized BGAs without exceeding manufacturer's p eak body temperatures?

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:20:32 -0800

51 lines

Re: Reflowing different sized BGAs without exceeding manufacturer's p eak body temperatures?

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:54:57 -0800

94 lines

Re: Reflowing different sized BGAs without exceeding manufacturer's p eak body temperatures?

Christopher Nash <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 00:36:09 -0500

90 lines

New Thread

Reflowing different sized BGAs without exceeding manufacturer's peak body temperatures?

Re: Reflowing different sized BGAs without exceeding manufacturer's peak body temperatures?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:39:14 -0500

112 lines

New Thread

Reliability 6012 Cl2 vs. Cl3

Reliability 6012 Cl2 vs. Cl3

Jay Otts <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jan 2007 14:23:57 -0600

41 lines

Re: Reliability 6012 Cl2 vs. Cl3

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Jan 2007 18:37:44 -0500

85 lines

Re: Reliability 6012 Cl2 vs. Cl3

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:23:34 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

Resistor Substitutions

Resistor Substitutions

ekalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:40:39 -0500

53 lines

Re: Resistor Substitutions

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:52:50 -0600

89 lines

Re: Resistor Substitutions

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:02:24 -0600

143 lines

Re: Resistor Substitutions

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:51:44 -0500

170 lines

Re: Resistor Substitutions

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:51:31 -0500

109 lines

New Thread

Rework of circuit packs with MSL Parts

Rework of circuit packs with MSL Parts

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:22:54 -0500

50 lines

Re: Rework of circuit packs with MSL Parts

Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:27:00 +0200

83 lines

Re: Rework of circuit packs with MSL Parts

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:35:56 -0500

124 lines

Re: Rework of circuit packs with MSL Parts

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 07:45:00 -0600

91 lines

Re: Rework of circuit packs with MSL Parts

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:48:13 -0500

121 lines

Re: Rework of circuit packs with MSL Parts

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:01:51 -0600

147 lines

Re: Rework of circuit packs with MSL Parts

Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:13:17 -0600

107 lines

Re: Rework of circuit packs with MSL Parts

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:15:03 -0600

155 lines

Re: Rework of circuit packs with MSL Parts

Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:18:36 -0600

113 lines

New Thread

ROSE test

ROSE test

Drew meyer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:05:02 -0600

56 lines

New Thread

Round 6 exemption requests - RoHS

Round 6 exemption requests - RoHS

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:04:02 -0800

52 lines

New Thread

salt water spray and flex coverlays

salt water spray and flex coverlays

Ivan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:29:35 +0200

34 lines

New Thread

SELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

SELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Jon Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:51:05 -0600

34 lines

Re: SELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:26:40 -0500

60 lines

Re: SELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

ekalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:28:11 -0500

76 lines

New Thread

SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Re: SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:41:45 -0500

85 lines

Re: SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Roberts, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:02:14 -0600

120 lines

Re: SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:41:22 -0600

169 lines

Re: SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Roberts, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:04:03 -0600

181 lines

Re: SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:24:41 -0600

219 lines

Re: SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:55:08 -0500

206 lines

Re: SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:29:14 -0600

234 lines

Re: SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Roberts, Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:44:21 -0600

230 lines

SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Frederick Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:27:05 -0500

274 lines

Re: SHELF LIFE OF STRANDED WIRE

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:44:04 -0500

204 lines

New Thread

SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Todd, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:03:56 -0500

55 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:30:22 -0800

97 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:37:23 EST

77 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:20:29 -0500

110 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Todd, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:22:34 -0500

122 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:47:16 -0500

159 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Todd, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:45:44 -0500

310 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Jerry Dengler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:56:51 -0500

162 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

David Duross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:01:50 -0500

100 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:05:04 -0500

205 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:06:53 -0500

336 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:17:56 -0500

99 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:32:21 -0800

397 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:56:26 -0500

421 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:53:52 -0600

114 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:07:04 -0500

114 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 08:11:19 -0600

173 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:12:49 -0500

142 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:14:26 -0500

138 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:52:25 -0600

154 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:02:14 -0600

168 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:11:01 -0500

194 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:25:58 -0800

228 lines

Re: SMD Capacitor Shear Strength

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:01:03 -0600

222 lines

New Thread

SMT equipment comparison

SMT equipment comparison

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:58:05 -0500

38 lines

Re: SMT equipment comparison

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:47:11 -0600

68 lines

Re: SMT equipment comparison

Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:52:47 -0500

104 lines

Re: SMT equipment comparison

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:20:32 -0000

72 lines

Re: SMT equipment comparison

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:04:06 -0500

107 lines

New Thread

SMT Jumpers?

SMT Jumpers?

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:56:47 -0800

37 lines

Re: SMT Jumpers?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:04:14 -0600

69 lines

New Thread

Sn63 or Sn62

Sn63 or Sn62

Zilber Gil <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:02:16 +0200

46 lines

Re: Sn63 or Sn62

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:22:04 -0000

87 lines

Re: Sn63 or Sn62

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:04:13 -0600

72 lines

Re: Sn63 or Sn62

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:13:47 -0600

79 lines

New Thread

SnPb HASL min thickness

SnPb HASL min thickness

James Verrette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:55:33 -0500

41 lines

Re: SnPb HASL min thickness

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:16:42 -0600

66 lines

New Thread

Solder Designations

Solder Designations

Gregg A. Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:29:13 -0800

40 lines

Re: Solder Designations

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:43:16 -0600

65 lines

Re: Solder Designations

ekalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:50:58 -0500

79 lines

Re: Solder Designations

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:01:07 -0500

84 lines

Re: Solder Designations

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:05:58 -0600

101 lines

New Thread

Soldering to Pt/Ag component terminations.

Re: Soldering to Pt/Ag component terminations.

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:02:46 -0500

71 lines

Re: Soldering to Pt/Ag component terminations.

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:53:20 -0500

158 lines

Re: Soldering to Pt/Ag component terminations.

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:33:14 -0600

118 lines

New Thread

Soldering to Pt/Ag conponent terminations.

Soldering to Pt/Ag conponent terminations.

Peter Barton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:18:00 +0000

54 lines

Re: Soldering to Pt/Ag conponent terminations.

P. Langeveld <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:01:58 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

Andrew Clifford <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:04:24 -0600

57 lines

Re: Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:06:07 -0500

76 lines

Re: Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:10:54 EST

53 lines

Re: Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

Clifford, Andrew (UK) <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:17:22 -0000

116 lines

Re: Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

arnaud grivon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:02:14 +0100

118 lines

Re: Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:45:03 -0500

101 lines

Re: Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:14:43 -0500

159 lines

Re: Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

David Greig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:44:40 -0000

128 lines

Re: Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:56:27 -0500

128 lines

Re: Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:58:49 -0500

190 lines

Re: Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

David Greig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:06:07 -0000

191 lines

Re: Soldermask Types implied in IPC-D-325A

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:21:11 EST

28 lines

New Thread

Spacing Requirement for Adjacent PFP pads carrying 70V

Spacing Requirement for Adjacent PFP pads carrying 70V

valerie St. Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:37:17 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

standart panel application

standart panel application

Ali Koca <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:26:38 +0200

38 lines

standart panel application

Ali Koca <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:37:33 +0200

42 lines

standart panel application

Ali Koca <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:16:31 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

State of Being Peter Pan

State of Being Peter Pan

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:50:46 -0700

78 lines

Re: State of Being Peter Pan

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:21:43 -0800

128 lines

New Thread

TECHNET article

Re: TECHNET article

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:05:31 EST

80 lines

New Thread

TECHNET article.

TECHNET article.

David Duross <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Jan 2007 14:28:24 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

Temporary peelable solder masks

Temporary peelable solder masks

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 03:27:24 -0600

35 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:36:34 -0000

82 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Burtt, Nigel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:43:45 -0000

86 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:18:15 -0500

155 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 08:25:47 -0800

190 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:39:41 -0000

231 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:26:09 -0500

259 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:29:17 -0500

167 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:05:31 EST

23 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:18:20 -0500

139 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 01:40:43 EST

30 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:42:56 -0000

243 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 07:47:18 -0600

43 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 08:23:52 -0600

277 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

N Burtt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 08:32:57 -0600

26 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 09:57:22 -0500

357 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 09:44:29 -0600

343 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:26:09 -0000

365 lines

Re: Temporary peelable solder masks

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:34:08 -0500

396 lines

New Thread

test disregard

test disregard

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:27:02 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

test please ignore-ga

test please ignore-ga

Tan, Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:51:46 +0800

24 lines

New Thread

Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:29:46 -0600

40 lines

Re: Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:36:22 -0800

76 lines

Re: Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:50:05 -0800

57 lines

Re: Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:12:02 -0800

64 lines

Re: Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:24:44 -0700

68 lines

Re: Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:10:59 -0500

106 lines

Re: Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Hernefjord Ingemar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:27:14 +0100

76 lines

New Thread

The 5th International Conference on Design and Manufacture for Sustainable Development - abstract deadline extended

Re: The 5th International Conference on Design and Manufacture for Sustainable Development - abstract deadline extended

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 08:54:28 -0800

160 lines

New Thread

The Peter Pan Priciple

The Peter Pan Priciple

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:20:55 EST

39 lines

Re: The Peter Pan Priciple

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:53:03 -0500

70 lines

Re: The Peter Pan Priciple

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:17:07 -0500

104 lines

New Thread

Tin-whisker mitigation for tin-plated bus bars

Tin-whisker mitigation for tin-plated bus bars

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 05:06:45 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

tombstoning of 0508 ceramic capacitors

tombstoning of 0508 ceramic capacitors

Royce Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:03:46 -0500

46 lines

Re: tombstoning of 0508 ceramic capacitors

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:23:49 -0500

78 lines

Re: tombstoning of 0508 ceramic capacitors

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:28:30 EST

28 lines

Re: tombstoning of 0508 ceramic capacitors

Christopher Nash <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:57:53 -0500

108 lines

Re: tombstoning of 0508 ceramic capacitors

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:29:45 -0800

46 lines

Re: tombstoning of 0508 ceramic capacitors

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:39:15 -0500

106 lines

New Thread

Underfiller for space appliaction/Solithane stress

Underfiller for space appliaction/Solithane stress

Zilber Gil <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:01:45 +0200

47 lines

New Thread

Upcoming IPC webcast series on Implementing China RoHS & Chemical Testing Criteria

Upcoming IPC webcast series on Implementing China RoHS & Chemical Testing Criteria

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 13:31:47 -0600

64 lines

New Thread

Very special PCB

Very special PCB

Sherif Refaat <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:45:50 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

VOC free legislation for fluxes

VOC free legislation for fluxes

Douglas McCall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:27:25 +0000

46 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:58:27 -0600

77 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:23:35 +0000

108 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:12:00 +0200

66 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:28:11 -0000

169 lines

New Thread

VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:50:02 -0600

113 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:52:55 +0000

180 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 07:12:47 -0600

203 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:18:43 -0500

264 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:20:44 -0500

303 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:32:47 +0200

206 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:35:00 -0500

225 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:04:24 -0500

196 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:59:10 +0000

272 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:20:44 -0800

304 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Barmuta, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:34:44 -0800

412 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:23:27 -0600

491 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:21:54 -0500

348 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:59:02 -0600

380 lines

Re: VOC free legislation for fluxes - NTC

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:44:05 -0600

386 lines

New Thread

WHMA-A-602

WHMA-A-602

Diamond, Pat <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:31:52 -0000

55 lines

Re: WHMA-A-602

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:49:35 -0600

86 lines

Re: WHMA-A-602

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:53:31 -0600

92 lines

Re: WHMA-A-602

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:50:22 -0500

144 lines

Re: WHMA-A-602

Diamond, Pat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:45:06 -0000

169 lines

New Thread

[LF] NTC China RoHS EFUP calculation?

Re: [LF] NTC China RoHS EFUP calculation?

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:05:00 -0800

77 lines

New Thread

[LF] State of Being Peter Pan

Re: [LF] State of Being Peter Pan

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:31:48 -0700

164 lines

New Thread

[NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Re: [NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:39:27 -0600

75 lines

Re: [NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Craig Cullum <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:39:59 -0600

122 lines

Re: [NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:44:38 -0600

148 lines

Re: [NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:54:12 -0600

100 lines

Re: [NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:57:03 -0500

201 lines

Re: [NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:20:46 -0600

158 lines

Re: [NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:32:10 EST

26 lines

Re: [NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Gary Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:38:39 -0700

217 lines

Re: [NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:35:17 -0500

265 lines

Re: [NTC] Test Technician's Friday Surprise!

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:32:38 -0600

317 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager