LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


October 2006


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Repeal RoHS" Movement Emerges" a reply (2 messages)
#2 laminate Qualification (1 message)
#3 laminate Qualification (6 messages)
#3 laminate Qualification - NTC (1 message)
1 GOhms Resistors (2 messages)
9/12µm Internal Copper Thickness (1 message)
<No subject> (2 messages)
Are TSSOP-8 packages moisture sensitive (9 messages)
AW: [TN] AW: [TN] Tombstoning and nitrogen (1 message)
AW: [TN] Tombstoning and nitrogen (6 messages)
Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating (10 messages)
BGA Xray source (1 message)
Bizzare Phenomena... (16 messages)
Board Warp and Resultant Reliability (3 messages)
Bonding machine (7 messages)
Can tin-whiskers grow on brush tin plating? (1 message)
capacitor polarity or not (6 messages)
China RoHS labelling and legislation (1 message)
Chinese Government Delegation Coming to US to Explain New Environmental Regulations Impacting the High-Tech Industry (1 message)
Colored conformal coating (10 messages)
Compression Limit on FR4? (14 messages)
Contamination questions (4 messages)
Cooling method for pallets (3 messages)
CR designator (14 messages)
Creep of FR4 (12 messages)
Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views (15 messages)
Dendritic crystal : atypical growth directions have been observed in Al-Zn alloys (1 message)
Design software tool update. (1 message)
Did you remember to register for IPC's upcoming webcast series? (1 message)
Dissolving Copper Hole Wall using Lead Free HAL (1 message)
ENIG board - Need to "degold"? (2 messages)
ENIG problem (48 messages)
Filter assembly with pierced terminals (1 message)
Freescale Component MC33982PNAR2 (aka PC33982BPNAR2) PQFN (1 message)
Friday humor (1 message)
FW: [LF] Chinese Government Delegation Coming to US to Explain New Environmental Regulations Impacting the High-Tech Industry (1 message)
FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 20 06) (3 messages)
FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006) (20 messages)
FW: [TN] #3 laminate Qualification (2 messages)
FW: [TN] NTC: Friday question 3 (1 message)
Fw: [TN] Verification of ESD protection if humidity < 30% (1 message)
Fwd: [TN] High Voltage Corona Insulation expert (1 message)
Galden Vapor Phase fluid (8 messages)
Gold immersion vs. silver immersion (4 messages)
Henry Rekers is out of the office. (1 message)
High Voltage Corona Insulation expert (1 message)
hybrid (6 messages)
IPC Design for Manufacture workshop in Bannockburn, IL (1 message)
IPC'S Design for Excellence/Exploring the Challenges - 12/7/06 (1 message)
IPC's Embedded Passives Workshop near full capacity (1 message)
IPC's upcoming Lead Free Conference in Frankfurrt, Germany (1 message)
IPC's upcoming Lead Free conference in Frankfurt, Germany (1 message)
IPC's upcoming webcast series on Design for Excellence (1 message)
IPC-610D Question (4 messages)
IPC-SKILL-201 (1 message)
IPC/JEDEC International Conference on LF Electronic Components and Assemblies "RoHS Compliance and Beyond" (1 message)
ITAR question (3 messages)
laminate Qualification (4 messages)
Laminate Question (1 message)
laminate thickness - new replacement chart for old D-275 Table 3-5 (6 messages)
Lead free ICT testing problems (5 messages)
Lead mining question on: RE: [TN] "Repeal RoHS" Movement Emerges" a reply (1 message)
Measuring component and circuit board weights (3 messages)
MED (3 messages)
Members of IPC sub-committee (5 messages)
Memory chip sockets (2 messages)
Min. PTH Hole Size? (2 messages)
Minimum Soldering Iron Temperature setting? (3 messages)
MS Visio Stencils of board components (1 message)
New EU legislation and its impact on the electronics industry (1 message)
NTC - Friday's Enigma... (14 messages)
NTC - Really Quiet Today... (4 messages)
NTC Friday - Mystery Corner (1 message)
NTC FW: [LF] REACH Webcast - 10/18 4pm EDT (1 message)
NTC RE: [TN] ENIG problem (1 message)
NTC RE: [TN] Solder paste question (1 message)
NTC: Friday enigma. (20 messages)
NTC: Friday question 2 (65 messages)
NTC: Friday question 3 (19 messages)
ODB++ Files (3 messages)
Oooops... (1 message)
Oxidized PCBs (12 messages)
Oxidized PCBs (Counterfeit parts) (5 messages)
Patent Pending Process Technology question (1 message)
PCB baking (2 messages)
Plasma Etch back and Desmear (2 messages)
PWB embedded passive devices (5 messages)
PWB Gold Contact Finger blind vias (1 message)
Question for Mr Yoda (9 messages)
Randall L Bock/MSD/US/PBI is out of the office. (2 messages)
REACH one step nearer in its worst form (17 messages)
Recommendations for inline paste printer (1 message)
Recommended SMD to SMD clearances? (2 messages)
Recommended Soldering reference (1 message)
Refdes nomenclature (3 messages)
Resin removal from PCB Cutting (2 messages)
RoHS Cat 8 and 9 consultants report (2 messages)
Round Pads for Discrete SMD's (3 messages)
Save the Date - IPC's Design for Manufacture Workshop in Virginia (1 message)
SMT Line Segregation (1 message)
Solder iron question (8 messages)
Suspect PCBs (11 messages)
T-260 laminate testing (2 messages)
Tacky Soldering Flux Shelf Life (4 messages)
TechNet Digest (1 message)
TechNet Digest - 24 Oct 2006 to 25 Oct 2006 (#2006-295) (2 messages)
titan PCB (1 message)
Tombstoning and nitrogen (15 messages)
Upcoming IPC Conference in Boston, MA (1 message)
Upcoming IPC/JEDEC Conference in Frankfurt, Germany (1 message)
Verification of ESD protection if humidity < 30% (3 messages)
vertical fill problem (4 messages)
[LF] Re: [LF] NTC - RE: [LF] [TN] FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound         (SMT Sep            2006) (1 message)
[LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006) (4 messages)
[LF] [TN] One of the First Lead Free Casualties? (2 messages)
[NTC] Rockwell Automation Retro Encabulator (1 message)
[TN] 9/12µm Internal Copper Thickness (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Repeal RoHS" Movement Emerges" a reply

"Repeal RoHS" Movement Emerges" a reply

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:50:24 -0700

77 lines

Re: "Repeal RoHS" Movement Emerges" a reply

Kerry McMullen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:26:37 -0400

127 lines

New Thread

#2 laminate Qualification

Re: #2 laminate Qualification

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:18:15 EDT

34 lines

New Thread

#3 laminate Qualification

Re: #3 laminate Qualification

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:29:21 EDT

30 lines

Re: #3 laminate Qualification

valerie St. Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:46:12 -0400

112 lines

Re: #3 laminate Qualification

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 07:53:28 -0700

158 lines

Re: #3 laminate Qualification

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:08:31 -0500

197 lines

Re: #3 laminate Qualification

valerie St. Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:13:27 -0400

117 lines

Re: #3 laminate Qualification

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:32:45 -0700

135 lines

New Thread

#3 laminate Qualification - NTC

Re: #3 laminate Qualification - NTC

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:59:18 EDT

43 lines

New Thread

1 GOhms Resistors

1 GOhms Resistors

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:46:54 +0200

45 lines

Re: 1 GOhms Resistors

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:37:26 -0500

96 lines

New Thread

9/12µm Internal Copper Thickness

9/12µm Internal Copper Thickness

arnaud grivon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:34:01 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Charlie Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:59:02 -0500

22 lines

<No subject>

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:05:50 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Are TSSOP-8 packages moisture sensitive

Are TSSOP-8 packages moisture sensitive

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:24:19 -0400

48 lines

Re: Are TSSOP-8 packages moisture sensitive

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:16:52 -0400

83 lines

Re: Are TSSOP-8 packages moisture sensitive

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:21:32 -0500

108 lines

Re: Are TSSOP-8 packages moisture sensitive

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:34:29 -0400

152 lines

Re: Are TSSOP-8 packages moisture sensitive

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:52:37 -0500

177 lines

Re: Are TSSOP-8 packages moisture sensitive

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:44:12 +0200

216 lines

Re: Are TSSOP-8 packages moisture sensitive

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:48:15 -0600

79 lines

Re: Are TSSOP-8 packages moisture sensitive

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:15:56 EDT

27 lines

Re: Are TSSOP-8 packages moisture sensitive

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:20:01 EDT

26 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] AW: [TN] Tombstoning and nitrogen

AW: [TN] AW: [TN] Tombstoning and nitrogen

Neifer, Gebhard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:17:11 +0200

91 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Tombstoning and nitrogen

AW: [TN] Tombstoning and nitrogen

Neifer, Gebhard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:20:05 +0200

105 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Tombstoning and nitrogen

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:35:21 +0100

155 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Tombstoning and nitrogen

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:53:59 EDT

43 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Tombstoning and nitrogen

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:57:16 EDT

27 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Tombstoning and nitrogen

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:37:48 +0100

65 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Tombstoning and nitrogen

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:57:07 EDT

27 lines

New Thread

Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:17:01 -0500

34 lines

Re: Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

DUTTON Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:47:11 +1000

77 lines

Re: Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:09:36 -0500

96 lines

Re: Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:21:08 -0400

131 lines

Re: Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:27:02 EDT

29 lines

Re: Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:52:05 -0500

158 lines

Re: Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:58:38 -0500

73 lines

Re: Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:08:54 -0700

96 lines

Re: Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:15:48 -0400

138 lines

Re: Backward Compatibility of Tin Electroplating

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:51:54 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

BGA Xray source

BGA Xray source

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 07:57:26 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Bizzare Phenomena...

Bizzare Phenomena...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:57:25 -0600

67 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:07:31 -0600

96 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:10:03 -0800

95 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:19:54 -0600

129 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:23:03 -0500

103 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:23:46 -0600

121 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:27:15 -0500

112 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Davis, Larry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:24:24 -0800

163 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Anslow, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:31:03 -0000

164 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:07:40 -0500

121 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Lance Mayes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:36:38 -0700

114 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Martin Butcher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:35:47 -0800

102 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:48:31 -0600

123 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Neil Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:09:52 -0600

98 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Miguel Vallejo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:16:26 -0800

146 lines

Re: Bizzare Phenomena...

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:20:41 +0100

101 lines

New Thread

Board Warp and Resultant Reliability

Board Warp and Resultant Reliability

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:01:52 -0500

41 lines

Re: Board Warp and Resultant Reliability

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:11:56 EDT

31 lines

Re: Board Warp and Resultant Reliability

Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 23:10:37 -0400

72 lines

New Thread

Bonding machine

Bonding machine

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 14:26:26 +0200

35 lines

Re: Bonding machine

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 11:21:57 -0400

88 lines

Re: Bonding machine

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:42:20 -0700

69 lines

Re: Bonding machine

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:45:13 +0200

126 lines

Re: Bonding machine

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:47:41 +0200

97 lines

Re: Bonding machine

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 05:59:55 -0400

145 lines

Re: Bonding machine

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:39:05 -0400

172 lines

New Thread

Can tin-whiskers grow on brush tin plating?

Can tin-whiskers grow on brush tin plating?

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:49:21 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

capacitor polarity or not

capacitor polarity or not

Cicchiani, Arlene M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:37:22 -0400

23 lines

Re: capacitor polarity or not

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:42:17 -0400

78 lines

Re: capacitor polarity or not

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:24:50 -0400

64 lines

Re: capacitor polarity or not

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:13:37 -0500

53 lines

Re: capacitor polarity or not

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 08:15:21 -0400

52 lines

Re: capacitor polarity or not

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:01:03 -0400

97 lines

New Thread

China RoHS labelling and legislation

China RoHS labelling and legislation

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:50:28 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

Chinese Government Delegation Coming to US to Explain New Environmental Regulations Impacting the High-Tech Industry

Chinese Government Delegation Coming to US to Explain New Environmental Regulations Impacting the High-Tech Industry

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:32:00 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

Colored conformal coating

Colored conformal coating

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:29:26 -0400

47 lines

Re: Colored conformal coating

Rich Wolbert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:35:45 -0400

72 lines

Re: Colored conformal coating

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:37:57 -0400

80 lines

Re: Colored conformal coating

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:36:42 -0500

80 lines

Re: Colored conformal coating

Schaefer, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:39:01 -0500

131 lines

Re: Colored conformal coating

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:43:37 -0400

78 lines

Re: Colored conformal coating

Karl Hunsinger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:44:10 -0400

80 lines

Re: Colored conformal coating

Gilbert Roberge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:56:41 -0400

71 lines

Re: Colored conformal coating

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:22:21 -0400

83 lines

Re: Colored conformal coating

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:13:24 +0100

89 lines

New Thread

Compression Limit on FR4?

Compression Limit on FR4?

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:53:37 -0500

30 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:02:16 -0500

63 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:03:16 -0500

57 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Calhoun, Keith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:14:11 -0400

95 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:52:33 -0500

80 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:00:53 -0400

115 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:02:32 -0500

94 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:11:05 -0400

118 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:19:12 -0500

62 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Maguire, James F <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:39:28 -0700

74 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:58:26 -0700

102 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:12:38 -0500

128 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:45:54 +0800

107 lines

Re: Compression Limit on FR4?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:37:57 -0400

139 lines

New Thread

Contamination questions

Contamination questions

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:56:45 -0400

44 lines

Re: Contamination questions

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:47:56 +0200

106 lines

Re: Contamination questions

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:30:11 -0400

148 lines

Re: Contamination questions

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:43:21 -0500

175 lines

New Thread

Cooling method for pallets

Cooling method for pallets

Gallegos, Luis A. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:53:08 -0500

80 lines

Re: Cooling method for pallets

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:42:06 -0400

99 lines

Re: Cooling method for pallets

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 13:53:11 -0400

100 lines

New Thread

CR designator

CR designator

Cicchiani, Arlene M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:27:25 -0400

24 lines

Re: CR designator

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:41:08 -0400

47 lines

Re: CR designator

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:42:29 -0400

33 lines

Re: CR designator

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:45:29 -0500

49 lines

Re: CR designator

Alcorn, Brent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:51:20 -0400

66 lines

Re: CR designator

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:47:40 -0400

99 lines

Re: CR designator

Alcorn, Brent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:01:32 -0400

145 lines

Re: CR designator

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:31:34 -0400

143 lines

Re: CR designator

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:34:03 -0500

180 lines

Re: CR designator

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:56:04 -0400

60 lines

Re: CR designator

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:56:48 -0400

207 lines

Re: CR designator

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:10:42 -0500

73 lines

Re: CR designator

Macconnell, Richard (ES) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:25:54 -0700

56 lines

Re: CR designator

Neda Thrash <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 21:18:26 EDT

23 lines

New Thread

Creep of FR4

Creep of FR4

Geoff Layhe of Lamar Group <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:02:59 +0100

37 lines

Re: Creep of FR4

Jim Henderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:14:24 -0400

66 lines

Re: Creep of FR4

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:23:56 -0500

62 lines

Re: Creep of FR4

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:31:36 -0400

69 lines

Re: Creep of FR4

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:40:11 -0500

97 lines

Re: Creep of FR4

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:21:24 -0500

90 lines

Re: Creep of FR4

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:45:21 -0400

96 lines

Re: Creep of FR4

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:50:01 -0400

111 lines

Re: Creep of FR4

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:57:24 -0700

75 lines

Re: Creep of FR4

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:59:07 -0700

124 lines

Re: Creep of FR4

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:19:15 -0400

75 lines

Re: Creep of FR4

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:32:12 -0700

105 lines

New Thread

Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Saint Jerky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 06:48:41 -0500

36 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Dan Mauro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:06:08 -0400

76 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:17:39 +0100

115 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Saint Jerky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:25:40 -0500

137 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:43:31 -0400

174 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Saint Jerky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:06:24 -0500

113 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:11:23 EDT

29 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Kathy Jenczewski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:17:49 -0400

132 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:12:49 -0400

81 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:13:49 -0700

67 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:15:21 -0700

103 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:20:39 -0500

119 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:49:44 -0500

107 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:29:46 EDT

28 lines

Re: Customer or Supplier Inherent Defect? Share your views

Saint Jerky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 20:44:42 -0500

86 lines

New Thread

Dendritic crystal : atypical growth directions have been observed in Al-Zn alloys

Dendritic crystal : atypical growth directions have been observed in Al-Zn alloys

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:59:37 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

Design software tool update.

Re: Design software tool update.

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:56:39 EDT

32 lines

New Thread

Did you remember to register for IPC's upcoming webcast series?

Did you remember to register for IPC's upcoming webcast series?

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:38:09 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Dissolving Copper Hole Wall using Lead Free HAL

Dissolving Copper Hole Wall using Lead Free HAL

Nimal Liyanage <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 06:11:41 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

ENIG board - Need to "degold"?

ENIG board - Need to "degold"?

Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:56:40 +0800

29 lines

Re: ENIG board - Need to "degold"?

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:16:37 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

ENIG problem

ENIG problem

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:04:50 +0200

34 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:31:57 -0500

67 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:39:06 -0400

101 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:48:08 -0500

126 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:49:12 -0400

72 lines

Re: ENIG problem

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:48:12 EDT

45 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:20:37 -0400

71 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:54:53 +0200

126 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:57:17 +0200

152 lines

Re: ENIG problem

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:02:42 -0700

154 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:11:18 +0200

119 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:12:04 +0200

97 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:23:51 +0200

88 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:49:10 -0400

116 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:01:51 +0200

170 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:09:37 -0400

230 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:18:54 -0400

227 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:21:25 +0200

162 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:37:08 -0400

223 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:13:52 +0200

259 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:49:53 EDT

28 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:05:12 EDT

26 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:16:40 -0500

300 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Sherif Refaat <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:16:29 +0000

32 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:38:53 EDT

36 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:42:15 EDT

31 lines

Re: ENIG problem

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:08:03 -0700

292 lines

Re: ENIG problem

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:13:28 -0700

329 lines

Re: ENIG problem

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:09:08 -0700

61 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:55:19 +0200

49 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:58:35 +0200

94 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:57:09 -0400

92 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:20:19 EDT

31 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:00:28 -0500

55 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:51:19 -0400

57 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:47:43 -0400

80 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Martin Tarr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:55:12 +0100

101 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:00:35 -0500

108 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:16:59 +0200

118 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:25:06 +0200

45 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Cagle, James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:31:21 -0700

129 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:22:44 -0400

142 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Anil Kher <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:29:03 +0530

188 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:30:45 -0400

59 lines

Re: ENIG problem

ZLATKO BIJEDIC <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:14:44 -0700

48 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:19:24 +0200

118 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:32:23 -0400

162 lines

Re: ENIG problem

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 07:26:51 -0500

157 lines

New Thread

Filter assembly with pierced terminals

Re: Filter assembly with pierced terminals

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 07:08:09 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

Freescale Component MC33982PNAR2 (aka PC33982BPNAR2) PQFN

Freescale Component MC33982PNAR2 (aka PC33982BPNAR2) PQFN

Rich Lasko <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:41:42 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

Friday humor

Friday humor

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:10:52 -0400

414 lines

New Thread

FW: [LF] Chinese Government Delegation Coming to US to Explain New Environmental Regulations Impacting the High-Tech Industry

FW: [LF] Chinese Government Delegation Coming to US to Explain New Environmental Regulations Impacting the High-Tech Industry

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:06:19 -0700

140 lines

New Thread

FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 20 06)

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 20 06)

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:54:21 -0500

74 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 20 06)

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:16:20 EDT

37 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 20 06)

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 11:55:12 +0300

62 lines

New Thread

FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:39:17 -0700

219 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:55:16 EDT

44 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:32:07 EDT

27 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:44:33 -0700

50 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:51:38 +0300

52 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:54:08 +0200

293 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:22:42 EDT

41 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Daniel Blass <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:35:01 -0500

33 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:42:07 -0400

85 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:12:51 -0400

93 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:38:20 -0500

69 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:47:55 EDT

37 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:50:38 EDT

28 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Daniel Blass <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:57:09 -0500

25 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:00:12 -0500

55 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:35:03 +0200

96 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:39:52 -0700

350 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 13:41:35 -0700

64 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:58:47 -0500

143 lines

Re: FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Anil Kher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:43:42 +0530

376 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] #3 laminate Qualification

FW: [TN] #3 laminate Qualification

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:50:11 -0500

181 lines

Re: FW: [TN] #3 laminate Qualification

Anslow, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:55:44 +0100

233 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] NTC: Friday question 3

FW: [TN] NTC: Friday question 3

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:16:03 -0400

250 lines

New Thread

Fw: [TN] Verification of ESD protection if humidity < 30%

Fw: [TN] Verification of ESD protection if humidity < 30%

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:01:01 -0400

88 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [TN] High Voltage Corona Insulation expert

Fwd: [TN] High Voltage Corona Insulation expert

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:46:28 -0700

69 lines

New Thread

Galden Vapor Phase fluid

Galden Vapor Phase fluid

Davis, Larry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 15:19:12 -0700

38 lines

Re: Galden Vapor Phase fluid

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:08:59 +0300

71 lines

Re: Galden Vapor Phase fluid

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:17:27 +0200

101 lines

Re: Galden Vapor Phase fluid

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:25:20 -0400

142 lines

Re: Galden Vapor Phase fluid

Brian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:31:59 +0300

183 lines

Re: Galden Vapor Phase fluid

Skillborg, Fredrik <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:39:22 +0200

219 lines

Re: Galden Vapor Phase fluid

Jeff Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:51:27 +1000

216 lines

Re: Galden Vapor Phase fluid

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:51:40 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Gold immersion vs. silver immersion

Re: Gold immersion vs. silver immersion

Charlie McMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:27:53 -0400

67 lines

Re: Gold immersion vs. silver immersion

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:45:59 -0400

97 lines

Re: Gold immersion vs. silver immersion

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:59:27 -0400

117 lines

Re: Gold immersion vs. silver immersion

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:34:39 +0100

166 lines

New Thread

Henry Rekers is out of the office.

Henry Rekers is out of the office.

No Name <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Oct 2006 04:00:51 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

High Voltage Corona Insulation expert

High Voltage Corona Insulation expert

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:27:29 EDT

26 lines

New Thread

hybrid

hybrid

Cicchiani, Arlene M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:32:23 -0400

22 lines

Re: hybrid

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:45:04 -0400

57 lines

Re: hybrid

Cicchiani, Arlene M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:46:13 -0400

79 lines

Re: hybrid

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:51:21 +0200

52 lines

Re: hybrid

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:51:37 -0400

77 lines

Re: hybrid

Cicchiani, Arlene M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:59:15 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

IPC Design for Manufacture workshop in Bannockburn, IL

IPC Design for Manufacture workshop in Bannockburn, IL

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:19:39 -0600

64 lines

New Thread

IPC'S Design for Excellence/Exploring the Challenges - 12/7/06

IPC'S Design for Excellence/Exploring the Challenges - 12/7/06

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:46:26 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

IPC's Embedded Passives Workshop near full capacity

IPC's Embedded Passives Workshop near full capacity

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:38:59 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

IPC's upcoming Lead Free Conference in Frankfurrt, Germany

IPC's upcoming Lead Free Conference in Frankfurrt, Germany

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:39:56 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

IPC's upcoming Lead Free conference in Frankfurt, Germany

IPC's upcoming Lead Free conference in Frankfurt, Germany

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:04:46 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

IPC's upcoming webcast series on Design for Excellence

IPC's upcoming webcast series on Design for Excellence

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:51:29 -0600

45 lines

New Thread

IPC-610D Question

IPC-610D Question

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 11:16:48 -0400

41 lines

Re: IPC-610D Question

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:02:32 -0400

71 lines

Re: IPC-610D Question

Susan Mansilla <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:11:14 EDT

30 lines

Re: IPC-610D Question

Fox, Ian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:49:39 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

IPC-SKILL-201

IPC-SKILL-201

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Oct 2006 22:25:51 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

IPC/JEDEC International Conference on LF Electronic Components and Assemblies "RoHS Compliance and Beyond"

IPC/JEDEC International Conference on LF Electronic Components and Assemblies "RoHS Compliance and Beyond"

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:18:10 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

ITAR question

ITAR question

Bill Dworak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:25:13 -0700

59 lines

Re: ITAR question

Rey Sosa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:19:04 -0700

92 lines

Re: ITAR question

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:02:28 -0400

95 lines

New Thread

laminate Qualification

laminate Qualification

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:56:14 -0400

68 lines

Re: laminate Qualification

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 18:12:28 EDT

36 lines

Re: laminate Qualification

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:37:19 -0400

107 lines

Re: laminate Qualification

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 07:35:15 -0400

109 lines

New Thread

Laminate Question

Laminate Question

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:59:03 EDT

21 lines

New Thread

laminate thickness - new replacement chart for old D-275 Table 3-5

laminate thickness - new replacement chart for old D-275 Table 3-5

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:40:56 -0400

33 lines

Re: laminate thickness - new replacement chart for old D-275 Table 3-5

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:22:38 -0500

73 lines

Re: laminate thickness - new replacement chart for old D-275 Table 3-5

valerie St. Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:28:59 -0400

126 lines

Re: laminate thickness - new replacement chart for old D-275 Table 3-5

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:13:25 -0400

163 lines

Re: laminate thickness - new replacement chart for old D-275 Table 3-5

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:39:31 -0500

183 lines

Re: laminate thickness - new replacement chart for old D-275 Table 3-5

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:17:26 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

Lead free ICT testing problems

Lead free ICT testing problems

Joel Alexander <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:14:57 -0400

30 lines

Re: Lead free ICT testing problems

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:22:06 EDT

33 lines

Re: Lead free ICT testing problems

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:42:06 -0500

73 lines

Re: Lead free ICT testing problems

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:51:19 -0500

67 lines

Re: Lead free ICT testing problems

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:53:46 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

Lead mining question on: RE: [TN] "Repeal RoHS" Movement Emerges" a reply

Lead mining question on: RE: [TN] "Repeal RoHS" Movement Emerges" a reply

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:38:48 -0700

181 lines

New Thread

Measuring component and circuit board weights

Measuring component and circuit board weights

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:12:18 -0400

143 lines

Re: Measuring component and circuit board weights

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:56:13 -0400

197 lines

Re: Measuring component and circuit board weights

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:26:32 -0400

86 lines

New Thread

MED

MED

Cicchiani, Arlene M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:10:44 -0400

23 lines

Re: MED

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:27:14 -0500

58 lines

Re: MED

Lance Mayes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 07:44:55 -0600

94 lines

New Thread

Members of IPC sub-committee

Members of IPC sub-committee

cyjui <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:02:26 +0800

38 lines

Re: Members of IPC sub-committee

Sauer, Steve (Xetron) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 06:12:40 -0400

54 lines

Re: Members of IPC sub-committee

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:07:13 -0500

108 lines

Re: Members of IPC sub-committee

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:23:06 EDT

104 lines

Re: Members of IPC sub-committee

cyjui <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:05:47 +0800

30 lines

New Thread

Memory chip sockets

Re: Memory chip sockets

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:20:39 -0500

64 lines

Re: Memory chip sockets

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:38:08 EDT

26 lines

New Thread

Min. PTH Hole Size?

Min. PTH Hole Size?

Pasquito, Helena <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:05:29 -0400

39 lines

Re: Min. PTH Hole Size?

Susan Mansilla <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:14:31 EDT

24 lines

New Thread

Minimum Soldering Iron Temperature setting?

Minimum Soldering Iron Temperature setting?

Bremer, Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:23:30 -0700

74 lines

Re: Minimum Soldering Iron Temperature setting?

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:01:26 -0500

111 lines

Re: Minimum Soldering Iron Temperature setting?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:46:45 +0300

101 lines

New Thread

MS Visio Stencils of board components

MS Visio Stencils of board components

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:14:33 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

New EU legislation and its impact on the electronics industry

New EU legislation and its impact on the electronics industry

Martin Tarr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:02:58 +0100

75 lines

New Thread

NTC - Friday's Enigma...

NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 07:10:59 -0500

46 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Gilbert Roberge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:22:27 -0400

72 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:24:38 -0400

90 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:28:09 +0300

89 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Kathy Nargitoth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:37:07 -0400

75 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Dan Mauro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:47:53 -0400

77 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 05:59:50 -0700

63 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:45:23 -0700

75 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:48:30 -0500

95 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Rick Pfeiffer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:59:09 -0400

166 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Neil Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:15:29 -0500

70 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:55:50 +0200

83 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Anil Kher <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:24:44 +0530

111 lines

Re: NTC - Friday's Enigma...

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:18:26 +0200

141 lines

New Thread

NTC - Really Quiet Today...

NTC - Really Quiet Today...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:24:13 -0500

28 lines

Re: NTC - Really Quiet Today...

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:30:52 -0500

58 lines

Re: NTC - Really Quiet Today...

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:48:08 -0500

58 lines

Re: NTC - Really Quiet Today...

Olav Folland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:51:08 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

NTC Friday - Mystery Corner

NTC Friday - Mystery Corner

Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:55:44 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

NTC FW: [LF] REACH Webcast - 10/18 4pm EDT

NTC FW: [LF] REACH Webcast - 10/18 4pm EDT

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:39:16 -0700

87 lines

New Thread

NTC RE: [TN] ENIG problem

NTC RE: [TN] ENIG problem

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:47:39 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

NTC RE: [TN] Solder paste question

Re: NTC RE: [TN] Solder paste question

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:17:22 -0400

339 lines

New Thread

NTC: Friday enigma.

NTC: Friday enigma.

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:04:58 +0300

23 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:22:35 +0100

60 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:30:22 +0800

57 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:02:08 -0400

45 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:15:08 +0200

48 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

ekalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:52:32 -0400

53 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:17:29 EDT

25 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:10:56 -0400

59 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Charlie Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:59:19 -0500

49 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Scott Decker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:38:53 -0700

76 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Neil Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:11:26 -0500

47 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:23:48 +0300

58 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:30:49 +0200

107 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:54:25 +0300

143 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:34:47 +0200

169 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 07:30:55 -0500

146 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:45:01 -0400

51 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:48:41 +0300

176 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:33:59 -0700

194 lines

Re: NTC: Friday enigma.

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 07:39:08 -0700

173 lines

New Thread

NTC: Friday question 2

NTC: Friday question 2

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:14:42 +0200

30 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:19:21 -0500

54 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:49:56 +0200

71 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:26:07 +0200

56 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 05:49:09 -0400

66 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:17:25 -0500

91 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:35:37 -0400

50 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Charlie Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:24:15 -0500

119 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:29:22 +0200

37 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:39:22 -0500

66 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:46:46 -0400

91 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:53:08 -0500

135 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Cheryl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:28:28 -0600

97 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:45:42 +0200

35 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Joe Russeau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:50:12 -0400

92 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:55:50 +0200

121 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:20:40 -0500

62 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Lance Mayes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 13:30:32 -0600

110 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:24:15 -0500

181 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:04:25 -0500

242 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Wayne Posey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:58:44 -0500

112 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:12:21 +0200

218 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Cheryl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:26:23 -0600

92 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:21:48 -0400

267 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:24:15 -0400

92 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:28:06 +0200

258 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:29:18 +0200

110 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:32:48 +0200

132 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:36:00 +0200

112 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:38:29 -0400

92 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:36:25 -0400

148 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 14:43:07 -0600

136 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:17:00 -0400

60 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Dharma Kemp-Bresett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 16:59:35 -0400

102 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:03:07 +0200

72 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:05:27 +0200

117 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

stephengregory5849 <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:24:55 -0500

253 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 18:59:22 -0400

292 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:57:14 -0400

313 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:08:55 -0700

343 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 13:03:46 +0200

107 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 13:06:00 +0200

117 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 13:06:43 +0200

150 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 13:07:32 +0200

158 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Badri <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 16:52:10 +0530

181 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 19:57:29 +0200

209 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:45:28 -0400

51 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 08:07:08 +0200

83 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 06:07:59 -0400

61 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 07:18:22 EDT

21 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 14:00:44 +0200

45 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 08:18:43 -0400

123 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 07:47:17 -0500

216 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 08:31:51 -0500

89 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 15:50:55 +0200

196 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:12:03 -0400

149 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:29:10 +0200

55 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:33:58 -0500

249 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:51:53 -0500

112 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Dharma Kemp-Bresett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:33:34 -0400

97 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Charlie Barker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 12:36:23 -0500

88 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 20:51:08 +0200

308 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 15:27:42 -0500

380 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:32:36 -0400

414 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 2

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:45:10 +0200

419 lines

New Thread

NTC: Friday question 3

NTC: Friday question 3

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:10:06 +0200

27 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:47:30 -0500

187 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:56:28 -0400

228 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Cheryl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:58:34 -0600

222 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Ed Hare <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:01:17 -0700

210 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:10:27 -0400

212 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:03:26 -0400

272 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:35:06 -0700

308 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:35:07 +0100

255 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:42:39 -0500

213 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:57:26 -0400

207 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:58:03 -0400

54 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:02:22 -0400

61 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:04:41 -0400

91 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:24:31 +0200

245 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:30:42 +0200

238 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:56:28 +0200

256 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Neil Maloney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:36:14 -0500

209 lines

Re: NTC: Friday question 3

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:58:29 +0200

237 lines

New Thread

ODB++ Files

ODB++ Files

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:00:14 -0400

40 lines

Re: ODB++ Files

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:23:20 -0500

77 lines

Re: ODB++ Files

Lakshminarayanan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:00:24 +0530

84 lines

New Thread

Oooops...

Oooops...

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Oct 2006 22:27:44 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Oxidized PCBs

Oxidized PCBs

Rich Wolbert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:31:58 -0500

26 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:47:22 -0500

57 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:51:48 +0300

48 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs

Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:59:57 -0400

101 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs

Rich Wolbert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:17:55 -0400

135 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:15:53 -0400

69 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs

JaMi Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:04:22 -0700

87 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs

Rich Wolbert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:39:37 -0400

131 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs

Rodney Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:35:00 -0500

176 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:05:25 -0700

148 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:19:43 -0700

173 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs

Rich Wolbert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:19:32 -0400

209 lines

New Thread

Oxidized PCBs (Counterfeit parts)

Re: Oxidized PCBs (Counterfeit parts)

Ben Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:02:16 -0500

98 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs (Counterfeit parts)

Bernard Kessler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:30:10 -0700

129 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs (Counterfeit parts)

Bernard Kessler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:38:49 -0700

151 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs (Counterfeit parts)

Rich Wolbert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:31:18 -0400

188 lines

Re: Oxidized PCBs (Counterfeit parts)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:53:16 -0500

200 lines

New Thread

Patent Pending Process Technology question

Re: Patent Pending Process Technology question

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:45:24 -0700

151 lines

New Thread

PCB baking

PCB baking

S.Badrinarayanan" <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 04:42:06 -0500

30 lines

Re: PCB baking

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Oct 2006 21:10:55 +0200

177 lines

New Thread

Plasma Etch back and Desmear

Plasma Etch back and Desmear

Wrobel, Clayton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:38:32 -0400

33 lines

Re: Plasma Etch back and Desmear

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:56:29 -0400

72 lines

New Thread

PWB embedded passive devices

PWB embedded passive devices

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 15:58:44 -0500

30 lines

Re: PWB embedded passive devices

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 17:11:57 -0400

71 lines

Re: PWB embedded passive devices

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:12:56 -0700

64 lines

Re: PWB embedded passive devices

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:02:12 EDT

33 lines

Re: PWB embedded passive devices

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:07:41 +0200

65 lines

New Thread

PWB Gold Contact Finger blind vias

PWB Gold Contact Finger blind vias

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:08:43 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

Question for Mr Yoda

Question for Mr Yoda

Inge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:30:40 +0200

26 lines

Re: Question for Mr Yoda

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:05:37 EDT

26 lines

Re: Question for Mr Yoda

Steve Mikell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Oct 2006 02:57:52 -0400

51 lines

Re: Question for Mr Yoda

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:53:15 -0500

84 lines

Re: Question for Mr Yoda

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:46:17 +0100

109 lines

Re: Question for Mr Yoda

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:57:34 -0800

136 lines

Re: Question for Mr Yoda

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:12:10 -0600

144 lines

Re: Question for Mr Yoda

Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:20:46 -0500

105 lines

Re: Question for Mr Yoda

Craig Cullum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:23:13 -0600

38 lines

New Thread

Randall L Bock/MSD/US/PBI is out of the office.

Randall L Bock/MSD/US/PBI is out of the office.

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 10:53:58 -0400

21 lines

Randall L Bock/MSD/US/PBI is out of the office.

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 02:09:50 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

REACH one step nearer in its worst form

REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Brian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:13:01 +0300

37 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:45:39 +0200

61 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:54:09 +0100

106 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Handley, William <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:42:36 -0700

136 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:50:48 -0700

162 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:55:13 -0500

185 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:00:31 -0700

192 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:36:09 -0700

64 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:44:35 -0700

80 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:03:24 -0700

106 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:00:51 +0200

128 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:39:15 -0400

201 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:22:49 -0700

192 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:49:22 -0500

212 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:59:42 -0700

244 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:16:20 -0700

287 lines

Re: REACH one step nearer in its worst form

Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:09:31 -0700

278 lines

New Thread

Recommendations for inline paste printer

Re: Recommendations for inline paste printer

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:30:29 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

Recommended SMD to SMD clearances?

Recommended SMD to SMD clearances?

Thad Schultz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:20:45 -0700

30 lines

Re: Recommended SMD to SMD clearances?

Craig Cullum <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:21:15 -0600

63 lines

New Thread

Recommended Soldering reference

Recommended Soldering reference

Jeff Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:02:22 +1000

31 lines

New Thread

Refdes nomenclature

Refdes nomenclature

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:28:05 -0400

30 lines

Re: Refdes nomenclature

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 11:05:00 -0400

55 lines

Re: Refdes nomenclature

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:27:34 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

Resin removal from PCB Cutting

Resin removal from PCB Cutting

Paul Baine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:05:42 -0400

37 lines

Re: Resin removal from PCB Cutting

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:21:44 +0100

83 lines

New Thread

RoHS Cat 8 and 9 consultants report

RoHS Cat 8 and 9 consultants report

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:51:02 -0700

37 lines

Re: RoHS Cat 8 and 9 consultants report

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:10:52 -0700

61 lines

New Thread

Round Pads for Discrete SMD's

Round Pads for Discrete SMD's

Smith, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:51:44 -0400

44 lines

Re: Round Pads for Discrete SMD's

DUTTON Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:57:48 +1000

85 lines

Re: Round Pads for Discrete SMD's

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:34:13 -0400

117 lines

New Thread

Save the Date - IPC's Design for Manufacture Workshop in Virginia

Save the Date - IPC's Design for Manufacture Workshop in Virginia

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:38:42 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

SMT Line Segregation

SMT Line Segregation

Kane, Amol (349) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:18:34 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Solder iron question

Solder iron question

Gloria Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:34:23 -0500

52 lines

Re: Solder iron question

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:11:36 -0500

99 lines

Re: Solder iron question

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:20:57 -0500

140 lines

Re: Solder iron question

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:38:19 -0400

64 lines

Re: Solder iron question

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:16:51 -0400

168 lines

Re: Solder iron question

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 21:31:25 +0200

200 lines

Re: Solder iron question

Gloria Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:12:21 -0500

196 lines

Re: Solder iron question

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:02:07 -0400

234 lines

New Thread

Suspect PCBs

Suspect PCBs

Tom Parkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:47:56 -0400

96 lines

Re: Suspect PCBs

Anslow, Phillip <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:56:24 +0100

128 lines

Re: Suspect PCBs

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 07:09:25 -0700

109 lines

Re: Suspect PCBs

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:12:57 -0400

130 lines

Re: Suspect PCBs

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:26:28 EDT

46 lines

Re: Suspect PCBs

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:40:10 -0500

66 lines

Re: Suspect PCBs

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:01:14 +0200

109 lines

Re: Suspect PCBs

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:07:44 -0700

140 lines

Re: Suspect PCBs

Hfjord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:13:59 +0200

187 lines

Re: Suspect PCBs

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:12:25 -0400

132 lines

Re: Suspect PCBs

ZLATKO BIJEDIC <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:34:38 -0700

97 lines

New Thread

T-260 laminate testing

T-260 laminate testing

Wolfgang Erat <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:21:39 -0400

44 lines

Re: T-260 laminate testing

Paul Reid <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 07:52:12 -0400

101 lines

New Thread

Tacky Soldering Flux Shelf Life

Tacky Soldering Flux Shelf Life

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:28:39 -0500

54 lines

Re: Tacky Soldering Flux Shelf Life

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:56:13 -0500

95 lines

Re: Tacky Soldering Flux Shelf Life

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:12:38 -0700

112 lines

Re: Tacky Soldering Flux Shelf Life

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:24:05 -0700

85 lines

New Thread

TechNet Digest

Re: TechNet Digest

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:49:23 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

TechNet Digest - 24 Oct 2006 to 25 Oct 2006 (#2006-295)

Re: TechNet Digest - 24 Oct 2006 to 25 Oct 2006 (#2006-295)

Avigdor Jakubinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:52:34 +0200

112 lines

Re: TechNet Digest - 24 Oct 2006 to 25 Oct 2006 (#2006-295)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:03:03 -0500

138 lines

New Thread

titan PCB

titan PCB

Rolfe, David <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:15:07 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Tombstoning and nitrogen

Tombstoning and nitrogen

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Oct 2006 23:52:32 +0300

33 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 06:39:22 -0400

85 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:01:31 +0100

113 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:44:58 -0700

82 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:56:39 +0300

159 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:18:35 EDT

28 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

David Greig <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:38:03 +0100

64 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:07:17 EDT

34 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:59:50 -0500

65 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:57:58 EDT

25 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:09:38 -0500

49 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:43:32 -0500

63 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

David Greig <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:41:11 +0100

60 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:20:06 -0500

98 lines

Re: Tombstoning and nitrogen

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:02:27 EDT

37 lines

New Thread

Upcoming IPC Conference in Boston, MA

Upcoming IPC Conference in Boston, MA

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:57:28 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

Upcoming IPC/JEDEC Conference in Frankfurt, Germany

Upcoming IPC/JEDEC Conference in Frankfurt, Germany

Tina Nerad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:57:09 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Verification of ESD protection if humidity < 30%

Verification of ESD protection if humidity < 30%

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:04:55 -0400

27 lines

Re: Verification of ESD protection if humidity < 30%

Calhoun, Keith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:37:33 -0400

61 lines

Re: Verification of ESD protection if humidity < 30%

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:03:59 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

vertical fill problem

vertical fill problem

Bob Arciolla <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:44:09 -0400

33 lines

Re: vertical fill problem

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:00:08 -0500

70 lines

Re: vertical fill problem

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:23:56 -0400

87 lines

Re: vertical fill problem

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:25:55 -0400

104 lines

New Thread

[LF] Re: [LF] NTC - RE: [LF] [TN] FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound         (SMT Sep            2006)

RE: [LF] Re: [LF] NTC - RE: [LF] [TN] FW: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound         (SMT Sep            2006)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 16:03:08 -0700

80 lines

New Thread

[LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Re: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:09:23 -0400

110 lines

Re: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 10:56:17 -0700

164 lines

Re: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Stadem, Richard D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:06:47 -0500

198 lines

Re: [LF] RoHS Opposition (on Pb) isn't sound (SMT Sep 2006)

Steve Mikell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:10:58 -0400

99 lines

New Thread

[LF] [TN] One of the First Lead Free Casualties?

[LF] [TN] One of the First Lead Free Casualties?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:23:24 -0500

85 lines

Re: [LF] [TN] One of the First Lead Free Casualties?

John Burke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:44:09 -0700

120 lines

New Thread

[NTC] Rockwell Automation Retro Encabulator

[NTC] Rockwell Automation Retro Encabulator

Kevin Glidden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:13:17 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

[TN] 9/12µm Internal Copper Thickness

Re: [TN] 9/12µm Internal Copper Thickness

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:58:15 EDT

38 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager