LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


February 2006


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

<List>[TN] Board etching question for you board shops out there. (1 message)
<List>[TN] IS410 FR-4 laminate (1 message)
<No subject> (2 messages)
Antron (1 message)
Backdrill Technology PCB supplier Sourcing (1 message)
BGA Question regarding breakout patterns. (2 messages)
BGA Reflow profile - Thermocouples (3 messages)
Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear ... (3 messages)
Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes (12 messages)
Board etching question for you board shops out there (1 message)
Board etching question for you board shops out there. (19 messages)
Ceramic Substrate Recommendations (2 messages)
Coeffecient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates (9 messages)
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates (1 message)
Conclusion ( repeated): Acrylic coating Vigon A200 (1 message)
Conclusion ( repeated): Acrylic coating Vigon A200 NTC (3 messages)
Definition of Tent Via (4 messages)
Dek Printer (17 messages)
Do you know what a Trem Card is? (4 messages)
Don't be left out on the Next RoHS (1 message)
embedded components (11 messages)
epa regulation (1 message)
Four levels of testing (1 message)
FW: Abbott and Costello (3 messages)
FW: Finger cots vrs. bare hands (1 message)
FW: [TN] Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes (1 message)
FW: [TN] Zero Emissions Spray Booth (1 message)
GULL WING LEAD PULL TESTING (4 messages)
Gull wing side & toe fillet height (6 messages)
Halogen limits of laminate (2 messages)
Heat storage within PCB (7 messages)
Hi voltage testing (11 messages)
High-frequency losses (e.g., SATA) (9 messages)
Hole size specs (8 messages)
Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33 (11 messages)
In layman's terms, please? (5 messages)
IPC - SIR Flux Qualification Standard (6 messages)
IPC / APEX 2006 (2 messages)
IS410 FR-4 laminate (13 messages)
It is most definitely Friday (1 message)
Jesper K. Konge/E-factory/Skjern/VKI is out of the office. (1 message)
Joel Alexander is out of the office. (1 message)
JTAG Scan Chains (2 messages)
Lead Free peelable solder mask (4 messages)
Lead tester (3 messages)
Lead-free patent activity - FYI (1 message)
Loose Heatsink (2 messages)
Machine Capability Study Software and Procedures (4 messages)
Manufacturing Waste Rate (1 message)
Metal film on resistor dissolving after in-line wash (2 messages)
NaCl Contamination levels on Plated Metal Parts (8 messages)
NTC-Testing - please disregard (3 messages)
NTC: Go Seahawks (36 messages)
Out of Office (1 message)
Populated PCB deflection spec? (5 messages)
Printing Ag epoxy (4 messages)
PSA heat sink attachment (3 messages)
PTH CUEENT HANDLING CAPABILITY TEST (1 message)
QFP Pad Crud (1 message)
Question on ITAR (2 messages)
Question regd surface finish. (5 messages)
Randall L Bock/MSD/US/PBI is out of the office. (1 message)
Recall: [TN] Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes (1 message)
Reflow & hand soldering IMC formation (1 message)
Regards from Peter Duncan (3 messages)
Resistivity calculator (4 messages)
Robots (6 messages)
RoHS Directive status??? (6 messages)
RoHS R5? (3 messages)
Solder Joint Inspection (13 messages)
solder paste printing process (3 messages)
Solder paste spread as a measure of solderablity (4 messages)
SOLDER RESIST - PRODUCTION STANDARDS (3 messages)
summary of changes between IPC 610 C to D and J-STD-001 C to D (5 messages)
SV: [TN] Conclusion ( repeated): Acrylic coating Vigon A200 NTC (1 message)
test (2 messages)
tongue-in-cheek Zero Emissions Spray Booth (2 messages)
Via fill (2 messages)
Via fillings question. (3 messages)
Via in Pad x Voids on Solder Process (3 messages)
Via on Hole process (6 messages)
Why asking Re: [TN] Lead Free peelable solder mask? (1 message)
Zero Emissions Spray Booth (7 messages)
[Maybe Spam] Re: [TN] NTC: Go Seahawks (3 messages)
[NTC]RE: [TN] Zero Emissions Spray Booth (4 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re:

Pete menuez

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:47:04 -0500

83 lines

Re:

R Sedlak

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:40:12 -0800

99 lines

New Thread

<List>[TN] Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Re: <List>[TN] Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Steve Hodge

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:43:26 -0700

72 lines

New Thread

<List>[TN] IS410 FR-4 laminate

Re: <List>[TN] IS410 FR-4 laminate

Steve Hodge

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:09:44 -0700

60 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Mengers, William D.

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:10:49 -0500

39 lines

<No subject>

Franklin D Asbell

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:11:41 -0600

66 lines

New Thread

Antron

Antron

David Tremmel

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:33:05 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

Backdrill Technology PCB supplier Sourcing

Backdrill Technology PCB supplier Sourcing

Irving Lee

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:14:03 +0800

38 lines

New Thread

BGA Question regarding breakout patterns.

Re: BGA Question regarding breakout patterns.

Michael Kuczynski

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:39:18 -0500

144 lines

BGA Question regarding breakout patterns.

Scott Decker

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:19:23 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

BGA Reflow profile - Thermocouples

Re: BGA Reflow profile - Thermocouples

Werner Engelmaier

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:39:11 EST

31 lines

Re: BGA Reflow profile - Thermocouples

Dehoyos, Ramon

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:32:34 -0500

72 lines

BGA Reflow profile - Thermocouples

Dominic Boudreau

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:50:18 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear ...

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear ...

Dehoyos, Ramon

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:07:47 -0500

108 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear ...

John Burke

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:56:48 -0800

87 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear ...

Joe Fjelstad

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:51:50 EST

45 lines

New Thread

Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Kane, Amol (349)

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:35:02 -0500

109 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Jack Crawford

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:16:52 -0600

180 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

John Burke

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:19:52 -0800

143 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Jack Crawford

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 19:00:29 -0600

86 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Jack Crawford

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:21:41 -0600

189 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Kane, Amol (349)

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:32:06 -0500

161 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Dehoyos, Ramon

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:59:35 -0500

124 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

John Burke

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:45:13 -0800

114 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Kane, Amol (349)

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:31:24 -0500

72 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Werner Engelmaier

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:28:08 EST

31 lines

Re: Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

John Burke

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:19:25 -0800

96 lines

Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Kane, Amol (349)

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:08:14 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

Board etching question for you board shops out there

Board etching question for you board shops out there

Ralph Richart

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:26:18 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Scott Decker

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:24:28 -0700

133 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Jeffrey Bush

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:29:40 -0500

170 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

<>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:03:32 EST

32 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Pete menuez

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:30:35 -0500

79 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Paul Reid

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:38:01 -0500

125 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Donald Vischulis

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:04:20 -0600

96 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Franklin D Asbell

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:20:53 -0600

90 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

EIMCNews

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:41:13 -0800

50 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:34:29 -0600

91 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Franklin D Asbell

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:05:52 -0600

48 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:00:30 -0600

162 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Dehoyos, Ramon

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:47:01 -0500

66 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Scott Decker

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:44:14 -0700

136 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Chuck Brummer

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:23:47 -0800

40 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Stephen Gregory

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:09:53 -0600

85 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:03:57 -0600

76 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Dwight Mattix

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:56:30 -0800

61 lines

Re: Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Franklin D Asbell

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:55:53 -0600

78 lines

Board etching question for you board shops out there.

Scott Decker

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:33:43 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

Ceramic Substrate Recommendations

Re: Ceramic Substrate Recommendations

Jeffrey Bush

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:16:30 -0500

74 lines

Ceramic Substrate Recommendations

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:26:48 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Coeffecient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

Re: Coeffecient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

David D. Hillman

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:19:17 -0600

105 lines

Re: Coeffecient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

Werner Engelmaier

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:15:18 EST

27 lines

Re: Coeffecient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

John Burke

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:59:53 -0800

142 lines

Re: Coeffecient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

John Burke

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:49:16 -0800

123 lines

Re: Coeffecient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

John Burke

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:42:06 -0800

89 lines

Re: Coeffecient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

Macconnell, Richard (ES)

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:40:27 -0800

81 lines

Re: Coeffecient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

Lance Mayes

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:27:38 -0700

104 lines

Re: Coeffecient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

kwood716

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:53:06 -0500

106 lines

Coeffecient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

Gregg A. Owens

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:46:37 -0800

54 lines

New Thread

Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

Re: Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Rates

Leo Higgins

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:02:07 -0800

107 lines

New Thread

Conclusion ( repeated): Acrylic coating Vigon A200

Conclusion ( repeated): Acrylic coating Vigon A200

gina hernefjord

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:49:50 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

Conclusion ( repeated): Acrylic coating Vigon A200 NTC

Re: Conclusion ( repeated): Acrylic coating Vigon A200 NTC

Bev Christian

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:37:08 -0500

143 lines

Re: Conclusion ( repeated): Acrylic coating Vigon A200 NTC

Dehoyos, Ramon

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:05:58 -0500

119 lines

Re: Conclusion ( repeated): Acrylic coating Vigon A200 NTC

Bev Christian

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:27:17 -0500

96 lines

New Thread

Definition of Tent Via

Re: Definition of Tent Via

John Parsons

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 08:12:43 -0800

44 lines

Re: Definition of Tent Via

Kevin Glidden

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 08:44:34 -0500

57 lines

Re: Definition of Tent Via

Jeffrey Bush

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 08:08:47 -0500

96 lines

Definition of Tent Via

Wee Mei

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:22:46 +0800

30 lines

New Thread

Dek Printer

Re: Dek Printer

Phil Zarrow

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:58:46 EST

28 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:29:07 -0600

195 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Michael McMonagle

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:50:37 -0600

175 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Ron Peeler

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:08:25 -0500

159 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Stephen Gregory

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:08:38 -0600

124 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Stadem, Richard D.

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:59:50 -0600

126 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Phil Zarrow

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:49:17 EST

81 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Kevin Jaworenko

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:55:33 -0600

185 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Michael McMonagle

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:53:24 -0600

207 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Ivanoe Pedruzzi

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:44:09 +0100

210 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Stephen Gregory

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:28:57 -0600

151 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Phil Zarrow

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:35:23 EST

52 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Michael McMonagle

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:44:38 -0600

143 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Ron Peeler

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:25:39 -0500

104 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Michael McMonagle

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:59:44 -0600

83 lines

Re: Dek Printer

Phil Zarrow

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:39:03 EST

28 lines

Dek Printer

Ron Peeler

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:58:32 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Do you know what a Trem Card is?

Re: Do you know what a Trem Card is?

Mike Fenner

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:36:22 -0000

83 lines

Re: Do you know what a Trem Card is?

ekalgren

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:11:51 -0500

107 lines

Re: Do you know what a Trem Card is?

Phil Nutting

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:01:29 -0500

77 lines

Do you know what a Trem Card is?

R Sedlak

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:56:51 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Don't be left out on the Next RoHS

Don't be left out on the Next RoHS

Keach Sasamori

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:59:00 -0600

71 lines

New Thread

embedded components

Re: embedded components

Happy Holden

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:55:33 -0500

599 lines

Re: embedded components

Bill C

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:14:24 -0600

22 lines

Re: embedded components

Dennis Fritz

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:31:12 EST

50 lines

Re: embedded components

John Burke

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:06:29 -0800

76 lines

Re: embedded components

Joe Fjelstad

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:54:57 EST

27 lines

Re: embedded components

Joe Fjelstad

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:53:00 EST

29 lines

Re: embedded components

John Burke

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:29:54 -0800

121 lines

Re: embedded components

Steve Mikell

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 05:46:47 +0700

79 lines

Re: embedded components

Stadem, Richard D.

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:15:22 -0600

66 lines

Re: embedded components

John Burke

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:50:48 -0800

82 lines

embedded components

Bill C

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:32:33 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

epa regulation

epa regulation

Joyce Koo

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:36:46 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Four levels of testing

Four levels of testing

Connie Korth

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:31:24 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

FW: Abbott and Costello

Re: FW: Abbott and Costello

Stadem, Richard D.

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:29:26 -0600

49 lines

Re: FW: Abbott and Costello

Douglas O. Pauls

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:19:57 -0600

25 lines

FW: Abbott and Costello

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:07:43 -0700

224 lines

New Thread

FW: Finger cots vrs. bare hands

FW: Finger cots vrs. bare hands

Phil Nutting

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:19:54 -0500

181 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

FW: [TN] Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Kane, Amol (349)

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:58:14 -0500

116 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Zero Emissions Spray Booth

FW: [TN] Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:08:28 -0700

73 lines

New Thread

GULL WING LEAD PULL TESTING

Re: GULL WING LEAD PULL TESTING

Mike Fenner

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:42:43 -0000

123 lines

Re: GULL WING LEAD PULL TESTING

Bev Christian

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 07:20:37 -0500

90 lines

Re: GULL WING LEAD PULL TESTING

Werner Engelmaier

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:55:26 EST

49 lines

GULL WING LEAD PULL TESTING

Lee Whiteman

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:54:33 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Gull wing side & toe fillet height

Re: Gull wing side & toe fillet height

Dehoyos, Ramon

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:28:03 -0500

170 lines

Re: Gull wing side & toe fillet height

Werner Engelmaier

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 00:57:49 EST

28 lines

Re: Gull wing side & toe fillet height

Wee Mei

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:23:43 +0800

121 lines

Re: Gull wing side & toe fillet height

Rex Waygood

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:03:00 -0000

100 lines

Re: Gull wing side & toe fillet height

sumxp

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:22:58 -0600

21 lines

Gull wing side & toe fillet height

sumxp

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:15:51 -0600

20 lines

New Thread

Halogen limits of laminate

Re: Halogen limits of laminate

Geoff Layhe of Lamar Group

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:23:45 -0000

90 lines

Halogen limits of laminate

Colin McVean

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:43:22 -0000

45 lines

New Thread

Heat storage within PCB

Re: Heat storage within PCB

Brooks,Bill

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:59:59 -0800

352 lines

Re: Heat storage within PCB

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:02:30 -0600

204 lines

Re: Heat storage within PCB

Brooks,Bill

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:34:42 -0800

134 lines

Re: Heat storage within PCB

Scott Decker

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:17:17 -0700

82 lines

Re: Heat storage within PCB

Werner Engelmaier

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:31:14 EST

27 lines

Re: Heat storage within PCB

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:56:51 -0600

68 lines

Heat storage within PCB

Ofer Cohen

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:26:13 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

Hi voltage testing

Re: Hi voltage testing

Donald Vischulis

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 19:28:44 -0600

94 lines

Re: Hi voltage testing

Steve Kelly

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 10:08:46 -0500

161 lines

Re: Hi voltage testing

Dehoyos, Ramon

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 08:38:55 -0500

179 lines

Re: Hi voltage testing

Blair K. Hogg

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:05:01 -0800

115 lines

Re: Hi voltage testing

Joyce Koo

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 17:02:32 -0500

63 lines

Re: Hi voltage testing

Jeffrey Bush

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:20:57 -0500

76 lines

Re: Hi voltage testing

ekalgren

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:39:33 -0500

145 lines

Re: Hi voltage testing

Dehoyos, Ramon

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:32:56 -0500

114 lines

Re: Hi voltage testing

Dale Ritzen

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 15:24:52 -0600

116 lines

Re: Hi voltage testing

Roach, David

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 15:01:20 -0600

80 lines

Hi voltage testing

Steve Kelly

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 15:21:37 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

High-frequency losses (e.g., SATA)

Re: High-frequency losses (e.g., SATA)

John Burke

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:48:58 -0800

323 lines

Re: High-frequency losses (e.g., SATA)

Dave Seymour

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:39:27 -0500

263 lines

Re: High-frequency losses (e.g., SATA)

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Louis_Gu=E9rin?=

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:32:22 -0500

209 lines

Re: High-frequency losses (e.g., SATA)

John Burke

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:01:12 -0800

160 lines

Re: High-frequency losses (e.g., SATA)

Valerie St.Cyr

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:27:25 -0500

87 lines

Re: High-frequency losses (e.g., SATA)

Dwight Mattix

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:09:03 -0800

107 lines

Re: High-frequency losses (e.g., SATA)

Michael Dunn

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:00:56 -0800

71 lines

Re: High-frequency losses (e.g., SATA)

Ofer Cohen

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:21:13 +0200

76 lines

High-frequency losses (e.g., SATA)

Michael Dunn

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:40:11 -0800

45 lines

New Thread

Hole size specs

Re: Hole size specs

Michael McMonagle

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:47:13 -0600

88 lines

Re: Hole size specs

Gary Ferrari

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:13:19 -0500

85 lines

Re: Hole size specs

EIMCNews

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:41:13 -0800

35 lines

Re: Hole size specs

Joe Fjelstad

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:57:32 EST

27 lines

Re: Hole size specs

Brooks,Bill

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:20:11 -0800

71 lines

Re: Hole size specs

EIMCNews

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:48:56 -0800

31 lines

Re: Hole size specs

Brooks,Bill

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:37:41 -0800

97 lines

Hole size specs

Jon McDowell

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:57:34 -0700

51 lines

New Thread

Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Re: Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Dennis Fritz

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:04:44 EST

85 lines

Re: Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Donald Vischulis

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:56:18 -0600

60 lines

Re: Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Joyce Koo

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:38:56 -0500

107 lines

Re: Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Happy Holden

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:24:02 -0500

81 lines

Re: Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Joyce Koo

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:25:51 -0500

96 lines

Re: Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Valerie St.Cyr

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:09:46 -0500

162 lines

Re: Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Steve Kelly

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:34:57 -0500

77 lines

Re: Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Deac Descoteaux

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:58:06 -0500

92 lines

Re: Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Lee parker

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:53:31 -0500

71 lines

Re: Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Jeffrey Bush

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:28:22 -0500

70 lines

Impedance Spec +/-5% and Cpk of 1.33

Glenn Pelkey

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:05:44 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

In layman's terms, please?

Re: In layman's terms, please?

John Burke

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:24:17 -0800

113 lines

Re: In layman's terms, please?

Jeffrey Bush

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:55:00 -0500

77 lines

Re: In layman's terms, please?

Valerie St.Cyr

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:22:32 -0500

65 lines

Re: In layman's terms, please?

mattyk

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:54:17 -0500

53 lines

In layman's terms, please?

Genny Gibbard

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:52:29 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

IPC - SIR Flux Qualification Standard

Re: IPC - SIR Flux Qualification Standard

Richard Kraszewski

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:43:30 -0500

110 lines

Re: IPC - SIR Flux Qualification Standard

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:41:03 -0600

96 lines

Re: IPC - SIR Flux Qualification Standard

Richard Kraszewski

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:48:36 -0500

72 lines

Re: IPC - SIR Flux Qualification Standard

Sauer, Steve (Xetron)

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:49:16 -0500

53 lines

Re: IPC - SIR Flux Qualification Standard

Schaefer, Chris

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:46:27 -0600

59 lines

IPC - SIR Flux Qualification Standard

Richard Kraszewski

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:23:47 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

IPC / APEX 2006

Re: IPC / APEX 2006

John Burke

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:52:56 -0800

75 lines

IPC / APEX 2006

Joe Russeau

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:32:12 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

IS410 FR-4 laminate

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:42:56 -0600

162 lines

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

James

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:02:14 -0800

188 lines

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

Phil Nutting

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:52:59 -0500

137 lines

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

James

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:45:42 -0800

131 lines

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

John Burke

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:55:22 -0800

138 lines

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

John Burke

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:51:45 -0800

102 lines

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

Phil Nutting

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:49:22 -0500

100 lines

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

Dehoyos, Ramon

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:10:23 -0500

102 lines

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

Jeffrey Bush

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:51:52 -0500

80 lines

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

Stephen Gregory

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:18:09 -0600

94 lines

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:51:02 -0700

63 lines

Re: IS410 FR-4 laminate

Gerard O'Brien

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:06:56 -0500

65 lines

IS410 FR-4 laminate

Scott Lefebvre

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:45:54 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

It is most definitely Friday

It is most definitely Friday

John Burke

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:32:44 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

Jesper K. Konge/E-factory/Skjern/VKI is out of the office.

Jesper K. Konge/E-factory/Skjern/VKI is out of the office.

Jesper K. Konge

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:38:03 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Joel Alexander is out of the office.

Joel Alexander is out of the office.

Joel Alexander

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:03:44 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

JTAG Scan Chains

Re: JTAG Scan Chains

kwood716

Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:49:36 -0500

67 lines

JTAG Scan Chains

Darrel Therriault

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:52:10 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

Lead Free peelable solder mask

Re: Lead Free peelable solder mask

Pete Lymn

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:44:58 -0000

50 lines

Re: Lead Free peelable solder mask

bob wettermann

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:16:16 -0800

53 lines

Re: Lead Free peelable solder mask

Stadem, Richard D.

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:10:14 -0600

86 lines

Lead Free peelable solder mask

Leigh-Ann Litavis

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:53:07 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

Lead tester

Re: Lead tester

Thomas Beneken

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:32:22 +0100

74 lines

Re: Lead tester

<>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 21:09:14 EST

25 lines

Lead tester

Barbara J. Rich

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:23:19 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

Lead-free patent activity - FYI

Lead-free patent activity - FYI

Joe Fjelstad

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:25:57 EST

104 lines

New Thread

Loose Heatsink

Re: Loose Heatsink

Stadem, Richard D.

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:09:41 -0600

81 lines

Loose Heatsink

Gunawan, Arif

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:10:38 +0800

49 lines

New Thread

Machine Capability Study Software and Procedures

Re: Machine Capability Study Software and Procedures

Steve Mikell

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:46:07 +0700

108 lines

Re: Machine Capability Study Software and Procedures

Randy Morrison

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:31:19 -0800

86 lines

Re: Machine Capability Study Software and Procedures

Kane, Amol (349)

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:39:52 -0500

77 lines

Machine Capability Study Software and Procedures

bob wettermann

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:24:14 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Manufacturing Waste Rate

Manufacturing Waste Rate

Baski Devre

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:28:45 +0200

44 lines

New Thread

Metal film on resistor dissolving after in-line wash

Re: Metal film on resistor dissolving after in-line wash

R Sedlak

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:31:07 -0800

59 lines

Re: Metal film on resistor dissolving after in-line wash

Peter Lee

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:02:07 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

NaCl Contamination levels on Plated Metal Parts

Re: NaCl Contamination levels on Plated Metal Parts

<>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:26:56 EST

73 lines

Re: NaCl Contamination levels on Plated Metal Parts

R Sedlak

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:59:59 -0800

178 lines

Re: NaCl Contamination levels on Plated Metal Parts

Douglas O. Pauls

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:07:30 -0600

154 lines

Re: NaCl Contamination levels on Plated Metal Parts

Joyce Koo

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:13:27 -0500

134 lines

Re: NaCl Contamination levels on Plated Metal Parts

R Sedlak

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:46:04 -0800

64 lines

Re: NaCl Contamination levels on Plated Metal Parts

Dehoyos, Ramon

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:48:19 -0500

104 lines

Re: NaCl Contamination levels on Plated Metal Parts

Graham Naisbitt

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:11:16 +0000

70 lines

NaCl Contamination levels on Plated Metal Parts

Joseph H. Smith

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:00:32 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

NTC-Testing - please disregard

Re: NTC-Testing - please disregard

Jeffrey Bush

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:47:19 -0500

62 lines

Re: NTC-Testing - please disregard

Tempea, Ioan

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:33:28 -0500

59 lines

NTC-Testing - please disregard

Keach Sasamori

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:29:24 -0600

25 lines

New Thread

NTC: Go Seahawks

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

jose

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:48:36 -0800

113 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Randy Bock Sr.

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 06:17:41 -0500

84 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

kwood716

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 16:20:50 -0500

125 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Lee Whiteman

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 16:22:17 -0500

95 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Deac Descoteaux

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:56:53 -0500

60 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Phil Nutting

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:55:01 -0500

64 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Bloomquist, Ken

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 12:49:57 -0800

34 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Ron Peeler

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:34:57 -0500

154 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

kwood716

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:31:30 -0500

115 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:21:59 -0600

87 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Mcmaster, Michael

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:46:12 -0800

353 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

David Suraski

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 12:55:57 -0500

64 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Joe Fjelstad

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 12:43:04 EST

38 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Todd, Richard

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 12:12:01 -0500

391 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Barmuta, Mike

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 08:48:08 -0800

360 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Peter Swanson

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:43:38 -0000

319 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Brian Ellis

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 09:21:33 +0200

47 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

- Bogert

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:28:19 -0500

319 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Cheryl Johnson

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:11:40 -0700

244 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Chris Ball

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:05:36 -0500

205 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

John Burke

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:00:50 -0800

259 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Joyce Koo

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:51:30 -0500

169 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Kane, Amol (349)

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:46:02 -0500

214 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

George Patrick

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:30:26 -0800

166 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

John Burke

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:31:21 -0800

181 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:12:55 -0700

97 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:10:43 -0700

140 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Randy Bock Sr.

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:10:15 -0500

176 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Chris Ball

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:47:17 -0500

109 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Randy Morrison

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:29:29 -0800

124 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Phil Nutting

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:09:02 -0500

142 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:48:55 -0700

52 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Joyce Koo

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:47:33 -0500

113 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Barmuta, Mike

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:35:19 -0800

90 lines

Re: NTC: Go Seahawks

Ron Peeler

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:35:14 -0500

61 lines

NTC: Go Seahawks

Bloomquist, Ken

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:15:07 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Out of Office

Out of Office

Paula Esty

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:55:38 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Populated PCB deflection spec?

Re: Populated PCB deflection spec?

Cheryl Johnson

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:08:57 -0700

216 lines

Re: Populated PCB deflection spec?

Werner Engelmaier

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:06:16 EST

24 lines

Re: Populated PCB deflection spec?

Cheryl Tulkoff

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:13:25 -0600

178 lines

Re: Populated PCB deflection spec?

Brooks,Bill

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:00:30 -0800

102 lines

Re: Populated PCB deflection spec?

Alan Young

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:49:01 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Printing Ag epoxy

Re: Printing Ag epoxy

Sumxplore

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:25:21 +0800

109 lines

Re: Printing Ag epoxy

Lee parker

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:23:43 -0500

52 lines

Re: Printing Ag epoxy

Joe Fjelstad

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 11:22:52 EST

40 lines

Printing Ag epoxy

sumxp

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 03:53:17 -0600

23 lines

New Thread

PSA heat sink attachment

Re: PSA heat sink attachment

Dehoyos, Ramon

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:21:31 -0500

120 lines

Re: PSA heat sink attachment

Leo Higgins

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:14:41 -0800

84 lines

PSA heat sink attachment

John S. Berg

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:33:55 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

PTH CUEENT HANDLING CAPABILITY TEST

PTH CUEENT HANDLING CAPABILITY TEST

Victor G. Hernandez

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:44:28 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

QFP Pad Crud

QFP Pad Crud

Richard Kraszewski

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:46:41 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

Question on ITAR

Re: Question on ITAR

Dave Simonik

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:15:54 -0500

77 lines

Question on ITAR

Bill Dworak

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:59:21 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

Question regd surface finish.

Re: Question regd surface finish.

Selva Suganthi

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:08:49 +0530

160 lines

Re: Question regd surface finish.

Joyce Koo

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:01:37 -0500

103 lines

Re: Question regd surface finish.

Lee parker

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:29:16 -0500

85 lines

Re: Question regd surface finish.

Scott B. Westheimer

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 07:51:36 -0500

67 lines

Question regd surface finish.

Selva Suganthi

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:08:38 +0530

33 lines

New Thread

Randall L Bock/MSD/US/PBI is out of the office.

Randall L Bock/MSD/US/PBI is out of the office.

Randy Bock Sr.

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:47:20 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Recall: [TN] Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Recall: [TN] Big Holes (no Pun intended) in the IPC610D Criteria for Shrink/tear holes

Jack Crawford

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:22:01 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

Reflow & hand soldering IMC formation

Reflow & hand soldering IMC formation

sumxp

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:48:34 -0600

22 lines

New Thread

Regards from Peter Duncan

Re: Regards from Peter Duncan

Ed Popielarski

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:33:51 -0800

118 lines

Re: Regards from Peter Duncan

Joyce Koo

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:47:55 -0500

58 lines

Regards from Peter Duncan

Wee Mei

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:54:02 +0800

32 lines

New Thread

Resistivity calculator

Re: Resistivity calculator

Stadem, Richard D.

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:17:24 -0600

75 lines

Re: Resistivity calculator

Douglas O. Pauls

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:57:09 -0600

134 lines

Re: Resistivity calculator

Michael McMonagle

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:12:51 -0600

78 lines

Resistivity calculator

Skillborg, Fredrik

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:27:59 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Robots

Re: Robots

kwood716

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:19:53 -0500

70 lines

Re: Robots

Dehoyos, Ramon

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:22:41 -0500

99 lines

Re: Robots

Lee Whiteman

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:53:39 -0500

125 lines

Re: Robots

Stadem, Richard D.

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:33:06 -0600

98 lines

Re: Robots

Kane, Amol (349)

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:26:16 -0500

74 lines

Robots

Black, Paul

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:24:09 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

RoHS Directive status???

Re: RoHS Directive status???

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:34:22 -0500

180 lines

Re: RoHS Directive status???

Jon McDowell

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:05:41 -0700

108 lines

Re: RoHS Directive status???

Jon McDowell

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:04:25 -0700

100 lines

Re: RoHS Directive status???

Blair K. Hogg

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:54:24 -0800

73 lines

Re: RoHS Directive status???

Ramon Essers

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:44:49 +0100

88 lines

RoHS Directive status???

Jon McDowell

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:35:55 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

RoHS R5?

Re: RoHS R5?

Ramon Essers

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:00:46 +0100

83 lines

Re: RoHS R5?

John Parsons

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:53:18 -0800

70 lines

RoHS R5?

John Parsons

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:12:10 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

Solder Joint Inspection

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

Kevin Glidden

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:51:36 -0500

104 lines

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:24:45 -0600

250 lines

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:11:54 -0600

210 lines

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:08:38 -0600

143 lines

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

Michael McMonagle

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:11:43 -0600

289 lines

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

Schaefer, Chris

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:29:06 -0600

226 lines

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

Barmuta, Mike

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:22:14 -0800

190 lines

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

Schaefer, Chris

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:01:33 -0600

126 lines

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

John Berg

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:44:27 -0600

62 lines

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:47:28 -0600

64 lines

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

Bloomquist, Ken

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:41:51 -0800

42 lines

Re: Solder Joint Inspection

John Maxwell

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:20:08 -0800

58 lines

Solder Joint Inspection

Bloomquist, Ken

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:55:17 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

solder paste printing process

Re: solder paste printing process

<>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 21:19:38 EST

25 lines

Re: solder paste printing process

Stuart Tingay

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:34:14 -0000

81 lines

solder paste printing process

Dominic Boudreau

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:10:05 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Solder paste spread as a measure of solderablity

Re: Solder paste spread as a measure of solderablity

<>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 19:15:34 EST

37 lines

Re: Solder paste spread as a measure of solderablity

John Burke

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:29:34 -0800

140 lines

Re: Solder paste spread as a measure of solderablity

Richard Kraszewski

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:51:46 -0500

94 lines

Solder paste spread as a measure of solderablity

Dennis Fritz

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:19:18 EST

55 lines

New Thread

SOLDER RESIST - PRODUCTION STANDARDS

Re: SOLDER RESIST - PRODUCTION STANDARDS

Gary Ferrari

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:11:18 -0500

121 lines

Re: SOLDER RESIST - PRODUCTION STANDARDS

Jeffrey Bush

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:32:09 -0500

95 lines

SOLDER RESIST - PRODUCTION STANDARDS

Leigh Jansen

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:58:53 -0000

46 lines

New Thread

summary of changes between IPC 610 C to D and J-STD-001 C to D

Re: summary of changes between IPC 610 C to D and J-STD-001 C to D

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:43:38 -0600

80 lines

Re: summary of changes between IPC 610 C to D and J-STD-001 C to D

Guy Ramsey

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:34:20 -0500

55 lines

Re: summary of changes between IPC 610 C to D and J-STD-001 C to D

arnaud grivon

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:56:06 +0100

58 lines

Re: summary of changes between IPC 610 C to D and J-STD-001 C to D

Werner Engelmaier

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:52:23 EST

32 lines

summary of changes between IPC 610 C to D and J-STD-001 C to D

Stadem, Richard D.

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 07:18:27 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

SV: [TN] Conclusion ( repeated): Acrylic coating Vigon A200 NTC

SV: [TN] Conclusion ( repeated): Acrylic coating Vigon A200 NTC

gina hernefjord

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 08:52:55 +0100

108 lines

New Thread

test

Re: test

Black, Paul

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:11:43 -0500

56 lines

test

Stadem, Richard D.

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:32:06 -0600

22 lines

New Thread

tongue-in-cheek Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Re: tongue-in-cheek Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Brian Ellis

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:43:44 +0200

166 lines

Re: tongue-in-cheek Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Phil Nutting

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:33:06 -0500

148 lines

New Thread

Via fill

Re: Via fill

Jeffrey Bush

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:14:51 -0500

76 lines

Via fill

Steve Kelly

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:51:17 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Via fillings question.

Re: Via fillings question.

Jeffrey Bush

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:01:08 -0500

88 lines

Re: Via fillings question.

Kevin Glidden

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:39:21 -0500

75 lines

Via fillings question.

Scott Decker

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 07:55:34 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

Via in Pad x Voids on Solder Process

Re: Via in Pad x Voids on Solder Process

Macko, Joe @ IEC

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:39:10 -0800

166 lines

Re: Via in Pad x Voids on Solder Process

Happy Holden

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:25:41 -0500

127 lines

Via in Pad x Voids on Solder Process

Marcello Brett Malteze

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:40:39 -0300

55 lines

New Thread

Via on Hole process

Re: Via on Hole process

Marcello Brett Malteze

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:16:04 -0200

180 lines

Re: Via on Hole process

Dwight Mattix

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:08:05 -0800

136 lines

Re: Via on Hole process

Marcello Brett Malteze

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:00:47 -0200

117 lines

Re: Via on Hole process

Dwight Mattix

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:18:09 -0800

121 lines

Re: Via on Hole process

Jeffrey Bush

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:31:47 -0500

92 lines

Via on Hole process

Marcello Brett Malteze

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:16:36 -0200

44 lines

New Thread

Why asking Re: [TN] Lead Free peelable solder mask?

Why asking Re: [TN] Lead Free peelable solder mask?

Dennis Fritz

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:54:42 EST

49 lines

New Thread

Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Re: Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75)

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 06:57:45 -0700

304 lines

Re: Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Brian Ellis

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:58:10 +0200

259 lines

Re: Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Graham Naisbitt

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:53:25 +0000

191 lines

Re: Zero Emissions Spray Booth

John Burke

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:08:06 -0800

244 lines

Re: Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Dehoyos, Ramon

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:00:48 -0500

206 lines

Re: Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Douglas O. Pauls

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:01:20 -0600

166 lines

Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Kane, Amol (349)

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:11:38 -0500

113 lines

New Thread

[Maybe Spam] Re: [TN] NTC: Go Seahawks

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [TN] NTC: Go Seahawks

Russell Burdick

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:09:25 -0700

291 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [TN] NTC: Go Seahawks

Ron Peeler

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:32:11 -0500

291 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [TN] NTC: Go Seahawks

Grant Emandien

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:50:49 +0200

254 lines

New Thread

[NTC]RE: [TN] Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Re: [NTC]RE: [TN] Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Martin Butcher

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:12:36 -0800

327 lines

Re: [NTC]RE: [TN] Zero Emissions Spray Booth

John Burke

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:56:03 -0800

330 lines

Re: [NTC]RE: [TN] Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Dehoyos, Ramon

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:46:33 -0500

301 lines

[NTC]RE: [TN] Zero Emissions Spray Booth

Martin Butcher

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:13:25 -0800

265 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager