LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


February 2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(Chinese) motherboard factory (1 message)
(NTC) Any List Moderators Listening - Subscription problems (1 message)
***FINAL REMINDER***LICIPCDC February 15th Meeting (1 message)
***SECOND REMINDER***LICIPCDC February 15th Meeting (1 message)
1206 placed instead of 0805 (1 message)
3 MEMS Searches in Los Angeles (1 message)
6 Mils STF (1 message)
<No subject> (1 message)
acceptable Final rinse DI water resistivity in a batch type clean er (4 messages)
Antw: [TN] Mixing Lead free BGAs with normal BGAs (1 message)
Antw: [TN] Solder joint reliability (1 message)
Apex? (3 messages)
AW: [TN] OSP process for PCB (1 message)
Barcode printer: Direct/Thermal Transfer or the one that require ribbon (2 messages)
Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling (26 messages)
Best Practices for smt Rework (1 message)
Butter coat (1 message)
Calculate current capacity for electrical contacts (9 messages)
Chinese motherboard factory (5 messages)
CID & CID+ Workshops, Tampa, Florida - March 17-19, 2005 (1 message)
Clarification of IPC-6012 (2 messages)
Coating (9 messages)
Conductive ink to add jumpers to boards (3 messages)
Conformal Coat ESD Tape (5 messages)
Courses You Want to Look for at Expo/APEX!!! (3 messages)
Cracking FR4 (14 messages)
cracking on PCB punched edge (2 messages)
Disapearing solder (3 messages)
discharge along crack in solder resist of flex PCB (1 message)
Edge quality index (1 message)
ENIG - Failures (7 messages)
ET marking ink (2 messages)
FAB Question (4 messages)
fishbone (1 message)
Fixed Z-Axis Lead Free BGA (3 messages)
Flipped transistor? (15 messages)
Flipped transistor? - covered in IPC-7711A/7721A (4 messages)
FR4 (3 messages)
FR4 board material (4 messages)
FW: PTH,panel plating pattern plating (2 messages)
Hot air leveing for SMD - specification (2 messages)
I hope this isn't a dumb question (5 messages)
immersion gold on CEM1 (1 message)
Immersion Silver (3 Flavors) (3 messages)
IPC Webcast Technology for the Future - Register NOW (1 message)
James TerVeen/ATC is out of the office. (1 message)
juggler (1 message)
LCP Text (2 messages)
Lead Free (3 messages)
Lead Free Workshops Coming to Your Area (1 message)
Led component Pull Test (1 message)
LF ICT probing (1 message)
LGA Packages (5 messages)
LICIPCDC February 15th Meeting (1 message)
limits for plant vibration (13 messages)
Magnetic inner core (2 messages)
Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up... (12 messages)
Microcircuit Palladium Lead Finish (Good or Bad)? (3 messages)
Mixing Lead free BGAs with normal BGAs (5 messages)
Need "Full AT" Spec (3 messages)
NTC Planes and Trains... (5 messages)
NTC: Friday type question (1 message)
ODB++ to Gerber convertor (4 messages)
Old Version GC-Place (1 message)
Opps, Sorry (1 message)
OSP Finishes (1 message)
OSP process for PCB (15 messages)
Parial Swati/NAN/ATS/IN is out of the office. (1 message)
Peel able Etch Block (6 messages)
Peelable mask (3 messages)
Peelable mask on Sterling Silver coatings? (3 messages)
Planar Transformer construction on circuit boards (2 messages)
Plating on LCP/PPA Moulded devices (8 messages)
Pot heater elements for Econopak EPK+ Type 400F Huntsville (1 message)
PTH,plane plating pattern plating (1 message)
QP242 Placement Equipment. (1 message)
qualification for new PCB vendor (3 messages)
Question about via masking on BGA pattern... (1 message)
Reflow oven and surface mount equipment infor request (1 message)
Removal of Non-functional pads (9 messages)
Rigid-Flex (2 messages)
RoHS Cleaning Chemical Compliance (5 messages)
SC79 packaging (4 messages)
Seeking data on temperature impact on Type UR conformal voating (3 messages)
Selective PTH laser solder machines... (1 message)
Signing off (4 messages)
Signing off (Out of Office) (2 messages)
SMT Equipment Training (2 messages)
Sn sputtering (3 messages)
SNEC chapter meeting (1 message)
So what about Tin Whiskers? (3 messages)
Solder joint reliability (1 message)
Someone Else Thinks Same Way (1 message)
Squeegee color codes (4 messages)
storage temperature of assembled pcbs (3 messages)
Sulfide contamination (15 messages)
Tears In Polyimide/Kapton Flex (3 messages)
Technical basis for Table 6-1 of IPC-2221 (6 messages)
Thermal Laminates (1 message)
Unicam and Universal VCD/Sequencer programming (1 message)
Vacuum sealer (1 message)
Wanted Help fo CID Certification (CID) (6 messages)
Warp & Twist (5 messages)
Wave Solder Flux Conversion Qualification (4 messages)
When to glue (2 messages)
[NTC]limits for plant vibration and trains (6 messages)
[TN] Led component Pull  Test (1 message)
[TN] Re: [TN] Led component Pull  Test (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re:

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 08:41:53 -0500

62 lines

Re:

Paul Aldis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:45:14 -0000

87 lines

Re:

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:11:56 -0000

58 lines

Re:

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:17:29 -0000

68 lines

Re:

Paul Aldis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:22:24 -0000

94 lines

New Thread

(Chinese) motherboard factory

Re: (Chinese) motherboard factory

Larry Russell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:16:09 +0800

185 lines

New Thread

(NTC) Any List Moderators Listening - Subscription problems

(NTC) Any List Moderators Listening - Subscription problems

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:48:18 -0800

45 lines

New Thread

***FINAL REMINDER***LICIPCDC February 15th Meeting

***FINAL REMINDER***LICIPCDC February 15th Meeting

Tordahl, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:35:33 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

***SECOND REMINDER***LICIPCDC February 15th Meeting

***SECOND REMINDER***LICIPCDC February 15th Meeting

Tordahl, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:05:51 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

1206 placed instead of 0805

1206 placed instead of 0805

Jason <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:39:58 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

3 MEMS Searches in Los Angeles

3 MEMS Searches in Los Angeles

Nicholas Meyler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:16:14 -0600

142 lines

New Thread

6 Mils STF

Re: 6 Mils STF

Brummer Chuck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:31:10 -0800

130 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Paul Aldis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:35:54 -0000

28 lines

New Thread

acceptable Final rinse DI water resistivity in a batch type clean er

acceptable Final rinse DI water resistivity in a batch type clean er

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:51:16 -0800

45 lines

Re: acceptable Final rinse DI water resistivity in a batch type clean er

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:04:25 +0200

88 lines

Re: acceptable Final rinse DI water resistivity in a batch type clean er

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:12:23 -0500

90 lines

Re: acceptable Final rinse DI water resistivity in a batch type clean er

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:31:14 -0000

146 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] Mixing Lead free BGAs with normal BGAs

Antw: [TN] Mixing Lead free BGAs with normal BGAs

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:24:12 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] Solder joint reliability

Antw: [TN] Solder joint reliability

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:09:36 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Apex?

Apex?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:21:02 -0500

33 lines

Re: Apex?

Bill Kasprzak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:48:22 -0500

78 lines

Re: Apex?

Marvin Gaines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:56:22 -0800

60 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] OSP process for PCB

AW: [TN] OSP process for PCB

Gebhard.Neifer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:33:51 +0100

132 lines

New Thread

Barcode printer: Direct/Thermal Transfer or the one that require ribbon

Barcode printer: Direct/Thermal Transfer or the one that require ribbon

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:56:11 -0800

33 lines

Re: Barcode printer: Direct/Thermal Transfer or the one that require ribbon

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:09:51 -0800

65 lines

New Thread

Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:04:57 -0500

38 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:40:24 -0500

75 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:18:36 -0500

104 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

fraley , barrie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:48:56 -0500

135 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:33:32 EST

32 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:41:14 -0500

85 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Susan Mansilla <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:42:19 EST

31 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:12:21 -0500

64 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:22:06 -0800

99 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:25:48 -0800

92 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:21:39 -0000

98 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

paul reid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:01:41 -0500

132 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:56:23 -0500

122 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:19:58 -0800

81 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:45:02 -0500

120 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:54:53 EST

25 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Mcmaster, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:58:07 -0800

142 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:04:11 -0600

169 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:10:54 -0700

194 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:15:23 -0600

222 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:38:46 -0500

272 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Hal Winslow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:42:37 -0500

328 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:35:40 -0500

171 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Roach, David <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:55:55 -0600

168 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:12:50 -0800

37 lines

Re: Behavior of Via's in low temperature cycling

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:33:00 -0800

62 lines

New Thread

Best Practices for smt Rework

Best Practices for smt Rework

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:53:21 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Butter coat

Re: Butter coat

Brummer Chuck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:31:39 -0800

68 lines

New Thread

Calculate current capacity for electrical contacts

Calculate current capacity for electrical contacts

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:39:00 -0500

35 lines

Re: Calculate current capacity for electrical contacts

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:26:47 -0700

64 lines

Re: Calculate current capacity for electrical contacts

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:27:56 +0100

54 lines

Re: Calculate current capacity for electrical contacts

Thomas Beneken <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:01:42 +0100

68 lines

Re: Calculate current capacity for electrical contacts

Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 13:25:32 +0200

74 lines

Re: Calculate current capacity for electrical contacts

Blair K. Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:05:45 -0800

75 lines

Re: Calculate current capacity for electrical contacts

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:27:09 -0800

115 lines

Re: Calculate current capacity for electrical contacts

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:13:58 -0500

104 lines

Re: Calculate current capacity for electrical contacts

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:10:44 +0100

89 lines

New Thread

Chinese motherboard factory

Chinese motherboard factory

Chris Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:46:13 +1030

38 lines

Re: Chinese motherboard factory

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:08:24 -0500

79 lines

Re: Chinese motherboard factory

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:58:54 +0200

61 lines

Re: Chinese motherboard factory

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:19:02 -0000

108 lines

Re: Chinese motherboard factory

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:43:10 -0500

156 lines

New Thread

CID & CID+ Workshops, Tampa, Florida - March 17-19, 2005

CID & CID+ Workshops, Tampa, Florida - March 17-19, 2005

Christi Poulsen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:08:01 -0600

145 lines

New Thread

Clarification of IPC-6012

Clarification of IPC-6012

Pete menuez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 08:31:02 -0500

34 lines

Re: Clarification of IPC-6012

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 08:41:52 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

Coating

Coating

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:30:21 -0500

40 lines

Re: Coating

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:47:42 +0000

94 lines

Re: Coating

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 02:00:31 EST

29 lines

Re: Coating

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:16:32 +0100

59 lines

Re: Coating

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:20:56 -0500

115 lines

Re: Coating

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:28:35 +0000

75 lines

Re: Coating

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:52:52 +0000

160 lines

Re: Coating

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:24:03 +0100

180 lines

Re: Coating

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:35:41 -0500

249 lines

New Thread

Conductive ink to add jumpers to boards

Conductive ink to add jumpers to boards

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:59:15 -0500

38 lines

Re: Conductive ink to add jumpers to boards

Johnson, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:32:02 -0500

64 lines

Re: Conductive ink to add jumpers to boards

Neda Thrash <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:13:38 EST

26 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coat ESD Tape

Conformal Coat ESD Tape

Rob Carrillo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:33:51 -0500

40 lines

Re: Conformal Coat ESD Tape

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:50:44 -0600

93 lines

Re: Conformal Coat ESD Tape

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:42:35 -0500

83 lines

Re: Conformal Coat ESD Tape

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:08:03 -0600

92 lines

Re: Conformal Coat ESD Tape

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:14:48 EST

23 lines

New Thread

Courses You Want to Look for at Expo/APEX!!!

Courses You Want to Look for at Expo/APEX!!!

Alexandra Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:59:51 -0600

84 lines

Re: Courses You Want to Look for at Expo/APEX!!!

Rob Carrillo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:42:14 -0500

112 lines

Re: Courses You Want to Look for at Expo/APEX!!!

Blair K. Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:44:46 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

Cracking FR4

Cracking FR4

Greaves, Bernie (IMP) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:24:04 +1030

28 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

cguitar <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:08:34 +0800

46 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:07:06 -0500

65 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:58:59 -0500

105 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

Johnson, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:05:55 -0500

72 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

TDK <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:22:39 -0700

149 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

Scott B. Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:26:05 -0500

58 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:58:13 -0800

98 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

Johnson, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:45:20 -0500

131 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:31:10 -0700

89 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:58:11 -0500

159 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:48:55 -0500

205 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:41:41 -0800

71 lines

Re: Cracking FR4

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:09:57 -0500

167 lines

New Thread

cracking on PCB punched edge

Re: cracking on PCB punched edge

Stephen Roy Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:51:50 EST

40 lines

Re: cracking on PCB punched edge

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:05:21 -0500

78 lines

New Thread

Disapearing solder

Disapearing solder

Mastorides, John <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:21:03 -0500

51 lines

Re: Disapearing solder

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:49:03 -0500

87 lines

Re: Disapearing solder

John Guy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:58:06 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

discharge along crack in solder resist of flex PCB

discharge along crack in solder resist of flex PCB

Thomas Beneken <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:51:29 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

Edge quality index

Edge quality index

Syed Sajid Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:00:45 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

ENIG - Failures

ENIG - Failures

Zweigart, Siegmund <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:11:34 +0100

34 lines

Re: ENIG - Failures

Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:05:10 -0500

95 lines

Re: ENIG - Failures

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:57:04 +0100

59 lines

Re: ENIG - Failures

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:01:36 +0100

77 lines

Re: ENIG - Failures

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:04:22 +0100

69 lines

Re: ENIG - Failures

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:05:39 +0100

70 lines

Re: ENIG - Failures

Stephen Roy Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:59:44 EST

37 lines

New Thread

ET marking ink

ET marking ink

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:51:54 -0500

29 lines

Re: ET marking ink

Blair K. Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:50:52 -0800

52 lines

New Thread

FAB Question

FAB Question

Donald Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:48:06 -0600

23 lines

Re: FAB Question

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:23:34 -0500

55 lines

Re: FAB Question

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:20:25 -0500

91 lines

Re: FAB Question

Donald Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:33:51 -0600

110 lines

New Thread

fishbone

fishbone

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:46:57 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Fixed Z-Axis Lead Free BGA

Fixed Z-Axis Lead Free BGA

Michael Forrester <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:29:21 -0500

32 lines

Re: Fixed Z-Axis Lead Free BGA

Mark Austin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:15:00 +0000

55 lines

Re: Fixed Z-Axis Lead Free BGA

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:07:23 -0800

85 lines

New Thread

Flipped transistor?

Flipped transistor?

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:24:31 -0500

47 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:29:32 -0500

74 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:29:14 -0600

86 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Rich Lasko <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:47:37 -0600

109 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:45:27 -0500

77 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:51:11 -0500

122 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:52:53 -0500

133 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Poh Kong Hui <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:35:45 +0800

110 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:04:33 -0500

154 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:31:52 -0000

87 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Cheryl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:54:45 -0700

138 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:13:20 -0500

170 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:27:49 +0200

172 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:54:49 -0700

136 lines

Re: Flipped transistor?

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:41:40 +0100

89 lines

New Thread

Flipped transistor? - covered in IPC-7711A/7721A

Re: Flipped transistor? - covered in IPC-7711A/7721A

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:17:27 -0600

193 lines

Re: Flipped transistor? - covered in IPC-7711A/7721A

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:35:28 -0500

250 lines

Re: Flipped transistor? - covered in IPC-7711A/7721A

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:39:15 -0600

267 lines

Re: Flipped transistor? - covered in IPC-7711A/7721A

Cheryl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:12:01 -0700

341 lines

New Thread

FR4

FR4

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:53:18 EST

26 lines

Re: FR4

Donald Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:28:26 -0600

46 lines

Re: FR4

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:47:12 EST

33 lines

New Thread

FR4 board material

FR4 board material

David Harman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:29:56 -0800

44 lines

Re: FR4 board material

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:21:00 -0600

31 lines

Re: FR4 board material

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:41:56 -0600

48 lines

Re: FR4 board material

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:09:04 -0500

92 lines

New Thread

FW: PTH,panel plating pattern plating

FW: PTH,panel plating pattern plating

Baski Devre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:54:54 +0200

40 lines

Re: FW: PTH,panel plating pattern plating

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:32:11 EST

33 lines

New Thread

Hot air leveing for SMD - specification

Hot air leveing for SMD - specification

Murulidhara <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:40:37 +0530

40 lines

Re: Hot air leveing for SMD - specification

Chezhian, Krishnan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 08:51:04 +0800

157 lines

New Thread

I hope this isn't a dumb question

I hope this isn't a dumb question

Chad Haima <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:26:11 -0800

47 lines

Re: I hope this isn't a dumb question

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:54:51 -0500

79 lines

Re: I hope this isn't a dumb question

Pete menuez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:12:04 -0500

85 lines

Re: I hope this isn't a dumb question

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:05:08 -0800

86 lines

Re: I hope this isn't a dumb question

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:34:29 EST

27 lines

New Thread

immersion gold on CEM1

immersion gold on CEM1

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:52:19 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Immersion Silver (3 Flavors)

Immersion Silver (3 Flavors)

Al Onderick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:31:50 -0600

52 lines

Re: Immersion Silver (3 Flavors)

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:23:28 -0500

100 lines

Re: Immersion Silver (3 Flavors)

Al Onderick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:46:50 -0600

111 lines

New Thread

IPC Webcast Technology for the Future - Register NOW

IPC Webcast Technology for the Future - Register NOW

Alexandra Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 19:59:20 -0600

69 lines

New Thread

James TerVeen/ATC is out of the office.

James TerVeen/ATC is out of the office.

James TerVeen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:00:42 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

juggler

juggler

Brummer Chuck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:27:52 -0800

64 lines

New Thread

LCP Text

LCP Text

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:15:42 -0600

25 lines

Re: LCP Text

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:26:07 +0100

120 lines

New Thread

Lead Free

Lead Free

Paul Aldis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:24:43 -0000

32 lines

Re: Lead Free

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:42:11 EST

62 lines

Re: Lead Free

Johnson, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:01:55 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

Lead Free Workshops Coming to Your Area

Lead Free Workshops Coming to Your Area

Alexandra Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:45:48 -0600

52 lines

New Thread

Led component Pull Test

Led component Pull Test

Arturo Medellin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 14:39:28 -0600

32 lines

New Thread

LF ICT probing

LF ICT probing

Sklenar Vit (RBAU-AE/MFE4) * <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:06:14 +1100

43 lines

New Thread

LGA Packages

LGA Packages

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:07:27 -0000

39 lines

Re: LGA Packages

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:16:21 -0500

64 lines

Re: LGA Packages

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:39:11 -0000

94 lines

Re: LGA Packages

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:10:07 -0500

117 lines

Re: LGA Packages

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:12:38 +0200

123 lines

New Thread

LICIPCDC February 15th Meeting

LICIPCDC February 15th Meeting

Tordahl, Edward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:11:16 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

limits for plant vibration

limits for plant vibration

Roger Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:18:12 -0600

41 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:33:14 -0500

99 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:43:23 -0700

125 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:05:34 +0100

91 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:32:02 -0500

92 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:46:37 +0100

119 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:30:29 -0700

161 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

Blair K. Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:50:29 -0800

54 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:01:25 +0100

174 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:19:12 +0100

75 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:34:00 -0500

143 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

Paul Aldis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:56:01 -0000

179 lines

Re: limits for plant vibration

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:31:27 +0100

200 lines

New Thread

Magnetic inner core

Magnetic inner core

Fineline Circuits, Inc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:00:08 -0500

31 lines

Re: Magnetic inner core

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:39:11 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

Stephen Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:53:51 -0600

46 lines

Re: Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:05:52 -0600

80 lines

Re: Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

David Greig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:24:03 -0000

113 lines

Re: Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

Stephen Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:18:19 -0600

134 lines

Re: Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

JaMi Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:56:32 -0800

189 lines

Re: Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

Stephen Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:58:38 -0600

275 lines

Re: Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:10:51 -0500

93 lines

Re: Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:34:07 -0600

173 lines

Re: Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

JaMi Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:02:45 -0800

337 lines

Re: Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:06:59 +0200

91 lines

Re: Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:12:47 -0600

186 lines

Re: Manufacturability of PCB Stack-up...

steve kingdon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:42:48 +1300

144 lines

New Thread

Microcircuit Palladium Lead Finish (Good or Bad)?

Microcircuit Palladium Lead Finish (Good or Bad)?

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:06:05 -0500

41 lines

Re: Microcircuit Palladium Lead Finish (Good or Bad)?

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:33:21 -0600

83 lines

Re: Microcircuit Palladium Lead Finish (Good or Bad)?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:36:58 -0500

99 lines

New Thread

Mixing Lead free BGAs with normal BGAs

Mixing Lead free BGAs with normal BGAs

DUTTON Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:17:52 +1100

35 lines

Re: Mixing Lead free BGAs with normal BGAs

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:58:36 -0600

83 lines

Re: Mixing Lead free BGAs with normal BGAs

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:48:51 -0800

91 lines

Re: Mixing Lead free BGAs with normal BGAs

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:23:15 -0800

32 lines

Re: Mixing Lead free BGAs with normal BGAs

DUTTON Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:26:12 +1100

34 lines

New Thread

Need "Full AT" Spec

Need "Full AT" Spec

Blake, Mark L <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:55:14 -0800

29 lines

Re: Need "Full AT" Spec

Stephen Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:15:09 -0600

99 lines

Re: Need "Full AT" Spec

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 08:01:43 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

NTC Planes and Trains...

NTC Planes and Trains...

Stephen Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:21:19 -0600

41 lines

Re: NTC Planes and Trains...

Hal Winslow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:01:04 -0500

83 lines

Re: NTC Planes and Trains...

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:27:43 -0800

108 lines

Re: NTC Planes and Trains...

Clyde Sprowl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:22:12 -0500

136 lines

Re: NTC Planes and Trains...

Geoff Haines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:51:19 +1100

74 lines

New Thread

NTC: Friday type question

Re: NTC: Friday type question

Brummer Chuck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Dec 2004 08:48:00 -0800

65 lines

New Thread

ODB++ to Gerber convertor

ODB++ to Gerber convertor

Daan Terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:32:01 +0100

42 lines

Re: ODB++ to Gerber convertor

Indrek Rebane <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:12:27 +0200

40 lines

Re: ODB++ to Gerber convertor

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:12:16 -0500

82 lines

Re: ODB++ to Gerber convertor

Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:52:44 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Old Version GC-Place

Re: Old Version GC-Place

Poh Kong Hui <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:57:34 +0800

28 lines

New Thread

Opps, Sorry

Opps, Sorry

Brummer Chuck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:34:17 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

OSP Finishes

OSP Finishes

Atkinson, Neil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:31:58 -0000

42 lines

New Thread

OSP process for PCB

OSP process for PCB

David Harman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:16:54 -0800

45 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Johnson, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:08:15 -0500

84 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Cheryl Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:22:42 -0700

126 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:51:27 -0000

84 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Paul Aldis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:18:08 -0000

110 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:04:24 -0700

111 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:22:02 -0000

81 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:47:59 EST

39 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:57:14 -0000

79 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:40:48 -0800

127 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Pete Lymn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:39:44 -0000

91 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Johnson, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:57:38 -0500

129 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:29:22 -0000

181 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

Jim Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:22:51 -0500

174 lines

Re: OSP process for PCB

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:48:41 -0800

172 lines

New Thread

Parial Swati/NAN/ATS/IN is out of the office.

Parial Swati/NAN/ATS/IN is out of the office.

Parial Swati <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 01:03:14 +0530

26 lines

New Thread

Peel able Etch Block

Peel able Etch Block

Brummer Chuck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:05:37 -0800

38 lines

Re: Peel able Etch Block

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:56:54 -0500

80 lines

Re: Peel able Etch Block

Donald Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:50:44 -0600

59 lines

Peel able Etch Block

Brummer Chuck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:05:37 -0800

38 lines

Re: Peel able Etch Block

Eric Bonatti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:52:44 -0500

128 lines

Re: Peel able Etch Block

Afri Singh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:39:52 -0500

165 lines

New Thread

Peelable mask

Peelable mask

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:03:48 -0000

45 lines

Re: Peelable mask

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:49:07 -0500

86 lines

Re: Peelable mask

Brummer Chuck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:47:53 -0800

80 lines

New Thread

Peelable mask on Sterling Silver coatings?

Peelable mask on Sterling Silver coatings?

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:20:47 -0000

37 lines

Re: Peelable mask on Sterling Silver coatings?

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:41:03 -0000

77 lines

Re: Peelable mask on Sterling Silver coatings?

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:40:57 -0600

68 lines

New Thread

Planar Transformer construction on circuit boards

Planar Transformer construction on circuit boards

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:05:06 -0500

29 lines

Re: Planar Transformer construction on circuit boards

Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:05:05 -0800

45 lines

New Thread

Plating on LCP/PPA Moulded devices

Re: Plating on LCP/PPA Moulded devices

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:57:29 EST

38 lines

Re: Plating on LCP/PPA Moulded devices

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:11:49 -0800

139 lines

Re: Plating on LCP/PPA Moulded devices

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:22:59 -0800

98 lines

Re: Plating on LCP/PPA Moulded devices

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:27:40 +0100

117 lines

Re: Plating on LCP/PPA Moulded devices

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 00:23:13 -0800

202 lines

Re: Plating on LCP/PPA Moulded devices

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:56:04 +0100

220 lines

Re: Plating on LCP/PPA Moulded devices

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 01:19:58 -0800

269 lines

Re: Plating on LCP/PPA Moulded devices

Eric CHRISTISON <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:46:08 -0000

273 lines

New Thread

Pot heater elements for Econopak EPK+ Type 400F Huntsville

Pot heater elements for Econopak EPK+ Type 400F Huntsville

Stephen Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:10:45 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

PTH,plane plating pattern plating

PTH,plane plating pattern plating

Baski Devre <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:50:46 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

QP242 Placement Equipment.

QP242 Placement Equipment.

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:59:58 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

qualification for new PCB vendor

qualification for new PCB vendor

Stone, Tenison (MN10) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:28:32 -0700

39 lines

Re: qualification for new PCB vendor

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:38:13 -0500

79 lines

Re: qualification for new PCB vendor

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:10:51 -0800

74 lines

New Thread

Question about via masking on BGA pattern...

Re: Question about via masking on BGA pattern...

Mcmaster, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:04:03 -0800

62 lines

New Thread

Reflow oven and surface mount equipment infor request

Re: Reflow oven and surface mount equipment infor request

Hughes, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:59:53 -0500

113 lines

New Thread

Removal of Non-functional pads

Removal of Non-functional pads

Pete menuez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:02:40 -0500

25 lines

Re: Removal of Non-functional pads

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:53:53 +0200

52 lines

Re: Removal of Non-functional pads

Terry Kozlyk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:04:37 -0700

91 lines

Re: Removal of Non-functional pads

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:13:02 -0500

94 lines

Re: Removal of Non-functional pads

Frank Kimmey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:29:00 -0800

98 lines

Re: Removal of Non-functional pads

Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:35:04 +0200

130 lines

Re: Removal of Non-functional pads

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:48:45 -0500

123 lines

Re: Removal of Non-functional pads

Bill.Birch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:46:47 -0500

95 lines

Re: Removal of Non-functional pads

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:53:36 EST

63 lines

New Thread

Rigid-Flex

Rigid-Flex

Jack C. Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:56:50 -0600

37 lines

Re: Rigid-Flex

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:51:13 EST

41 lines

New Thread

RoHS Cleaning Chemical Compliance

RoHS Cleaning Chemical Compliance

Charlie Pitarys <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:31:00 -0500

33 lines

Re: RoHS Cleaning Chemical Compliance

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 22:48:10 -0800

64 lines

Re: RoHS Cleaning Chemical Compliance

Alistair Murray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:15:06 -0000

120 lines

Re: RoHS Cleaning Chemical Compliance

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:18:58 +0200

66 lines

Re: RoHS Cleaning Chemical Compliance

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:29:15 -0500

96 lines

New Thread

SC79 packaging

SC79 packaging

Karen Walters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:46:35 -0500

34 lines

Re: SC79 packaging

Karen Walters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:59:32 -0500

77 lines

Re: SC79 packaging

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:18:14 -0600

50 lines

Re: SC79 packaging

Karen Walters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:33 -0500

98 lines

New Thread

Seeking data on temperature impact on Type UR conformal voating

Seeking data on temperature impact on Type UR conformal voating

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:41:14 -0500

27 lines

Re: Seeking data on temperature impact on Type UR conformal voating

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:50:39 -0700

56 lines

Re: Seeking data on temperature impact on Type UR conformal voating

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:37:47 +0000

71 lines

New Thread

Selective PTH laser solder machines...

Selective PTH laser solder machines...

Stephen Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:23:01 -0600

47 lines

New Thread

Signing off

Signing off

Tom Gervascio <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:23:20 -0500

33 lines

Re: Signing off

Bill Coleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:38:56 -0700

65 lines

Re: Signing off

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:47:30 +0100

51 lines

Re: Signing off

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:42:34 -0500

82 lines

New Thread

Signing off (Out of Office)

Re: Signing off (Out of Office)

Tom Gervascio <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:39:36 -0500

27 lines

Re: Signing off (Out of Office)

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:54:06 -0500

76 lines

New Thread

SMT Equipment Training

SMT Equipment Training

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:36:55 -0800

31 lines

Re: SMT Equipment Training

John Guy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:10:48 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

Sn sputtering

Sn sputtering

Janoch Jiří, Ing. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:23:07 +0100

35 lines

Re: Sn sputtering

Karnwal, Pankaj <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:41:02 +0100

76 lines

Re: Sn sputtering

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:51:27 -0000

121 lines

New Thread

SNEC chapter meeting

SNEC chapter meeting

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:56:22 EST

54 lines

New Thread

So what about Tin Whiskers?

So what about Tin Whiskers?

Kasprzak, Bill (sys) USX <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:27:58 -0500

34 lines

Re: So what about Tin Whiskers?

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:27:18 -0700

75 lines

Re: So what about Tin Whiskers?

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:10:03 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Solder joint reliability

Solder joint reliability

Ted Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:47:37 -0800

47 lines

New Thread

Someone Else Thinks Same Way

Someone Else Thinks Same Way

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:58:17 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Squeegee color codes

Squeegee color codes

Syed Sajid Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:19:14 -0600

25 lines

Re: Squeegee color codes

Stephen Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:52:21 -0600

92 lines

Re: Squeegee color codes

Syed Sajid Ahmad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:21:48 -0600

140 lines

Re: Squeegee color codes

Stephen Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:11:56 -0600

199 lines

New Thread

storage temperature of assembled pcbs

storage temperature of assembled pcbs

Şefika ÖZKAL <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:34:52 +0200

92 lines

Re: storage temperature of assembled pcbs

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:10:46 -0500

62 lines

Re: storage temperature of assembled pcbs

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:16:16 -0600

170 lines

New Thread

Sulfide contamination

Re: Sulfide contamination

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:09:15 +0100

58 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:12:40 +0200

113 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:27:15 +0200

67 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:28:44 +0200

58 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:41:09 +0100

78 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:36:06 -0500

67 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:41:22 -0500

138 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:45:55 +0200

165 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:43:52 -0500

120 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:39:34 -0500

172 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:48:27 -0500

179 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 01:55:27 EST

30 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 06:23:04 -0700

57 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:33:23 -0500

92 lines

Re: Sulfide contamination

Stephen Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:54:09 -0600

117 lines

New Thread

Tears In Polyimide/Kapton Flex

Re: Tears In Polyimide/Kapton Flex

Brummer Chuck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:11:55 -0800

52 lines

Re: Tears In Polyimide/Kapton Flex

Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:42:12 -0800

75 lines

Re: Tears In Polyimide/Kapton Flex

Eric Bonatti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:26:46 -0500

128 lines

New Thread

Technical basis for Table 6-1 of IPC-2221

Technical basis for Table 6-1 of IPC-2221

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:55:57 -0500

41 lines

Re: Technical basis for Table 6-1 of IPC-2221

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:32:15 +0200

69 lines

Re: Technical basis for Table 6-1 of IPC-2221

Johnson, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 07:42:42 -0500

109 lines

Re: Technical basis for Table 6-1 of IPC-2221

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:13:42 +0200

134 lines

Re: Technical basis for Table 6-1 of IPC-2221

Jack C. Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:50:35 -0600

73 lines

Technical basis for Table 6-1 of IPC-2221

Valerie St.Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:23:49 -0500

96 lines

New Thread

Thermal Laminates

Thermal Laminates

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:37:45 +0400

44 lines

New Thread

Unicam and Universal VCD/Sequencer programming

Unicam and Universal VCD/Sequencer programming

Taylor, Royce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 05:55:57 -0600

46 lines

New Thread

Vacuum sealer

Vacuum sealer

Yannick Brisson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:55:50 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Wanted Help fo CID Certification (CID)

Wanted Help fo CID Certification (CID)

narenthesia_engg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:03:57 +0530

37 lines

Re: Wanted Help fo CID Certification (CID)

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:01:28 -0800

89 lines

Re: Wanted Help fo CID Certification (CID)

Clyde Sprowl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:19:40 -0500

113 lines

Re: Wanted Help fo CID Certification (CID)

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:05:32 -0800

165 lines

Re: Wanted Help fo CID Certification (CID)

William Gilman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:14:06 -0500

126 lines

Re: Wanted Help fo CID Certification (CID)

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:16:37 -0800

173 lines

New Thread

Warp & Twist

Warp & Twist

Judy Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:45:15 -0800

35 lines

Re: Warp & Twist

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 14:12:32 -0500

70 lines

Re: Warp & Twist

Pete menuez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:10:40 -0500

75 lines

Re: Warp & Twist

Judy Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:16:47 -0800

109 lines

Re: Warp & Twist

Russell Burdick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 18:08:37 -0700

131 lines

New Thread

Wave Solder Flux Conversion Qualification

Wave Solder Flux Conversion Qualification

Chris Schaefer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:14:20 -0600

22 lines

Wave Solder Flux Conversion Qualification

Chris Schaefer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:27:56 -0600

54 lines

Re: Wave Solder Flux Conversion Qualification

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:19:23 -0500

87 lines

Re: Wave Solder Flux Conversion Qualification

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:46:39 +0000

121 lines

New Thread

When to glue

When to glue

Black, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:47:45 -0500

34 lines

Re: When to glue

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:00:23 -0000

84 lines

New Thread

[NTC]limits for plant vibration and trains

Re: [NTC]limits for plant vibration and trains

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:39:01 -0600

115 lines

Re: [NTC]limits for plant vibration and trains

Paul Aldis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:45:03 -0000

164 lines

Re: [NTC]limits for plant vibration and trains

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:53:19 +0100

143 lines

Re: [NTC]limits for plant vibration and trains

Art Glass <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:50:11 -0600

19 lines

Re: [NTC]limits for plant vibration and trains

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:06:03 -0500

73 lines

Re: [NTC]limits for plant vibration and trains

Gaugler, Kevin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:26:37 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

[TN] Led component Pull  Test

Re: [TN] Led component Pull  Test

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 22:14:14 EST

60 lines

New Thread

[TN] Re: [TN] Led component Pull  Test

Re: [TN] Re: [TN] Led component Pull  Test

Arturo Medellin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:33:48 -0600

101 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager