LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


November 2004


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"CL-CODE-MFR" code (3 messages)
(Archive Copy) Re: [TN] Alternatives to Conformal Coating? (1 message)
(QFN) Microchip Carrier with Center PAD (3 messages)
63/37 paste and Lead free component (1 message)
90/10 solder (1 message)
<No subject> (1 message)
A Friday question (11 messages)
Alternatives to Conformal Coating? (14 messages)
Antw: Re: [TN] English expression (2 messages)
Antw: [TN] 63/37 paste and Lead free component (1 message)
Antw: [TN] Solderability issue... (1 message)
Aqueous batch washer (2 messages)
Aqueous cleaner mats?? (3 messages)
Assemblies built to withstand very high G-loads... (8 messages)
AW: [TN] AW: [TN] Video analysis of solder joint formation - NTC (2 messages)
AW: [TN] Video analysis of solder joint formation (1 message)
AW: [TN] Video analysis of solder joint formation - NTC (1 message)
Battery Life Test (2 messages)
BGA Environmental Protection (3 messages)
BGA repairs (2 messages)
Boston area Mtg IPC/DC, 18-Nov (1 message)
CAD data for assembling of PCB. (5 messages)
Calculating cost to assemble (3 messages)
Calculation of Connector Contact DC Resistance (2 messages)
cap shear test spec (2 messages)
CC (1 message)
Central & South American shops (1 message)
Champagne Voids (6 messages)
Component counters (4 messages)
Conductive Adhesive (8 messages)
Contamination on the fabs.... (6 messages)
Controlled Impedance Design (7 messages)
Coplanarity for SMT connectors (2 messages)
copper weight (18 messages)
CSP&UBGA manual reballing problems (1 message)
Cu Sputtering (4 messages)
Current Capacity for Via (1 message)
D-Pack, holes, solder (6 messages)
Dennis Petrosky/NY-BIN/Ametek is out of the office. (2 messages)
design consideration solder methodology (1 message)
Desmear Line (1 message)
DFM Cost Factors (2 messages)
DI water heaters (3 messages)
Die Penetrant SJ Crack Inspection Process (6 messages)
Diode Pin Numbering Question... (2 messages)
Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver (12 messages)
Embedded Passive Components Conference - Last Chance to Register (1 message)
English expression (22 messages)
ENIG (2 messages)
ENIG as edge-connector finish (6 messages)
Entek Plus Cu106A HT (2 messages)
ESD Footwear Questions (2 messages)
excessive baking (1 message)
Field Failures and reworked PCAs? (4 messages)
Flow soldering gold plated pads? (3 messages)
flux names (1 message)
Forum members in Singapore (1 message)
Forum? (7 messages)
FR4 and Lead free (7 messages)
FR4 versus FR5 (3 messages)
Friday NTC: how to feel really stupid (2 messages)
Friday Question - Heavy Costs (20 messages)
FW: Soldered heat slug (2 messages)
FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation (14 messages)
FW: [TN] (3 messages)
Fwd: Re: [TN] Via-on-pad / via-in-pad (1 message)
gold removal from smt components per J-STD-001 ? (2 messages)
Guidelines for Cleaning by Flux Type (2 messages)
High G- forces (1 message)
High Pot Test Mats (1 message)
HTC Vapor Phase System (1 message)
Humidity test (3 messages)
Immersion Silver (18 messages)
Immersion White Tin Plating Specification (6 messages)
In-House Training Programs (3 messages)
Ionic contamination (1 message)
IPC Designers Council Pacific Northwest Chapter Meeting Notice (1 message)
IPC J-STD-001 Certified Trainer Courses... (4 messages)
IPC Solder Paste Test Method stencils (3 messages)
IPC web server down (2 messages)
IPC-1720A Assembly Qualification Profile (3 messages)
Jumper Wire - Better insulation? (10 messages)
Label 0.25"X0.75" (6 messages)
labor price-break for having board on sub-panel (array) (2 messages)
Laser seamwelding (5 messages)
Last Chance to Register for Lead Free North America (1 message)
Lead Free is not Free, is Costly (10 messages)
Lead Free North America Conference - December 1-3 in Boston, MA (1 message)
Lead free Tin Plating problems... (2 messages)
LongBoards (9 messages)
Looking for a contact (1 message)
Matthew L Hamand is out of the office. (1 message)
max peak temp bt (2 messages)
Moisture - Post Baking condition (1 message)
moisture saturation curve (1 message)
Need help (for sputtered Cu source) (4 messages)
new member (16 messages)
NOMAIL (1 message)
NTC - other forums (5 messages)
NTC repeated paragraph (1 message)
NTC: etiquette (11 messages)
NTC: Friday and I wanna know.... (9 messages)
NTC: home computer (16 messages)
NTC: odd Friday (1 message)
Official IPC J-STD-001 Certified Trainer Courses... (1 message)
Open traces (2 messages)
OSP standard (4 messages)
OT: ODB++ files (4 messages)
out of office reply (1 message)
Oxide replacement (5 messages)
Pad design to keep SMT connector from shifting during re flow. (2 messages)
Pad design to keep SMT connector from shifting during reflow. (3 messages)
Panels vs. Pallets (1 message)
PCB Materials (3 messages)
Plating through a 2 layer board hole after assembly? (2 messages)
plugging vias (7 messages)
PM Procedures for Ionising Air Guns (1 message)
Poor ENIG Solderability (7 messages)
Press fit tooling (3 messages)
Process Indicators... (14 messages)
Profiling Equipment Recommendations (1 message)
PWB Immersion Silver Finish (3 messages)
Re-balling of BGAs (9 messages)
Re; Controlled Impedance Design (1 message)
Recall: gold removal from smt components per J-STD-001 ? (1 message)
Removal of Connector (8 messages)
repeated paragraph (4 messages)
Resistor Pack Preference - Concave or Convex (1 message)
Samtec PCS2 Socket issue... (9 messages)
SIGNOFF (1 message)
Silkscreen removal (2 messages)
SMT Soldering Test of ENIG (2 messages)
SNEC Mtg (2 messages)
SNEC mtg date correction (1 message)
SOD323 problem... (17 messages)
Solder Attach to Area Array Packages (1 message)
solder float test (2 messages)
Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope? (10 messages)
Solder material qualification (1 message)
Solder or Sodder? Even More NTC (3 messages)
Solder or Sodder? More NTC (2 messages)
Solder resist inspection underneath components (7 messages)
Solderability issue... (5 messages)
Soldered heat slug (1 message)
Special Discounts on 001D and 610D Workshops (1 message)
Specification status / MIL-C-5541 (3 messages)
Specifications for Drilled hole roughness as per IPC (4 messages)
Standard status (5 messages)
Strange Soldermask Defect. (2 messages)
Strange Soldermask Defect... (26 messages)
Surface Finish for keypad membrane switches (6 messages)
Tape and reel parts (2 messages)
Technet Unsubscribe (1 message)
Tescon P&P (1 message)
thicker conformal coating - selective encapsulant (1 message)
Tin whiskers (4 messages)
Trays for SMT connectors (2 messages)
Upcoming Lead Free, RoHS and WEEE Events (1 message)
Users of Allied High Tech X-sect equip? (1 message)
Via hole failures (with pictures) (12 messages)
Via-on-pad / via-in-pad (8 messages)
Video analysis of solder joint formation (3 messages)
Video analysis of solder joint formation - Working NOW!!!! (1 message)
VOCs (2 messages)
water based conformal coatings (5 messages)
Wave and Reflow soldering fluids (1 message)
You are invited to IPC Designers Learning Symposium, Montreal Canada (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re:

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:31:02 -0600

79 lines

Re:

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:56:58 -0500

81 lines

Re:

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:19:24 -0600

106 lines

Re:

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:55:56 -0500

148 lines

New Thread

"CL-CODE-MFR" code

"CL-CODE-MFR" code

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:59:59 -0800

37 lines

Re: "CL-CODE-MFR" code

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:27:18 -0600

104 lines

Re: "CL-CODE-MFR" code

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:10:49 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

(Archive Copy) Re: [TN] Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Re: (Archive Copy) Re: [TN] Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:16:26 +0100

153 lines

New Thread

(QFN) Microchip Carrier with Center PAD

(QFN) Microchip Carrier with Center PAD

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:35:26 -0800

37 lines

Re: (QFN) Microchip Carrier with Center PAD

Dave Seymour <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:05:35 -0500

102 lines

Re: (QFN) Microchip Carrier with Center PAD

Mcmaster, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:00:07 -0800

139 lines

New Thread

63/37 paste and Lead free component

63/37 paste and Lead free component

Yannick Brisson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:18:24 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

90/10 solder

90/10 solder

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:04:29 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Chellis, Tammy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:33:02 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

A Friday question

A Friday question

Blair K. Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 06:42:19 -0800

64 lines

Re: A Friday question

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:54:03 -0000

102 lines

Re: A Friday question

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:57:40 -0500

106 lines

Re: A Friday question

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:21:57 -0800

67 lines

Re: A Friday question

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:28:06 -0700

137 lines

Re: A Friday question

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:35:19 -0500

139 lines

Re: A Friday question

Jim Steadman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:45:12 -0800

164 lines

Re: A Friday question

Dave Simonik <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:07:29 -0500

114 lines

Re: A Friday question

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:44:03 -0500

174 lines

Re: A Friday question

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:15:01 +0100

53 lines

Re: A Friday question

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:17:11 +0100

151 lines

New Thread

Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:08:12 -0800

58 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Valerie St.Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:46:12 -0500

99 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Donkle, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:36:23 -0600

108 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:48:33 -0500

95 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:51:36 -0700

93 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:50:53 -0500

106 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:45:38 EST

24 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:55:03 -0800

134 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:27:07 -0800

185 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:44:27 -0800

210 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:20:05 -0800

271 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:08:33 +0200

114 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:40:58 +0100

89 lines

Re: Alternatives to Conformal Coating?

Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:03:54 -0000

169 lines

New Thread

Antw: Re: [TN] English expression

Antw: Re: [TN] English expression

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:43:47 +0100

51 lines

Re: Antw: Re: [TN] English expression

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:34:55 -0000

83 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] 63/37 paste and Lead free component

Antw: [TN] 63/37 paste and Lead free component

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:03:35 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] Solderability issue...

Antw: [TN] Solderability issue...

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:58:56 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

Aqueous batch washer

Aqueous batch washer

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:40:00 -0600

37 lines

Re: Aqueous batch washer

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:57:23 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

Aqueous cleaner mats??

Aqueous cleaner mats??

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:26:15 -0800

59 lines

Re: Aqueous cleaner mats??

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:09:40 -0000

125 lines

Re: Aqueous cleaner mats??

Shean Dalton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:43:24 -0600

104 lines

New Thread

Assemblies built to withstand very high G-loads...

Assemblies built to withstand very high G-loads...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:36:33 -0500

25 lines

Re: Assemblies built to withstand very high G-loads...

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:06:01 -0500

65 lines

Re: Assemblies built to withstand very high G-loads...

COOKE, ROBERT W. (JSC-NX) (WGI) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:53:58 -0600

68 lines

Re: Assemblies built to withstand very high G-loads...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:25:42 -0700

50 lines

Re: Assemblies built to withstand very high G-loads...

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:48:52 +0100

52 lines

Re: Assemblies built to withstand very high G-loads...

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 06:11:22 -0500

98 lines

Re: Assemblies built to withstand very high G-loads...

Lance Mayes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 05:26:59 -0700

113 lines

Re: Assemblies built to withstand very high G-loads...

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:04:52 -0700

139 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] AW: [TN] Video analysis of solder joint formation - NTC

AW: [TN] AW: [TN] Video analysis of solder joint formation - NTC

Gebhard.Neifer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:49:52 +0100

429 lines

Re: AW: [TN] AW: [TN] Video analysis of solder joint formation - NTC

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:08:48 -0500

535 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Video analysis of solder joint formation

AW: [TN] Video analysis of solder joint formation

Gebhard.Neifer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:06:41 +0100

184 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Video analysis of solder joint formation - NTC

Re: AW: [TN] Video analysis of solder joint formation - NTC

Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:37:48 +0200

402 lines

New Thread

Battery Life Test

Battery Life Test

Antonio <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:59:22 -0200

29 lines

Re: Battery Life Test

Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:39:57 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

BGA Environmental Protection

BGA Environmental Protection

Newland, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:38:45 -0500

43 lines

Re: BGA Environmental Protection

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:29:22 +0000

112 lines

Re: BGA Environmental Protection

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:50:21 -0500

79 lines

New Thread

BGA repairs

BGA repairs

Zweigart, Siegmund <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:44:31 +0100

32 lines

Re: BGA repairs

Reuven ROKAH <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:18:30 +0200

85 lines

New Thread

Boston area Mtg IPC/DC, 18-Nov

Boston area Mtg IPC/DC, 18-Nov

Jeff Seeger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:23:35 -0500

100 lines

New Thread

CAD data for assembling of PCB.

CAD data for assembling of PCB.

Yordan Venev <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:11:35 +0200

54 lines

Re: CAD data for assembling of PCB.

Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:32:19 +0200

97 lines

Re: CAD data for assembling of PCB.

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:20:18 -0500

101 lines

Re: CAD data for assembling of PCB.

Daan Terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:12:31 +0100

98 lines

Re: CAD data for assembling of PCB.

Yordan Venev <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:45:57 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

Calculating cost to assemble

Calculating cost to assemble

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:22:28 -0500

33 lines

Re: Calculating cost to assemble

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:04:21 -0500

97 lines

Re: Calculating cost to assemble

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:09:26 -0500

148 lines

New Thread

Calculation of Connector Contact DC Resistance

Calculation of Connector Contact DC Resistance

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:59:29 -0500

34 lines

Re: Calculation of Connector Contact DC Resistance

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:55:51 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

cap shear test spec

cap shear test spec

Hung, Jesse <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:47:51 +0800

33 lines

Re: cap shear test spec

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 19:47:27 EST

48 lines

New Thread

CC

CC

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:08:33 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Central & South American shops

Central & South American shops

Robert Coburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:43:29 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Champagne Voids

Champagne Voids

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 12:29:49 EST

25 lines

Re: Champagne Voids

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:04:13 -0500

40 lines

Re: Champagne Voids

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:35:45 -0500

72 lines

Re: Champagne Voids

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 07:51:04 -0700

69 lines

Re: Champagne Voids

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:50:38 -0600

63 lines

Re: Champagne Voids

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:57:45 EST

31 lines

New Thread

Component counters

Component counters

Black, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:26:10 -0500

33 lines

Re: Component counters

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:32:29 -0600

70 lines

Re: Component counters

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:49:13 -0500

62 lines

Re: Component counters

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:50:10 -0600

68 lines

New Thread

Conductive Adhesive

Conductive Adhesive

Peter L <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:19:37 -0600

27 lines

Re: Conductive Adhesive

John Guy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:28:57 -0500

66 lines

Re: Conductive Adhesive

James TerVeen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:37:36 -0500

119 lines

Re: Conductive Adhesive

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:44:17 +0100

71 lines

Re: Conductive Adhesive

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:23:35 -0500

175 lines

Re: Conductive Adhesive

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:44:00 -0500

76 lines

Re: Conductive Adhesive

John Guy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:02:13 -0500

209 lines

Re: Conductive Adhesive

Misner, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:12:08 -0600

61 lines

New Thread

Contamination on the fabs....

Contamination on the fabs....

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:14:00 -0800

48 lines

Re: Contamination on the fabs....

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:17:36 -0800

84 lines

Re: Contamination on the fabs....

Cheryl Tulkoff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:51:19 -0600

141 lines

Re: Contamination on the fabs....

Cheryl Tulkoff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:01:33 -0600

144 lines

Re: Contamination on the fabs....

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:45:51 +0200

77 lines

Re: Contamination on the fabs....

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:42:57 -0800

118 lines

New Thread

Controlled Impedance Design

Controlled Impedance Design

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:19:07 -0800

50 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance Design

Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:30:22 -0800

84 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance Design

Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:32:33 -0800

89 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance Design

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:58:38 -0800

103 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance Design

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:10:56 -0800

90 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance Design

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:05:28 -0800

96 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance Design

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:15:03 -0700

100 lines

New Thread

Coplanarity for SMT connectors

Coplanarity for SMT connectors

Becerra Alejandro (TTE) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:58:21 -0500

30 lines

Re: Coplanarity for SMT connectors

Dale Ritzen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:27:39 -0600

68 lines

New Thread

copper weight

copper weight

Joe Spicuzza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:01:35 -0500

37 lines

Re: copper weight

Thomas, Brian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:14:20 -0500

85 lines

Re: copper weight

Judy Rae Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:26:34 -0800

59 lines

Re: copper weight

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:23:12 -0800

58 lines

Re: copper weight

Valerie St.Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:36:49 -0500

78 lines

Re: copper weight

Paul Holloway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:55:42 -0600

79 lines

Re: copper weight

Joe Spicuzza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:51:35 -0500

35 lines

Re: copper weight

Judy Rae Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:06:50 -0800

58 lines

Re: copper weight

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:13:08 -0500

73 lines

Re: copper weight

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:44:08 -0500

118 lines

Re: copper weight

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:35:12 -0500

153 lines

Re: copper weight

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:21:24 -0500

190 lines

Re: copper weight

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:54:27 EST

41 lines

Re: copper weight

David Greig <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 19:18:26 -0000

92 lines

Re: copper weight

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:25:50 -0500

87 lines

Re: copper weight

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:00:11 -0700

70 lines

Re: copper weight

Valerie St.Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:11:34 -0500

90 lines

Re: copper weight

Joe Spicuzza <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:45:32 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

CSP&UBGA manual reballing problems

CSP&UBGA manual reballing problems

don_well <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:30:31 +0800

17 lines

New Thread

Cu Sputtering

Cu Sputtering

Rob Goodwin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:59:59 -0600

26 lines

Re: Cu Sputtering

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:12:52 -0000

83 lines

Re: Cu Sputtering

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:33:48 +0100

54 lines

Re: Cu Sputtering

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:28:06 -0500

90 lines

New Thread

Current Capacity for Via

Current Capacity for Via

ChangMyung RYU <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Nov 2004 00:50:33 +0000

52 lines

New Thread

D-Pack, holes, solder

D-Pack, holes, solder

Yannick Brisson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:05:14 -0500

32 lines

Re: D-Pack, holes, solder

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:04:52 -0500

60 lines

Re: D-Pack, holes, solder

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:08:14 -0500

61 lines

Re: D-Pack, holes, solder

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:39:20 -0600

65 lines

Re: D-Pack, holes, solder

John Guy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:42:30 -0500

71 lines

Re: D-Pack, holes, solder

Valerie St.Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:09:45 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Dennis Petrosky/NY-BIN/Ametek is out of the office.

Dennis Petrosky/NY-BIN/Ametek is out of the office.

Dennis Petrosky <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 01:03:03 -0500

24 lines

Re: Dennis Petrosky/NY-BIN/Ametek is out of the office.

Saul MorenoRodriguez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:51:31 -0600

53 lines

New Thread

design consideration solder methodology

Re: design consideration solder methodology

Daan Terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 09:19:45 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

Desmear Line

Re: Desmear Line

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:42:40 +0530

177 lines

New Thread

DFM Cost Factors

Re: DFM Cost Factors

Happy Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 08:47:37 -0500

118 lines

Re: DFM Cost Factors

T.D. Kozlyk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 05:50:09 -0700

93 lines

New Thread

DI water heaters

DI water heaters

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 06:38:30 -0800

30 lines

Re: DI water heaters

Dave Simonik <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:03:03 -0500

88 lines

Re: DI water heaters

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:12:12 -0500

134 lines

New Thread

Die Penetrant SJ Crack Inspection Process

Die Penetrant SJ Crack Inspection Process

Newland, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:55:51 -0500

45 lines

Re: Die Penetrant SJ Crack Inspection Process

Bob willis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:14:11 -0000

124 lines

Re: Die Penetrant SJ Crack Inspection Process

Judy Rae Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:31:09 -0800

130 lines

Re: Die Penetrant SJ Crack Inspection Process

Bob willis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:40:24 -0000

195 lines

Re: Die Penetrant SJ Crack Inspection Process

Shoda, Stephen J (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:59:13 -0500

83 lines

Re: Die Penetrant SJ Crack Inspection Process

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:02:29 -0700

195 lines

New Thread

Diode Pin Numbering Question...

Re: Diode Pin Numbering Question...

Schleman, Joe A. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 10:17:50 -0500

304 lines

Re: Diode Pin Numbering Question...

JaMi Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 10:22:43 -0800

327 lines

New Thread

Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

Eric Kalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:31:11 -0500

58 lines

Re: Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

Lee Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:46:27 -0500

94 lines

Re: Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

Mantz, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:53:11 -0800

86 lines

Re: Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:03:17 -0500

82 lines

Re: Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:32:10 -0800

83 lines

Re: Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

Eric Kalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:25:42 -0500

216 lines

Re: Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:33:55 -0500

239 lines

Re: Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:34:04 -0800

81 lines

Re: Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:28:08 EST

33 lines

Re: Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

leoleelee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:47:08 +0800

127 lines

Re: Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

Eric Kalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:20:56 -0500

73 lines

Re: Electrodeposited Silver vs. Immersion Silver

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:39:19 -0500

127 lines

New Thread

Embedded Passive Components Conference - Last Chance to Register

Embedded Passive Components Conference - Last Chance to Register

Alexandra Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:57:48 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

English expression

English expression

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:19:33 +0100

44 lines

Re: English expression

Judy Rae Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:38:31 -0800

64 lines

Re: English expression

Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:25:41 +0200

74 lines

Re: English expression

Gordon McAlpine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:29:59 -0000

98 lines

Re: English expression

COOKE, ROBERT W. (JSC-NX) (WGI) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:29:29 -0600

74 lines

Re: English expression

James TerVeen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 11:31:09 -0500

93 lines

Re: English expression

Kerr, Bryan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:31:30 +0000

121 lines

Re: English expression

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:35:04 +0100

65 lines

Re: English expression

Phillip Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:48:05 -0600

116 lines

Re: English expression

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:59:28 -0000

104 lines

Re: English expression

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:12:33 -0800

76 lines

Re: English expression

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:22:42 -0500

93 lines

Re: English expression

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:36:11 -0800

41 lines

Re: English expression

Valerie St.Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:02:17 -0500

110 lines

Re: English expression

Pete menuez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:34:54 -0500

97 lines

Re: English expression

Lance Mayes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:56:31 -0700

136 lines

Re: English expression

DUTTON Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:56:01 +1100

77 lines

Re: English expression

Chezhian, Krishnan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:03:28 +0800

106 lines

Re: English expression

Connie Korth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:53:35 -0600

118 lines

Re: English expression

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:05:36 EST

28 lines

Re: English expression

Reuven ROKAH <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Nov 2004 09:24:26 +0200

88 lines

Re: English expression

Larry Russell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:47:55 +0800

128 lines

New Thread

ENIG

ENIG

Janoch Jiří, Ing. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:04:57 +0100

32 lines

Re: ENIG

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 08:27:17 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

ENIG as edge-connector finish

ENIG as edge-connector finish

Glynn Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:00:18 -0800

24 lines

Re: ENIG as edge-connector finish

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:12:53 -0500

60 lines

Re: ENIG as edge-connector finish

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:17:13 -0500

79 lines

Re: ENIG as edge-connector finish

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:01:05 -0600

105 lines

Re: ENIG as edge-connector finish

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:04:49 -0500

121 lines

Re: ENIG as edge-connector finish

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:16:42 -0800

66 lines

New Thread

Entek Plus Cu106A HT

Entek Plus Cu106A HT

Cheryl Tulkoff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:59:10 -0600

26 lines

Re: Entek Plus Cu106A HT

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:49:52 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

ESD Footwear Questions

ESD Footwear Questions

Kevin Jaworenko <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:54:04 -0600

57 lines

Re: ESD Footwear Questions

Jimi Yazdanpanah <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:59:43 +1300

54 lines

New Thread

excessive baking

excessive baking

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:06:01 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Field Failures and reworked PCAs?

Field Failures and reworked PCAs?

EMTC Ireland <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:20:40 -0000

38 lines

Re: Field Failures and reworked PCAs?

Leo Higgins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:59:14 -0800

106 lines

Re: Field Failures and reworked PCAs?

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:31:54 -0500

135 lines

Re: Field Failures and reworked PCAs?

Gil Laifer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:27:06 +0100

69 lines

New Thread

Flow soldering gold plated pads?

Flow soldering gold plated pads?

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:30:05 -0000

42 lines

Re: Flow soldering gold plated pads?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:47:49 EST

38 lines

Re: Flow soldering gold plated pads?

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:54:30 -0000

73 lines

New Thread

flux names

flux names

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:46:47 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Forum members in Singapore

Forum members in Singapore

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:48:38 EST

33 lines

New Thread

Forum?

Forum?

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 07:05:55 EST

24 lines

Re: Forum?

David Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 06:32:40 -0600

50 lines

Re: Forum?

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:02:02 -0500

75 lines

Re: Forum?

Blomberg, Rainer (FL51) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:15:38 -0700

49 lines

Re: Forum?

Lance Mayes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:59:52 -0700

60 lines

Re: Forum?

Cagle, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:54:36 -0500

75 lines

Re: Forum?

Susan Mansilla <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 05:59:34 EST

26 lines

New Thread

FR4 and Lead free

FR4 and Lead free

Black, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:08:26 -0500

38 lines

Re: FR4 and Lead free

Eddie Rocha <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:59:13 -0800

67 lines

Re: FR4 and Lead free

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:34:47 -0500

83 lines

Re: FR4 and Lead free

Lee Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:29:25 -0500

80 lines

Re: FR4 and Lead free

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:33:09 -0800

120 lines

Re: FR4 and Lead free

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:38:42 EST

33 lines

Re: FR4 and Lead free

Hughes, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 04:42:09 -0500

195 lines

New Thread

FR4 versus FR5

FR4 versus FR5

Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:31:38 +0200

33 lines

Re: FR4 versus FR5

Geoff Layhe of Lamar Group <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:54:31 -0000

73 lines

FR4 versus FR5

Happy Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:16:15 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Friday NTC: how to feel really stupid

Friday NTC: how to feel really stupid

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:11:24 +0100

24 lines

Re: Friday NTC: how to feel really stupid

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:25:32 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Jack C. Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:52:56 -0600

30 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Eric Kalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:03:09 -0500

66 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:18:32 +0100

71 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Precision Analytical Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 06:10:03 -0800

58 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:41:55 +0200

54 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:09:11 +0000

100 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:11:47 +0000

101 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:00:09 -0500

107 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Jack C. Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:21:52 -0600

105 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Precision Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:27:07 -0800

135 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:45:27 +0000

146 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:46:47 -0500

104 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:56:08 -0000

145 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:07:45 -0500

97 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:04:51 -0800

44 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:22:58 -0800

126 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

George Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:35:20 -0800

157 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

paul reid <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:02:55 -0500

183 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Shean Dalton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:06:44 -0600

141 lines

Re: Friday Question - Heavy Costs

Edwin Louis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:24:53 -0500

117 lines

New Thread

FW: Soldered heat slug

FW: Soldered heat slug

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:56:35 -0600

37 lines

Re: FW: Soldered heat slug

Valerie St.Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:22:23 -0500

78 lines

New Thread

FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Higgins, Michael F <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:31:40 -0500

35 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Judy Rae Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:57:54 -0800

57 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:02:59 -0600

81 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Judy Rae Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:15:21 -0800

100 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Shean Dalton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:09:08 -0600

80 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:06:37 -0000

90 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 07:57:43 -0500

104 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 07:54:19 -0500

71 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:31:08 -0500

41 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Paul Peltier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:36:58 -0500

75 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Shahed Safavi-Bayat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:57:15 -0500

48 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:10:10 -0600

79 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:06:12 EST

32 lines

Re: FW: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 12:50:05 EST

40 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN]

FW: [TN]

Chellis, Tammy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:48:39 -0500

132 lines

Re: FW: [TN]

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:57:36 -0500

182 lines

Re: FW: [TN]

Afri Singh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:23:07 -0500

213 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: [TN] Via-on-pad / via-in-pad

Fwd: Re: [TN] Via-on-pad / via-in-pad

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:46:51 -0500

119 lines

New Thread

gold removal from smt components per J-STD-001 ?

gold removal from smt components per J-STD-001 ?

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:29:27 -0800

39 lines

gold removal from smt components per J-STD-001 ?

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:31:00 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

Guidelines for Cleaning by Flux Type

Guidelines for Cleaning by Flux Type

Dave Sorg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:22:22 -0600

40 lines

Re: Guidelines for Cleaning by Flux Type

Shean Dalton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:54:23 -0600

92 lines

New Thread

High G- forces

High G- forces

Zweigart, Siegmund <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:19:11 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

High Pot Test Mats

Re: High Pot Test Mats

David Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:31:56 -0600

50 lines

New Thread

HTC Vapor Phase System

HTC Vapor Phase System

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:13:23 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

Humidity test

Humidity test

Janoch Jiří, Ing. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 11:49:34 +0100

31 lines

Humidity test

Janoch Jiří, Ing. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 11:53:20 +0100

33 lines

Re: Humidity test

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 12:54:04 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

Immersion Silver

Immersion Silver

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:40:58 -0800

63 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:32:04 -0600

29 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:33:54 -0500

78 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:34:05 -0800

96 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Lee Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:07:15 -0500

139 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:19:21 -0500

187 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:28:24 -0800

218 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:01:02 -0500

226 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Mcmaster, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:54:36 -0800

69 lines

Immersion Silver

Scott Lefebvre <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:42:51 -0800

39 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

David Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:48:32 -0600

65 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:52:17 -0500

90 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:51:39 -0500

78 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Happy Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:58:50 -0500

84 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:52:29 -0800

82 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Precision Analytical Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:09:25 -0800

69 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:05:38 -0500

84 lines

Re: Immersion Silver

Lee parker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:18:02 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

Immersion White Tin Plating Specification

Immersion White Tin Plating Specification

Kaye Clayo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:22:58 -0500

40 lines

Re: Immersion White Tin Plating Specification

Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:52:21 -0800

83 lines

Re: Immersion White Tin Plating Specification

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:02:06 -0500

91 lines

Re: Immersion White Tin Plating Specification

Kaye Clayo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:24:44 -0500

138 lines

Re: Immersion White Tin Plating Specification

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:05:00 -0500

201 lines

Re: Immersion White Tin Plating Specification

R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:31:09 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

In-House Training Programs

Re: In-House Training Programs

Tom Parkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 08:05:35 -0500

111 lines

Re: In-House Training Programs

Pasquito, Helena <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 08:23:16 -0500

79 lines

Re: In-House Training Programs

Sara Gorcos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:28:12 -0500

89 lines

New Thread

Ionic contamination

Ionic contamination

Jose Antonio Garcia Ontalba <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:34:28 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

IPC Designers Council Pacific Northwest Chapter Meeting Notice

IPC Designers Council Pacific Northwest Chapter Meeting Notice

George Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:26:35 -0800

79 lines

New Thread

IPC J-STD-001 Certified Trainer Courses...

IPC J-STD-001 Certified Trainer Courses...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:35:02 EST

37 lines

Re: IPC J-STD-001 Certified Trainer Courses...

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:41:57 -0500

94 lines

Re: IPC J-STD-001 Certified Trainer Courses...

Blair K. Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 05:49:46 -0800

82 lines

Re: IPC J-STD-001 Certified Trainer Courses...

Lance Mayes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:51:54 -0700

88 lines

New Thread

IPC Solder Paste Test Method stencils

IPC Solder Paste Test Method stencils

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:07:46 -0500

28 lines

Re: IPC Solder Paste Test Method stencils

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:14:31 -0500

70 lines

Re: IPC Solder Paste Test Method stencils

Biard, Gloria <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:01:56 -0600

55 lines

New Thread

IPC web server down

IPC web server down

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:59:17 -0600

26 lines

Re: IPC web server down

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:01:32 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

IPC-1720A Assembly Qualification Profile

IPC-1720A Assembly Qualification Profile

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 07:30:48 -0500

32 lines

Re: IPC-1720A Assembly Qualification Profile

Tom Parkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:41:59 -0500

76 lines

Re: IPC-1720A Assembly Qualification Profile

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:47:29 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Jumper Wire - Better insulation?

Jumper Wire - Better insulation?

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:43:50 -0800

31 lines

Re: Jumper Wire - Better insulation?

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 07:21:59 -0600

60 lines

Re: Jumper Wire - Better insulation?

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:42:48 -0500

74 lines

Re: Jumper Wire - Better insulation?

COOKE, ROBERT W. (JSC-NX) (WGI) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 10:31:14 -0600

79 lines

Re: Jumper Wire - Better insulation?

Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:46:35 -0800

123 lines

Re: Jumper Wire - Better insulation?

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:12:28 -0800

91 lines

Re: Jumper Wire - Better insulation?

Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:31:57 -0800

145 lines

Re: Jumper Wire - Better insulation?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:32:51 -0500

139 lines

Re: Jumper Wire - Better insulation?

Clyde Sprowl <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:38:53 -0500

146 lines

Re: Jumper Wire - Better insulation?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:52:28 -0500

172 lines

New Thread

Label 0.25"X0.75"

Label 0.25"X0.75"

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:58:37 -0800

40 lines

Re: Label 0.25"X0.75"

Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:14:40 -0800

73 lines

Re: Label 0.25"X0.75"

James TerVeen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 14:31:14 -0500

99 lines

Re: Label 0.25"X0.75"

Thorup, John <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:29:56 -0800

66 lines

Re: Label 0.25"X0.75"

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 12:35:36 -0700

72 lines

Re: Label 0.25"X0.75"

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:43:27 -0600

68 lines

New Thread

labor price-break for having board on sub-panel (array)

labor price-break for having board on sub-panel (array)

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:04:00 -0800

31 lines

Re: labor price-break for having board on sub-panel (array)

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:37:04 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Laser seamwelding

Laser seamwelding

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:57:00 +0100

23 lines

Re: Laser seamwelding

Creswick, Steven <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 06:09:58 -0500

68 lines

Re: Laser seamwelding

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 12:55:39 +0100

70 lines

Re: Laser seamwelding

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 07:17:51 -0700

108 lines

Re: Laser seamwelding

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:06:28 +0100

118 lines

New Thread

Last Chance to Register for Lead Free North America

Last Chance to Register for Lead Free North America

Alexandra Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:51:49 -0600

32 lines

New Thread

Lead Free is not Free, is Costly

Lead Free is not Free, is Costly

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:36:44 -0500

95 lines

Re: Lead Free is not Free, is Costly

Blair K. Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:26:59 -0800

66 lines

Re: Lead Free is not Free, is Costly

COOKE, ROBERT W. (JSC-NX) (WGI) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:33:12 -0600

123 lines

Re: Lead Free is not Free, is Costly

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:40:05 -0500

94 lines

Re: Lead Free is not Free, is Costly

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 22:36:38 EST

25 lines

Re: Lead Free is not Free, is Costly

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:33:03 -0500

55 lines

Re: Lead Free is not Free, is Costly

Reuven ROKAH <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:44:07 +0200

138 lines

Re: Lead Free is not Free, is Costly

Blair K. Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Nov 2004 19:30:05 -0800

47 lines

Re: Lead Free is not Free, is Costly

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:24:55 -0500

77 lines

Re: Lead Free is not Free, is Costly

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:11:40 -0000

99 lines

New Thread

Lead Free North America Conference - December 1-3 in Boston, MA

Lead Free North America Conference - December 1-3 in Boston, MA

Alexandra Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:45:03 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

Lead free Tin Plating problems...

Lead free Tin Plating problems...

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:28:54 -0800

53 lines

Re: Lead free Tin Plating problems...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:21:16 -0700

84 lines

New Thread

LongBoards

LongBoards

Jack C. Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:09:59 -0600

35 lines

Re: LongBoards

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:16:09 -0500

64 lines

Re: LongBoards

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:35:45 -0500

71 lines

Re: LongBoards

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:36:48 -0800

74 lines

Re: LongBoards

Jack C. Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:18:09 -0600

55 lines

Re: LongBoards

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 08:15:17 -0500

81 lines

Re: LongBoards

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:11:26 -0500

76 lines

Re: LongBoards

Hal Winslow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:02:25 -0500

135 lines

Re: LongBoards

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:23:13 -0800

137 lines

New Thread

Looking for a contact

Looking for a contact

Tom Gervascio <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:02:25 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Matthew L Hamand is out of the office.

Matthew L Hamand is out of the office.

Matthew Hamand <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:00:46 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

max peak temp bt

max peak temp bt

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:27:37 -0500

24 lines

Re: max peak temp bt

Lee Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:23:08 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

Moisture - Post Baking condition

Moisture - Post Baking condition

ChangMyung RYU <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:28:29 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

moisture saturation curve

moisture saturation curve

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:16:30 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Need help (for sputtered Cu source)

Need help (for sputtered Cu source)

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:44:48 EST

28 lines

Re: Need help (for sputtered Cu source)

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:32:20 +0100

52 lines

Re: Need help (for sputtered Cu source)

Hughes, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 04:51:46 -0500

113 lines

Re: Need help (for sputtered Cu source)

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:39:56 +0100

130 lines

New Thread

new member

new member

Edward "Ed" Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:25:22 -0600

23 lines

Re: new member

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:43:15 -0600

24 lines

Re: new member

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:56:50 -0600

58 lines

Re: new member

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:04:54 -0500

77 lines

Re: new member

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:31:26 -0800

51 lines

Re: new member

Lance Mayes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:41:31 -0700

63 lines

Re: new member

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:53:08 -0800

89 lines

Re: new member

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:53:07 -0800

89 lines

Re: new member

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:53:50 -0800

88 lines

Re: new member

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:46:27 EST

23 lines

Re: new member

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:54:44 EST

68 lines

Re: new member

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 06:54:01 -0500

79 lines

Re: new member

Blair Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:17:20 -0600

40 lines

Re: new member

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:01:59 -0800

95 lines

Re: new member

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:03:00 -0800

45 lines

Re: new member

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:36:00 -0800

66 lines

New Thread

NOMAIL

NOMAIL

David Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:22:22 -0600

199 lines

New Thread

NTC - other forums

NTC - other forums

Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:17:18 +0200

33 lines

Re: NTC - other forums

Ed Hare <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Nov 2004 09:21:41 -0800

66 lines

Re: NTC - other forums

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:45:49 +0000

77 lines

Re: NTC - other forums

Blair K. Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 05:31:40 -0800

53 lines

Re: NTC - other forums

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:34:44 EST

34 lines

New Thread

NTC repeated paragraph

Re: NTC repeated paragraph

Hal Winslow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:02:45 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

NTC: etiquette

NTC: etiquette

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:13:59 -0600

33 lines

Re: NTC: etiquette

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 17:50:06 +0000

85 lines

Re: NTC: etiquette

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:54:30 -0600

70 lines

Re: NTC: etiquette

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:55:14 -0800

52 lines

Re: NTC: etiquette

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:38:37 -0600

83 lines

Re: NTC: etiquette

Clyde Sprowl <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:32:48 -0500

96 lines

Re: NTC: etiquette

Mcmaster, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:25:35 -0800

121 lines

Re: NTC: etiquette

Shean Dalton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:30:32 -0600

80 lines

Re: NTC: etiquette

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:37:51 -0600

48 lines

Re: NTC: etiquette

Precision Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:37:53 -0800

104 lines

Re: NTC: etiquette

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:56:35 -0000

68 lines

New Thread

NTC: Friday and I wanna know....

NTC: Friday and I wanna know....

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:11:49 +0100

32 lines

Re: NTC: Friday and I wanna know....

Fredrik Skillborg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:32:34 +0100

66 lines

Re: NTC: Friday and I wanna know....

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:56:55 -0500

84 lines

Re: NTC: Friday and I wanna know....

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 06:59:34 -0700

66 lines

Re: NTC: Friday and I wanna know....

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:11:35 -0500

94 lines

Re: NTC: Friday and I wanna know....

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:07:37 +0100

82 lines

Re: NTC: Friday and I wanna know....

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:48:47 -0600

60 lines

Re: NTC: Friday and I wanna know....

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:03:44 -0500

87 lines

Re: NTC: Friday and I wanna know....

Precision Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:08:12 -0800

87 lines

New Thread

NTC: home computer

NTC: home computer

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:12:48 +0100

31 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Fredrik Skillborg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:46:40 +0100

63 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 16:39:45 +0100

87 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:10:33 -0500

135 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Reeves, Tim R. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:43:49 -0500

103 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Mcmaster, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:41:14 -0800

125 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Clyde Sprowl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:22:20 -0500

126 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:56:05 +0100

113 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Reeves, Tim R. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:29:45 -0500

136 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:07:38 +0100

148 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:25:21 -0000

139 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Reeves, Tim R. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:28:28 -0500

177 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

George Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:00:36 -0800

226 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:25:16 -0600

286 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:40:33 -0500

305 lines

Re: NTC: home computer

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:24:21 +0100

191 lines

New Thread

NTC: odd Friday

NTC: odd Friday

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:25:32 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Official IPC J-STD-001 Certified Trainer Courses...

Re: Official IPC J-STD-001 Certified Trainer Courses...

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:59:32 -0600

83 lines

New Thread

Open traces

Open traces

Suzanne Foulkes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:45:24 -0500

28 lines

Re: Open traces

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:06:34 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

OSP standard

OSP standard

Ted Kong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:14:26 -0800

35 lines

Re: OSP standard

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:24:52 -0500

67 lines

Re: OSP standard

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:51:24 -0500

99 lines

Re: OSP standard

Lee Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:59:39 -0500

82 lines

New Thread

OT: ODB++ files

OT: ODB++ files

Jim Steadman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:28:11 -0800

26 lines

Re: OT: ODB++ files

Sue Macaluso <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:03:55 -0500

75 lines

Re: OT: ODB++ files

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:38:38 -0500

119 lines

Re: OT: ODB++ files

George Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:30:14 -0800

138 lines

New Thread

out of office reply

out of office reply

Stephansson Sean-ESS060 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:58:10 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Oxide replacement

Oxide replacement

Scott B. Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:21:23 -0500

36 lines

Re: Oxide replacement

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:21:23 -0500

72 lines

Re: Oxide replacement

Scott B. Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:39:45 -0500

88 lines

Re: Oxide replacement

Lee Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:10:49 -0500

124 lines

Re: Oxide replacement

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:54:42 -0800

111 lines

New Thread

Pad design to keep SMT connector from shifting during re flow.

Re: Pad design to keep SMT connector from shifting during re flow.

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:13:56 -0500

66 lines

Re: Pad design to keep SMT connector from shifting during re flow.

David Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:17:25 -0600

97 lines

New Thread

Pad design to keep SMT connector from shifting during reflow.

Pad design to keep SMT connector from shifting during reflow.

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:39:30 -0500

29 lines

Re: Pad design to keep SMT connector from shifting during reflow.

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:18:51 -0500

66 lines

Re: Pad design to keep SMT connector from shifting during reflow.

Tom Gervascio <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:33:00 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

Panels vs. Pallets

Panels vs. Pallets

Jack C. Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:57:38 -0600

74 lines

New Thread

PCB Materials

PCB Materials

Barry Darnell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:11:07 -0500

36 lines

Re: PCB Materials

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:35:34 -0500

77 lines

Re: PCB Materials

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:01:50 -0800

78 lines

New Thread

Plating through a 2 layer board hole after assembly?

Plating through a 2 layer board hole after assembly?

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:07:46 -0800

82 lines

Re: Plating through a 2 layer board hole after assembly?

Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:40:04 -0800

125 lines

New Thread

plugging vias

plugging vias

Dee Stover <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:52:06 -0700

51 lines

Re: plugging vias

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:30:36 -0700

88 lines

Re: plugging vias

Pete menuez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:46:06 -0500

127 lines

Re: plugging vias

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:18:11 -0600

36 lines

Re: plugging vias

Stephen G. Pierce <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:56:48 -0600

45 lines

Re: plugging vias

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:05:10 -0500

195 lines

Re: plugging vias

Lee Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Nov 2004 11:32:23 -0500

93 lines

New Thread

PM Procedures for Ionising Air Guns

PM Procedures for Ionising Air Guns

bob wettermann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:25:24 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

Poor ENIG Solderability

Poor ENIG Solderability

Peter Barton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:54:00 +0000

95 lines

Re: Poor ENIG Solderability

Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:01:15 -0800

43 lines

Re: Poor ENIG Solderability

Anil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:16:05 +0530

158 lines

Re: Poor ENIG Solderability

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:22:52 -0500

190 lines

Re: Poor ENIG Solderability

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:18:50 -0500

227 lines

Re: Poor ENIG Solderability

Anil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:18:46 +0530

222 lines

Re: Poor ENIG Solderability

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:12:06 -0500

242 lines

New Thread

Press fit tooling

Press fit tooling

Daan Terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:40:52 +0100

43 lines

Re: Press fit tooling

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:00:33 -0500

79 lines

Re: Press fit tooling

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 08:02:43 -0600

69 lines

New Thread

Process Indicators...

Process Indicators...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:01:45 EST

55 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Daan Terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:34:44 +0100

115 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 08:32:15 -0500

99 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 08:06:29 -0600

144 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:00:08 -0500

99 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Loa Allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:09:18 -0800

139 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Leo Lambert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:18:16 -0500

180 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 19:02:17 +0200

107 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:39:47 -0500

194 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Precision Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:51:57 -0800

102 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Lee Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:05:31 -0500

152 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 16:44:45 -0600

215 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:04:01 -0500

241 lines

Re: Process Indicators...

Steve Mikell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:04:27 +0700

120 lines

New Thread

Profiling Equipment Recommendations

Profiling Equipment Recommendations

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:25:53 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

PWB Immersion Silver Finish

PWB Immersion Silver Finish

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:19:33 -0600

28 lines

Re: PWB Immersion Silver Finish

Precision Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:02:18 -0800

99 lines

Re: PWB Immersion Silver Finish

Lee Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:46:31 -0500

150 lines

New Thread

Re-balling of BGAs

Re-balling of BGAs

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:23:51 -0500

28 lines

Re: Re-balling of BGAs

Heather Sease <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:56:22 -0700

88 lines

Re: Re-balling of BGAs

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 19:39:08 EST

72 lines

Re: Re-balling of BGAs

Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:55:05 -0800

69 lines

Re: Re-balling of BGAs

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:01:20 -0600

100 lines

Re: Re-balling of BGAs

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:20:01 -0500

33 lines

Re: Re-balling of BGAs

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:02:31 -0500

74 lines

Re: Re-balling of BGAs

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 08:04:19 -0800

118 lines

Re: Re-balling of BGAs

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:06:52 -0600

57 lines

New Thread

Re; Controlled Impedance Design

Re; Controlled Impedance Design

Happy Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:49:00 -0500

110 lines

New Thread

Recall: gold removal from smt components per J-STD-001 ?

Recall: gold removal from smt components per J-STD-001 ?

Macko, Joe @ IEC <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:30:38 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

Removal of Connector

Re: Removal of Connector

Poh Kong Hui <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 21:57:08 +0800

35 lines

Re: Removal of Connector

Wonder, Troy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:02:03 -0700

73 lines

Re: Removal of Connector

Peter Barton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:05:00 +0000

76 lines

Re: Removal of Connector

Cagle, James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:19:02 -0500

98 lines

Re: Removal of Connector

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:04:58 -0500

76 lines

Re: Removal of Connector

Collins Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:40:01 -0500

112 lines

Re: Removal of Connector

Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:06:33 -0800

165 lines

Re: Removal of Connector

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:22:31 -0500

227 lines

New Thread

repeated paragraph

repeated paragraph

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:59:02 -0800

32 lines

Re: repeated paragraph

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:02:41 -0600

70 lines

Re: repeated paragraph

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:26:06 -0800

93 lines

Re: repeated paragraph

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:28:06 -0600

102 lines

New Thread

Resistor Pack Preference - Concave or Convex

Resistor Pack Preference - Concave or Convex

Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:23:42 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

Samtec PCS2 Socket issue...

Samtec PCS2 Socket issue...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:09:31 EST

57 lines

Re: Samtec PCS2 Socket issue...

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:17:44 -0500

95 lines

Re: Samtec PCS2 Socket issue...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:31:57 EST

106 lines

Re: Samtec PCS2 Socket issue...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:38:20 -0700

132 lines

Re: Samtec PCS2 Socket issue...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:17:45 EST

29 lines

Re: Samtec PCS2 Socket issue...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:06:38 -0700

57 lines

Re: Samtec PCS2 Socket issue...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:21:18 EST

51 lines

Re: Samtec PCS2 Socket issue...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 23:38:56 -0700

84 lines

Re: Samtec PCS2 Socket issue...

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:08:53 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

SIGNOFF

SIGNOFF

Lance Mayes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 08:14:05 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Silkscreen removal

Silkscreen removal

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Nov 2004 13:41:16 -0800

29 lines

Re: Silkscreen removal

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:10:57 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

SMT Soldering Test of ENIG

SMT Soldering Test of ENIG

Happy Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:54:45 -0500

30 lines

Re: SMT Soldering Test of ENIG

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:12:04 EST

38 lines

New Thread

SNEC Mtg

SNEC Mtg

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:59:50 EST

61 lines

Re: SNEC Mtg

Blair K. Hogg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:37:45 -0800

43 lines

New Thread

SNEC mtg date correction

SNEC mtg date correction

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:32:21 EST

63 lines

New Thread

SOD323 problem...

SOD323 problem...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:50:20 -0500

51 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:51:28 -0500

102 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:45:02 -0500

101 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:00:55 -0500

106 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:30:16 -0500

34 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:59:58 EST

24 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:39:45 -0800

63 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:50:11 -0500

110 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Victor G. Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:22:14 -0600

137 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Dave Dixon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:35:04 -0600

40 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:39:52 EST

39 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Reuven ROKAH <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:53:53 +0200

88 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:43:58 -0800

82 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:49:37 -0800

120 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:56:27 -0500

102 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:39:29 -0800

116 lines

Re: SOD323 problem...

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:02:52 -0500

141 lines

New Thread

Solder Attach to Area Array Packages

Re: Solder Attach to Area Array Packages

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:12:19 -0000

167 lines

New Thread

solder float test

solder float test

Joseph H. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:01:09 +0700

28 lines

Re: solder float test

Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:09:57 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope?

Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope?

Robert Coburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:50:08 -0500

31 lines

Re: Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope?

Lee Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:05:05 -0500

68 lines

Re: Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope?

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:08:51 -0600

34 lines

Re: Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope?

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:25:29 -0800

81 lines

Re: Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope?

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:07:58 -0700

57 lines

Re: Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:52:49 EST

38 lines

Re: Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:26:04 +0200

79 lines

Re: Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:06:47 -0500

120 lines

Re: Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:21:39 EST

29 lines

Re: Solder Mask expectations / pushing the envelope?

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:43:13 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

Solder material qualification

Solder material qualification

Tom Gervascio <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:25:40 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

Solder or Sodder? Even More NTC

Re: Solder or Sodder? Even More NTC

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:50:49 -0000

128 lines

Re: Solder or Sodder? Even more NTC

Reeves, Tim R. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:29:01 -0500

239 lines

Re: Solder or Sodder? Even more NTC

John Maxwell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 16:43:03 -0800

260 lines

New Thread

Solder or Sodder? More NTC

Re: Solder or Sodder? More NTC

Reeves, Tim R. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:53:56 -0500

114 lines

Re: Solder or Sodder? More NTC

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:46:23 -0000

156 lines

New Thread

Solder resist inspection underneath components

Solder resist inspection underneath components

Daan Terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:31:28 +0100

53 lines

Re: Solder resist inspection underneath components

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:37:29 -0500

75 lines

Re: Solder resist inspection underneath components

Jim Jablonsky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:03:27 -0500

86 lines

Re: Solder resist inspection underneath components

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:59:12 EST

72 lines

Re: Solder resist inspection underneath components

Fredrik Skillborg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:59:46 +0100

79 lines

Re: Solder resist inspection underneath components

Daan Terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:22:18 +0100

105 lines

Re: Solder resist inspection underneath components

Pete menuez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:23:13 -0500

145 lines

New Thread

Solderability issue...

Solderability issue...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Nov 2004 17:21:55 -0500

47 lines

Re: Solderability issue...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:40:39 -0500

55 lines

Re: Solderability issue...

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:29:18 -0800

112 lines

Re: Solderability issue...

David D. Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:20:08 -0600

152 lines

Re: Solderability issue...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:01:04 -0700

176 lines

New Thread

Soldered heat slug

Soldered heat slug

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:30:41 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

Special Discounts on 001D and 610D Workshops

Special Discounts on 001D and 610D Workshops

Alexandra Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:54:01 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

Specification status / MIL-C-5541

Specification status / MIL-C-5541

Robert Coburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:59:17 -0500

24 lines

Re: Specification status / MIL-C-5541

Collins Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:10:47 -0500

71 lines

Re: Specification status / MIL-C-5541

Eric Kalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:49:15 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

Specifications for Drilled hole roughness as per IPC

Specifications for Drilled hole roughness as per IPC

Parial Swati <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:06:26 +0530

31 lines

Re: Specifications for Drilled hole roughness as per IPC

Susan Mansilla <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:11:49 EST

28 lines

Re: Specifications for Drilled hole roughness as per IPC

Parial Swati <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:19:33 +0530

82 lines

Re: Specifications for Drilled hole roughness as per IPC

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:33:06 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

Standard status

Standard status

Robert Coburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:53:10 -0500

25 lines

Re: Standard status

Judy Rae Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:49:23 -0800

48 lines

Re: Standard status

Eric Kalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:41:02 -0500

61 lines

Re: Standard status

Gary Bremer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:11:16 -0800

49 lines

Re: Standard status

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:41:42 -0600

65 lines

New Thread

Strange Soldermask Defect.

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect.

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:05:21 -0800

48 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect.

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:46:12 -0000

92 lines

New Thread

Strange Soldermask Defect...

Strange Soldermask Defect...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:41:21 -0500

39 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Eric Kalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:46:36 -0500

83 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Charlie Pitarys <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:46:55 -0500

73 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Linda Langley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:49:49 -0500

95 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:42:28 -0800

80 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:54:50 -0700

71 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

James TerVeen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:00:34 -0500

100 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

George Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:02:36 -0800

106 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:06:19 -0600

77 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Nick Ban <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:10:05 -0600

131 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Precision Lab <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:24:08 -0800

79 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

George Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:37:40 -0800

113 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:48:43 -0800

81 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:00:26 -0600

36 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Roach, David <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:17:30 -0600

102 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Clyde Sprowl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:52:17 -0500

103 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:00:01 -0600

133 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:58:10 +0200

61 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Robert Coburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:14:04 -0500

21 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

T.D. Kozlyk <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 05:19:41 -0700

60 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:34:22 -0500

72 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Whittaker, Dewey (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 06:29:18 -0700

59 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Maxine Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:51:59 -0600

102 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:49:49 -0700

108 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:03:09 -0500

158 lines

Re: Strange Soldermask Defect...

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:36:06 -0000

80 lines

New Thread

Surface Finish for keypad membrane switches

Surface Finish for keypad membrane switches

Kaye Clayo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 16:09:39 -0500

38 lines

Re: Surface Finish for keypad membrane switches

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 08:12:37 -0000

76 lines

Re: Surface Finish for keypad membrane switches

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 07:39:34 -0500

77 lines

Re: Surface Finish for keypad membrane switches

Gerard O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 08:24:08 -0500

81 lines

Re: Surface Finish for keypad membrane switches

Janoch Jiří, Ing. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:45:50 +0100

110 lines

Re: Surface Finish for keypad membrane switches

James Hofer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:58:01 -0800

141 lines

New Thread

Tape and reel parts

Tape and reel parts

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:43:42 -0600

37 lines

Re: Tape and reel parts

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:02:32 -0600

74 lines

New Thread

Technet Unsubscribe

Technet Unsubscribe

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:27:43 +0800

33 lines

New Thread

Tescon P&P

Tescon P&P

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:49:34 -0800

44 lines

New Thread

thicker conformal coating - selective encapsulant

thicker conformal coating - selective encapsulant

Edward Mines <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:46:10 -0800

43 lines

New Thread

Tin whiskers

Tin whiskers

- Bogert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:42:58 -0500

74 lines

Re: Tin whiskers

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:43:58 -0600

111 lines

Re: Tin whiskers

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:14:26 -0700

76 lines

Re: Tin whiskers

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:12:59 +0100

73 lines

New Thread

Trays for SMT connectors

Trays for SMT connectors

Black, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 10:22:34 -0500

36 lines

Re: Trays for SMT connectors

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 14:22:29 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Upcoming Lead Free, RoHS and WEEE Events

Upcoming Lead Free, RoHS and WEEE Events

Alexandra Curtis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:07:01 -0600

75 lines

New Thread

Users of Allied High Tech X-sect equip?

Users of Allied High Tech X-sect equip?

Gregg Klawson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:17:32 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Via hole failures (with pictures)

Via hole failures (with pictures)

Al Onderick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:55:08 -0600

30 lines

Re: Via hole failures (with pictures)

Joe Spicuzza <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:26:47 -0500

62 lines

Re: Via hole failures (with pictures)

Scott B. Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:43:17 -0500

66 lines

Re: Via hole failures (with pictures)

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 19:16:33 -0500

129 lines

Re: Via hole failures (with pictures)

Crepeau, Phil (Space Technology) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 16:27:48 -0800

92 lines

Re: Via hole failures (with pictures)

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:00:52 EST

34 lines

Re: Via hole failures (with pictures)

Susan Mansilla <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 05:43:27 EST

32 lines

Re: Via hole failures (with pictures)

paul reid <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:30:49 -0500

67 lines

Re: Via hole failures (with pictures)

Jeffrey Bush <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 12:40:34 -0500

116 lines

Re: Via hole failures (with pictures)

Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:56:15 +0100

82 lines

Re: Via hole failures (with pictures)

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:03:48 -0500

63 lines

Re: Via hole failures (with pictures)

Al Onderick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:54:33 -0600

127 lines

New Thread

Via-on-pad / via-in-pad

Via-on-pad / via-in-pad

Sefika Ozkal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:40:57 +0200

112 lines

Via-on-pad / via-in-pad

Bob Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Nov 2004 06:48:33 -0800

62 lines

Re: Via-on-pad / via-in-pad

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Nov 2004 17:09:06 +0200

84 lines

Re: Via-on-pad / via-in-pad

Sefika Ozkal <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:05:03 +0200

92 lines

Re: Via-on-pad / via-in-pad

Shahed Safavi-Bayat <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:15:37 -0500

146 lines

Re: Via-on-pad / via-in-pad

Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:50:56 -0600

171 lines

Re: Via-on-pad / via-in-pad

Happy Holden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:58:20 -0500

90 lines

Re: Via-on-pad / via-in-pad

Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:53:59 -0500

212 lines

New Thread

Video analysis of solder joint formation

Video analysis of solder joint formation

Bob willis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:11:40 -0000

59 lines

Re: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Pasquito, Helena <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:34:24 -0500

81 lines

Re: Video analysis of solder joint formation

Bob willis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 15:59:49 -0000

135 lines

New Thread

Video analysis of solder joint formation - Working NOW!!!!

Re: Video analysis of solder joint formation - Working NOW!!!!

Bob willis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 17:53:40 -0000

96 lines

New Thread

VOCs

VOCs

David Tremmel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:50:32 -0600

33 lines

Re: VOCs

Douglas O. Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:54:24 -0600

122 lines

New Thread

water based conformal coatings

water based conformal coatings

Lee Aspey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:10:17 -0600

21 lines

Re: water based conformal coatings

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 17:59:51 +0000

80 lines

Re: water based conformal coatings

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 25 Nov 2004 14:37:30 EST

27 lines

Re: water based conformal coatings

Leigh-Ann Litavis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:15:38 EST

29 lines

Re: water based conformal coatings

Lee Parker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:42:06 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

Wave and Reflow soldering fluids

Wave and Reflow soldering fluids

Valenzuela, Michelle (MO) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:55:40 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

You are invited to IPC Designers Learning Symposium, Montreal Canada

You are invited to IPC Designers Learning Symposium, Montreal Canada

Christi Poulsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:23:27 -0600

108 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager