LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


October 2002


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(OT) Cell phones... (16 messages)
2 [TN] Undercut peeling on all Gold Board (1 message)
<No subject> (1 message)
Acetone Test for Solder Mask (12 messages)
Advantages of 2113 over 7629 (2 messages)
Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead (8 messages)
Back to back BGAs (3 messages)
Benchmarking (2 messages)
BGA ball fracture... (2 messages)
board bake? (6 messages)
board shop capability (3 messages)
Board shop capability doc (1 message)
chip outs (2 messages)
CI Calculator (2 messages)
Clean room. (4 messages)
Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough? (13 messages)
Co planarity spec for components (1 message)
component spacing (4 messages)
conductor cut: IPC-7721 (6 messages)
Conformal Coating Spec : MS-472N (2 messages)
Connectors (1 message)
Copper distribution (3 messages)
definition question (7 messages)
definition question - rephrased (1 message)
Dimensional stability (4 messages)
Dispenser Solder Paste (small sources) (3 messages)
Dissolution Rate of Tin (4 messages)
do-ray (3 messages)
DRAWING NOMINAL (8 messages)
drilling hole for thermo-profile (3 messages)
Dross on Solder Pot (14 messages)
Dross particles sticking to soldermask... (12 messages)
dross sticking on laminate (1 message)
Dross sticking to soldermask... (1 message)
Dry- Ovens (1 message)
Dryfilm Adhesion (1 message)
DTS (3 messages)
Dual footprint on Stacked Memories (5 messages)
edge clip for hybrid (1 message)
Edge connector (2 messages)
EMI Sheilding (6 messages)
EMI Shielding (1 message)
ERSA BGA Rework System (1 message)
ESD compliant document holders for travelers (4 messages)
ESD floor wax (5 messages)
ESD ISSUE (15 messages)
ESD ISSUE - bare skin with static straps (6 messages)
FAB - Controlled Capacitance (4 messages)
Face Mask vs. Nose Guard (2 messages)
Fibre Optic (3 messages)
First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder (36 messages)
Fitting question (1 message)
Flammability (10 messages)
Flex Cable Material (4 messages)
Flying Probe Testers... (10 messages)
Focussed Cleaner (3 messages)
FW: Laminate Materials (1 message)
FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] (1 message)
FW: Undeliverable: Re: [TN] Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead (2 messages)
FW: [TN] Fibre Optic (1 message)
Gold Embrittlement (6 messages)
Gold finish. (1 message)
Gold on Leads (1 message)
Golden Pin Connectors (3 messages)
GXTT Plating (palladium-nickel alloy) (1 message)
HASL process OK or not ? (10 messages)
Have you ever used this part? (1 message)
Have You Heard A Board Shop Called... (4 messages)
High Voltage encapsulant recommendations (2 messages)
HOAX (2 messages)
how thick is ½ ounce copper (3 messages)
how thick is ounce copper (1 message)
impedance measurement to verify conformance to spec (1 message)
information from European report on toxic metals (10 messages)
Ink Jet Printing for PCBs (4 messages)
Ionograph measurements (11 messages)
Ionograph measurements (NT) (1 message)
Ionograph measurements (NT) OT!! (2 messages)
IP-5 Power Bits (2 messages)
IPC-6012A (2 messages)
IPC-A-610C VS. GR-78-CORE (1 message)
IPC-SM-840 (2 messages)
IPC/JEDEC announce Taipei Conf on LF Comp & Assy (1 message)
It may be a Hoax, was [TN] (no subject) (1 message)
JIC 37° fittings (1 message)
Jim Herard/Endicott/IBM is out of the office. (1 message)
Kollmorgan Flying Probe Testers (1 message)
Laminate Materials (3 messages)
laminate source (2 messages)
Laminate surface micro void & IPC Specification (3 messages)
Lead -Antimony experience (3 messages)
Lead protrusion (10 messages)
Lethal Potassium Chloride OT (3 messages)
Looking ESD Tags! (1 message)
Looking for Extra Large Panels(size:48"X96") of FR-4 Material. (2 messages)
Low ICT yield using lead free on OSP (1 message)
Mark Orlowski/PEMSTAR Inc is out of the office. (1 message)
Matt McNeary/FTINN/MFG/KEMET/US is out of the office. (1 message)
Metcal BGA Rework/Prototype station (3 messages)
MiniWave/Minisandblasting Equipment (6 messages)
Mounting Horizontal Diode (1 message)
MPM UP1500 (1 message)
Need camera for stereo microscope (3 messages)
Need camera for stereo microscope - still pictures? (1 message)
Nitrogen drying/tangent..... (2 messages)
Nitrogen drying? (7 messages)
no clean flux as a board cleaner? (12 messages)
nominal (3 messages)
Nonwetting on ImAu (1 message)
Nonwetting on ImAu, REAL message (5 messages)
Out (1 message)
PADS vs. Expedition (1 message)
PCB design with mask over vias. (17 messages)
PCB Prototyping (5 messages)
Performance-Based Quality (8 messages)
Personal message (3 messages)
Pictures of my problem... (2 messages)
Poor solder resist adherence. (2 messages)
Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610 (11 messages)
Press fit connectors... (32 messages)
Proof of design book (2 messages)
PWB Laminate Measling Defects (2 messages)
QSOP footprint connector (1 message)
quality (9 messages)
Question about inspeciton instrument (5 messages)
Question about inspection instrument (1 message)
Question regarding welds (4 messages)
Réf. : Re: [TN] PCB design with mask over vias. (1 message)
Réf. : [TN] HASL process OK or not ? (1 message)
Réf. : [TN] laminate source (1 message)
Réf. : [TN] Personal message (1 message)
Réf. : [TN] Proof of design book (1 message)
Raised TH components after Wave (11 messages)
Red Ink (5 messages)
Roadmap for Transition to Lead Free Components? (5 messages)
Round Pads for 0402 Parts? (12 messages)
Scary --- and very concerned (4 messages)
seeking recommendation on BGA cold solder joints monitor (3 messages)
Shean Dalton/ElectrovertUS/Cookson is out of the office. (1 message)
Side and Toe Fillets... (9 messages)
Side and Toe Fillets...From IPC (5 messages)
slivers from electroplated tin (6 messages)
small parts handling equipment (1 message)
SMD and NSMD pads on same BGA (4 messages)
SMD/NSMD pic (5 messages)
SNEC Meeting (1 message)
solder deposition by dipping (2 messages)
Solder melt energy coefficient (6 messages)
solder paste vendor (1 message)
Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria? (22 messages)
soldered press fit pins (1 message)
soldering brass to copper (10 messages)
soldering brass to copper & microsandblaster (1 message)
Sorry the repeat reference... (1 message)
Stacking of components (SMD) Revisited (8 messages)
Standards for PC Assembly: Off shelf (2 messages)
Sterling silver finish (5 messages)
Tape Grid Arrays (3 messages)
TBGAs (3 messages)
TechNet (6 messages)
Technet Error Messages (1 message)
Technical paper to read and consider (1 message)
Temp Humidity Control - Do you? (9 messages)
Temperature Chart (1 message)
testhouses? (2 messages)
Thickness Problem (2 messages)
Undercut peeling on all Gold Board (5 messages)
Undercut peeling on all Gold Board--More than you wanted to know (1 message)
Unidrill (1 message)
Via clearance (2 messages)
Virus alert (3 messages)
WARPAGE (11 messages)
Water-soluble flux wash pressures? (5 messages)
Wave soldering pallet thickness (5 messages)
Welding of innerlayers (4 messages)
when is a press-fit pin not a press-fit pin (2 messages)
x's-outs (2 messages)
Z-axis BGA solder joint verification ? (7 messages)
Z-axis BGA solder joint verification? Addendum - Stress Riser Question (7 messages)
[LF] [TN] Scary --- and very concerned (10 messages)
[TN] how thick is ½ ounce copper (13 messages)
[TN] Réf. : Re: [TN] PCB design with mask over vias. (1 message)
[TN] RE: [TN] how thick is ½ ounce copper (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re:

Edward Szpruch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:35:26 +0200

116 lines

Re:

Klaus Unmuessig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:42:37 +0200

81 lines

Re:

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:02:16 +0100

90 lines

Re:

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:19:55 +0100

87 lines

Re:

Steve Owen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:54:09 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

(OT) Cell phones...

(OT) Cell phones...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 21:03:56 EDT

78 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 07:03:43 -0700

138 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 08:06:11 +0800

121 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Jim Lamb <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Oct 2002 21:14:51 -0700

77 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Thi Pham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:55:08 -0400

86 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 08:38:15 -0400

181 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:46:05 -0500

190 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 08:16:40 -0700

89 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:55:50 -0400

265 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:28:25 -0400

171 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Keel, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:27:21 -0700

402 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:33:07 -0700

66 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Tim Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:46:29 -0700

186 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:39:09 -0400

187 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:42:37 -0400

285 lines

Re: (OT) Cell phones...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 00:24:21 EDT

67 lines

New Thread

2 [TN] Undercut peeling on all Gold Board

Re: 2 [TN] Undercut peeling on all Gold Board

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:17:07 -0700

164 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:27:34 +0200

42 lines

New Thread

Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:07:57 -0500

35 lines

Re: Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:19:10 -0500

72 lines

Re: Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:53:42 -0500

85 lines

Re: Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:54:32 -0600

98 lines

Re: Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:03:10 -0600

101 lines

Re: Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:33:45 -0600

256 lines

Re: Acetone Test for Solder Mask

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:39:49 EST

70 lines

Re: Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:43:16 -0600

165 lines

Re: Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:53:10 +0200

157 lines

Re: Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Edward Szpruch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:26:30 +0200

255 lines

Re: Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:21:40 +0200

295 lines

Re: Acetone Test for Solder Mask

Tim Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:08:01 -0800

141 lines

New Thread

Advantages of 2113 over 7629

Advantages of 2113 over 7629

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:03:01 -0500

27 lines

Re: Advantages of 2113 over 7629

Tim Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:27:01 -0700

98 lines

New Thread

Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

Kane, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:27:28 -0400

55 lines

Re: Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:48:27 -0500

86 lines

Re: Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

Adair, Bret <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:52:42 -0700

244 lines

Re: Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:45:54 EDT

29 lines

Re: Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:46:07 -0500

77 lines

Re: Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:30:24 -0700

43 lines

Re: Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

Kane, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:15:53 -0400

79 lines

Re: Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 15:00:28 EDT

30 lines

New Thread

Back to back BGAs

Back to back BGAs

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:38:55 -0500

33 lines

Re: Back to back BGAs

Rey Sosa <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:19:59 -0800

77 lines

Re: Back to back BGAs

Dave Hicks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:59:10 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Benchmarking

Re: Benchmarking

Peter Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 19:02:36 +0100

69 lines

Re: Benchmarking

Mark Orlowski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:48:21 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

BGA ball fracture...

BGA ball fracture...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:38:03 EDT

83 lines

Re: BGA ball fracture...

Charlie McMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:46:38 -0400

159 lines

New Thread

board bake?

board bake?

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:06:25 -0400

43 lines

Re: board bake?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:13:49 EDT

101 lines

Re: board bake?

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:14:43 -0500

72 lines

Re: board bake?

Dave Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:30:12 -0500

100 lines

Re: board bake?

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:29:00 -0700

74 lines

Re: board bake?

Daan Terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 20:53:40 +0200

338 lines

New Thread

board shop capability

board shop capability

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:45:56 EDT

31 lines

Re: board shop capability

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:58:34 -0500

156 lines

Re: board shop capability

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:06:49 +0800

125 lines

New Thread

Board shop capability doc

Re: Board shop capability doc

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:55:39 -0500

169 lines

New Thread

chip outs

chip outs

Mary Jane Chism <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:27:43 -0500

104 lines

Re: chip outs

Bill Wesmoreland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:33:07 -0500

256 lines

New Thread

CI Calculator

CI Calculator

Kathy Bergman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:31:48 -0800

28 lines

Re: CI Calculator

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:50:09 -0800

65 lines

New Thread

Clean room.

Clean room.

Mike Holst. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:53:53 +0200

50 lines

Re: Clean room.

Brummer Chuck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 07:54:41 -0700

190 lines

Re: Clean room.

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:35:15 -0400

304 lines

Re: Clean room.

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:42:57 +0530

144 lines

New Thread

Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

Virgil Lenton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:55:55 -0500

46 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:12:36 +0300

91 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:43:09 -0500

134 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

Charlie Pitarys <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:45:41 -0400

488 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

Halas, Mirka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:52:53 -0400

192 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:56:18 -0500

66 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

Charlie Pitarys <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:43:10 -0400

161 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:42:42 -0500

32 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:38:41 -0500

184 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:01:24 +0300

132 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:44:32 -0400

65 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:53:18 -0400

182 lines

Re: Cleanliness Testing - When is it clean enough?

Virgil Lenton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:33:40 -0600

112 lines

New Thread

Co planarity spec for components

Co planarity spec for components

Malewicz Wesley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:09:44 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

component spacing

Re: component spacing

Dave Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:28:14 -0500

100 lines

Re: component spacing

Leo Lambert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:35:05 -0400

222 lines

Re: component spacing

Sammie Sutton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:45:21 -0700

210 lines

Re: component spacing

Bill Wesmoreland <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:30:41 -0500

184 lines

New Thread

conductor cut: IPC-7721

conductor cut: IPC-7721

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:55:30 -0400

48 lines

Re: conductor cut: IPC-7721

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:15:47 -0700

64 lines

Re: conductor cut: IPC-7721

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:25:44 -0500

82 lines

Re: conductor cut: IPC-7721

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:40:18 -0400

80 lines

Re: conductor cut: IPC-7721

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:15:38 -0400

114 lines

Re: conductor cut: IPC-7721

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:35:03 +0800

130 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coating Spec : MS-472N

Conformal Coating Spec : MS-472N

Lim, Chee How <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:07:13 -0400

39 lines

Re: Conformal Coating Spec : MS-472N

Chris Almeras <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 15:24:45 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Connectors

Connectors

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 05:48:21 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Copper distribution

Copper distribution

Rudy Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:11:58 EDT

41 lines

Re: Copper distribution

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:43:50 EDT

26 lines

Copper distribution

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:51:58 EDT

44 lines

New Thread

definition question

definition question

JaMi Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 22:43:44 -0700

84 lines

Re: definition question

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:25:43 -0700

163 lines

Re: definition question

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:01:50 -0500

224 lines

Re: definition question

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:12:43 -0700

276 lines

Re: definition question

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:09:49 -0400

258 lines

Re: definition question

Mcmaster, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:43:22 -0700

230 lines

Re: definition question

Tim Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:42:47 -0700

167 lines

New Thread

definition question - rephrased

Re: definition question - rephrased

JaMi Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:31:31 -0700

307 lines

New Thread

Dimensional stability

Dimensional stability

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:03:43 +0530

52 lines

Re: Dimensional stability

Geoff Layhe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:05:59 -0000

107 lines

Re: Dimensional stability

Jonathan C Whitcomb <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:19:30 -0500

152 lines

Re: Dimensional stability

Geoff Layhe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:00:28 -0000

202 lines

New Thread

Dispenser Solder Paste (small sources)

Dispenser Solder Paste (small sources)

Franck, George <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:26:47 -0400

90 lines

Re: Dispenser Solder Paste (small sources)

WEEKES, MICHAEL HS-SNS <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:59:01 -0500

118 lines

Re: Dispenser Solder Paste (small sources)

Duane Shreve <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:42:18 -0700

163 lines

New Thread

Dissolution Rate of Tin

Dissolution Rate of Tin

rgrant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:08:01 -0700

32 lines

Re: Dissolution Rate of Tin

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:05:57 -0600

75 lines

Re: Dissolution Rate of Tin

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:11:48 EST

34 lines

Re: Dissolution Rate of Tin

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:13:42 EST

98 lines

New Thread

do-ray

do-ray

Mauro, Dan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:40:36 -0400

119 lines

Re: do-ray

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 07:56:59 +0800

105 lines

Re: do-ray

Jason W. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:59:48 -0500

197 lines

New Thread

DRAWING NOMINAL

DRAWING NOMINAL

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:44:11 -0400

30 lines

Re: DRAWING NOMINAL

rgrant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:38:03 -0600

65 lines

Re: DRAWING NOMINAL

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:41:40 -0500

64 lines

Re: DRAWING NOMINAL

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:06:26 -0700

29 lines

Re: DRAWING NOMINAL

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:04:27 -0700

102 lines

Re: DRAWING NOMINAL

Bresnan, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:46:09 -0700

94 lines

Re: DRAWING NOMINAL

David Ricketts <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:43:44 -0700

130 lines

Re: DRAWING NOMINAL

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:40:22 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

drilling hole for thermo-profile

drilling hole for thermo-profile

Tobias.Chang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:36:08 -0400

36 lines

Re: drilling hole for thermo-profile

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:20:15 -0700

57 lines

Re: drilling hole for thermo-profile

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:30:21 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

Dross on Solder Pot

Dross on Solder Pot

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:27:29 -0400

43 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:50:02 -0700

85 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:26:31 EDT

122 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 20:35:10 -0500

83 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:26:36 -0400

95 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Leo Lambert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:22:47 -0400

77 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:25:19 -0500

206 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:57:45 EDT

52 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:37:47 -0400

38 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

tony steinke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:12:44 -0700

71 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:53:58 -0500

74 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Atkinson, Neil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:16:25 +0100

113 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:19:31 -0700

68 lines

Re: Dross on Solder Pot

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:23:04 -0500

91 lines

New Thread

Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:58:08 EDT

90 lines

Re: Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:51:39 -0700

126 lines

Re: Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Gene Felder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:16:03 -0700

112 lines

Re: Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:39:10 EDT

82 lines

Re: Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:30:48 -0700

140 lines

Re: Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:00:26 EDT

165 lines

Re: Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:08:44 -0400

197 lines

Re: Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:14:27 -0400

318 lines

Re: Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:17:42 EDT

94 lines

Re: Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:22:39 -0700

135 lines

Re: Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:07:54 +0300

86 lines

Re: Dross particles sticking to soldermask...

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:12:18 +0100

229 lines

New Thread

dross sticking on laminate

dross sticking on laminate

Tostevin, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:25:44 -0500

120 lines

New Thread

Dross sticking to soldermask...

Dross sticking to soldermask...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:56:45 EDT

67 lines

New Thread

Dry- Ovens

Dry- Ovens

Zweigart, Siegmund <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:34:04 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Dryfilm Adhesion

Dryfilm Adhesion

Greg Triggs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:31:45 -0700

66 lines

New Thread

DTS

DTS

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:22:02 -0500

116 lines

Re: DTS

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:02:00 -0600

81 lines

Re: DTS

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:23:58 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

Dual footprint on Stacked Memories

Dual footprint on Stacked Memories

Eric Castonguay <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 17:05:24 -0500

40 lines

Re: Dual footprint on Stacked Memories

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:18:59 -0400

83 lines

Re: Dual footprint on Stacked Memories

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 21:50:05 EDT

163 lines

Re: Dual footprint on Stacked Memories

Willie Duersch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:09:03 -0600

78 lines

Re: Dual footprint on Stacked Memories

Eric Castonguay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:52:12 -0400

288 lines

New Thread

edge clip for hybrid

Re: edge clip for hybrid

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Sep 2002 22:08:47 -0700

102 lines

New Thread

Edge connector

Edge connector

Marki Sasportas <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:07:13 +0200

31 lines

Re: Edge connector

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Oct 2002 14:10:23 EDT

87 lines

New Thread

EMI Sheilding

EMI Sheilding

Ken Carlile <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:27:17 -0500

21 lines

Re: EMI Sheilding

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 17:08:06 -0400

53 lines

Re: EMI Sheilding

Dave Hornback <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:45:54 -0700

45 lines

Re: EMI Sheilding

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:23:26 -0400

52 lines

Re: EMI Sheilding

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:40:27 -0700

82 lines

Re: EMI Sheilding

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:33:15 -0700

118 lines

New Thread

EMI Shielding

Re: EMI Shielding

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:02:02 -0600

53 lines

New Thread

ERSA BGA Rework System

ERSA BGA Rework System

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:40:00 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

ESD compliant document holders for travelers

ESD compliant document holders for travelers

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:57:21 -0400

34 lines

Re: ESD compliant document holders for travelers

Steve Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:44:00 -0700

65 lines

Re: ESD compliant document holders for travelers

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:38:25 -0400

63 lines

Re: ESD compliant document holders for travelers

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:00:44 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

ESD floor wax

ESD floor wax

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:16:33 -0500

35 lines

Re: ESD floor wax

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:40:56 -0600

78 lines

Re: ESD floor wax

Steve Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:09:32 -0800

72 lines

Re: ESD floor wax

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:21:54 -0600

103 lines

Re: ESD floor wax

Gene Felder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:31:12 -0800

72 lines

New Thread

ESD ISSUE

ESD ISSUE

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:00:16 -0400

41 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:35:15 -0400

205 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:51:20 -0400

91 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Gregg Klawson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:51:14 -0400

149 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:28:05 -0500

77 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:30:06 -0600

254 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Willie Duersch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:21:41 -0600

637 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:59:56 -0400

325 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Kane, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:22:19 -0400

729 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:49:32 -0400

363 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:32:10 -0400

25 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:53:33 -0600

307 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:20:38 -0400

852 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Gene Felder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:48:32 -0700

189 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:35:15 -0400

205 lines

New Thread

ESD ISSUE - bare skin with static straps

Re: ESD ISSUE - bare skin with static straps

Gene Felder <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:30:08 -0700

232 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE - bare skin with static straps

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:11:15 -0400

259 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE - bare skin with static straps

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:42:00 -0700

28 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE - bare skin with static straps

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:22:41 +0800

76 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE - bare skin with static straps

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 07:10:50 -0500

331 lines

Re: ESD ISSUE - bare skin with static straps

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 08:04:57 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

FAB - Controlled Capacitance

FAB - Controlled Capacitance

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:39:38 -0800

113 lines

Re: FAB - Controlled Capacitance

Leon Heller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:06:34 +0000

58 lines

Re: FAB - Controlled Capacitance

Karl Sauter <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:34:57 -0800

103 lines

Re: FAB - Controlled Capacitance

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:56:54 -0800

69 lines

New Thread

Face Mask vs. Nose Guard

Face Mask vs. Nose Guard

Glenn Pelkey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:33:16 -0700

37 lines

Re: Face Mask vs. Nose Guard

Steve Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:49:38 -0700

77 lines

New Thread

Fibre Optic

Fibre Optic

Ong Seet Leng <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:50:24 +0800

28 lines

Re: Fibre Optic

Higgins Leo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 02:20:27 -0400

160 lines

Re: Fibre Optic

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:37:38 -0400

241 lines

New Thread

First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Poh Kong Hui <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:53:33 +0800

38 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Steve Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:37:58 -0700

70 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:53:09 -0400

89 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Dave Hornback <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:59:56 -0700

64 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:15:33 -0400

86 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:36:14 -0500

81 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Duane Shreve <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:00:30 -0600

70 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:54:50 -0600

61 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:36:37 -0400

106 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

rgrant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:01:46 -0600

84 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Steve Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:17:32 -0700

157 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

rgrant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:11:02 -0600

186 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:25:33 +0800

155 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:41:00 EDT

122 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:12:46 -0400

187 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:42:23 -0400

46 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:33:35 -0400

250 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:14:26 -0400

238 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Steve Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:14:40 -0700

50 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Poh Kong Hui <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:15:05 +0800

202 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:52:46 -0700

49 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Casto, Vicki <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:50:36 -0400

191 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:32:24 -0400

250 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:43:31 -0400

83 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:50:24 -0700

148 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:45:47 EDT

91 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 14:57:24 -0700

30 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Jason W. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:56:59 -0500

89 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Jason W. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:04:32 -0500

162 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:38:49 +0800

264 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:40:30 +0800

119 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 22:15:49 EDT

64 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Eric Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:19:21 +0100

219 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:26:40 -0400

161 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:00:03 -0700

25 lines

Re: First Article Buy-off Process for SMT & Wave Solder

Steve Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:03:05 -0700

176 lines

New Thread

Fitting question

Fitting question

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:53:11 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Flammability

Flammability

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:07:35 -0500

31 lines

Re: Flammability

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:35:12 -0400

62 lines

Re: Flammability

Rudy Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:34:39 EDT

70 lines

Re: Flammability

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:46:21 -0500

68 lines

Re: Flammability

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:56:17 -0500

99 lines

Re: Flammability

Eric Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:59:25 +0100

60 lines

Re: Flammability

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:25:44 +0300

99 lines

Re: Flammability

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:22:44 +0100

106 lines

Re: Flammability

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:46:15 +0800

158 lines

Re: Flammability

Tim Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:36:20 -0700

62 lines

New Thread

Flex Cable Material

Flex Cable Material

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:49:21 -0400

29 lines

Re: Flex Cable Material

Roger Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:56:39 -0400

67 lines

Re: Flex Cable Material

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:53:45 EDT

60 lines

Re: Flex Cable Material

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:31:03 -0400

258 lines

New Thread

Flying Probe Testers...

Flying Probe Testers...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:11:55 EDT

66 lines

Re: Flying Probe Testers...

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:26:06 -0600

109 lines

Re: Flying Probe Testers...

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:56:14 -0400

62 lines

Re: Flying Probe Testers...

Fineline Circuits, Inc. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:50:37 -0700

180 lines

Re: Flying Probe Testers...

Erat, Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:52:10 -0400

92 lines

Re: Flying Probe Testers...

Jim Axton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:13:51 -0700

192 lines

Re: Flying Probe Testers...

Jim Axton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:16:02 -0700

153 lines

Re: Flying Probe Testers...

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:05:31 -0600

169 lines

Re: Flying Probe Testers...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:29:38 EDT

67 lines

Re: Flying Probe Testers...

Jowan Iven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 07:51:21 +0200

173 lines

New Thread

Focussed Cleaner

Focussed Cleaner

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:07:21 -0600

32 lines

Re: Focussed Cleaner

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:29:49 +0200

61 lines

Re: Focussed Cleaner

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:49:00 -0500

116 lines

New Thread

FW: Laminate Materials

FW: Laminate Materials

Sefika Ozkal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:30:48 +0300

336 lines

New Thread

FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

FW: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Marita Zavala <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:25:57 -0700

124 lines

New Thread

FW: Undeliverable: Re: [TN] Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

FW: Undeliverable: Re: [TN] Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:50:53 -0500

115 lines

Re: FW: Undeliverable: Re: [TN] Alternative Finishes To Tin/Lead

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:00:02 -0400

194 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Fibre Optic

FW: [TN] Fibre Optic

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:24:05 -0400

275 lines

New Thread

Gold Embrittlement

Gold Embrittlement

Frank Kimmey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:42:20 -0700

86 lines

Re: Gold Embrittlement

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:34:05 EDT

94 lines

Re: Gold Embrittlement

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 20:05:42 EDT

52 lines

Re: Gold Embrittlement

Brian Toleno <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:40:02 -0700

66 lines

Re: Gold Embrittlement

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:35:07 -0500

187 lines

Re: Gold Embrittlement

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:39:56 +0100

182 lines

New Thread

Gold finish.

Gold finish.

Henry Rekers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:43:16 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

Gold on Leads

Gold on Leads

Rudy Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:16:29 EDT

51 lines

New Thread

Golden Pin Connectors

Golden Pin Connectors

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:27:56 -0700

26 lines

Re: Golden Pin Connectors

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:27:27 -0400

57 lines

Re: Golden Pin Connectors

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:40:05 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

GXTT Plating (palladium-nickel alloy)

GXTT Plating (palladium-nickel alloy)

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:31:30 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

HASL process OK or not ?

HASL process OK or not ?

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:00:21 +0100

58 lines

Re: HASL process OK or not ?

WEEKES, MICHAEL HS-SNS <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:23:24 -0500

87 lines

Re: HASL process OK or not ?

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:50:19 -0600

137 lines

Re: HASL process OK or not ?

Rudy Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:03:10 EST

66 lines

Re: HASL process OK or not ?

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:31:52 +0100

120 lines

Re: HASL process OK or not ?

Russell Burdick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:47:44 -0700

126 lines

Re: HASL process OK or not ?

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:48:22 -0800

152 lines

Re: HASL process OK or not ?

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:59:21 -0600

181 lines

Re: HASL process OK or not ?

Geoff Layhe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:47:16 -0000

167 lines

Re: HASL process OK or not ?

Sherif Refaat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:14:26 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Have you ever used this part?

Have you ever used this part?

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:10:52 -0500

81 lines

New Thread

Have You Heard A Board Shop Called...

Have You Heard A Board Shop Called...

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:59:53 -0700

30 lines

Re: Have You Heard A Board Shop Called...

Jason Lineback <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:42:16 -0500

74 lines

Re: Have You Heard A Board Shop Called...

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:47:05 -0500

78 lines

Re: Have You Heard A Board Shop Called...

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 07:43:33 -0400

64 lines

New Thread

High Voltage encapsulant recommendations

High Voltage encapsulant recommendations

Gary Bremer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:29:39 -0400

27 lines

Re: High Voltage encapsulant recommendations

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:56:18 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

HOAX

Re: HOAX

Eric Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:19:32 +0100

45 lines

Re: HOAX

Tim Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:17:08 -0700

81 lines

New Thread

how thick is ½ ounce copper

how thick is ½ ounce copper

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:00:13 -0400

33 lines

Re: how thick is ½ ounce copper

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:01:05 +0800

77 lines

Re: how thick is ½ ounce copper

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:22:04 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

how thick is ounce copper

Re: how thick is ounce copper

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 13:14:44 EDT

37 lines

New Thread

impedance measurement to verify conformance to spec

impedance measurement to verify conformance to spec

Mark Lettang <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:41:58 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

information from European report on toxic metals

information from European report on toxic metals

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 02:11:59 EST

179 lines

Re: information from European report on toxic metals

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:11:38 -0800

271 lines

Re: information from European report on toxic metals

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:26:37 -0800

115 lines

Re: information from European report on toxic metals

rgrant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:34:41 -0700

377 lines

Re: information from European report on toxic metals

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:37:21 EST

78 lines

Re: information from European report on toxic metals

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:16:02 +0200

216 lines

Re: information from European report on toxic metals

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:49:29 -0500

268 lines

Re: information from European report on toxic metals

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:53:52 -0500

128 lines

Re: information from European report on toxic metals

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:08:24 EST

54 lines

Re: information from European report on toxic metals

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:02:41 -0500

228 lines

New Thread

Ink Jet Printing for PCBs

Ink Jet Printing for PCBs

Roger Cook <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:51:49 -0700

32 lines

Re: Ink Jet Printing for PCBs

Leo Roos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:08:22 -0700

62 lines

Re: Ink Jet Printing for PCBs

McCabe, Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 11:40:16 -0400

73 lines

Re: Ink Jet Printing for PCBs

Jason Lineback <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:37:34 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

Ionograph measurements

Re: Ionograph measurements

Tegehall Per-Erik <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 08:56:10 +0200

133 lines

Re: Ionograph measurements

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 07:50:29 -0500

163 lines

Re: Ionograph measurements

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:18:36 -0400

166 lines

Re: Ionograph measurements

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:59:54 +0100

190 lines

Re: Ionograph measurements

Tegehall Per-Erik <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:08:44 +0200

221 lines

Re: Ionograph measurements

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:59:06 -0500

295 lines

Re: Ionograph measurements

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:46:42 +0200

42 lines

Re: Ionograph measurements

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:32:02 -0400

213 lines

Re: Ionograph measurements

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Oct 2002 17:55:05 +0100

111 lines

Re: Ionograph measurements

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Sep 2002 07:06:06 -0400

311 lines

Re: Ionograph measurements

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:03:22 +0100

392 lines

New Thread

Ionograph measurements (NT)

Re: Ionograph measurements (NT)

Tim Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:17:34 -0700

63 lines

New Thread

Ionograph measurements (NT) OT!!

Re: Ionograph measurements (NT) OT!!

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:15:58 -0400

94 lines

Re: Ionograph measurements (NT) OT!!

Munie, Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:44:00 -0500

132 lines

New Thread

IP-5 Power Bits

IP-5 Power Bits

Dave Hornback <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:27:40 -0700

27 lines

Re: IP-5 Power Bits

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:52:22 -0400

61 lines

New Thread

IPC-6012A

IPC-6012A

Sonny Jee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:15:41 +0900

44 lines

Re: IPC-6012A

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 22:16:26 EDT

49 lines

New Thread

IPC-A-610C VS. GR-78-CORE

IPC-A-610C VS. GR-78-CORE

marita zavala (marita.zavala@sanmina-sci-com) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:30:52 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

IPC-SM-840

IPC-SM-840

Colin Weber <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:34:12 +1100

41 lines

Re: IPC-SM-840

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:38:18 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

IPC/JEDEC announce Taipei Conf on LF Comp & Assy

IPC/JEDEC announce Taipei Conf on LF Comp & Assy

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:24:27 -0500

278 lines

New Thread

It may be a Hoax, was [TN] (no subject)

It may be a Hoax, was [TN] (no subject)

Matthias Mansfeld <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:55:20 +0200

61 lines

New Thread

JIC 37° fittings

JIC 37° fittings

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:09:24 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Jim Herard/Endicott/IBM is out of the office.

Jim Herard/Endicott/IBM is out of the office.

Jim Herard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 01:42:41 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Kollmorgan Flying Probe Testers

Re: Kollmorgan Flying Probe Testers

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:39:25 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

Laminate Materials

Laminate Materials

Sefika Ozkal <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 07:48:45 +0300

243 lines

Re: Laminate Materials

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:21:03 -0400

284 lines

Re: Laminate Materials

Mcmaster, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:47:40 -0700

304 lines

New Thread

laminate source

laminate source

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 13 Oct 2002 08:43:47 EDT

28 lines

Laminate Source

Geoff Layhe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:10:34 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Laminate surface micro void & IPC Specification

Laminate surface micro void & IPC Specification

Shirley Xiao <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:15:28 -0700

31 lines

Re: Laminate surface micro void & IPC Specification

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:19:37 -0500

61 lines

Re: Laminate surface micro void & IPC Specification

Shirley Xiao <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 04:51:03 -0700

105 lines

New Thread

Lead -Antimony experience

Lead -Antimony experience

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:36:10 +0800

40 lines

Re: Lead -Antimony experience

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 06:33:13 -0600

93 lines

Re: Lead -Antimony experience

Phillip Hinton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:46:38 EST

76 lines

New Thread

Lead protrusion

Lead protrusion

Keith Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:04:35 -0500

56 lines

Re: Lead protrusion

Sauer, Steven T. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:22:38 -0500

52 lines

Re: Lead protrusion

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:34:28 -0500

96 lines

Re: Lead protrusion

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:41:11 -0500

143 lines

Re: Lead protrusion

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:26:25 -0700

178 lines

Re: Lead protrusion

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:38:24 -0500

207 lines

Re: Lead protrusion

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:03:24 -0500

102 lines

Re: Lead protrusion

Steve MacDonald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:12:34 -0500

255 lines

Re: Lead protrusion

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:27:15 -0500

107 lines

Re: Lead protrusion

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:39:26 -0600

146 lines

New Thread

Lethal Potassium Chloride OT

Re: Lethal Potassium Chloride OT

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:42:58 EDT

91 lines

Re: Lethal Potassium Chloride OT

Tim Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:04:24 -0700

213 lines

Re: Lethal Potassium Chloride OT

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:00:28 -0400

286 lines

New Thread

Looking ESD Tags!

Looking ESD Tags!

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:16:42 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

Looking for Extra Large Panels(size:48"X96") of FR-4 Material.

Looking for Extra Large Panels(size:48"X96") of FR-4 Material.

SDC's Tech Net <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:16:52 -0700

34 lines

Re: Looking for Extra Large Panels(size:48"X96") of FR-4 Material.

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:57:38 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

Low ICT yield using lead free on OSP

Low ICT yield using lead free on OSP

David <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 23:07:08 +0800

125 lines

New Thread

Mark Orlowski/PEMSTAR Inc is out of the office.

Mark Orlowski/PEMSTAR Inc is out of the office.

Mark Orlowski/PEMSTAR Inc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:01:45 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Matt McNeary/FTINN/MFG/KEMET/US is out of the office.

Matt McNeary/FTINN/MFG/KEMET/US is out of the office.

Matt McNeary/FTINN2/MFG/KEMET/US <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:00:54 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Metcal BGA Rework/Prototype station

Metcal BGA Rework/Prototype station

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:22:42 -0400

33 lines

Re: Metcal BGA Rework/Prototype station

WEEKES, MICHAEL HS-SNS <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:22:33 -0400

63 lines

Re: Metcal BGA Rework/Prototype station

Dave Pahlas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:27:03 -0400

66 lines

New Thread

MiniWave/Minisandblasting Equipment

MiniWave/Minisandblasting Equipment

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:36:31 -0500

34 lines

Re: MiniWave/Minisandblasting Equipment

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 01:51:18 -0700

99 lines

Re: MiniWave/Minisandblasting Equipment

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 07:31:04 -0400

77 lines

Re: MiniWave/Minisandblasting Equipment

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:35:45 -0400

83 lines

Re: MiniWave/Minisandblasting Equipment

Jos Groffils <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:57:07 +0200

86 lines

Re: MiniWave/Minisandblasting Equipment

SUBSCRIBE Technet Anonymous <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:37:02 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Mounting Horizontal Diode

Mounting Horizontal Diode

Stan AUGUSTIN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:28:21 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

MPM UP1500

MPM UP1500

Jowan Iven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:21:36 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Need camera for stereo microscope

Need camera for stereo microscope

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:29:54 -0400

31 lines

Re: Need camera for stereo microscope

McFaddin, Wade <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 19:48:53 -0500

69 lines

Re: Need camera for stereo microscope

Eric Castonguay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 09:53:17 -0400

176 lines

New Thread

Need camera for stereo microscope - still pictures?

Re: Need camera for stereo microscope - still pictures?

Carl VanWormer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 07:54:12 -0700

73 lines

New Thread

Nitrogen drying/tangent.....

Re: Nitrogen drying/tangent.....

Steve Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:37:03 -0800

106 lines

Re: Nitrogen drying/tangent.....

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:56:07 -0500

127 lines

New Thread

Nitrogen drying?

Nitrogen drying?

Gregg Klawson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:20:48 -0500

33 lines

Re: Nitrogen drying?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:13:09 +0200

64 lines

Re: Nitrogen drying?

Misner, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:26:03 -0700

64 lines

Re: Nitrogen drying?

Gregg Klawson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:25:21 -0500

113 lines

Re: Nitrogen drying?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:56:07 -0500

96 lines

Re: Nitrogen drying?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:57:06 -0500

62 lines

Re: Nitrogen drying?

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:26:26 -0500

217 lines

New Thread

no clean flux as a board cleaner?

no clean flux as a board cleaner?

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:25:04 -0600

115 lines

Re: no clean flux as a board cleaner?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 19:45:42 EDT

66 lines

Re: no clean flux as a board cleaner?

rgrant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:03:29 -0600

188 lines

Re: no clean flux as a board cleaner?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:16:26 +0300

70 lines

Re: no clean flux as a board cleaner?

Eric Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:07:40 +0100

59 lines

Re: no clean flux as a board cleaner?

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 07:56:59 -0400

225 lines

Re: no clean flux as a board cleaner?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:11:43 EDT

41 lines

Re: no clean flux as a board cleaner?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 07:24:31 -0500

112 lines

Re: no clean flux as a board cleaner?

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:25:46 -0500

195 lines

Re: no clean flux as a board cleaner?

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:38:15 -0400

143 lines

Re: no clean flux as a board cleaner?

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:05:33 -0600

105 lines

Re: no clean flux as a board cleaner?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:11:26 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

nominal

nominal

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:08:05 EDT

29 lines

Re: nominal

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 07:34:56 -0500

72 lines

Re: nominal

Bresnan, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 06:26:09 -0700

59 lines

New Thread

Nonwetting on ImAu

Nonwetting on ImAu

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:03:36 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Nonwetting on ImAu, REAL message

Nonwetting on ImAu, REAL message

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:22:38 -0400

46 lines

Re: Nonwetting on ImAu, REAL message

Dave Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:31:28 -0500

74 lines

Re: Nonwetting on ImAu, REAL message

Bill Wesmoreland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:52:46 -0500

92 lines

Re: Nonwetting on ImAu, REAL message

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 20:27:48 -0500

103 lines

Re: Nonwetting on ImAu, REAL message

Higgins Leo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 01:40:09 -0400

244 lines

New Thread

Out

Out

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 16:24:03 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

PADS vs. Expedition

PADS vs. Expedition

Smith, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:45:32 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

PCB design with mask over vias.

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 07:21:00 -0700

61 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:27:33 EDT

41 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:30:32 -0400

73 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:13:38 +0800

97 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 07:34:08 EDT

35 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:02:08 -0400

179 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

Dave Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:38:09 -0500

210 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:38:27 +0800

215 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 23:20:11 EDT

64 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

Seth Goodman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 23:22:37 -0500

65 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

Seth Goodman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 23:45:47 -0500

66 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:57:56 -0400

247 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 07:46:35 +0800

122 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

Seth Goodman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 03:24:02 -0500

250 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:37:56 EDT

37 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:24:47 -0400

38 lines

Re: PCB design with mask over vias.

Tim Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:53:07 -0700

90 lines

New Thread

PCB Prototyping

PCB Prototyping

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:29:29 -0700

37 lines

Re: PCB Prototyping

Dougal Stewart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:09:31 +0100

74 lines

Re: PCB Prototyping

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:15:43 -0800

86 lines

Re: PCB Prototyping

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:41:46 -0800

138 lines

Re: PCB Prototyping

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:01:44 -0800

178 lines

New Thread

Performance-Based Quality

Performance-Based Quality

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:39:13 -0700

137 lines

Re: Performance-Based Quality

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:31:32 -0500

285 lines

Re: Performance-Based Quality

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:38:25 -0600

373 lines

Re: Performance-Based Quality

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:56:39 -0700

259 lines

Re: Performance-Based Quality

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:07:54 -0500

449 lines

Re: Performance-Based Quality

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:16:36 -0500

464 lines

Re: Performance-Based Quality

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:57:19 -0700

257 lines

Re: Performance-Based Quality

Tegehall Per-Erik <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:13:18 +0100

503 lines

New Thread

Personal message

Personal message

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:20:52 +0100

61 lines

Re: Personal message

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:56:40 +0300

86 lines

Re: Personal message

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:41:29 -0400

88 lines

New Thread

Pictures of my problem...

Pictures of my problem...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:55:39 EDT

57 lines

Re: Pictures of my problem...

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:18:21 -0500

120 lines

New Thread

Poor solder resist adherence.

Poor solder resist adherence.

Juan T. Marugán <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:07:58 -0500

45 lines

Re: Poor solder resist adherence.

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:25:28 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:32:33 -0600

99 lines

Re: Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:07:10 EST

208 lines

Re: Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:32:16 EST

59 lines

Re: Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:22:22 EST

93 lines

Re: Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:28:13 EST

52 lines

Re: Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:16:38 -0600

139 lines

Re: Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:25:20 -0600

67 lines

Re: Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:47:00 -0800

64 lines

Re: Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Rich Buccieri <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:39:07 -0600

230 lines

Re: Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:29:15 EST

96 lines

Re: Press fit connectors requirements per IPC-A-610

Rich Buccieri <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:08:00 -0600

227 lines

New Thread

Press fit connectors...

Press fit connectors...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:07:10 EDT

61 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Genny Gibbard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:14:39 -0600

120 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:17:00 -0700

66 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:22:59 -0400

28 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:28:38 -0500

147 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:51:08 -0700

156 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Dave Pahlas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:54:34 -0400

127 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Rey Sosa <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:55:39 -0700

153 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:46:10 -0700

102 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

rgrant <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:47:58 -0600

116 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:58:38 EDT

101 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:12:40 EDT

97 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:36:23 -0700

199 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Gerry Savard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:49:20 -0400

218 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Gaby Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:04:04 +0200

109 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:33:28 -0600

200 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Charles Caswell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:45:00 -0600

239 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Ron Olinyk <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:17:53 -0500

128 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:30:37 +0800

92 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:01:07 EST

113 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

DUTTON Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:46:44 +1100

272 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:49:33 +0800

102 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:05:18 -0700

116 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:44:33 +0800

183 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:49:12 -0500

210 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:14:17 -0600

67 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Jeff Seeger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:33:25 -0500

58 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:42:08 -0600

73 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Morse, Carrie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:13:22 -0500

242 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:43:31 -0700

206 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

David Ricketts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:24:04 -0800

325 lines

Re: Press fit connectors...

Atkinson, Neil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:34:27 -0000

92 lines

New Thread

Proof of design book

Proof of design book

Adair, Bret <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:55:16 -0700

79 lines

Re: Proof of design book

Fineline Circuits, Inc. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 16:59:51 -0700

162 lines

New Thread

PWB Laminate Measling Defects

PWB Laminate Measling Defects

Dam, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:01:32 -0400

28 lines

Re: PWB Laminate Measling Defects

Lum Wee Mei <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:18:21 +0800

50 lines

New Thread

QSOP footprint connector

QSOP footprint connector

Reid, Lorraine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:10:17 +0100

111 lines

New Thread

quality

quality

Mike Rodgers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:49:48 -0500

26 lines

Re: quality

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:01:35 EDT

44 lines

Re: quality

ken Giery <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:32:13 -0400

56 lines

Re: quality

Eric Castonguay <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:32:38 -0400

151 lines

Re: quality

Rudy Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:11:27 EDT

30 lines

Re: quality

Dehoyos, Ramon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:09:09 -0700

49 lines

Re: Quality

Brian Toleno <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:00:39 -0400

67 lines

Re: Quality

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:40:02 -0500

150 lines

Re: Quality

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:29:38 -0500

129 lines

New Thread

Question about inspeciton instrument

Question about inspeciton instrument

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:09:30 -0700

31 lines

Re: Question about inspeciton instrument

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:39:58 EDT

117 lines

Re: Question about inspeciton instrument

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:21:14 -0500

62 lines

Re: Question about inspeciton instrument

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:22:31 -0500

64 lines

Re: Question about inspeciton instrument

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:38:07 -0700

94 lines

New Thread

Question about inspection instrument

Question about inspection instrument

Mary Jane Chism <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:38:39 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

Question regarding welds

Question regarding welds

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:38:49 -0500

34 lines

Re: Question regarding welds

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:42:00 EDT

26 lines

Re: Question regarding welds

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:50:53 -0400

70 lines

Re: Question regarding welds

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:05:18 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

Réf. : Re: [TN] PCB design with mask over vias.

Réf. : Re: [TN] PCB design with mask over vias.

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:20:48 +0400

261 lines

New Thread

Réf. : [TN] HASL process OK or not ?

Réf. : [TN] HASL process OK or not ?

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:54:37 +0400

271 lines

New Thread

Réf. : [TN] laminate source

Réf. : [TN] laminate source

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:04:44 +0400

216 lines

New Thread

Réf. : [TN] Personal message

Réf. : [TN] Personal message

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:08:57 +0400

265 lines

New Thread

Réf. : [TN] Proof of design book

Réf. : [TN] Proof of design book

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:47:53 +0400

194 lines

New Thread

Raised TH components after Wave

Raised TH components after Wave

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:02:25 -0500

38 lines

Re: Raised TH components after Wave

Richard Carruth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:04:50 -0600

82 lines

Re: Raised TH components after Wave

Dave Pahlas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:17:07 -0500

76 lines

Re: Raised TH components after Wave

Bloomquist, Ken <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:20:41 -0800

33 lines

Re: Raised TH components after Wave

Chad Haima <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:18:49 -0800

78 lines

Re: Raised TH components after Wave

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:32:56 -0600

67 lines

Re: Raised TH components after Wave

Dave Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:39:23 -0600

66 lines

Re: Raised TH components after Wave

Bailey, Beth A. (AMHERST) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:44:15 -0500

74 lines

Re: Raised TH components after Wave

Jason W. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:04:34 -0600

81 lines

Re: Raised TH components after Wave

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:39:31 -0500

105 lines

Re: Raised TH components after Wave

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:05:04 -0700

115 lines

New Thread

Red Ink

Red Ink

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:35:58 EDT

56 lines

Re: Red Ink

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:12:27 -0500

132 lines

Re: Red Ink

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:16:08 -0700

77 lines

Re: Red Ink

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:48:01 +0800

74 lines

Re: Red Ink

Leigh-Ann Litavis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:49:45 EST

27 lines

New Thread

Roadmap for Transition to Lead Free Components?

Roadmap for Transition to Lead Free Components?

Dave Hornback <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:13:25 -0700

29 lines

Re: Roadmap for Transition to Lead Free Components?

rgrant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:53:27 -0600

63 lines

Re: Roadmap for Transition to Lead Free Components?

Steve Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:18:18 -0700

61 lines

Re: Roadmap for Transition to Lead Free Components?

Higgins Leo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:22:36 -0400

265 lines

Re: Roadmap for Transition to Lead Free Components?

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:30:01 -0400

389 lines

New Thread

Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:17:00 -0800

36 lines

Re: Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:37:18 EST

60 lines

Re: Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:55:00 -0800

65 lines

Re: Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Simon Howells <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:15:02 +1100

98 lines

Re: Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:19:07 EST

88 lines

Re: Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Jason W. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:37:00 -0600

105 lines

Re: Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Augustin Stan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:18:51 -0600

24 lines

Re: Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 05:57:32 -0600

196 lines

Re: Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Stan AUGUSTIN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:01:32 +0200

215 lines

Re: Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Dave Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 06:33:39 -0600

68 lines

Re: Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:41:05 -0600

104 lines

Re: Round Pads for 0402 Parts?

Eric Castonguay <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:11:25 -0500

199 lines

New Thread

Scary --- and very concerned

Scary --- and very concerned

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:06:13 EDT

38 lines

Re: Scary --- and very concerned

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:29:55 EDT

98 lines

Re: Scary --- and very concerned

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:00:16 +0300

99 lines

Re: Scary --- and very concerned

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:56:32 EST

39 lines

New Thread

seeking recommendation on BGA cold solder joints monitor

seeking recommendation on BGA cold solder joints monitor

carlsbad li <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:25:01 -0700

36 lines

Re: seeking recommendation on BGA cold solder joints monitor

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:13:58 EDT

44 lines

Re: seeking recommendation on BGA cold solder joints monitor

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:10:12 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

Shean Dalton/ElectrovertUS/Cookson is out of the office.

Shean Dalton/ElectrovertUS/Cookson is out of the office.

Shean Dalton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 01:01:06 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Side and Toe Fillets...

Side and Toe Fillets...

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:06:34 EDT

77 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...

Grant Emandien <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:22:43 +0200

82 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:53:57 -0500

197 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:10:38 EDT

45 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...

Gregg A. Owens <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:17:07 -0700

528 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...

Nancy Trumbull <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:47:56 -0400

95 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:04:58 -0500

616 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:18:01 -0500

82 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...

Eric Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:04:56 -0000

120 lines

New Thread

Side and Toe Fillets...From IPC

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...From IPC

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:22:54 -0500

257 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...From IPC

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:05:35 EDT

175 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...From IPC

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:38:59 -0400

275 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...From IPC

Wenger, George M. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:01:14 -0500

331 lines

Re: Side and Toe Fillets...From IPC

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:28:21 EDT

28 lines

New Thread

slivers from electroplated tin

slivers from electroplated tin

Adam Seychell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 20:02:49 -0500

45 lines

Re: slivers from electroplated tin

Rudy Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 23:32:09 EDT

77 lines

Re: slivers from electroplated tin

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 21:45:15 -0700

70 lines

Re: slivers from electroplated tin

tony steinke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:06:41 -0700

172 lines

Re: slivers from electroplated tin

Adam Seychell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 22:08:45 -0500

26 lines

Re: slivers from electroplated tin

Rudy Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 00:15:44 EDT

55 lines

New Thread

small parts handling equipment

small parts handling equipment

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:04:17 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

SMD and NSMD pads on same BGA

SMD and NSMD pads on same BGA

Glenn Pelkey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:48:18 -0800

37 lines

Re: SMD and NSMD pads on same BGA

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:23:45 -0600

83 lines

Re: SMD and NSMD pads on same BGA

Rey Sosa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:13:25 -0800

71 lines

Re: SMD and NSMD pads on same BGA

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:19:56 EST

110 lines

New Thread

SMD/NSMD pic

SMD/NSMD pic

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:41:20 EDT

25 lines

Re: SMD/NSMD pic

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:46:07 EDT

52 lines

Re: SMD/NSMD pic

Steve Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:46:06 -0700

52 lines

Re: SMD/NSMD pic

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:14:20 -0400

56 lines

Re: SMD/NSMD pic

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:33:05 EDT

27 lines

New Thread

SNEC Meeting

SNEC Meeting

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 04:25:42 EDT

100 lines

New Thread

solder deposition by dipping

solder deposition by dipping

Jos Groffils <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:06:07 +0200

65 lines

Re: solder deposition by dipping

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:08:43 +0100

107 lines

New Thread

Solder melt energy coefficient

Solder melt energy coefficient

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:56:25 -0700

104 lines

Re: Solder melt energy coefficient

Jos Groffils <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:14:46 +0200

73 lines

Re: Solder melt energy coefficient

Jos Groffils <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:32:43 +0200

91 lines

Re: Solder melt energy coefficient

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 07:47:45 -0500

87 lines

Re: Solder melt energy coefficient

Tim Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:17:11 -0700

197 lines

Re: Solder melt energy coefficient

Tim Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:26:46 -0700

266 lines

New Thread

solder paste vendor

solder paste vendor

Vandendolder, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:00:16 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:30:22 -0700

27 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:44:24 EDT

81 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:50:41 -0400

68 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:07:38 -0700

168 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:19:43 -0700

241 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Charlie McMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:20:25 -0400

242 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Valerie St.Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:25:59 -0400

153 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Hogg, Blair K. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:45:29 -0400

33 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:56:59 -0700

173 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:07:32 EDT

102 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:20:05 -0700

222 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Charlie McMahon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:27:22 -0400

249 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:40:57 -0700

91 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Valerie St.Cyr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:36:08 -0400

284 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:17:20 -0500

263 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:57:57 -0700

295 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:52:37 +0800

107 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:05:17 -0500

337 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:11:31 EDT

82 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:59:48 +0800

80 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:46:54 -0500

29 lines

Re: Solder UNDER Soldermask Accept/Reject Criteria?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 07:07:51 -0400

48 lines

New Thread

soldered press fit pins

Re: soldered press fit pins

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:54:10 EST

58 lines

New Thread

soldering brass to copper

soldering brass to copper

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:22:41 -0400

32 lines

Re: soldering brass to copper

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:28:21 -0700

31 lines

Re: soldering brass to copper

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:47:31 +0100

77 lines

Re: soldering brass to copper

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:02:09 -0400

70 lines

Re: soldering brass to copper

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:50:46 -0500

114 lines

Re: soldering brass to copper

rgrant <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:39:50 -0600

142 lines

Re: soldering brass to copper

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:45:48 -0500

194 lines

Re: soldering brass to copper

Tostevin, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:12:37 -0500

236 lines

Re: soldering brass to copper

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:54:54 -0500

293 lines

Re: soldering brass to copper

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:56:24 +0100

231 lines

New Thread

soldering brass to copper & microsandblaster

Re: soldering brass to copper & microsandblaster

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:55:32 -0500

302 lines

New Thread

Sorry the repeat reference...

Sorry the repeat reference...

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:52:29 EST

60 lines

New Thread

Stacking of components (SMD) Revisited

Stacking of components (SMD) Revisited

Alex Krstic <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:47:46 -0600

183 lines

Re: Stacking of components (SMD) Revisited

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:34:59 EDT

34 lines

Re: Stacking of components (SMD) Revisited

Mark Roslawsk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:24:49 -0700

309 lines

Re: Stacking of components (SMD) Revisited

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:25:56 -0700

32 lines

Re: Stacking of components (SMD) Revisited

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:33:28 -0400

262 lines

Re: Stacking of components (SMD) Revisited

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:16:48 -0400

348 lines

Re: Stacking of components (SMD) Revisited

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:50:08 +0800

155 lines

Re: Stacking of components (SMD) Revisited

Croslin, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:01:12 -0400

184 lines

New Thread

Standards for PC Assembly: Off shelf

Standards for PC Assembly: Off shelf

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:41:48 -0400

49 lines

Re: Standards for PC Assembly: Off shelf

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:32:19 EDT

53 lines

New Thread

Sterling silver finish

Sterling silver finish

Francis Sun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:09:36 -0400

41 lines

Re: Sterling silver finish

Chris Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:31:57 -0400

72 lines

Re: Sterling silver finish

Dave Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:55:57 -0500

97 lines

Re: Sterling silver finish

Rey Sosa <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:32:16 -0700

85 lines

Re: Sterling silver finish

Dave Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:29:39 -0500

115 lines

New Thread

Tape Grid Arrays

Tape Grid Arrays

Louis, Edwin @ CSE <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:20:56 -0400

23 lines

Re: Tape Grid Arrays

Chris Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:17:30 -0400

54 lines

Re: Tape Grid Arrays

Higgins Leo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:21:14 -0400

142 lines

New Thread

TBGAs

TBGAs

Louis, Edwin @ CSE <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:29:56 -0400

28 lines

Re: TBGAs

Higgins Leo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:38:17 -0400

186 lines

Re: TBGAs

Louis, Edwin @ CSE <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:33:40 -0400

100 lines

New Thread

TechNet

Re: TechNet

Raghavendra Bs <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 09:33:43 +0530

29 lines

Re: TechNet

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 08:44:37 +0200

56 lines

Re: TechNet

Raghavendra Bs <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 14:29:30 +0530

66 lines

Re: TechNet

Raghavendra Bs <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 06:15:33 +0530

89 lines

Re: TechNet

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:47:36 +0200

151 lines

Re: TechNet

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:28:31 -0600

67 lines

New Thread

Technet Error Messages

Technet Error Messages

Keach Sasamori <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:18:25 -0500

117 lines

New Thread

Technical paper to read and consider

Technical paper to read and consider

Joe Fjelstad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:58:51 EST

226 lines

New Thread

Temp Humidity Control - Do you?

Temp Humidity Control - Do you?

Henry Rekers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:24:15 -0700

34 lines

Re: Temp Humidity Control - Do you?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:27:47 -0400

68 lines

Re: Temp Humidity Control - Do you?

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:55:07 -0400

51 lines

Re: Temp Humidity Control - Do you?

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:40:54 -0400

87 lines

Re: Temp Humidity Control - Do you?

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:42:55 -0400

93 lines

Temp Humidity Control - Do you?

Francois Monette <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:50:59 -0400

69 lines

Re: Temp Humidity Control - Do you?

WEEKES, MICHAEL HS-SNS <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:54:45 -0400

66 lines

Re: Temp Humidity Control - Do you?

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:55:33 -0400

103 lines

Re: Temp Humidity Control - Do you?

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:36:05 -0500

130 lines

New Thread

Temperature Chart

Temperature Chart

Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:00:44 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

testhouses?

testhouses?

Galster Norbert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:44:21 +0200

34 lines

Re: testhouses?

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:42:41 -0700

57 lines

New Thread

Thickness Problem

Thickness Problem

Sefika Ozkal <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:34:52 +0300

166 lines

Re: Thickness Problem

David Ricketts <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:33:38 -0700

215 lines

New Thread

Undercut peeling on all Gold Board

Undercut peeling on all Gold Board

Steve Mac Donald <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:59:30 -0500

32 lines

Re: Undercut peeling on all Gold Board

Crepeau, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:11:04 -0700

79 lines

Re: Undercut peeling on all Gold Board

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 07:18:55 -0700

86 lines

Re: Undercut peeling on all Gold Board

Eddie Rocha <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:27:35 -0700

91 lines

Re: Undercut peeling on all Gold Board

Glynn Shaw <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:43:21 -0700

113 lines

New Thread

Undercut peeling on all Gold Board--More than you wanted to know

Re: Undercut peeling on all Gold Board--More than you wanted to know

Rudy Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Oct 2002 01:05:19 EDT

76 lines

New Thread

Unidrill

Unidrill

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:10:32 EDT

29 lines

New Thread

Via clearance

Via clearance

Paul Truit <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:30:04 -0400

33 lines

Re: Via clearance

Nowland, Russell Howard (Russell) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:47:48 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

Virus alert

Re: Virus alert

Tegehall Per-Erik <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:21:04 +0200

103 lines

Re: Virus alert

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:33:42 +0800

188 lines

Re: Virus alert

Dan R. Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:36:50 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

WARPAGE

WARPAGE

Karnwal, Pankaj <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:02:16 +0100

49 lines

Re: WARPAGE

Eric Castonguay <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:14:53 -0500

223 lines

Re: WARPAGE

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:30:42 -0600

312 lines

Re: WARPAGE

James TerVeen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:39:46 -0500

163 lines

Re: WARPAGE

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:46:28 -0600

200 lines

Re: WARPAGE

Glenn Pelkey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:13:23 -0800

303 lines

Re: WARPAGE

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:20:26 -0500

316 lines

Re: WARPAGE

Randy Bock Sr. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:44:18 -0500

512 lines

Re: WARPAGE

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:48:46 +0800

219 lines

Re: WARPAGE

Russell Burdick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:26:15 -0700

268 lines

Re: WARPAGE

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Oct 2002 09:36:20 -0600

336 lines

New Thread

Water-soluble flux wash pressures?

Water-soluble flux wash pressures?

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:57:00 -0700

45 lines

Re: Water-soluble flux wash pressures?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:43:39 +0800

96 lines

Re: Water-soluble flux wash pressures?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:55:20 EDT

38 lines

Re: Water-soluble flux wash pressures?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:43:07 +0300

96 lines

Re: Water-soluble flux wash pressures?

Dave Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:30:41 -0500

93 lines

New Thread

Wave soldering pallet thickness

Re: Wave soldering pallet thickness

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Sep 2002 22:12:56 -0700

97 lines

Re: Wave soldering pallet thickness

Peter Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 07:39:00 -0700

406 lines

Re: Wave soldering pallet thickness

Dave Pahlas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:22:53 -0400

329 lines

Re: Wave soldering pallet thickness

Dave Chapman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:28:53 -0500

405 lines

Re: Wave soldering pallet thickness

Dave Pick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 21:00:00 +0100

358 lines

New Thread

Welding of innerlayers

Welding of innerlayers

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:15:43 -0500

31 lines

Re: Welding of innerlayers

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:45:56 EDT

26 lines

Re: Welding of innerlayers

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:12:27 -0500

62 lines

Re: Welding of innerlayers

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:34:06 -0400

58 lines

New Thread

when is a press-fit pin not a press-fit pin

when is a press-fit pin not a press-fit pin

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:34:41 -0600

84 lines

Re: when is a press-fit pin not a press-fit pin

Sauer, Steven T. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:19:39 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

x's-outs

x's-outs

Bill Dworak <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:57:28 -0700

64 lines

Re: x's-outs

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:32:34 -0500

147 lines

New Thread

Z-axis BGA solder joint verification ?

Z-axis BGA solder joint verification ?

Mark Roslawski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:44:50 -0700

136 lines