LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


February 2001


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Here you have, ;0)" (1 message)
"Temprobe" thermocouples for profiling (8 messages)
(TN) BGA area array connectors - how reliable? (3 messages)
1206 part on 1210 pads (2 messages)
30GA or smaller (Fine wire soldering) (1 message)
<No subject> (4 messages)
A=600 (1 message)
Actel FPGA bypassing (1 message)
An Attempt At Acronym Humor (2 messages)
Anodic Protection of Electroless Nickel (3 messages)
Antw: Re: [TN] Conductor Crack Detector (2 messages)
Antw: Re: [TN] fractured joints (1 message)
Antw: [TN] Climate test (2 messages)
Antw: [TN] Fractured Joints! (5 messages)
Antw: [TN] SEM Recommendations (1 message)
Antwort: [TN] Solder mask pre-clean (1 message)
Applications for ceramic wear parts or blades? (1 message)
Assy houses (3 messages)
AutoProgram for QUAD placement machine (IVc) (1 message)
AW: [TN] AW: [TN] Temperatures for Rework operation (1 message)
AW: [TN] Temperatures for Rework operation (6 messages)
backpanels and chemistries (1 message)
backplane or backpanel (10 messages)
BarCode Software (4 messages)
Bare board shelf Life (2 messages)
BGA Layout (1 message)
BGA REWORK (14 messages)
Black oxide alternatives- multilayer bonding (2 messages)
Book Review - SPC For SMT (3 messages)
BS4584-1990 (1 message)
Bunch of damn vultures (8 messages)
buried capacitance material (5 messages)
Burn-in (11 messages)
Button Terminology query (1 message)
Casting Porosity (1 message)
Chemical Substance for removal of oxidation (4 messages)
Chip device vs pad sizes (7 messages)
Climate test (2 messages)
components prohibited from aqueous wash (12 messages)
Concoating and large BGAs (1 message)
Conductor Crack Detector (2 messages)
Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 (1 message)
Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev. B (2 messages)
Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev.B (7 messages)
Controlled Impedance (4 messages)
Controlled Impedance Definition (1 message)
Controlled Impedence (3 messages)
Copper levels in wave solder pot (3 messages)
CornerBond 3515 (3 messages)
Cost reductions (3 messages)
CTE mismatch (2 messages)
DC resistance of PCB traces (1 message)
Delamination problem of PCB. (1 message)
design vs reality? (6 messages)
DFM Checklist (6 messages)
DFM conference, association, research organization (4 messages)
DFM No mas, no mas (3 messages)
DFM/CE (12 messages)
DI water and aluminum bond pads (9 messages)
DI water and aluminum bond pads 2 (1 message)
Dial buttons (13 messages)
Did we design a fuse? (2 messages)
Drii &Router bit suppliers (1 message)
DRY FILM BLUES (4 messages)
Dryfilm Lamination of Inners (1 message)
Ebony and Ivory... (3 messages)
Electroless Coating standard (2 messages)
Electronics Manufacturing (1 message)
Electronics Manufacturing Training (3 messages)
Entek OSP (3 messages)
EPA Regs Will Close PWB Facilities (1 message)
Exposed pad (thermally enhanced)TSSOP (1 message)
Extending the lives of components. (2 messages)
FAB - Reality Check, Tooling Holes and Profiling (4 messages)
Fatigue testing of Flex PWB's (2 messages)
Flip Chip Placement and Prices (2 messages)
Flip Chip Process Information? (2 messages)
Flip-chip underfill? (10 messages)
Florida IMAPS/SMTA Symposia, call for presenters (1 message)
Flying probes (5 messages)
fractured joints (10 messages)
Fractured Joints! (4 messages)
Fractured solder joint on component side (4 messages)
Free DFM/CE Audit Checklist (1 message)
FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS (67 messages)
FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS PLEASE REPLY DIRECTLY TO Mr MOON, NO T THE WHOLE LIST (4 messages)
FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS PLEASE REPLY DIRECTLY TO MrMOON, NO T THE WHOLE LIST (1 message)
FW: BGA production start (2 messages)
Getting More, and Not Paying More (21 messages)
Glass exposure system (4 messages)
HASL thickness specification (4 messages)
HDI Microvia PCB Cost Less in Production Quantity? (1 message)
Heat-sinked BGA Bridging... (14 messages)
How does HASL / FR-4 board cleanliness and humidity relate to failure rates? (2 messages)
How to mark the fiducial mark on the rejected unit with laser or Ink? (1 message)
Humidity and temperature specification (3 messages)
I'm a vulture too (1 message)
Identifying an INTEL part (8 messages)
Immersion Silver on flex. (4 messages)
In house soldering training (2 messages)
Incorrect Dates on Previous E-mail RE: IPC 2001 Flex Conference Call for Papers (1 message)
Insufficient Solder Joints (3 messages)
Is it acceptable trace rework? (4 messages)
L leads soldering question (4 messages)
Lead carbonate growth during humdity testing (1 message)
Lead trimming, BGA rework, and Nortel (1 message)
Lead trimming, BGA rework, and Nortel - I'm baack! (2 messages)
LET THERE BE LIGHT!!! IPC Sponsors First Conference on Optoelectronics, May 3-4, 2001, Toronto, CN (1 message)
Limits to Lifted Pad/Open Trace (4 messages)
Locate the failure of component & SJ (3 messages)
Looking for copy right marking info on the PCBs (7 messages)
Looking for flex fab equipment vendors info/suggestions (1 message)
Low mass heating elements (1 message)
Maiting Plating Thickness (2 messages)
materials (4 messages)
Measuring OSP with SERA (1 message)
Method of Leak Testing (11 messages)
Mini glass beads for ferrite core gapping (2 messages)
MOONMAN LEAN CD ADDRESS (1 message)
More about white tin (5 messages)
More about white tin (another question) (8 messages)
New Solvents/Cleaning NewsGroup available (1 message)
NHB5300 (5 messages)
Nitrogen vs compressed air (4 messages)
No technical content...Dale has died. (4 messages)
Oxide substitution for oxide in innerlayers (2 messages)
PGBA Cold solder joints (1 message)
Picking up connectors (1 message)
Pink ESD Bags (1 message)
Polysulfone (5 messages)
Potential of galvanic couple of dissimilar metals (5 messages)
Preheating before installation of chip components (2 messages)
pumping concoat (1 message)
Purchase use parts (or equipment) (1 message)
QFP144 solder bridging (10 messages)
Question about ceramic ferrules for fiber optics (1 message)
Re 30GA Wire (1 message)
Re Fractured Joints (1 message)
Re Fractured Solder (1 message)
Re Lifted Pad Limits (2 messages)
Re Limits to Lifted Pad/Open Trace (1 message)
Re Soldering Temperature (4 messages)
Re; (TN) Infiniband Backpanel Plating Spec (1 message)
Reballing BGAs (2 messages)
Removing Solder from Gold fingers (8 messages)
RF Shield (3 messages)
Rogers material v/s Lot charge of $10K, ouch!!! (5 messages)
Rotron Fan (1 message)
saying thank you to Lucent (1 message)
Scab-On Parts (8 messages)
SEM Recommendations (1 message)
Serpentine routes (1 message)
Silver Conductive ViaPlug (2 messages)
silver epoxy & solder coated parts (2 messages)
simulation software (2 messages)
Small Hole PTH Reliability in PWB's (4 messages)
SMT adhesive (9 messages)
SMT backpanels (1 message)
SMT Wavesolder & via in a pad (5 messages)
SNEC MTG (1 message)
Solder Bump Crack (2 messages)
Solder mask pre-clean (2 messages)
Solder paste reuse (8 messages)
Solder size for a specific pad size (2 messages)
Solder surface appearance... (4 messages)
Solder termination surface finishes, coatings, platings, etc. (1 message)
Solderability of 0402 components (3 messages)
soldering equip (1 message)
Solvent testing (1 message)
SPAM from EPS-AZ.com? (1 message)
Specs for E-Ni / I-Au (3 messages)
Standoffs (5 messages)
Stencils with glue releasing (6 messages)
SV: [TN] Solder mask pre-clean (1 message)
tape and reels (3 messages)
temperature (4 messages)
Temperatures for Rework operation (5 messages)
Test (2 messages)
Test Vehicle Conditioning (4 messages)
Thermal profiles at Wave Solder (8 messages)
Thermal profiles at wavesolder (4 messages)
Thermally conductive molding compound or glob top (1 message)
Thickness of solder (2 messages)
This one's real, folks FYI (1 message)
To burn, or not to burn..... (1 message)
Tombstoning (3 messages)
Tombstoning on Palladium termination finish chip capacit or (1 message)
Tombstoning on Palladium termination finish chip capacitor (2 messages)
Torque value for 0603 components (1 message)
Trace width for VCC (2 messages)
UL rating (2 messages)
Use of 1206 quad resistor networks (3 messages)
Virus Warning - Here you have, ;0) (1 message)
Was: Removing Solder from Gold fingers, Now: BGA underfill services... (2 messages)
Washing of no-clean (13 messages)
Wave solder and earthquakes. (8 messages)
Wavesolder Equipment (1 message)
Wetting issues... (5 messages)
What are the 5S's? (8 messages)
what is DFT? (1 message)
What is the appropriate master standard? (1 message)
What is the Rolling Press? (2 messages)
White tin (6 messages)
White Tin Standards (2 messages)
Who uses cermic screw adjusters/screw drivers? (1 message)
Wire crimp pull tests (5 messages)
Wire stripping and forming machine (8 messages)
[DC] DC resistance of PCB traces (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re:

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:03:40 -0800

63 lines

Re:

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:12:19 -0600

68 lines

Re:

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:22:03 -0600

72 lines

Re:

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:18:33 EST

54 lines

Re:

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:25:17 -0500

145 lines

New Thread

"Here you have, ;0)"

"Here you have, ;0)"

Doug Jeffery <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:41:32 -0600

233 lines

New Thread

"Temprobe" thermocouples for profiling

"Temprobe" thermocouples for profiling

Howard Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:47:05 -0700

55 lines

Re: "Temprobe" thermocouples for profiling

Pat Kane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:39:41 EST

57 lines

Re: "Temprobe" thermocouples for profiling

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:24:11 -0600

60 lines

Re: "Temprobe" thermocouples for profiling

Phil Zarrow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:56:52 EST

40 lines

Re: "Temprobe" thermocouples for profiling

David Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:13:18 -0800

77 lines

Re: "Temprobe" thermocouples for profiling

Samuel.Ares <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:31:36 -0500

90 lines

Re: "Temprobe" thermocouples for profiling

Roger Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:15:27 -0600

59 lines

Re: "Temprobe" thermocouples for profiling

Greg Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:54:17 -0800

140 lines

New Thread

(TN) BGA area array connectors - how reliable?

Re: (TN) BGA area array connectors - how reliable?

Dennis Manowski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:22:36 -0800

45 lines

Re: (TN) BGA area array connectors - how reliable?

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:04:09 -0600

38 lines

Re: (TN) BGA area array connectors - how reliable?

Cyker, Howard A (Howie) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:32:14 -0500

89 lines

New Thread

1206 part on 1210 pads

1206 part on 1210 pads

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 09:43:03 -0500

25 lines

Re: 1206 part on 1210 pads

Cyker, Howard A (Howie) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:03:07 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

30GA or smaller (Fine wire soldering)

30GA or smaller (Fine wire soldering)

Linda Dawson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:24:12 -0600

22 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Trevor Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:04:30 -0500

29 lines

<No subject>

Pat Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:41:31 -0500

30 lines

<No subject>

Schreiner, Vince <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:33:04 -0500

29 lines

<No subject>

Grant Emandien <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:43:32 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

A=600

A=600

Arnold Andrade <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 00:07:53 -0800

63 lines

New Thread

Actel FPGA bypassing

Actel FPGA bypassing

Kemi Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:02:25 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

An Attempt At Acronym Humor

An Attempt At Acronym Humor

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:40:10 EST

72 lines

Re: An Attempt At Acronym Humor

Yves.Dupuis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:59:55 -0500

109 lines

New Thread

Anodic Protection of Electroless Nickel

Re: Anodic Protection of Electroless Nickel

Rob Durante <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:50:27 -0800

110 lines

Re: Anodic Protection of Electroless Nickel

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 21:48:56 EST

36 lines

Re: Anodic Protection of Electroless Nickel

Rob Durante <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:02:17 -0800

67 lines

New Thread

Antw: Re: [TN] Conductor Crack Detector

Antw: Re: [TN] Conductor Crack Detector

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:55:06 +0100

55 lines

Re: Antw: Re: [TN] Conductor Crack Detector

Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 22:30:13 -0500

98 lines

New Thread

Antw: Re: [TN] fractured joints

Antw: Re: [TN] fractured joints

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:40:47 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] Climate test

Antw: [TN] Climate test

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:55:49 +0100

70 lines

Re: Antw: [TN] Climate test

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:31:14 EST

31 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] Fractured Joints!

Antw: [TN] Fractured Joints!

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:38:02 +0100

39 lines

Re: Antw: [TN] Fractured Joints!

Matthias Mansfeld <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:23:34 +0100

37 lines

Re: Antw: [TN] Fractured Joints!

Jonathan Boyle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:13:21 -0800

58 lines

Re: Antw: [TN] Fractured Joints!

Jonathan Boyle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 12:14:47 -0800

55 lines

Re: Antw: [TN] Fractured Joints!

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:05:55 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Antw: [TN] SEM Recommendations

Antw: [TN] SEM Recommendations

Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:53:49 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Antwort: [TN] Solder mask pre-clean

Antwort: [TN] Solder mask pre-clean

Heinz Mader <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:02:27 +0100

113 lines

New Thread

Applications for ceramic wear parts or blades?

Applications for ceramic wear parts or blades?

Russell Epstein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:58:35 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

Assy houses

Re: Assy houses

Wilson, Robert S <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:27:40 -0800

108 lines

Re: Assy houses

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:41:45 -0500

54 lines

Re: Assy houses

Terveen, James @ NARDAEAST <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:10:20 -0500

84 lines

New Thread

AutoProgram for QUAD placement machine (IVc)

AutoProgram for QUAD placement machine (IVc)

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:19:51 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] AW: [TN] Temperatures for Rework operation

AW: [TN] AW: [TN] Temperatures for Rework operation

Busko, Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:41:31 +0100

237 lines

New Thread

AW: [TN] Temperatures for Rework operation

AW: [TN] Temperatures for Rework operation

Busko, Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:44:49 +0100

103 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Temperatures for Rework operation

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:36:16 -0500

381 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Temperatures for Rework operation

Ken Mc Gowan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:02:20 -0200

418 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Temperatures for Rework operation

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:25:51 -0500

496 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Temperatures for Rework operation

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:22:38 +0200

112 lines

Re: AW: [TN] Temperatures for Rework operation

Gary McCauley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:26:46 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

backpanels and chemistries

Re: backpanels and chemistries

Sprowles, Jol <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 07:36:48 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

backplane or backpanel

backplane or backpanel

michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:44:03 +0800

41 lines

Re: backplane or backpanel

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:48:51 -0800

93 lines

Re: backplane or backpanel

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:59:55 -0500

124 lines

Re: backplane or backpanel

Gary McCauley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:03:12 -0600

120 lines

Re: backplane or backpanel

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:17:49 EST

28 lines

Re: backplane or backpanel

Cyker, Howard A (Howie) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:37:07 -0500

52 lines

Re: backplane or backpanel

Hiteshew, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:03:41 -0500

111 lines

Re: backplane or backpanel

michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:28:00 +0800

147 lines

Re: backplane or backpanel

Kasprzak, Bill (esd) USX <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:16:24 -0500

90 lines

Re: backplane or backpanel

Cyker, Howard A (Howie) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:54:39 -0500

100 lines

New Thread

BarCode Software

BarCode Software

Kelly Kovalovsky <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:28:43 -0500

29 lines

Re: BarCode Software

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:58:00 -0500

61 lines

Re: BarCode Software

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:57:42 EST

26 lines

Re: BarCode Software

David Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 21:10:14 -0800

63 lines

New Thread

Bare board shelf Life

Bare board shelf Life

Brown Janice <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:37:27 -0500

28 lines

Re: Bare board shelf Life

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:18:59 EST

55 lines

New Thread

BGA Layout

BGA Layout

Tamir Ben Shoshan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:39:33 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

BGA REWORK

BGA REWORK

Trevor Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 09:43:45 -0500

30 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

Bogdan Gabi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:09:04 +0200

212 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:08:31 -0700

64 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

Furrow, Robert Gordon (Bob) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:27:36 -0500

67 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:36:39 -0500

71 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

Peter Loveless, [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:45:45 -0500

117 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:55:53 +0100

108 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

Jim Kittel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:56:17 -0700

131 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

Thomas Han <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:06:04 -0800

54 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 14:04:38 -0500

142 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:59:27 +0100

109 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:32:40 -0600

32 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

Brad Kendall <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:08:40 -0800

222 lines

Re: BGA REWORK

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 03:44:11 -0600

25 lines

New Thread

Black oxide alternatives- multilayer bonding

Black oxide alternatives- multilayer bonding

Mark Hargreaves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:30:12 -0500

29 lines

Re: Black oxide alternatives- multilayer bonding

Murray Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:17:55 -0800

72 lines

New Thread

Book Review - SPC For SMT

Book Review - SPC For SMT

David Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:20:07 -0800

93 lines

Re: Book Review - SPC For SMT

James-Kester <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:15:11 +0800

123 lines

Re: Book Review - SPC For SMT

Yves.Dupuis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:27:16 -0500

164 lines

New Thread

BS4584-1990

BS4584-1990

Brock Hunter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:06:05 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Bunch of damn vultures

Bunch of damn vultures

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 15:31:31 -0600

31 lines

Re: Bunch of damn vultures

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 18:04:44 EST

46 lines

Re: Bunch of damn vultures

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 18:41:34 -0600

29 lines

Re: Bunch of damn vultures

Kelly M. Schriver <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 07:01:22 -0600

74 lines

Re: Bunch of damn vultures

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 07:05:29 -0600

34 lines

Re: Bunch of damn vultures

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:34:13 -0500

82 lines

Re: Bunch of damn vultures

Sherry Warner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:14:16 -0500

114 lines

Re: Bunch of damn vultures

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:02:21 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

buried capacitance material

buried capacitance material

michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:46:33 +0800

33 lines

Re: buried capacitance material

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:50:37 -0800

52 lines

Re: buried capacitance material

Hiteshew, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:53:53 -0500

64 lines

Re: buried capacitance material

Srinivasamurthy Sampath <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:28:42 +0800

95 lines

Re: buried capacitance material

Colin W.T. McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 09:46:01 -0000

69 lines

New Thread

Burn-in

Burn-in

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:14:02 -0500

83 lines

Re: Burn-in

Craig Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:02:55 -0500

151 lines

Re: Burn-in

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:04:47 -0600

102 lines

Re: Burn-in

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:08:30 -0600

141 lines

Re: Burn-in

Misner, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:22:19 -0600

57 lines

Re: Burn-in

Thorup, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:23:49 -0800

79 lines

Re: Burn-in

Craig Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:33:01 -0500

92 lines

Re: Burn-in

Lester Agcaoili <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:27:05 -0800

120 lines

Re: Burn-in

Thorup, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:09:54 -0800

158 lines

Re: Burn-in

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:12:57 -0500

153 lines

Re: Burn-in

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:57:55 -0500

141 lines

New Thread

Button Terminology query

Button Terminology query

avigdor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 19:02:54 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

Casting Porosity

Casting Porosity

AJAJIM <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:56:59 +0300

38 lines

New Thread

Chemical Substance for removal of oxidation

Chemical Substance for removal of oxidation

Samuel.Ares <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:23:23 -0500

32 lines

Re: Chemical Substance for removal of oxidation

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 12:58:32 -0500

85 lines

Re: Chemical Substance for removal of oxidation

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 18:39:37 EST

37 lines

Re: Chemical Substance for removal of oxidation

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:23:38 +0200

75 lines

New Thread

Chip device vs pad sizes

Chip device vs pad sizes

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:19:40 -0600

27 lines

Re: Chip device vs pad sizes

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:51:25 -0600

113 lines

Re: Chip device vs pad sizes

Galang, Jerry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:44:59 -0800

62 lines

Re: Chip device vs pad sizes

Rick Howieson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:08:13 -0700

66 lines

Re: Chip device vs pad sizes

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 18:45:43 -0700

97 lines

Re: Chip device Vs pad sizes

Lam, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:41:40 -0800

48 lines

Re: Chip device Vs pad sizes

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 07:23:34 -0600

20 lines

New Thread

Climate test

Climate test

賴穗源( sylai ) Q80_5381 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:18:15 +0800

74 lines

Re: Climate test

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:36:55 +0200

48 lines

New Thread

components prohibited from aqueous wash

components prohibited from aqueous wash

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:40:16 -0500

43 lines

Re: components prohibited from aqueous wash

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:34:40 +0200

74 lines

Re: components prohibited from aqueous wash

Kelly M. Schriver <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 08:28:39 -0600

102 lines

Re: components prohibited from aqueous wash

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 07:37:10 -0600

77 lines

Re: components prohibited from aqueous wash

Dennis Guy-Sell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:29:56 -0700

32 lines

Re: components prohibited from aqueous wash

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 19:07:54 +0200

75 lines

Re: components prohibited from aqueous wash

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:50:29 -0600

101 lines

Re: components prohibited from aqueous wash

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:22:15 +0200

79 lines

Re: components prohibited from aqueous wash

Kelly M. Schriver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:37:42 -0600

128 lines

Re: components prohibited from aqueous wash

Paul Signorelli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:30:30 -0600

25 lines

Re: components prohibited from aqueous wash

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:48:51 +0200

152 lines

Re: components prohibited from aqueous wash

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:10:19 -0600

181 lines

New Thread

Concoating and large BGAs

Concoating and large BGAs

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:48:42 +0100

92 lines

New Thread

Conductor Crack Detector

Conductor Crack Detector

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:35:02 EST

26 lines

Re: Conductor Crack Detector

Hans Shin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:58:02 -0800

43 lines

New Thread

Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001

Re: Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001

Matthias Mansfeld <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:30:45 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev. B

Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev. B

Timothy Cousins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 03:04:54 GMT

64 lines

Re: Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev. B

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 07:36:11 -0600

107 lines

New Thread

Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev.B

Re: Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev.B

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:19:43 +0200

83 lines

Re: Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev.B

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:11:50 -0500

334 lines

Re: Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev.B

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:40:39 -0800

63 lines

Re: Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev.B

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:49:02 -0500

116 lines

Re: Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev.B

Timothy Cousins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 22:41:29 GMT

87 lines

Re: Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev.B

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:24:31 -0500

186 lines

Re: Contamination by Fire Combustion Products and J-STD-001 rev.B

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:33:52 -0600

67 lines

New Thread

Controlled Impedance

Re: Controlled Impedance

Tuan Le <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:40:04 -0800

148 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance

Tuan Le <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:03:15 -0800

268 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance

Hiteshew, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:44:08 -0500

163 lines

Re: Controlled Impedance

Tom Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:42:13 -0500

82 lines

New Thread

Controlled Impedance Definition

Controlled Impedance Definition

Tamir Ben Shoshan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:41:29 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

Controlled Impedence

Controlled Impedence

Tom Colby <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:52:05 -0500

28 lines

Re: Controlled Impedence

Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:23:31 EST

36 lines

Re: Controlled Impedence

Hiteshew, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:38:23 -0500

107 lines

New Thread

Copper levels in wave solder pot

Copper levels in wave solder pot

Susan James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:07:14 -0600

27 lines

Re: Copper levels in wave solder pot

Thorup, John <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:31:12 -0800

54 lines

Re: Copper levels in wave solder pot

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:22:15 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

CornerBond 3515

CornerBond 3515

Angel Pulido <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:04:34 -0500

28 lines

Re: CornerBond 3515

Angel Pulido <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:05:01 -0500

30 lines

Re: CornerBond 3515

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 20:11:39 EST

30 lines

New Thread

Cost reductions

Cost reductions

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:16:18 -0600

33 lines

Re: Cost reductions

Hamilton, Richard CLE 4454 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:23:16 -0700

69 lines

Re: Cost reductions

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 19:56:42 EST

66 lines

New Thread

CTE mismatch

CTE mismatch

Ken Fong <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:48:05 +0800

26 lines

Re: CTE mismatch

Craig Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:19:14 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

DC resistance of PCB traces

DC resistance of PCB traces

Olson, Jack <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:49:54 -0600

38 lines

New Thread

Delamination problem of PCB.

Delamination problem of PCB.

T. Ishino <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 06:14:02 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

design vs reality?

design vs reality?

Neel, Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:17:53 -0600

51 lines

Re: design vs reality?

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:50:14 -0500

102 lines

Re: design vs reality?

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:56:47 -0600

42 lines

Re: design vs reality?

Steve Telgen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:30:54 -0500

71 lines

Re: design Vs reality?

Steve Underwood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:27:14 -0500

133 lines

Re: design vs reality?

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:01:08 -0500

85 lines

New Thread

DFM Checklist

DFM Checklist

Mondel Pollard (EUS) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:22:27 -0600

63 lines

Re: DFM Checklist

Juan Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:03:48 -0500

38 lines

DFM Checklist

Tamir Ben Shoshan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:17:22 +0200

39 lines

Re: DFM Checklist

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:35:08 EST

23 lines

Re: DFM Checklist

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 04:57:04 -0700

52 lines

Re: DFM Checklist

Mark Witherite <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 06:08:11 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

DFM conference, association, research organization

DFM conference, association, research organization

Ken Fong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:34:40 +0800

25 lines

Re: DFM conference, association, research organization

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 21:58:59 EST

37 lines

Re: DFM conference, association, research organization

Julian Coates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:21:49 -0000

63 lines

Re: DFM conference, association, research organization

Mauricio Castro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:33:57 -0600

91 lines

New Thread

DFM No mas, no mas

DFM No mas, no mas

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:03:35 -0600

46 lines

Re: DFM No mas, no mas

gleason <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:54:31 -0800

79 lines

Re: DFM No mas, no mas

Sandy Kumar <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:12:46 -0600

84 lines

New Thread

DFM/CE

DFM/CE

Rick Howieson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 08:34:30 -0700

24 lines

Re: DFM/CE

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:33:35 -0600

27 lines

Re: DFM/CE

Mauricio Castro <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:44:35 -0600

89 lines

Re: DFM/CE

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 15:33:00 -0600

24 lines

Re: DFM/CE

Chuck Garth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 16:55:04 EST

37 lines

Re: DFM/CE

Sherry Goodell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 19:22:09 -0500

59 lines

Re: DFM/CE

Susana Anaya <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 07:41:25 -0800

26 lines

Re: DFM/CE

Ken Fong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:26:40 +0800

52 lines

Re: DFM/CE

Anil K. Singh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:01:38 +0530

51 lines

Re: DFM/CE

Le Dai Tri <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:41:38 +0700

65 lines

Re: DFM/CE

Olsen, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:11:34 -0500

85 lines

Re: DFM/CE

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:18:19 EST

29 lines

New Thread

DI water and aluminum bond pads

DI water and aluminum bond pads

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:59:09 -0600

29 lines

Re: DI water and aluminum bond pads

Mikell, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:05:43 -0500

69 lines

Re: DI water and aluminum bond pads

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:07:44 -0600

30 lines

Re: DI water and aluminum bond pads

Mikell, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 18:41:47 -0500

61 lines

Re: DI water and aluminum bond pads

Abu-Hamdeh, Gus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:02:38 -0800

66 lines

Re: DI water and aluminum bond pads

pratap <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:37:02 -0800

28 lines

Re: DI water and aluminum bond pads

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 18:57:46 EST

51 lines

Re: DI water and aluminum bond pads

David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:40:33 -0600

84 lines

Re: DI water and aluminum bond pads

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:51:01 EST

35 lines

New Thread

DI water and aluminum bond pads 2

Re: DI water and aluminum bond pads 2

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 08:53:42 EST

28 lines

New Thread

Dial buttons

Dial buttons

avigdor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:57:43 +0200

34 lines

Re: Dial buttons

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:11:03 -0600

25 lines

Re: Dial buttons

avigdor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:15:02 +0200

39 lines

Re: Dial buttons

Pete Nemcik <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:18:37 -0500

59 lines

Re: Dial buttons

Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:20:34 EST

38 lines

Re: Dial buttons

Thorup, John <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 07:48:23 -0800

62 lines

Re: Dial buttons

avigdor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 19:37:41 +0200

83 lines

Re: Dial buttons

Nancy Trumbull <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:13:03 -0500

61 lines

Re: Dial buttons

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:09:29 -0700

125 lines

Re: Dial buttons

John Brewer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:18:30 -0500

22 lines

Re: Dial buttons

Robert McCall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:24:44 -0600

59 lines

Re: Dial buttons

Robert McCall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:34:12 -0600

59 lines

Re: Dial buttons

avigdor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:49:31 +0200

73 lines

New Thread

Did we design a fuse?

Did we design a fuse?

George Franck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 09:14:45 -0500

38 lines

Re: Did we design a fuse?

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:05:09 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

Drii &Router bit suppliers

Drii &Router bit suppliers

김선동 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:32:45 +0900

28 lines

New Thread

DRY FILM BLUES

DRY FILM BLUES

Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:36:14 EST

28 lines

Re: DRY FILM BLUES

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:36:17 EST

24 lines

Re: DRY FILM BLUES

Doty, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:18:29 -0500

163 lines

Re: DRY FILM BLUES

Tony Steinke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:00:20 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Dryfilm Lamination of Inners

Dryfilm Lamination of Inners

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:26:30 EST

36 lines

New Thread

Ebony and Ivory...

Ebony and Ivory...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:30:52 EST

40 lines

Re: Ebony and Ivory...

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:47:34 +0200

77 lines

Re: Ebony and Ivory...

Tony Steinke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:46:35 -0500

91 lines

New Thread

Electroless Coating standard

Electroless Coating standard

Tamir Ben Shoshan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:31:11 +0200

23 lines

Re: Electroless Coating standard

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:09:27 EST

69 lines

New Thread

Electronics Manufacturing

Re: Electronics Manufacturing

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:13:35 -0700

100 lines

New Thread

Electronics Manufacturing Training

Electronics Manufacturing Training

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:54:57 -0700

76 lines

Re: Electronics Manufacturing Training

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 22:42:29 EST

72 lines

Re: Electronics Manufacturing Training

Roberts Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:46:03 -0600

109 lines

New Thread

Entek OSP

Entek OSP

Spencer Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:48:13 -0500

54 lines

Re: Entek OSP

Furrow, Robert Gordon (Bob) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:19:08 -0500

62 lines

Re: Entek OSP

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:36:50 -0800

58 lines

New Thread

EPA Regs Will Close PWB Facilities

EPA Regs Will Close PWB Facilities

Nick Ban <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:49:03 -0600

57 lines

New Thread

Exposed pad (thermally enhanced)TSSOP

Exposed pad (thermally enhanced)TSSOP

LB Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:13:12 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

Extending the lives of components.

Extending the lives of components.

Alan Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:31:57 +0000

43 lines

Re: Extending the lives of components.

Bates, Barry L <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:30:00 +0000

133 lines

New Thread

FAB - Reality Check, Tooling Holes and Profiling

FAB - Reality Check, Tooling Holes and Profiling

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:04:27 -0800

34 lines

Re: FAB - Reality Check, Tooling Holes and Profiling

Steve Telgen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:35:41 -0500

61 lines

Re: FAB - Reality Check, Tooling Holes and Profiling

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:16:18 -0800

35 lines

Re: FAB - Reality Check, Tooling Holes and Profiling

Steve Telgen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:40:42 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Fatigue testing of Flex PWB's

Fatigue testing of Flex PWB's

Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:55:03 -0600

46 lines

Re: Fatigue testing of Flex PWB's

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:26:04 EST

35 lines

New Thread

Flip Chip Placement and Prices

Flip Chip Placement and Prices

Richard Chiu <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:49:44 -0000

27 lines

Re: Flip Chip Placement and Prices

Cyker, Howard A (Howie) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:41:54 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

Flip Chip Process Information?

Flip Chip Process Information?

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:35:26 -0800

36 lines

Re: Flip Chip Process Information?

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:17:08 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

Flip-chip underfill?

Flip-chip underfill?

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:57:20 -0800

36 lines

Re: Flip-chip underfill?

Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:29:13 -0500

122 lines

Re: Flip-chip underfill?

Srinivasamurthy Sampath <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:58:45 +0800

210 lines

Re: Flip-chip underfill?

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:21:33 -0800

163 lines

Re: Flip-chip underfill?

Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 22:36:44 -0500

226 lines

Re: Flip-chip underfill?

Srinivasamurthy Sampath <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:31:50 +0800

362 lines

Re: Flip-chip underfill?

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:32:27 +0100

320 lines

Re: Flip-chip underfill?

Hann Pang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:26:09 -0600

327 lines

Re: Flip-chip underfill?

Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:19:52 -0500

314 lines

Re: Flip-chip underfill?

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:22:29 +0100

411 lines

New Thread

Florida IMAPS/SMTA Symposia, call for presenters

Florida IMAPS/SMTA Symposia, call for presenters

Obarski, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:47:24 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

Flying probes

Flying probes

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 07:52:30 -0700

79 lines

Re: Flying probes

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:08:35 -0600

32 lines

Re: Flying probes

pratap <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:36:25 -0800

29 lines

Re: Flying probes

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:49:42 -0600

74 lines

Re: Flying probes

Blaine Shelkey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:04:14 -0500

190 lines

New Thread

fractured joints

fractured joints

Bob Arciolla <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:29:01 -0500

61 lines

Re: fractured joints

Rick Howieson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:23:20 -0700

83 lines

Re: fractured joints

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:53:05 -0600

94 lines

Re: fractured joints

Roberts Jon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:06:55 -0600

85 lines

Re: fractured joints

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:39:39 -0500

119 lines

Re: fractured joints

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:36:59 EST

25 lines

Re: fractured joints

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:45:57 -0500

62 lines

Re: fractured joints

Ed Valentine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:33:20 -0500

66 lines

Re: fractured joints

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:37:51 -0000

82 lines

Re: fractured joints

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:20:40 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

Fractured Joints!

Fractured Joints!

Jonathan Boyle <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:24:50 -0800

30 lines

Re: Fractured Joints!

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:30:40 -0500

71 lines

Re: Fractured Joints!

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Feb 2001 02:03:21 EST

31 lines

Re: Fractured Joints!

Jonathan Boyle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:11:16 -0800

90 lines

New Thread

Fractured solder joint on component side

Fractured solder joint on component side

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:56:51 -0500

85 lines

Re: Fractured solder joint on component side

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:49:37 -0500

140 lines

Re: Fractured solder joint on component side

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:12:41 -0600

106 lines

Re: Fractured solder joint on component side

Nancy Trumbull <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 06:50:00 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Free DFM/CE Audit Checklist

Free DFM/CE Audit Checklist

Craig Ropp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 19:24:22 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:26:33 -0600

29 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Mark Charlton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 15:43:38 -0500

75 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:56:44 -0800

61 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Lam, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:23:26 -0800

62 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Miguel Vallejo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:48:56 -0800

60 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Vertefeuille, Russell (AZ77) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:45:34 -0700

62 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Tom Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 15:01:25 -0800

62 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:42:56 -0700

94 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 18:39:06 -0700

90 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 18:39:43 -0700

90 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 19:05:07 -0700

127 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 09:08:40 +0200

58 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 04:42:00 -0600

25 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Donna Slaughter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 06:33:39 -0500

78 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 05:07:46 -0800

293 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Scott Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 08:00:54 +0800

172 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Ken Fong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:07:29 +0800

60 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Thomas Han <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:39:15 -0800

111 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Weiner Mickey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:36:41 +0200

174 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Anil Kher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:22:04 +0530

54 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:32:06 +0200

56 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Frank Kriesch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:48:42 +0100

39 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Colin W.T. McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:28:45 -0000

64 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Frank Davies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:58:43 -0000

64 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Takach, Lou J <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 05:33:10 -0500

63 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Rick Pfeiffer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:56:33 -0500

28 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Bates, Barry L <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:54:47 +0000

226 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Michel Arbour <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:19:38 -0500

66 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:25:45 -0500

74 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Krick, Dave (D.A.) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:15:11 -0500

95 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Paul Bannister <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:27:11 -0500

79 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Julien Bouchard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:28:12 -0500

60 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Kari Rambo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:24:36 -0600

97 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Buschor, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:35:56 -0500

66 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Rumbold, Roland L <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 06:06:22 -0800

121 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Steve Telgen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:18:25 -0500

62 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Nick D'Onofrio <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:27:01 -0500

80 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Richard Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:14:27 -0600

74 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Christophe CROCOMBETTE <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:14:41 +0100

27 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Becerra Alejandro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:17:52 -0500

63 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Dan Fazioli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:25:55 -0500

50 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:35:46 -0600

58 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Jeff Slipp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:45:53 -0400

43 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Joel Brock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:27:45 -0600

80 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Misner, Bruce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:17:41 -0600

64 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Abu-Hamdeh, Gus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:27:25 -0800

107 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Liam.Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:22:34 +0000

88 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Kenny McKee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:37:22 -0700

146 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:52:52 -0500

190 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Sy Oczkowski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:44:25 -0600

50 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Dominic Gagnier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:54:09 -0500

214 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Clark, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:00:16 -0700

63 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:22:15 -0800

23 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Paul Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:10:37 -0000

58 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Jac Kroeker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:16:22 -0800

46 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Kasprzak, Bill (esd) USX <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:41:39 -0500

65 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

pratap <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:07:05 -0800

77 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:24:08 -0600

24 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Tom Burek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:36:11 -0500

125 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:53:28 -0500

51 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Lourdes White <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:00:58 EST

27 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:25:44 -0600

50 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

½ðºè <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:29:36 +0800

48 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:12:13 -0700

85 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Robert McCall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:29:29 -0600

59 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

Ken Fong <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:07:28 +0800

141 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS

F.Pitzl <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 15:29:10 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS PLEASE REPLY DIRECTLY TO Mr MOON, NO T THE WHOLE LIST

FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS PLEASE REPLY DIRECTLY TO Mr MOON, NO T THE WHOLE LIST

Galang, Jerry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:09:08 -0800

252 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS PLEASE REPLY DIRECTLY TO Mr MOON, NO T THE WHOLE LIST

bbarr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:16:26 -0500

49 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS PLEASE REPLY DIRECTLY TO Mr MOON, NO T THE WHOLE LIST

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:49:04 -0500

92 lines

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS PLEASE REPLY DIRECTLY TO Mr MOON, NO T THE WHOLE LIST

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:02:30 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS PLEASE REPLY DIRECTLY TO MrMOON, NO T THE WHOLE LIST

Re: FREE DFM/CE AUDIT CHECKLISTS PLEASE REPLY DIRECTLY TO MrMOON, NO T THE WHOLE LIST

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:04:22 -0600

79 lines

New Thread

FW: BGA production start

FW: BGA production start

Lon Weffers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:32:38 +0100

115 lines

Re: FW: BGA production start

Spencer Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:05:19 -0500

223 lines

New Thread

Getting More, and Not Paying More

Getting More, and Not Paying More

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:11:33 EST

40 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Rick Howieson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:33:44 -0700

69 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 08:32:53 -0700

95 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:52:23 -0600

23 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:00:22 EST

28 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

avigdor <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:16:34 +0200

43 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Robert Vanech <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:19:35 +0000

67 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:25:29 -0500

74 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Pat Stone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:31:46 -0500

77 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Marc A. Holloway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:26:34 +0000

45 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:51:02 EST

38 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 12:09:07 -0700

50 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Lambert, Katherine A. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:44:35 -0500

86 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:31:00 +0200

82 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Kasprzak, Bill (esd) USX <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:34:51 -0500

123 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Rick Howieson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:34:57 -0700

149 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:44:18 +0200

38 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:35:17 +0200

81 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Gary McCauley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 07:56:16 -0600

44 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:14:09 -0800

53 lines

Re: Getting More, and Not Paying More

michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 12:38:59 +0800

152 lines

New Thread

Glass exposure system

Glass exposure system

Ron Videen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:41:12 -0600

46 lines

Re: Glass exposure system

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:04:43 -0800

52 lines

Re: Glass exposure system

Ron Videen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 17:11:41 -0600

83 lines

Re: Glass exposure system

Rumbold, Roland L <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:20:51 -0800

84 lines

New Thread

HASL thickness specification

HASL thickness specification

Yehuda Weisz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 20:27:19 +0200

79 lines

Re: HASL thickness specification

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:19:12 -0600

60 lines

Re: HASL thickness specification

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:29:19 +0100

88 lines

Re: HASL thickness specification

Ken Mc Gowan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:37:50 -0200

124 lines

New Thread

HDI Microvia PCB Cost Less in Production Quantity?

Re: HDI Microvia PCB Cost Less in Production Quantity?

Lam, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:30:21 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:33:48 EST

58 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:25:41 +0100

106 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Bogdan Gabi <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:53:15 +0200

354 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:45:17 +0100

141 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Jim Kittel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 06:33:27 -0700

94 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Trevor Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:35:18 -0500

107 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:53:49 -0500

62 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Wenger, George M (George) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:08:12 -0500

97 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:30:42 -0600

149 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:36:03 +0100

167 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

To My E-Mail Address <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:09:58 EST

63 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 20:37:40 +0200

110 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Bob Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:41:08 -0800

112 lines

Re: Heat-sinked BGA Bridging...

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:00:28 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

How does HASL / FR-4 board cleanliness and humidity relate to failure rates?

How does HASL / FR-4 board cleanliness and humidity relate to failure rates?

Timothy Cousins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 21:27:20 GMT

96 lines

Re: How does HASL / FR-4 board cleanliness and humidity relate to failure rates?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:19:23 -0600

107 lines

New Thread

How to mark the fiducial mark on the rejected unit with laser or Ink?

How to mark the fiducial mark on the rejected unit with laser or Ink?

Gilbert Min <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:52:18 +0900

28 lines

New Thread

Humidity and temperature specification

Humidity and temperature specification

Stella Neyman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:51:26 -0500

28 lines

Re: Humidity and temperature specification

Rich Lasko <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:51:15 -0600

52 lines

Re: Humidity and temperature specification

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 07:14:17 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

I'm a vulture too

I'm a vulture too

michael <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Feb 2001 10:50:17 +0800

67 lines

New Thread

Identifying an INTEL part

Identifying an INTEL part

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:34:07 EST

45 lines

Re: Identifying an INTEL part

Tom Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:46:02 -0500

96 lines

Re: Identifying an INTEL part

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:49:47 -0800

84 lines

Re: Identifying an INTEL part

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:13:22 -0800

69 lines

Re: Identifying an INTEL part

Mikell, Steve <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:41:14 -0500

66 lines

Re: Identifying an INTEL part

Tom Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:30:59 -0500

100 lines

Re: Identifying an INTEL part

Angel Pulido <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 20:37:04 -0500

106 lines

Re: Identifying an INTEL part

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 07:53:27 -0800

130 lines

New Thread

Immersion Silver on flex.

Immersion Silver on flex.

Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:06:05 -0500

25 lines

Re: Immersion Silver on flex.

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:35:12 EST

28 lines

Re: Immersion Silver on flex.

Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:47:25 -0500

58 lines

Re: Immersion Silver on flex.

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 23:24:23 EST

55 lines

New Thread

In house soldering training

In house soldering training

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:22:58 -0500

33 lines

Re: In house soldering training

Nancy Trumbull <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:51:41 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

Incorrect Dates on Previous E-mail RE: IPC 2001 Flex Conference Call for Papers

Incorrect Dates on Previous E-mail RE: IPC 2001 Flex Conference Call for Papers

Maryellen Hilderbrand <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:43:12 -0600

103 lines

New Thread

Insufficient Solder Joints

Insufficient Solder Joints

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:56:36 -0500

54 lines

Re: Insufficient Solder Joints

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:50:41 -0600

149 lines

Re: Insufficient Solder Joints

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:24:20 -0500

105 lines

New Thread

Is it acceptable trace rework?

Is it acceptable trace rework?

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:26:20 -0800

29 lines

Re: Is it acceptable trace rework?

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:48:02 -0500

72 lines

Re: Is it acceptable trace rework?

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:10:10 -0800

53 lines

Re: Is it acceptable trace rework?

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:17:54 -0800

60 lines

New Thread

L leads soldering question

L leads soldering question

Bissonnette, Jean-Francois <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:12:38 -0500

72 lines

Re: L leads soldering question

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:36:13 -0500

128 lines

Re: L leads soldering question

Ken Fong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:34:58 +0800

112 lines

Re: L leads soldering question

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 05:06:20 -0600

23 lines

New Thread

Lead carbonate growth during humdity testing

Re: Lead carbonate growth during humdity testing

David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 08:33:13 -0600

108 lines

New Thread

Lead trimming, BGA rework, and Nortel

Lead trimming, BGA rework, and Nortel

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:31:35 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

Lead trimming, BGA rework, and Nortel - I'm baack!

Re: Lead trimming, BGA rework, and Nortel - I'm baack!

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:21:54 -0500

97 lines

Re: Lead trimming, BGA rework, and Nortel - I'm baack!

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:33:25 -0600

49 lines

New Thread

LET THERE BE LIGHT!!! IPC Sponsors First Conference on Optoelectronics, May 3-4, 2001, Toronto, CN

LET THERE BE LIGHT!!! IPC Sponsors First Conference on Optoelectronics, May 3-4, 2001, Toronto, CN

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:15:41 -0600

129 lines

New Thread

Limits to Lifted Pad/Open Trace

Limits to Lifted Pad/Open Trace

JinSee Goh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 03:04:23 -0600

22 lines

Re: Limits to Lifted Pad/Open Trace

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:49:34 -0500

65 lines

Re: Limits to Lifted Pad/Open Trace

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:01:02 -0600

103 lines

Re: Limits to Lifted Pad/Open Trace

Tom B. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 22:03:49 -0000

66 lines

New Thread

Locate the failure of component & SJ

Locate the failure of component & SJ

lckang <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:56:30 +0800

95 lines

Re: Locate the failure of component & SJ

Pelkey, Glenn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 08:13:05 -0800

74 lines

Re: Locate the failure of component & SJ

lckang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:19:45 +0800

64 lines

New Thread

Looking for copy right marking info on the PCBs

Re: Looking for copy right marking info on the PCBs

Roger M. Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:33:17 -0500

97 lines

Re: Looking for copy right marking info on the PCBs

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:39:24 -0600

126 lines

Re: Looking for copy right marking info on the PCBs

Roger M. Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:42:41 -0500

37 lines

Re: Looking for copy right marking info on the PCBs

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:12:23 +0200

49 lines

Re: Looking for copy right marking info on the PCBs

Keel, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:14:50 -0800

194 lines

Re: Looking for copy right marking info on the PCBs

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:32:06 +0200

212 lines

Re: Looking for copy right marking info on the PCBs

Thorup, John <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 06:36:42 -0800

345 lines

New Thread

Looking for flex fab equipment vendors info/suggestions

Looking for flex fab equipment vendors info/suggestions

Josh Duberman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:10:41 -0800

44 lines

New Thread

Low mass heating elements

Low mass heating elements

Jorge Rodriguez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:41:21 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

Maiting Plating Thickness

Maiting Plating Thickness

avigdor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:56:18 +0200

36 lines

Re: Maiting Plating Thickness

avigdor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:34:57 +0200

35 lines

New Thread

materials

materials

KUMAR <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:11:14 -0000

59 lines

Re: materials

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:47:26 -0500

42 lines

Re: materials

Rougeux, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:03:44 -0600

70 lines

Re: materials

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:10:00 -0500

94 lines

New Thread

Measuring OSP with SERA

Measuring OSP with SERA

Lisa Angle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:06:44 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Method of Leak Testing

Method of Leak Testing

Steffen, Don E <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:34:13 -0500

93 lines

Re: Method of Leak Testing

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:33:15 EST

32 lines

Re: Method of Leak Testing

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:26:45 +0200

75 lines

Re: Method of Leak Testing

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:59:49 -0500

65 lines

Re: Method of Leak Testing

Kelly M. Schriver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:37:03 -0600

174 lines

Re: Method of Leak Testing

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:58:56 -0500

60 lines

Re: Method of Leak Testing

Abu-Hamdeh, Gus <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:41:03 -0800

64 lines

Re: Method of Leak Testing

bbarr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:11:30 -0500

113 lines

Re: Method of Leak Testing

AJAJIM <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:04:07 +0300

187 lines

Re: Method of Leak Testing

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:29:21 -0500

212 lines

Re: Method of Leak Testing

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:30:23 -0800

98 lines

New Thread

Mini glass beads for ferrite core gapping

Mini glass beads for ferrite core gapping

Ken Fong <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 18:38:49 +0800

27 lines

Re: Mini glass beads for ferrite core gapping

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:20:21 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

MOONMAN LEAN CD ADDRESS

MOONMAN LEAN CD ADDRESS

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:23:39 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

More about white tin

More about white tin

Michael Khusid <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:36:10 -0500

120 lines

more about white tin

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:59:29 -0500

35 lines

Re: more about white tin

Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:20:01 EST

47 lines

Re: more about white tin

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:07:24 -0500

82 lines

Re: more about white tin

Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:42:48 EST

42 lines

New Thread

More about white tin (another question)

Re: More about white tin (another question)

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:29:06 -0500

167 lines

Re: More about white tin (another question)

Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:47:02 EST

35 lines

Re: More about white tin (another question)

Ken Fong <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:37:43 +0800

61 lines

Re: More about white tin (another question)

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:07:35 EST

33 lines

Re: More about white tin (another question)

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:54:21 -0500

75 lines

Re: More about white tin (another question)

Steve Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:03:03 -0700

126 lines

Re: More about white tin (another question)

Rob Durante <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:03:15 -0800

216 lines

Re: More about white tin (another question)

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 19:42:02 EST

50 lines

New Thread

New Solvents/Cleaning NewsGroup available

New Solvents/Cleaning NewsGroup available

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:38:54 -0600

161 lines

New Thread

NHB5300

NHB5300

Kuczynski, Michael @ SPACENAV <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:41:51 -0500

36 lines

Re: NHB5300

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:07:05 EST

24 lines

Re: NHB5300

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:31:48 -0500

80 lines

Re: NHB5300

Sauer, Steven T. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:19:33 -0500

24 lines

Re: NHB5300

Sherry Warner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:26:55 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

Nitrogen vs compressed air

Nitrogen vs compressed air

Terveen, James @ NARDAEAST <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:52:44 -0500

25 lines

Re: Nitrogen vs compressed air

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:29:24 +0200

49 lines

Re: Nitrogen vs compressed air

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:19:30 -0500

72 lines

Re: Nitrogen vs compressed air

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:34:18 -0600

85 lines

New Thread

No technical content...Dale has died.

No technical content...Dale has died.

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Feb 2001 21:08:40 EST

29 lines

Re: No technical content...Dale has died.

David Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:57:46 -0800

68 lines

Re: No technical content...Dale has died.

Bill Decray <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:17:28 -0500

111 lines

Re: No technical content...Dale has died.

Kasprzak, Bill (esd) USX <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:11:04 -0500

169 lines

New Thread

Oxide substitution for oxide in innerlayers

Oxide substitution for oxide in innerlayers

Edward Szpruch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:49:55 +0200

37 lines

Re: Oxide substitution for oxide in innerlayers

sean clinton <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 07:28:38 -0600

108 lines

New Thread

PGBA Cold solder joints

Re: PGBA Cold solder joints

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:22:06 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

Picking up connectors

Picking up connectors

John Koleszar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:19:54 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Pink ESD Bags

Re: Pink ESD Bags

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2001 19:00:41 +0200

74 lines

New Thread

Polysulfone

Polysulfone

Larry J. Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 06:20:11 EST

80 lines

Re: Polysulfone

Kelly M. Schriver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:07:11 -0600

204 lines

Re: Polysulfone

Edwards, Ted A (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 08:09:32 -0700

61 lines

Re: Polysulfone

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 07:42:27 -0800

58 lines

Re: Polysulfone

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 08:05:35 -0800

96 lines

New Thread

Potential of galvanic couple of dissimilar metals

Potential of galvanic couple of dissimilar metals

Vandendolder, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:23:59 -0500

44 lines

Re: Potential of galvanic couple of dissimilar metals

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:07:09 EST

24 lines

Re: Potential of galvanic couple of dissimilar metals

Vandendolder, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:01:25 -0500

55 lines

Re: Potential of galvanic couple of dissimilar metals

Mike Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 22:11:47 -0000

97 lines

Re: Potential of galvanic couple of dissimilar metals

Vandendolder, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:26:57 -0500

110 lines

New Thread

Preheating before installation of chip components

Preheating before installation of chip components

Tom Lesniewski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:24:36 -0600

32 lines

Re: Preheating before installation of chip components

Wilson, Robert S <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:50:36 -0800

200 lines

New Thread

pumping concoat

pumping concoat

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:52:16 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Purchase use parts (or equipment)

Purchase use parts (or equipment)

Denis Seguin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:19:27 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

QFP144 solder bridging

QFP144 solder bridging

Nicolas Ortiz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:45:07 -0700

25 lines

Re: QFP144 solder bridging

Ed Valentine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 20:17:42 -0500

64 lines

Re: QFP144 solder bridging

Trevor Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:03:20 -0500

68 lines

Re: QFP144 solder bridging

Nicolas Ortiz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:41:43 -0700

107 lines

Re: QFP144 solder bridging

Nicolas Ortiz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:45:17 -0700

119 lines

Re: QFP144 solder bridging

Jim Kittel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 08:26:51 -0700

150 lines

Re: QFP144 solder bridging

Nicolas Ortiz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:10:13 -0700

186 lines

Re: QFP144 solder bridging

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:00:32 -0500

236 lines

Re: QFP144 solder bridging

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:25:42 -0700

71 lines

Re: QFP144 solder bridging

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:47:06 -0800

95 lines

New Thread

Question about ceramic ferrules for fiber optics

Question about ceramic ferrules for fiber optics

Russell Epstein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:41:00 -0600

35 lines

New Thread

Re 30GA Wire

Re 30GA Wire

James Moffitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:27:45 EST

51 lines

New Thread

Re Fractured Joints

Re Fractured Joints

James Moffitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:50:42 EST

81 lines

New Thread

Re Fractured Solder

Re Fractured Solder

James Moffitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:51:25 EST

51 lines

New Thread

Re Lifted Pad Limits

Re Lifted Pad Limits

James Moffitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:51:28 EST

55 lines

Re: Re Lifted Pad Limits

JinSee Goh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:08:20 +0800

125 lines

New Thread

Re Limits to Lifted Pad/Open Trace

Re Limits to Lifted Pad/Open Trace

James Moffitt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:27:40 EST

107 lines

New Thread

Re Soldering Temperature

Re Soldering Temperature

James Moffitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:27:47 EST

77 lines

Re: Re Soldering Temperature

Howard Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:35:43 -0700

146 lines

Re: Re Soldering Temperature

James Moffitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:02:37 EST

67 lines

Re: Re Soldering Temperature

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:57:49 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

Re; (TN) Infiniband Backpanel Plating Spec

Re; (TN) Infiniband Backpanel Plating Spec

Dennis Manowski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:58:42 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

Reballing BGAs

Re: Reballing BGAs

Lisa Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:35:11 -0800

112 lines

Re: Reballing BGAs

Jason Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:52:47 -0600

133 lines

New Thread

Removing Solder from Gold fingers

Removing Solder from Gold fingers

Rich Lasko <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:58:27 -0600

29 lines

Re: Removing Solder from Gold fingers

Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:41:50 EST

24 lines

Re: Removing Solder from Gold fingers

Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:55:35 EST

81 lines

Re: Removing Solder from Gold fingers

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:40:02 -0500

68 lines

Re: Removing Solder from Gold fingers

Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:08:55 EST

31 lines

Re: Removing Solder from Gold fingers

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:25:01 -0500

61 lines

Re: Removing Solder from Gold fingers

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:38:10 -0600

148 lines

Re: Removing Solder from Gold fingers

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:20:18 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

RF Shield

RF Shield

peter lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 14:22:03 -0800

47 lines

Re: RF Shield

Wenger, George M (George) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:55:28 -0500

83 lines

Re: RF Shield

Bates, Barry L <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:20:23 +0000

130 lines

New Thread

Rogers material v/s Lot charge of $10K, ouch!!!

Rogers material v/s Lot charge of $10K, ouch!!!

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:06:01 -0800

30 lines

Re: Rogers material v/s Lot charge of $10K, ouch!!!

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:37:56 EST

44 lines

Re: Rogers material v/s Lot charge of $10K, ouch!!!

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 07:49:54 -0500

74 lines

Re: Rogers material v/s Lot charge of $10K, ouch!!!

Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 08:27:29 EST

43 lines

Re: Rogers material v/s Lot charge of $10K, ouch!!!

김선동 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:14:03 +0900

113 lines

New Thread

Rotron Fan

Rotron Fan

Robert Vanech <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:22:57 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

saying thank you to Lucent

saying thank you to Lucent

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:40:09 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Scab-On Parts

Scab-On Parts

Bob Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:44:56 -0600

36 lines

Re: Scab-On Parts

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:55:08 -0500

75 lines

Re: Scab-On Parts

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:21:40 -0600

127 lines

Re: Scab-On Parts

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:11:19 -0600

57 lines

Re: Scab-On Parts

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:11:41 -0500

111 lines

Re: Scab-On Parts

Bob Hawkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:45:05 -0600

42 lines

Re: Scab-On Parts

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:43:19 EST

42 lines

Re: Scab-On Parts

Jeff Ferry <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:50:33 -0500

148 lines

New Thread

SEM Recommendations

SEM Recommendations

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:12:03 -0500

280 lines

New Thread

Serpentine routes

Serpentine routes

Kuczynski, Michael @ SPACENAV <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:47:42 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Silver Conductive ViaPlug

Silver Conductive ViaPlug

Michael Forrester <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:28:45 -0500

35 lines

Re: Silver Conductive ViaPlug

Craig Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:06:08 -0500

103 lines

New Thread

silver epoxy & solder coated parts

Re: silver epoxy & solder coated parts

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:39:26 +0100

160 lines

Re: silver epoxy & solder coated parts

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:26:11 +0100

144 lines

New Thread

simulation software

simulation software

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:33:53 -0600

29 lines

Re: simulation software

Steve Telgen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:44:44 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Small Hole PTH Reliability in PWB's

Small Hole PTH Reliability in PWB's

Erickson, Gary <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:16:05 -0500

168 lines

Re: Small Hole PTH Reliability in PWB's

Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:57:28 EST

34 lines

Re: Small Hole PTH Reliability in PWB's

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:21:02 EST

84 lines

Re: Small Hole PTH Reliability in PWB's

Mason Hu <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:48:02 -0600

32 lines

New Thread

SMT adhesive

SMT adhesive

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:47:09 -0500

42 lines

Re: SMT adhesive

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:15:54 -0500

77 lines

Re: SMT adhesive

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:18:56 -0600

43 lines

Re: SMT adhesive

Trevor Goddard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:53:06 -0500

68 lines

Re: SMT adhesive

Howard Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:50:32 -0700

156 lines

Re: SMT adhesive

bbarr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:32:43 -0500

93 lines

Re: SMT adhesive

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:07:26 -0600

124 lines

Re: SMT adhesive

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:47:13 -0600

57 lines

Re: SMT adhesive

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:06:45 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

SMT backpanels

SMT backpanels

Dennis Manowski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:34:02 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

SMT Wavesolder & via in a pad

SMT Wavesolder & via in a pad

Danny Harkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:28:54 -0500

33 lines

Re: SMT Wavesolder & via in a pad

Brian Holt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:48:11 -0700

69 lines

Re: SMT Wavesolder & via in a pad

Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:01:36 -0500

71 lines

Re: SMT Wavesolder & via in a pad

Furrow, Robert Gordon (Bob) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:16:56 -0500

101 lines

Re: SMT Wavesolder & via in a pad

Stephen S. Schiera <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:15:53 -0600

75 lines

New Thread

SNEC MTG

SNEC MTG

Gary Ferrari <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:12:36 EST

125 lines

New Thread

Solder Bump Crack

Solder Bump Crack

Jonathan A Noquil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:05:46 +0800

28 lines

Re: Solder Bump Crack

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:50:30 EST

31 lines

New Thread

Solder mask pre-clean

Solder mask pre-clean

Albin, David <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:28:33 -0000

35 lines

Re: Solder mask pre-clean

Tony Steinke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:47:51 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

Solder paste reuse

Solder paste reuse

Nicolas Ortiz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:40:49 -0700

25 lines

Re: Solder paste reuse

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:22:26 EST

54 lines

Re: Solder paste reuse

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:56:56 +0100

93 lines

Re: Solder paste reuse

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:44:07 -0500

64 lines

Re: Solder paste reuse

Julien Bouchard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:00:21 -0500

63 lines

Re: Solder paste reuse

Howard Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:17:21 -0500

205 lines

Re: Solder paste reuse

Bill Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Feb 2001 01:53:32 EST

66 lines

Re: Solder paste reuse

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:39:04 -0500

134 lines

New Thread

Solder size for a specific pad size

Re: Solder size for a specific pad size

Swaroop Kommera <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:13:31 -0500

30 lines

Re: Solder size for a specific pad size

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:55:50 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Solder surface appearance...

Solder surface appearance...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 21:30:07 EST

70 lines

Re: Solder surface appearance...

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:03:27 +0200

97 lines

Re: Solder surface appearance...

David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:16:53 -0600

40 lines

Re: Solder surface appearance...

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:36:56 -0600

207 lines

New Thread

Solder termination surface finishes, coatings, platings, etc.

Solder termination surface finishes, coatings, platings, etc.

Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:12:43 -0600

23 lines

New Thread

Solderability of 0402 components

Solderability of 0402 components

PL <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:00:54 -0800

77 lines

Re: Solderability of 0402 components

David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 06:40:30 -0600

66 lines

Re: Solderability of 0402 components

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:06:04 -0600

89 lines

New Thread

soldering equip

soldering equip

Dee Stover <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 06:43:43 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

Solvent testing

Solvent testing

Edwards, Ted A (AZ75) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:03:21 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

SPAM from EPS-AZ.com?

SPAM from EPS-AZ.com?

John Brewer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:41:22 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Specs for E-Ni / I-Au

Specs for E-Ni / I-Au

Deborah Schepis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:06:42 -0500

35 lines

Re: Specs for E-Ni / I-Au

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Feb 2001 07:00:06 EST

34 lines

Re: Specs for E-Ni / I-Au

Hans Hinners <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:12:33 -0800

77 lines

New Thread

Standoffs

Standoffs

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:57:09 -0800

100 lines

Re: Standoffs

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 14:18:01 -0500

85 lines

Re: Standoffs

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:53:48 -0500

183 lines

Re: Standoffs

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 06:12:56 -0800

216 lines

Re: Standoffs

David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:09:22 -0600

156 lines

New Thread

Stencils with glue releasing

Stencils with glue releasing

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:34:37 -0600

40 lines

Re: Stencils with glue releasing

Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:06:48 -0800

92 lines

Re: Stencils with glue releasing

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:24:31 -0600

127 lines

Re: Stencils with glue releasing

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:52:09 EST

72 lines

Re: Stencils with glue releasing

Howard Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:23:22 -0500

335 lines

Re: Stencils with glue releasing

Bill Schreiber <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:36:41 -0600

198 lines

New Thread

SV: [TN] Solder mask pre-clean

SV: [TN] Solder mask pre-clean

Jan Thuesen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:49:58 +0100

80 lines

New Thread

tape and reels

tape and reels

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:38:33 -0500

32 lines

Re: tape and reels

Sauer, Steven T. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:07:07 -0500

44 lines

Re: tape and reels

Cyker, Howard A (Howie) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:51:33 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

temperature

temperature

Bob Arciolla <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:09:00 -0500

72 lines

Re: temperature

Brooks,Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:05:48 -0800

135 lines

Re: temperature

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:32:44 -0600

152 lines

Re: temperature

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Feb 2001 08:29:25 -0500

138 lines

New Thread

Temperatures for Rework operation

Temperatures for Rework operation

Becerra Alejandro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:11:07 -0500

35 lines

Re: Temperatures for Rework operation

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:09:18 -0500

76 lines

Re: Temperatures for Rework operation

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 07:22:48 -0600

35 lines

Re: Temperatures for Rework operation

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:27:05 -0600

112 lines

Re: Temperatures for Rework operation

Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:21:45 -0500

169 lines

New Thread

Test

Test

AJAJIM <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 07:31:42 +0300

30 lines

test

Brad L. Matthies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:27:41 -0600

22 lines

New Thread

Test Vehicle Conditioning

Test Vehicle Conditioning

Buschor, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:33:08 -0500

30 lines

Re: Test Vehicle Conditioning

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 21:49:01 EST

23 lines

Re: Test Vehicle Conditioning

Buschor, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:36:51 -0500

46 lines

Re: Test Vehicle Conditioning

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:26:06 EST

32 lines

New Thread

Thermal profiles at Wave Solder

Thermal profiles at Wave Solder

Rougeux, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:36:14 -0600

33 lines

Re: Thermal profiles at Wave Solder

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:02:14 -0600

100 lines

Re: Thermal profiles at Wave Solder

Samuel.Ares <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:37:03 -0500

75 lines

Re: Thermal profiles at Wave Solder

Rougeux, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:31:05 -0600

61 lines

Re: Thermal profiles at Wave Solder

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:50:42 -0600

160 lines

Re: Thermal profiles at Wave Solder

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:42:03 -0800

77 lines

Re: Thermal profiles at Wave Solder

Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:11:08 EST

23 lines

Re: Thermal profiles at Wave Solder

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:23:20 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

Thermal profiles at wavesolder

Thermal profiles at wavesolder

Rougeux, Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:22:41 -0600

36 lines

Re: Thermal profiles at wavesolder

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:43:50 -0600

119 lines

Re: Thermal profiles at wavesolder

Campbell, William (wcampbel) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:10:16 -0500

81 lines

Re: Thermal profiles at wavesolder

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:45:14 -0600

134 lines

New Thread

Thermally conductive molding compound or glob top

Thermally conductive molding compound or glob top

LI YUAN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:52:42 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

Thickness of solder

Thickness of solder

Ken Fong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:29:32 +0800

26 lines

Re: Thickness of solder

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:19:44 EST

48 lines

New Thread

This one's real, folks FYI

This one's real, folks FYI

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:19:35 -0600

97 lines

New Thread

To burn, or not to burn.....

To burn, or not to burn.....

John Brewer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:55:43 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Tombstoning

Tombstoning

Bogdan Gabi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:58:26 +0200

79 lines

Re: Tombstoning

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:50:11 -0700

77 lines

Re: Tombstoning

Brad Kendall <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:13:47 -0800

58 lines

New Thread

Tombstoning on Palladium termination finish chip capacit or

Re: Tombstoning on Palladium termination finish chip capacit or

Ken Patel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:37:33 -0800

53 lines

New Thread

Tombstoning on Palladium termination finish chip capacitor

Tombstoning on Palladium termination finish chip capacitor

Jorge Rodriguez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:12:51 -0700

34 lines

Re: Tombstoning on Palladium termination finish chip capacitor

Jon Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:03:01 EST

25 lines

New Thread

Torque value for 0603 components

Torque value for 0603 components

Becerra Alejandro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:08:54 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Trace width for VCC

Trace width for VCC

Tamir Ben Shoshan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:16:27 +0200

23 lines

Re: Trace width for VCC

Seth Goodman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:49:18 -0600

56 lines

New Thread

UL rating

UL rating

KUMAR <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:20:41 -0000

61 lines

Re: UL rating

Ted Tontis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:03:43 -0600

94 lines

New Thread

Use of 1206 quad resistor networks

Use of 1206 quad resistor networks

Andy Linahan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 09:28:07 +0800

38 lines

Re: Use of 1206 quad resistor networks

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Feb 2001 21:16:50 EST

53 lines

Re: Use of 1206 quad resistor networks

<Your Full Name> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:56:20 +0800

103 lines

New Thread

Virus Warning - Here you have, ;0)

Virus Warning - Here you have, ;0)

Chris Stack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:06:55 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Was: Removing Solder from Gold fingers, Now: BGA underfill services...

Was: Removing Solder from Gold fingers, Now: BGA underfill services...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:40:27 EST

64 lines

Re: Was: Removing Solder from Gold fingers, Now: BGA underfill services...

Robert Lazzara <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:54:00 EST

35 lines

New Thread

Washing of no-clean

Washing of no-clean

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:17:50 -0500

35 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:28:27 -0600

118 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Blomberg, Rainer (FL51) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:07:07 -0500

76 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:31:14 +0200

63 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:50:37 -0500

90 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:21:07 +0200

115 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:09:44 -0500

160 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Howard Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:27:08 -0500

394 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:48:39 -0000

504 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Howard Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:39:14 -0700

496 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:38:00 +0200

303 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Howard Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:00:10 -0500

674 lines

Re: Washing of no-clean

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:28:41 +0200

414 lines

New Thread

Wave solder and earthquakes.

Wave solder and earthquakes.

Jonathan Boyle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:02:48 -0800

25 lines

Re: Wave solder and earthquakes.

David Ricketts <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:31:34 -0800

56 lines

Re: Wave solder and earthquakes.

David J. Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:44:40 -0800

85 lines

Re: Wave solder and earthquakes.

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:53:06 EST

33 lines

Re: Wave solder and earthquakes.

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:04:22 -0800

41 lines

Re: Wave solder and earthquakes.

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:29:52 -0800

66 lines

Re: Wave solder and earthquakes.

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:58:41 -0800

56 lines

Re: Wave solder and earthquakes.

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Feb 2001 16:42:12 -0800

64 lines

New Thread

Wavesolder Equipment

Wavesolder Equipment

Stephen S. Schiera <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Feb 2001 17:02:29 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

Wetting issues...

Wetting issues...

Kevin Stokes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:32:44 -0500

96 lines

Re: Wetting issues...

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:23:31 -0500

131 lines

Re: Wetting issues...

Furrow, Robert Gordon (Bob) <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:14:01 -0500

61 lines

Re: Wetting issues...

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:30:49 -0800

47 lines

Re: Wetting issues...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Feb 2001 13:41:21 EST

35 lines

New Thread

What are the 5S's?

What are the 5S's?

Joe Barocio <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:00:19 -0600

28 lines

Re: What are the 5S's?

Meigs, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:14:28 -0700

67 lines

Re: What are the 5S's?

Vandendolder, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:30:41 -0500

60 lines

Re: What are the 5S's?

Dan Fazioli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:49:20 -0500

63 lines