LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECHNET Archives


TECHNET Archives

TECHNET Archives


May 2000


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Red Jelly" Flux (2 messages)
(FAB) Shorts Through Thin Epoxy Dielectric at 150V (4 messages)
(Fwd) Loveletter worm - really technical details (1 message)
(Fwd) Loveletter Worm - technical details (1 message)
24" Soldering Machine (1 message)
3D Modeling (1 message)
4 oz Cu (9 messages)
<No subject> (4 messages)
abrasive swabs (2 messages)
ADMIN Re: [TN] Please let me post my opinions/questions/ answ ers without anyinterruption (1 message)
Announcement (12 messages)
ANSI/EIA RS-481 (2 messages)
antistatic tape (6 messages)
APEX 2001 Technical Conference Information (3 messages)
Aqueous Cleaning Systems (6 messages)
ASSY: soldering of standoff to PC board (3 messages)
Automated Programing System of ROM writing (1 message)
Bad Day at Black Rock (11 messages)
Bend Flex Alternative (1 message)
BGA Design and Pick-&-Place Optics (6 messages)
BGA Soldering (3 messages)
Black nickel barrier problem w/immersion Ni/Ag (5 messages)
black oxide discoloration (6 messages)
Blind Via BGA Acceptance Criteria? (2 messages)
BLISTER (5 messages)
Board flow (2 messages)
Board Warpage (4 messages)
Brush dust off on equipment with duster (8 messages)
buried capacitor (4 messages)
Cadence to Mentor (2 messages)
Calce, Maryland (1 message)
Capacitor issues... (4 messages)
ChemMask DA Removal Help (1 message)
CHIP STACKING 0805 CHIPS- QUESTION ON IPC-HDBK-001 (1 message)
Chloride (4 messages)
Circuit board material for SMT board (4 messages)
collapsible solder ball (2 messages)
Comfortable ESD Smocks? (3 messages)
CompactPCI dimensions ? (1 message)
Component prep service needed (1 message)
Component shortages (3 messages)
Component shortages - watch your Palm Pilot (3 messages)
component wastage factors (1 message)
Conformal Coating (2 messages)
Conformal Coating newbie (2 messages)
Conformal coatings (5 messages)
Connecting 120VAC to PCB (1 message)
Contamination Problem (3 messages)
Contamination Testing (6 messages)
Copper clad laminates (1 message)
Corey A Peterson/Mequon/RA/Rockwell is out of the office. (1 message)
Cost Reductions from Converting to SMT (8 messages)
CTI (3 messages)
Cutting slot within copper plane (1 message)
Dendritic Growth-IPC-TM-650 2.6.13 (4 messages)
Design Specs for SMT (3 messages)
DI water purity (1 message)
DI water purity range (2 messages)
Difficulties to get rigid Polyimide material (1 message)
Distribution Mode for Trimmed parameter (4 messages)
Echo (2 messages)
Electroless/imersion Ni/Au Vs electrolitic Ni/Au (5 messages)
Electrovert MCS-1000 Users... (3 messages)
ESD and Air Hoses (2 messages)
ESD lab coats (6 messages)
Evaluation of Failed IC's (4 messages)
External Annular Ring for Blind Via in Pad BGA Design? (3 messages)
Fire Retardant Coating (3 messages)
Flat cable soldering on PCB (1 message)
flow solder machine (4 messages)
Formula for the Permability of Materials at different frequencies ? (2 messages)
Forum Protocol (1 message)
Fr4 Board materials have a permeability of? (3 messages)
FR4 Material (2 messages)
Frank-Peter Kriesch/F-E/VDOLuftfahrt ist außer Haus. (1 message)
Fw: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] (3 messages)
FW: UPDATE : Coming Virus (2 messages)
FW: [TN] Circuit board material for SMT board (1 message)
FW: [TN] What is an acid trap? (1 message)
General PCB Specifications (2 messages)
Glass Fabric 1500 & 1506 (2 messages)
HASL air knife cleaning material. (3 messages)
HASL Tin-Lead component in thin coating (6 messages)
Heat Ladders ? (3 messages)
Help! Interpret IPC-SM-840C and IPC-A-61 (3 messages)
Hole Fill (2 messages)
Houston Chapter meeting and Free Seminar with Vern Solberg (1 message)
I can't X-ray through this BGA!!! (8 messages)
Immersion Silver/Tin PCB Supplier in Asia (2 messages)
Immersion Tin finishes (1 message)
Insulation Data on Device Encapsulants (1 message)
International Contamination standard (1 message)
IPC 610 (2 messages)
IPC Halogen-Free Materials E-mail Forum (1 message)
IPC standards (2 messages)
IPC standards - exposed copper (3 messages)
IPC Works 2000 Call For Papers (1 message)
IPC-6013, Amendment 1, Available for Free Download (1 message)
IR or Convection tack dry (1 message)
ITT Connector (3 messages)
J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000 (10 messages)
J-STD-001C para 7.4 (1 message)
Labeling on PISM (1 message)
Laminate - No UV block - "natural or white." (1 message)
laminates & Cupric etcher controller (2 messages)
LCCC HEIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS (5 messages)
LCD Design Bureaus (1 message)
Lead Free (2 messages)
Looking for Rosemont Analytical Inc. (5 messages)
Looking for soldering feeder for wire solder (4 messages)
loose components (5 messages)
low-flow epoxy prepreg (1 message)
Manufacturability issues with components... (3 messages)
Measurement of flux residue (5 messages)
micro SMD, 5 bump package (1 message)
micro-bga (2 messages)
microhm resistance meter with standard four (1 message)
microhm resistance meter with standard four*probe (7 messages)
Moisture Absorption (5 messages)
More OSP (5 messages)
MS16535 rivet tooling (2 messages)
MS16535 rivet tooling - Part Two (1 message)
NASA Specs (7 messages)
Nickel Thickness on Flex (2 messages)
Noise suppression using "white noise"... (7 messages)
Noise Suupression (2 messages)
non-static tape (3 messages)
OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers' Qualificat ion Profile (1 message)
OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers' Qualification Profile (4 messages)
OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers'QualificationProfile (2 messages)
Off topic - Intranet based modification database? (7 messages)
OSP (4 messages)
OSP and Fine Pitch (7 messages)
PADS format compatibility (2 messages)
Padstacks info for multi layer (2 messages)
Pallets (2 messages)
Passivation (7 messages)
PCB / PWB packing and storage specifications (1 message)
PCB Data Required (1 message)
PCB onboard inductor dimensioning? (1 message)
Plated Hole Pad Dimensions (2 messages)
Plated thru holes for compliant pins (3 messages)
Plating rack Leeching (1 message)
Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers without anyinterruption. (1 message)
Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers withoutanyinterruption. (1 message)
Prepreg numbering (6 messages)
Press fit vs. Hand Solder (2 messages)
PSA cover tape problems... (1 message)
Question about EPROM's... (7 messages)
Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Grounding resis tor (2 messages)
Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Grounding resistor (4 messages)
Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Groundingresistor (1 message)
Question--No Technical Content (3 messages)
Ra and Rz values (2 messages)
raw materials measurements (2 messages)
RE: [TN] Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers without anyinterruption. (1 message)
ReAirCleaning (1 message)
reflow of punch and return boards (2 messages)
Reflowable heat transfer compound (3 messages)
Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] (13 messages)
Rejected postings (1 message)
Resharpening of cutters (1 message)
resistance measurements (1 message)
Resistors (2 messages)
Rework Stations/systems (6 messages)
Root Cause and Corrective Action (3 messages)
Rubberized conveyor (2 messages)
Rust on lead cutting edge (2 messages)
Scoring - Looking for Service Bureau (5 messages)
Searching for IPC "marking" spec (13 messages)
Selective wave soldering machine (4 messages)
Shelf life of tantalum capacitors (3 messages)
shorts (1 message)
signoffTechNet (2 messages)
Silicone Confromal Coating (13 messages)
silverloaded epoxy vs GHz (2 messages)
sizing vias for current (1 message)
SLC infor (3 messages)
SMT Components (2 messages)
SMT/PTH classification (2 messages)
Solder Bridging (2 messages)
solder bumping (3 messages)
Solder fillet on high lead Ball (2 messages)
Solder Mask (13 messages)
Solder mask post HASL staining (2 messages)
Solder Non-wetting (3 messages)
soldermask (3 messages)
Soldermask between pads (4 messages)
SPC software packge (2 messages)
Spec/standard comparison (4 messages)
Speed of moisture absorbtion (2 messages)
Speed of moisture absorption (1 message)
Stacking chips (1 message)
Stamp/mark dye (1 message)
Subj: 0201 & 0402 SMT (4 messages)
Supplier for Large PC Boards (3 messages)
Tapered needles (6 messages)
TechNet Digest - 17 May (#2000-304) (2 messages)
Terminating wires, tinned or not? (4 messages)
Test.. (1 message)
Testing.... (1 message)
Texas Instrument (and other) BGA's... (2 messages)
Texas Instrument BGA's... (6 messages)
Thanks to all on To X-ray or Not. (1 message)
Thick film lay-out (9 messages)
Three copies per message? (2 messages)
Through Hole Wave Solder Mask Application (7 messages)
Tip Scrubber (2 messages)
To X-ray or Not to X-ray. (11 messages)
Tombstoning and missing parts on 0805 Resistors (6 messages)
TPCA 2000 Information Available (1 message)
Tru Chem -SPC software package (1 message)
Un-subscribe (1 message)
Unsubscribe (2 messages)
UPDATE : Coming Virus (1 message)
UV Cure Conformal Coating (4 messages)
Virus Alert! (2 messages)
Vision Inspection Technology machine (2 messages)
Warpage (Bow and Twist) Causes (3 messages)
Wave Soldering 2512 Resistors (2 messages)
What is an acid trap? (7 messages)
wirebonding EFO (1 message)
YAY! Keach fixed the Listserver!! (2 messages)
Zero Acceptance Number (c=0) Sampling Plans (5 messages)
[PCB Specifications (1 message)
[TN] Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers without anyinterruption. (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECHNET Home

TECHNET Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Red Jelly" Flux

"Red Jelly" Flux

Pat Diamond <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 15:08:24 +0100

37 lines

Re: "Red Jelly" Flux

Mik Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 21:04:36 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

(FAB) Shorts Through Thin Epoxy Dielectric at 150V

(FAB) Shorts Through Thin Epoxy Dielectric at 150V

May William D (Dean) CNIN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 08:21:31 -0500

51 lines

Re: (FAB) Shorts Through Thin Epoxy Dielectric at 150V

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 15:04:12 EDT

29 lines

Re: (FAB) Shorts Through Thin Epoxy Dielectric at 150V

Hinners Hans Civ WRALC/LYPME <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 16:48:15 -0400

95 lines

Re: (FAB) Shorts Through Thin Epoxy Dielectric at 150V

Thomi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 23:11:34 +0200

97 lines

New Thread

(Fwd) Loveletter worm - really technical details

(Fwd) Loveletter worm - really technical details

Matthias Mansfeld <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 19:55:57 +0200

131 lines

New Thread

(Fwd) Loveletter Worm - technical details

(Fwd) Loveletter Worm - technical details

Matthias Mansfeld <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 19:53:05 +0200

85 lines

New Thread

24" Soldering Machine

24" Soldering Machine

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 15:27:13 -0700

93 lines

New Thread

3D Modeling

Re: 3D Modeling

Jonathan A Noquil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jun 2000 09:42:25 +0800

35 lines

New Thread

4 oz Cu

4 oz Cu

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:19:47 -0700

35 lines

Re: 4 oz Cu

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 15:34:11 -0400

79 lines

Re: 4 oz Cu

Roger M. Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 19:41:56 +0000

111 lines

Re: 4 oz Cu

Jim Gleason <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 15:37:52 -0400

71 lines

Re: 4 oz Cu

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:37:18 EDT

31 lines

Re: 4 oz Cu

gacrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:32:10 -0600

67 lines

Re: 4 oz Cu

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 19:41:25 EDT

41 lines

Re: 4 oz Cu

michael <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:43:15 +0800

65 lines

Re: 4 oz Cu

gacrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:13:28 -0600

72 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Angelo Hermoso <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 18:21:17 +0800

21 lines

<No subject>

Kat Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 05:31:33 -0400

30 lines

<No subject>

tangweidong <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 17:59:05 +0800

36 lines

<No subject>

C.K.CHU <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 16:05:14 +0800

49 lines

New Thread

abrasive swabs

abrasive swabs

Sheila Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 08:54:19 -0400

31 lines

Re: abrasive swabs

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 17:20:05 +1000

61 lines

New Thread

ADMIN Re: [TN] Please let me post my opinions/questions/ answ ers without anyinterruption

Re: ADMIN Re: [TN] Please let me post my opinions/questions/ answ ers without anyinterruption

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 09:50:43 -0700

272 lines

New Thread

Announcement

Announcement

Doug Brooks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 09:27:30 -0700

54 lines

Re: Announcement

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:14:05 -0700

82 lines

Re: Announcement

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 08:50:19 +0200

82 lines

Re: Announcement

Hinners Hans Civ WRALC/LYPME <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 14:00:48 +0100

116 lines

Re: Announcement

Doug Brooks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 15:03:28 -0700

161 lines

Re: Announcement

Kasprzak, Bill (esd) USX <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 10:16:42 -0400

218 lines

Re: Announcement

Collins, Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:31:13 -0300

256 lines

Re: Announcement

Collins, Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:29:04 -0300

240 lines

Re: Announcement

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 08:36:06 -0600

249 lines

Re: Announcement

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 12:59:41 -0700

38 lines

Re: Announcement

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:17:54 +0200

281 lines

Re: Announcement

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 16:53:38 +0300

304 lines

New Thread

ANSI/EIA RS-481

ANSI/EIA RS-481

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 17:04:15 -0700

84 lines

Re: ANSI/EIA RS-481

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 21:10:58 EDT

68 lines

New Thread

antistatic tape

antistatic tape

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 13:55:57 -0400

37 lines

Re: antistatic tape

Steffen, Don E <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 13:33:29 -0500

73 lines

Re: antistatic tape

Cash, Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:41:14 -0700

71 lines

Re: antistatic tape

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 14:47:34 -0400

93 lines

Re: antistatic tape

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 14:53:14 -0400

69 lines

Re: antistatic tape

fraley , barrie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 14:57:45 -0400

93 lines

New Thread

APEX 2001 Technical Conference Information

APEX 2001 Technical Conference Information

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:56:21 -0500

119 lines

APEX 2001 Technical Conference Information

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:56:21 -0500

93 lines

Re: APEX 2001 Technical Conference Information

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 08:35:06 +1000

157 lines

New Thread

Aqueous Cleaning Systems

Aqueous Cleaning Systems

The Job Shop <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 10:13:59 -0700

65 lines

Re: Aqueous Cleaning Systems

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:56:37 -0400

42 lines

Re: Aqueous Cleaning Systems

Alan Kreplick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:22:29 -0400

145 lines

Re: Aqueous Cleaning Systems

Charlie Pitarys <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:27:54 -0400

135 lines

Re: Aqueous Cleaning Systems

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:04:01 -0400

157 lines

Re: Aqueous Cleaning Systems

Kasprzak, Bill (esd) USX <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:55:10 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

ASSY: soldering of standoff to PC board

ASSY: soldering of standoff to PC board

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:45:58 -0400

44 lines

Re: ASSY: soldering of standoff to PC board

Jason Larson, AScT <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 09:43:13 -0700

75 lines

Re: ASSY: soldering of standoff to PC board

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 12:57:06 EDT

70 lines

New Thread

Automated Programing System of ROM writing

Automated Programing System of ROM writing

Quoc Khanh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 08:12:13 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

Bad Day at Black Rock

Bad Day at Black Rock

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 22:22:01 -0700

93 lines

Re: Bad Day at Black Rock

Lon Weffers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 09:02:36 +0200

124 lines

Re: Bad Day at Black Rock

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 06:58:06 -0400

150 lines

Re: Bad Day at Black Rock

Clements John <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 07:27:26 -0400

125 lines

Re: Bad Day at Black Rock

Kasprzak, Bill (esd) USX <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 07:47:31 -0400

134 lines

Re: Bad Day at Black Rock

Jos Groffils <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:36:18 +0100

30 lines

Re: Bad Day at Black Rock

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:13:40 +0200

161 lines

Re: Bad Day at Black Rock

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:40:15 +0200

29 lines

Re: Bad Day at Black Rock

Kevin Dale Kirmse <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:36:10 -0400

79 lines

Re: Bad Day at Black Rock

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:46:00 -0700

31 lines

Re: Bad Day at Black Rock

Mik Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:11:08 +0100

138 lines

New Thread

Bend Flex Alternative

Bend Flex Alternative

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:27:29 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

BGA Design and Pick-&-Place Optics

BGA Design and Pick-&-Place Optics

Michael Forrester <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:37:45 -0400

44 lines

Re: BGA Design and Pick-&-Place Optics

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:43:32 -0600

101 lines

Re: BGA Design and Pick-&-Place Optics

Peter Tremewen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 13:48:46 +1000

71 lines

Re: BGA Design and Pick-&-Place Optics

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 16:39:45 +0300

81 lines

Re: BGA Design and Pick-&-Place Optics

Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 13:27:05 -0500

29 lines

Re: BGA Design and Pick-&-Place Optics

McGlaughlin, Jeffrey A <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 07:25:18 -0400

138 lines

New Thread

BGA Soldering

BGA Soldering

Clayton Gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 10:57:59 +1000

50 lines

Re: BGA Soldering

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 21:44:02 EDT

79 lines

Re: BGA Soldering

Tony DiMauro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 08:57:53 -0700

145 lines

New Thread

Black nickel barrier problem w/immersion Ni/Ag

Black nickel barrier problem w/immersion Ni/Ag

Michael Forrester <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 12:42:58 -0400

36 lines

Re: Black nickel barrier problem w/immersion Ni/Ag

Kiiski Jarmo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 08:04:11 +0300

75 lines

Re: Black nickel barrier problem w/immersion Ni/Ag

Tracy Black <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 08:39:19 -0700

132 lines

Re: Black nickel barrier problem w/immersion Ni/Ag

George Milad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 15:24:11 EDT

54 lines

Re: Black nickel barrier problem w/immersion Ni/Ag

Jonathan A Noquil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:42:29 +0800

96 lines

New Thread

black oxide discoloration

black oxide discoloration

Angelo Hermoso <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 11:26:28 -0700

33 lines

Re: black oxide discoloration

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 2000 00:45:06 EDT

29 lines

Re: black oxide discoloration

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 01:07:47 EDT

46 lines

Re: black oxide discoloration

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 2 May 2000 01:12:14 EDT

30 lines

Re: black oxide discoloration

Angelo Hermoso <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 14:18:00 +0800

53 lines

Re: black oxide discoloration

Jim Kenny <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 08:24:17 -0400

73 lines

New Thread

Blind Via BGA Acceptance Criteria?

Blind Via BGA Acceptance Criteria?

Patterson, Dawn D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 17:41:53 -0400

49 lines

Re: Blind Via BGA Acceptance Criteria?

Patterson, Dawn D. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 06:48:07 -0700

75 lines

New Thread

BLISTER

BLISTER

gina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 11:46:29 -0600

31 lines

Re: BLISTER

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:32:22 +0300

58 lines

Re: BLISTER

gina <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 17:30:34 -0600

86 lines

Re: BLISTER

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:38:21 +0300

113 lines

Re: BLISTER

Hinners Hans Civ WRALC/LYPME <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:15:44 -0400

130 lines

New Thread

Board flow

Board flow

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 16:20:22 -0400

61 lines

Re: Board flow

Edward J. Valentine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 18:22:25 -0400

106 lines

New Thread

Board Warpage

Board Warpage

Steffen, Don E <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 17:30:56 -0500

43 lines

Re: Board Warpage

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 16:13:35 -0700

71 lines

Re: Board Warpage

Shirley Xiao <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 17:27:18 -0700

105 lines

Re: Board Warpage

Quoc Khanh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 07:55:16 -0700

83 lines

New Thread

Brush dust off on equipment with duster

Brush dust off on equipment with duster

Kiiski Jarmo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:17:06 +0300

33 lines

Brush dust off on equipment with duster

Kiiski Jarmo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 09:04:56 +0300

35 lines

Re: Brush dust off on equipment with duster

Cash, Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 06:36:55 -0700

71 lines

Re: Brush dust off on equipment with duster

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 08:36:16 -0700

76 lines

Re: Brush dust off on equipment with duster

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:42:08 -0700

32 lines

Re: Brush dust off on equipment with duster

Kiiski Jarmo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:18:39 +0300

118 lines

Re: Brush dust off on equipment with duster

Cash, Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 06:49:06 -0700

164 lines

Re: Brush dust off on equipment with duster

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:59:02 -0600

170 lines

New Thread

buried capacitor

buried capacitor

Nicholas LAI <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 13:46:59 +0800

32 lines

Re: buried capacitor

Scott Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 20:33:07 +0800

70 lines

Re: buried capacitor

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 08:56:49 EDT

32 lines

Re: buried capacitor

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 15:03:46 +0200

114 lines

New Thread

Cadence to Mentor

Cadence to Mentor

Kotecki, George <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 10:33:44 -0400

31 lines

Re: Cadence to Mentor

Ko Adeline-FSGA2298 <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jun 2000 09:04:58 +0800

43 lines

New Thread

Calce, Maryland

Calce, Maryland

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:47:54 +0200

27 lines

New Thread

Capacitor issues...

Capacitor issues...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 18:20:15 EDT

47 lines

Re: Capacitor issues...

Kelly M. Schriver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Jan 1999 18:52:25 -0600

90 lines

Re: Capacitor issues...

Edward J. Valentine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 22:15:08 -0400

95 lines

Re: Capacitor issues...

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:55:11 +0200

72 lines

New Thread

ChemMask DA Removal Help

ChemMask DA Removal Help

Richard MacCutcheon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:36:44 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

CHIP STACKING 0805 CHIPS- QUESTION ON IPC-HDBK-001

CHIP STACKING 0805 CHIPS- QUESTION ON IPC-HDBK-001

Ashok Dhawan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 08:40:44 -0700

85 lines

New Thread

Chloride

Chloride

Scott B. Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 12:29:11 +0800

100 lines

Re: Chloride

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 09:14:05 +0300

74 lines

Re: Chloride

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 09:14:05 +0300

87 lines

Re: Chloride

David L. Morrow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 10:41:47 EDT

45 lines

New Thread

Circuit board material for SMT board

Circuit board material for SMT board

Shirley Xiao <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 22:15:31 -0700

58 lines

Re: Circuit board material for SMT board

Shirley Xiao <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 00:55:15 -0700

160 lines

Re: Circuit board material for SMT board

Olson, Jack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:39:34 -0500

48 lines

Re: Circuit board material for SMT board

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 09:12:55 -0700

98 lines

New Thread

collapsible solder ball

collapsible solder ball

Roseann Strength <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 14:45:45 -0700

29 lines

Re: collapsible solder ball

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 07:14:50 -0700

116 lines

New Thread

Comfortable ESD Smocks?

Comfortable ESD Smocks?

Hinners Hans Civ WRALC/LYPME <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 14:15:14 -0400

43 lines

Re: Comfortable ESD Smocks?

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 15:14:55 -0400

75 lines

Re: Comfortable ESD Smocks?

Hinners Hans Civ WRALC/LYPME <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 15:59:43 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

CompactPCI dimensions ?

CompactPCI dimensions ?

Kim Andersen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 21:04:57 +0200

37 lines

New Thread

Component prep service needed

Component prep service needed

Landes, Jeff <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 09:42:49 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Component shortages

Component shortages

Ralph Vaughan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:31:40 -0400

37 lines

Re: Component shortages

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:42:36 EDT

89 lines

Re: component shortages

John Brewer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 07:42:18 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

Component shortages - watch your Palm Pilot

Component shortages - watch your Palm Pilot

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:24:59 +0200

47 lines

Component shortages - watch your Palm Pilot

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:24:59 +0200

58 lines

Re: Component shortages - watch your Palm Pilot

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 07:24:46 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

component wastage factors

component wastage factors

Roger Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 13:25:15 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coating

Conformal Coating

Alexis Meehan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 19:07:21 -0700

45 lines

Re: Conformal Coating

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:51:20 +0200

97 lines

New Thread

Conformal Coating newbie

Conformal Coating newbie

Steve Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:07:27 -0600

54 lines

Re: Conformal Coating newbie

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:17:46 +0100

103 lines

New Thread

Conformal coatings

Conformal coatings

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 15:56:51 -0400

38 lines

Re: Conformal coatings

Hinners Hans Civ WRALC/LYPME <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 21:18:53 +0100

73 lines

Re: Conformal coatings

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 16:47:06 -0400

80 lines

Re: Conformal coatings

Collins, Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 07:49:13 -0300

111 lines

Re: Conformal coatings

Jean-Francois Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:46:54 -0400

146 lines

New Thread

Connecting 120VAC to PCB

Connecting 120VAC to PCB

Tim Croissant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 16:05:05 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

Contamination Problem

Contamination Problem

Roger M. Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:22:36 +0000

46 lines

Re: Contamination Problem

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 17:52:26 +0200

93 lines

Re: Contamination Problem

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 19:06:45 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

Contamination Testing

Contamination Testing

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 07:22:03 -0600

185 lines

Re: Contamination Testing

McMonagle, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 09:49:53 -0400

69 lines

Re: Contamination Testing

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 10:04:44 -0400

52 lines

Re: Contamination Testing

Virgil Minor <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 08:58:12 -0500

41 lines

Re: Contamination Testing

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 15:04:10 EDT

46 lines

Re: Contamination Testing

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 15:04:13 EDT

49 lines

New Thread

Copper clad laminates

Copper clad laminates

Scott B. Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:31:54 +0800

80 lines

New Thread

Corey A Peterson/Mequon/RA/Rockwell is out of the office.

Corey A Peterson/Mequon/RA/Rockwell is out of the office.

Corey A Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:10:05 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Cost Reductions from Converting to SMT

Cost Reductions from Converting to SMT

Philip Poling <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 07:47:01 -0500

49 lines

Re: Cost Reductions from Converting to SMT

Richard Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 08:32:52 -0700

101 lines

Re: Cost Reductions from Converting to SMT

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 19:06:02 +0300

140 lines

Re: Cost Reductions from Converting to SMT

Larry W. Burgess <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:21:49 -0700

134 lines

Re: Cost Reductions from Converting to SMT

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 19:26:48 +0300

175 lines

Re: Cost Reductions from Converting to SMT

Justin Braime <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 08:43:52 +1200

170 lines

Re: Cost Reductions from Converting to SMT

Tracy Black <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 08:04:02 -0700

45 lines

Re: Cost Reductions from Converting to SMT

Peter Tremewen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 21:36:48 +1000

72 lines

New Thread

CTI

CTI

Scott B. Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 11:58:22 +0800

71 lines

Re: CTI

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:50:40 EDT

41 lines

Re: CTI

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:49:31 -0700

114 lines

New Thread

Cutting slot within copper plane

Cutting slot within copper plane

<Goh Guan Chye> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 00:24:13 +0800

36 lines

New Thread

Dendritic Growth-IPC-TM-650 2.6.13

Dendritic Growth-IPC-TM-650 2.6.13

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 11:09:49 -0500

34 lines

Re: Dendritic Growth-IPC-TM-650 2.6.13

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 15:04:03 EDT

44 lines

Re: Dendritic Growth-IPC-TM-650 2.6.13

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 14:28:38 -0500

40 lines

Re: Dendritic Growth-IPC-TM-650 2.6.13

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 17:28:03 EDT

42 lines

New Thread

Design Specs for SMT

Re: Design Specs for SMT

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 07:34:27 -0400

102 lines

Re: Design Specs for SMT

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 09:05:35 -0400

140 lines

Re: Design Specs for SMT

McMonagle, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 08:09:03 -0400

140 lines

New Thread

DI water purity

DI water purity

David Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 09:56:58 -0700

73 lines

New Thread

DI water purity range

DI water purity range

David Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:20:56 -0700

76 lines

Re: DI water purity range

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 11:23:26 +0200

56 lines

New Thread

Difficulties to get rigid Polyimide material

Difficulties to get rigid Polyimide material

Matthias Mansfeld <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 12:40:22 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

Distribution Mode for Trimmed parameter

Distribution Mode for Trimmed parameter

Charles Law <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 16:38:27 +0800

44 lines

Re: Distribution Mode for Trimmed parameter

Kiiski Jarmo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 14:55:08 +0300

92 lines

Re: Distribution Mode for Trimmed parameter

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 12:07:35 -0400

86 lines

Re: Distribution Mode for Trimmed parameter

Glenn Pelkey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 17:35:46 PDT

91 lines

New Thread

Echo

Echo

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 07:52:45 -0400

29 lines

Re: Echo

Virgil Minor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:49:22 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Electroless/imersion Ni/Au Vs electrolitic Ni/Au

Electroless/imersion Ni/Au Vs electrolitic Ni/Au

CHONG,CHEE-LEONG (A-Malaysia,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 00:19:45 +0800

55 lines

Re: Electroless/imersion Ni/Au Vs electrolitic Ni/Au

<Dennis Fritz> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 14:12:34 EDT

72 lines

Re: Electroless/imersion Ni/Au Vs electrolitic Ni/Au

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:31:41 -0700

102 lines

Re: Electroless/imersion Ni/Au Vs electrolitic Ni/Au

Jim Kittel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:32:04 -0600

132 lines

Re: Electroless/imersion Ni/Au Vs electrolitic Ni/Au

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 15:35:09 -0600

172 lines

New Thread

Electrovert MCS-1000 Users...

Electrovert MCS-1000 Users...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 22:58:48 EDT

30 lines

Re: Electrovert MCS-1000 Users...

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 16:18:40 +1000

62 lines

Re: Electrovert MCS-1000 Users...

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 08:32:33 -0600

61 lines

New Thread

ESD and Air Hoses

ESD and Air Hoses

Carl Barnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 13:32:45 -0700

35 lines

Re: ESD and Air Hoses

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 09:41:53 +0300

67 lines

New Thread

ESD lab coats

ESD lab coats

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 12:22:26 -0400

46 lines

Re: ESD lab coats

Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 09:55:01 -0700

55 lines

Re: ESD lab coats

Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 09:57:51 -0700

73 lines

Re: ESD lab coats

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:09:44 -0700

106 lines

Re: ESD lab coats

Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 13:29:51 -0700

117 lines

Re: ESD lab coats

David Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 08:52:01 -0700

137 lines

New Thread

Evaluation of Failed IC's

Evaluation of Failed IC's

Wilber Heath <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 06:53:47 -0500

36 lines

Re: Evaluation of Failed IC's

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 08:03:18 -0400

62 lines

Re: Evaluation of Failed IC's

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 08:20:25 -0400

71 lines

Re: Evaluation of Failed IC's

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 20:06:27 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

External Annular Ring for Blind Via in Pad BGA Design?

External Annular Ring for Blind Via in Pad BGA Design?

Patterson, Dawn D. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 13:00:10 -0400

30 lines

Re: External Annular Ring for Blind Via in Pad BGA Design?

Howieson, Rick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 12:00:23 -0600

56 lines

Re: External Annular Ring for Blind Via in Pad BGA Design?

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:16:06 EDT

49 lines

New Thread

Fire Retardant Coating

Fire Retardant Coating

Clayton Gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 12:06:46 +1000

33 lines

Re: Fire Retardant Coating

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 22:32:56 EDT

42 lines

Re: Fire Retardant Coating

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 18:29:53 +0100

94 lines

New Thread

Flat cable soldering on PCB

Flat cable soldering on PCB

Avigdor Jakubinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 14:04:00 +0300

58 lines

New Thread

flow solder machine

flow solder machine

Jim Gleason <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 10:48:18 -0400

56 lines

Re: flow solder machine

David Whalley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 17:49:05 +0100

35 lines

Re: flow solder machine

Christopher Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 08:47:18 +1200

76 lines

Re: flow solder machine

Paul Peltier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:17:21 -0400

113 lines

New Thread

Formula for the Permability of Materials at different frequencies ?

Formula for the Permability of Materials at different frequencies ?

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:24:05 -0500

30 lines

Re: Formula for the Permability of Materials at different frequencies ?

KK Chin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 10:33:15 -0700

79 lines

New Thread

Forum Protocol

Forum Protocol

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:14:29 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

Fr4 Board materials have a permeability of?

Fr4 Board materials have a permeability of?

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 13:09:07 -0500

28 lines

Re: Fr4 Board materials have a permeability of?

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:46:35 -0700

56 lines

Re: Fr4 Board materials have a permeability of?

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 14:06:52 -0500

85 lines

New Thread

FR4 Material

FR4 Material

Michael Blackburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:56:11 -0400

42 lines

Re: FR4 Material

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 12:25:07 EDT

39 lines

New Thread

Frank-Peter Kriesch/F-E/VDOLuftfahrt ist außer Haus.

Frank-Peter Kriesch/F-E/VDOLuftfahrt ist außer Haus.

Frank Kriesch/F-TV/VDOLuftfahrt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 01:01:09 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

Fw: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Fw: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Mik Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 11:33:31 +0100

100 lines

Re: Fw: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 20:06:21 +0300

127 lines

Re: Fw: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Mik Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 21:34:19 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

FW: UPDATE : Coming Virus

FW: UPDATE : Coming Virus

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 17:57:14 +1000

98 lines

Re: FW: UPDATE : Coming Virus

Doug McKean <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 01:36:52 -0700

50 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] Circuit board material for SMT board

FW: [TN] Circuit board material for SMT board

CHONG,CHEE-LEONG (A-Malaysia,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 16:41:55 +0800

192 lines

New Thread

FW: [TN] What is an acid trap?

FW: [TN] What is an acid trap?

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 15:46:13 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

General PCB Specifications

General PCB Specifications

Michael Forrester <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 14:19:48 -0400

51 lines

Re: General PCB Specifications

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 May 2000 14:43:10 EDT

27 lines

New Thread

Glass Fabric 1500 & 1506

Glass Fabric 1500 & 1506

Shirley Xiao <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 21:46:25 -0700

33 lines

Re: Glass Fabric 1500 & 1506

Mcmaster, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 09:44:07 -0700

66 lines

New Thread

HASL air knife cleaning material.

HASL air knife cleaning material.

Le Dai Tri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:36:03 +0700

106 lines

Re: HASL air knife cleaning material.

<Joseph M. Webb> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 08:01:13 -0400

34 lines

Re: HASL air knife cleaning material.

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 11:52:30 EDT

38 lines

New Thread

HASL Tin-Lead component in thin coating

HASL Tin-Lead component in thin coating

Le Dai Tri <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 15:16:19 +0700

119 lines

Re: HASL Tin-Lead component in thin coating

Jonathan A Noquil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 19:37:50 +0900

134 lines

Re: HASL Tin-Lead component in thin coating

Furrow, Robert Gordon (Bob) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 08:15:23 -0400

81 lines

Re: HASL Tin-Lead component in thin coating

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:20:04 EDT

41 lines

Re: HASL Tin-Lead component in thin coating

<Joseph M. Webb> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:14:24 -0400

37 lines

Re: HASL Tin-Lead component in thin coating

Wenger, George M (George) <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 17:59:07 -0400

127 lines

New Thread

Heat Ladders ?

Heat Ladders ?

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 11:02:22 -0600

172 lines

Re: Heat Ladders ?

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 14:10:09 EDT

56 lines

Re: Heat Ladders ?

Marc Fortin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 15:04:01 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

Help! Interpret IPC-SM-840C and IPC-A-61

Help! Interpret IPC-SM-840C and IPC-A-61

Tom Burek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:55:07 -0400

40 lines

Help! Interpret IPC-SM-840C and IPC-A-61

Tom Burek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:55:07 -0400

48 lines

Re: Help! Interpret IPC-SM-840C and IPC-A-61

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:53:37 -0700

56 lines

New Thread

Hole Fill

Hole Fill

Alan Kreplick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 16:55:48 -0400

57 lines

Re: Hole Fill

Tony DiMauro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:21:28 -0700

115 lines

New Thread

Houston Chapter meeting and Free Seminar with Vern Solberg

Houston Chapter meeting and Free Seminar with Vern Solberg

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 08:58:22 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

I can't X-ray through this BGA!!!

Re: I can't X-ray through this BGA!!!

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 16:06:17 +1000

125 lines

Re: I can't X-ray through this BGA!!!

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 06:11:28 -0400

146 lines

Re: I can't X-ray through this BGA!!!

Phil Zarrow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 07:35:41 EDT

40 lines

Re: I can't X-ray through this BGA!!!

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 08:39:06 +1000

77 lines

Re: I can't X-ray through this BGA!!!

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 20:07:57 EDT

94 lines

Re: I can't X-ray through this BGA!!!

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 07:58:58 -0700

141 lines

Re: I can't X-ray through this BGA!!!

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:53:00 -0700

166 lines

Re: I can't X-ray through this BGA!!!

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 16:29:34 EDT

48 lines

New Thread

Immersion Silver/Tin PCB Supplier in Asia

Immersion Silver/Tin PCB Supplier in Asia

S. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 00:36:26 EDT

29 lines

Re: Immersion Silver/Tin PCB Supplier in Asia

<Dennis Fritz> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:47:19 EDT

43 lines

New Thread

Immersion Tin finishes

Immersion Tin finishes

Burtt, Nigel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 13:44:03 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Insulation Data on Device Encapsulants

Insulation Data on Device Encapsulants

Phil Dutton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 17:19:27 +0930

52 lines

New Thread

International Contamination standard

International Contamination standard

Le Dai Tri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:30:32 +0700

87 lines

New Thread

IPC 610

IPC 610

Cronin, Eamon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 16:57:46 +0100

30 lines

Re: IPC 610

<Janice LePage> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 11:32:05 -0700

73 lines

New Thread

IPC Halogen-Free Materials E-mail Forum

IPC Halogen-Free Materials E-mail Forum

Christopher Jorgensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 14:16:09 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

IPC standards

IPC standards

ROMERO, DAVID <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:56:29 -0600

41 lines

Re: IPC standards

Nancy Trumbull <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 07:39:22 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

IPC standards - exposed copper

Re: IPC standards - exposed copper

Brooks Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 09:29:42 -0700

110 lines

Re: IPC standards - exposed copper

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 13:47:27 EDT

74 lines

Re: IPC standards - exposed copper

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 18:28:49 -0400

143 lines

New Thread

IPC Works 2000 Call For Papers

IPC Works 2000 Call For Papers

John Perry <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 14:51:38 -0500

226 lines

New Thread

IPC-6013, Amendment 1, Available for Free Download

IPC-6013, Amendment 1, Available for Free Download

Christopher Jorgensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 15:55:20 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

IR or Convection tack dry

IR or Convection tack dry

Denis J. Dionne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:35:43 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

ITT Connector

ITT Connector

Jorge A Rodriguez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 14:05:27 -0600

46 lines

Re: ITT Connector

Virgil Minor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 15:29:01 -0500

41 lines

ITT Connector

Jorge A Rodriguez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 07:42:07 -0600

45 lines

New Thread

J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000

J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000

Richard MacCutcheon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 08:29:31 -0600

32 lines

Re: J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 12:15:56 EDT

63 lines

Re: J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000

Marsico, James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 15:57:57 -0400

59 lines

Re: J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000

Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 16:11:16 -0500

80 lines

Re: J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 07:43:46 -0400

59 lines

Re: J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 08:23:36 EDT

39 lines

Re: J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:04:47 -0400

71 lines

Re: J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000

Kane, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:55:15 -0400

162 lines

Re: J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000

Louis, Edwin @ CSE <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 15:24:24 -0400

183 lines

Re: J-STD-001 implementation from Mil2000

Kane, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 08:36:57 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

J-STD-001C para 7.4

J-STD-001C para 7.4

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 10:56:03 -0500

110 lines

New Thread

Labeling on PISM

Labeling on PISM

edward edward szpruch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 08:21:19 +0300

35 lines

New Thread

Laminate - No UV block - "natural or white."

Laminate - No UV block - "natural or white."

dbrandler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 09:20:30 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

laminates & Cupric etcher controller

laminates & Cupric etcher controller

Scott Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 19:46:19 +0800

68 lines

Re: laminates & Cupric etcher controller

Frank Davies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 13:23:13 +0100

127 lines

New Thread

LCCC HEIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS

LCCC HEIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS

Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:33:47 -0500

33 lines

Re: LCCC HEIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:11:49 -0700

42 lines

Re: LCCC HEIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 19:25:33 EDT

50 lines

Re: LCCC HEIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 07:16:08 EDT

38 lines

Re: LCCC HEIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:27:46 +0200

95 lines

New Thread

LCD Design Bureaus

LCD Design Bureaus

S. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 01:00:34 EDT

38 lines

New Thread

Lead Free

Lead Free

Jonathan A Noquil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 16:18:15 +0800

33 lines

Re: Lead Free

Kiiski Jarmo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 13:31:56 +0300

61 lines

New Thread

Looking for Rosemont Analytical Inc.

Looking for Rosemont Analytical Inc.

Hinners Hans Civ WRALC/LYPME <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 19:49:08 +0100

46 lines

Re: Looking for Rosemont Analytical Inc.

McMonagle, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:58:03 -0400

84 lines

Re: Looking for Rosemont Analytical Inc.

David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:29:27 -0500

39 lines

Re: Looking for Rosemont Analytical Inc.

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:58:45 -0700

104 lines

Re: Looking for Rosemont Analytical Inc.

Hinners Hans Civ WRALC/LYPME <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 21:09:36 +0100

80 lines

New Thread

Looking for soldering feeder for wire solder

Looking for soldering feeder for wire solder

West, Jim <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 16:12:11 -0400

35 lines

Re: Looking for soldering feeder for wire solder

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 17:06:59 EDT

48 lines

Re: Looking for soldering feeder for wire solder

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 08:12:16 -0700

79 lines

Re: Looking for soldering feeder for wire solder

Scott Mcanall <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 12:06:59 EDT

32 lines

New Thread

loose components

loose components

Lon Weffers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:02:49 +0200

43 lines

Re: loose components

Martin Christie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:35:00 +0100

68 lines

Re: loose components

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 21:56:51 +1000

98 lines

Re: loose components

Lon Weffers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 09:54:29 +0200

106 lines

Re: loose components

Kasprzak, Bill (esd) USX <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 09:29:19 -0400

83 lines

New Thread

low-flow epoxy prepreg

low-flow epoxy prepreg

Rick Babyak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:32:50 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

Manufacturability issues with components...

Manufacturability issues with components...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 22:16:11 EDT

61 lines

Re: Manufacturability issues with components...

Kelly M. Schriver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 06:40:04 -0500

155 lines

Manufacturability issues with components...

John Brewer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 08:39:42 -0400

57 lines

New Thread

Measurement of flux residue

Measurement of flux residue

Poh Kong Hui <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 22:56:03 +0800

32 lines

Re: Measurement of flux residue

Jim Gilbert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:23:54 -0400

57 lines

Re: Measurement of flux residue

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:59:28 EDT

42 lines

Re: Measurement of flux residue

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:02:33 EDT

36 lines

Re: Measurement of flux residue

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 19:26:34 +0300

60 lines

New Thread

micro SMD, 5 bump package

micro SMD, 5 bump package

Peter Wong <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 08:41:47 -0700

123 lines

New Thread

micro-bga

micro-bga

Ralph Vaughan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:13:24 -0400

38 lines

Re: micro-bga

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:53:25 -0400

85 lines

New Thread

microhm resistance meter with standard four

Re: microhm resistance meter with standard four

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:29:19 EDT

36 lines

New Thread

microhm resistance meter with standard four*probe

microhm resistance meter with standard four*probe

090512 洪靖信 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:10:09 +0800

210 lines

Re: microhm resistance meter with standard four*probe

Kiiski Jarmo <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:37:02 +0300

55 lines

Re: microhm resistance meter with standard four*probe

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:23:48 +0200

64 lines

Re: microhm resistance meter with standard four*probe

fraley , barrie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:23:44 -0400

93 lines

Re: microhm resistance meter with standard four*probe

fraley , barrie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:23:44 -0400

101 lines

Re: microhm resistance meter with standard four*probe

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:35:02 -0700

52 lines

Re: microhm resistance meter with standard four*probe

Don Vischulis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 19:25:53 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Moisture Absorption

Moisture Absorption

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 11:42:07 -0500

62 lines

Re: Moisture Absorption

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 13:47:15 EDT

81 lines

Re: Moisture Absorption

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 12:52:15 -0700

80 lines

Re: Moisture Absorption

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 18:52:24 EDT

69 lines

Re: Moisture Absorption

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 21:25:51 -0400

97 lines

New Thread

More OSP

More OSP

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 08:19:12 -0400

43 lines

Re: More OSP

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 08:46:12 EDT

53 lines

Re: More OSP

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 13:31:01 -0600

77 lines

Re: More OSP

Mike Lang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 09:27:50 -0400

35 lines

Re: More OSP

Mike Lang <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 09:27:50 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

MS16535 rivet tooling

MS16535 rivet tooling

Mike Sewell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 12:00:11 EDT

30 lines

Re: MS16535 rivet tooling

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 12:29:08 -0400

82 lines

New Thread

MS16535 rivet tooling - Part Two

Re: MS16535 rivet tooling - Part Two

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 14:59:09 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

NASA Specs

NASA Specs

Kuczynski Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 09:05:10 -0400

37 lines

Re: NASA Specs

Golembiewski, Ray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 09:32:11 -0400

67 lines

Re: NASA Specs

McMonagle, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:15:20 -0400

78 lines

Re: NASA Specs

McMonagle, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 11:15:20 -0400

91 lines

NASA Specs

Kuczynski Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 09:05:10 -0400

50 lines

Re: NASA Specs

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 08:28:39 +1000

65 lines

Re: NASA Specs

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 08:28:39 +1000

78 lines

New Thread

Nickel Thickness on Flex

Nickel Thickness on Flex

Glenn Pelkey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 17:35:20 PDT

48 lines

Re: Nickel Thickness on Flex

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 09:59:15 +1000

106 lines

New Thread

Noise suppression using "white noise"...

Noise suppression using "white noise"...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 21:27:08 EDT

52 lines

Re: Noise suppression using "white noise"...

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 09:28:52 +0300

93 lines

Re: Noise suppression using "white noise"...

Mik Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 21:02:57 +0100

89 lines

Re: Noise suppression using "white noise"...

peter blokhuis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2000 19:45:38 -0700

175 lines

Re: Noise suppression using "white noise"...

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2000 09:55:06 +0300

202 lines

Re: Noise suppression using "white noise"...

Thorup, John <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 07:34:32 -0700

99 lines

Re: Noise suppression using "white noise"...

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 10:53:44 -0500

154 lines

New Thread

Noise Suupression

Re: Noise Suupression

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 08:42:01 -0700

112 lines

Re: Noise Suupression

David Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 13:22:47 -0700

88 lines

New Thread

non-static tape

non-static tape

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 14:39:55 -0400

50 lines

non-static tape

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 14:39:55 -0400

46 lines

Re: non-static tape

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 15:21:59 -0400

96 lines

New Thread

OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers' Qualificat ion Profile

Re: OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers' Qualificat ion Profile

Hinners Hans Civ WRALC/LYPME <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 09:35:57 -0400

105 lines

New Thread

OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers' Qualification Profile

OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers' Qualification Profile

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 16:43:37 EDT

47 lines

Re: OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers' Qualification Profile

Ian McMillan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:17:53 -0700

78 lines

Re: OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers' Qualification Profile

Le Dai Tri <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:09:25 +0700

94 lines

Re: OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers' Qualification Profile

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 18 May 2000 09:47:15 EDT

46 lines

New Thread

OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers'QualificationProfile

Re: OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers'QualificationProfile

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:23:37 -0400

132 lines

Re: OEM Standard for Printed Board Manufacturers'QualificationProfile

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:24:33 -0400

115 lines

New Thread

Off topic - Intranet based modification database?

Off topic - Intranet based modification database?

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 16:52:34 +0100

57 lines

Re: Off topic - Intranet based modification database?

Alain Savard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 12:40:01 -0400

96 lines

Re: Off topic - Intranet based modification database?

Collins, Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 13:58:45 -0300

130 lines

Re: Off topic - Intranet based modification database?

michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 08:57:58 +0800

94 lines

Re: Off topic - Intranet based modification database?

Collins, Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 08:11:41 -0300

158 lines

Re: Off topic - Intranet based modification database?

Collins, Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 08:11:41 -0300

155 lines

Re: Off topic - Intranet based modification database?

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:14:03 +0100

171 lines

New Thread

OSP

OSP

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:48:14 -0400

39 lines

Re: OSP

Carano,Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 17:06:13 -0400

95 lines

Re: OSP

Noble, Ed <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 07:34:13 -0400

128 lines

Re: OSP

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 07:32:18 -0600

129 lines

New Thread

OSP and Fine Pitch

OSP and Fine Pitch

Mike Lang <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:26:15 -0400

50 lines

Re: OSP and Fine Pitch

Tempea, Ioan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 12:35:49 -0400

95 lines

Re: OSP and Fine Pitch

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:47:36 +0200

89 lines

Re: OSP and Fine Pitch

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 15:47:59 EDT

43 lines

Re: OSP and Fine Pitch

Jorge Engenharia <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 17:07:04 -0300

187 lines

Re: OSP and Fine Pitch

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:07:23 +0200

80 lines

Re: OSP and Fine Pitch

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:48:22 EDT

34 lines

New Thread

PADS format compatibility

PADS format compatibility

Roland Jaquet <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 20:37:57 +0200

86 lines

Re: PADS format compatibility

Kenneth Stephens <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 21:28:10 -0700

132 lines

New Thread

Padstacks info for multi layer

Padstacks info for multi layer

Denis Seguin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 09:27:55 -0400

42 lines

Re: Padstacks info for multi layer

Roger M. Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 17:59:35 +0000

113 lines

New Thread

Pallets

Pallets

Larry Koens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 14:09:51 -0500

72 lines

Re: Pallets

Cash, Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:11:37 -0400

51 lines

New Thread

Passivation

Passivation

Jonathan A Noquil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:42:33 +0800

31 lines

Re: Passivation

Avigdor Jakubinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 10:59:27 +0300

81 lines

Re: Passivation

Jonathan A Noquil <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 18:12:23 +0900

48 lines

Re: Passivation

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:39:39 +0300

53 lines

Re: Passivation

<Rudy Sedlak> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 09:29:06 EDT

30 lines

Re: Passivation

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 11:27:22 -0700

45 lines

Re: Passivation

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 16:40:52 -0700

123 lines

New Thread

PCB / PWB packing and storage specifications

Re: PCB / PWB packing and storage specifications

Richard Tilbrook <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 08:31:22 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

PCB Data Required

PCB Data Required

Paul J Palmer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 14:21:16 +0100

83 lines

New Thread

PCB onboard inductor dimensioning?

PCB onboard inductor dimensioning?

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 10:10:45 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Plated Hole Pad Dimensions

Plated Hole Pad Dimensions

Dieffenbacher, William C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 09:34:18 -0400

35 lines

Re: Plated Hole Pad Dimensions

Dieffenbacher, William C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 13:45:47 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

Plated thru holes for compliant pins

Plated thru holes for compliant pins

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:56:24 EDT

29 lines

Re: Plated thru holes for compliant pins

Hinners Hans Civ WRALC/LYPME <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:25:16 -0400

61 lines

Re: Plated thru holes for compliant pins

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:41:57 -0700

57 lines

New Thread

Plating rack Leeching

Plating rack Leeching

Doug Jeffery <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:43:53 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers without anyinterruption.

Re: Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers without anyinterruption.

이민수 차장 전자 연구소연구2팀 <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 10:08:53 +0900

46 lines

New Thread

Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers withoutanyinterruption.

Re: Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers withoutanyinterruption.

Keach Sasamori <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 10:48:05 -0500

104 lines

New Thread

Prepreg numbering

Prepreg numbering

KK Chin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 11:06:57 -0700

33 lines

Re: Prepreg numbering

Bob Dube <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 15:18:46 -0400

73 lines

Re: Prepreg numbering

KK Chin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 12:41:02 -0700

114 lines

Re: Prepreg numbering

pratap <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 15:57:55 -0700

72 lines

Re: Prepreg numbering

Colin W.T. McVean <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2000 10:57:28 +0100

162 lines

Re: Prepreg numbering

Geoff Layhe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 09:01:49 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

Press fit vs. Hand Solder

Press fit vs. Hand Solder

Jason Larson, CET <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 10:34:08 -0700

36 lines

Re: Press fit vs. Hand Solder

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 12:56:19 -0700

63 lines

New Thread

PSA cover tape problems...

PSA cover tape problems...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 18:10:07 EDT

54 lines

New Thread

Question about EPROM's...

Question about EPROM's...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 16:32:34 EDT

38 lines

Re: Question about EPROM's...

Roger M. Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:48:53 +0000

112 lines

Re: Question about EPROM's...

Tom Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 16:53:36 -0400

69 lines

Re: Question about EPROM's...

Craig Elison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 15:59:08 -0500

77 lines

Re: Question about EPROM's...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 17:06:32 EDT

49 lines

Re: Question about EPROM's...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 17:08:37 EDT

36 lines

Re: Question about EPROM's...

Tom Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 17:16:04 -0400

48 lines

New Thread

Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Grounding resis tor

Re: Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Grounding resis tor

Kane, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 09:47:24 -0400

210 lines

Re: Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Grounding resis tor

Cash, Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 08:47:49 -0700

261 lines

New Thread

Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Grounding resistor

Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Grounding resistor

Ashok Dhawan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:50:33 -0700

77 lines

Re: Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Grounding resistor

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 17:36:17 -0400

75 lines

Re: Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Grounding resistor

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 17:36:17 -0400

88 lines

Re: Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Grounding resistor

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 21:27:23 -0400

156 lines

New Thread

Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Groundingresistor

Re: Question on EIA-625 : Technical specs of Groundingresistor

David Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 22:04:58 -0700

175 lines

New Thread

Question--No Technical Content

Question--No Technical Content

Eric Kalgren <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 20:02:21 -0600

55 lines

Re: Question--No Technical Content

Justin Braime <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 15:51:12 +1200

178 lines

Re: Question--No Technical Content

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 17:57:52 +1000

114 lines

New Thread

Ra and Rz values

Ra and Rz values

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 26 May 2000 14:48:34 EDT

29 lines

Re: Ra and Rz values

Carano,Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 16:08:24 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

raw materials measurements

raw materials measurements

Jason Larson, AScT <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:59:52 -0700

32 lines

Re: raw materials measurements

Richard Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 12:23:25 -0700

98 lines

New Thread

RE: [TN] Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers without anyinterruption.

Re: RE: [TN] Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers without anyinterruption.

Avigdor Jakubinsky <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 15:37:19 +0300

142 lines

New Thread

ReAirCleaning

ReAirCleaning

James H Moffitt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2000 21:29:43 EDT

41 lines

New Thread

reflow of punch and return boards

reflow of punch and return boards

Ed Holton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 09:07:44 -0400

29 lines

Re: reflow of punch and return boards

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:26:17 -0500

97 lines

New Thread

Reflowable heat transfer compound

Reflowable heat transfer compound

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 22:16:10 +1000

28 lines

Re: Reflowable heat transfer compound

Kelly M. Schriver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 07:15:48 -0500

65 lines

Re: Reflowable heat transfer compound

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 08:47:07 +1000

102 lines

New Thread

Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 18:50:48 EDT

41 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 09:42:05 +1000

69 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

The Job Shop <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 11:59:01 -0700

102 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 22:03:42 EDT

41 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 22:27:15 EDT

37 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Keach Sasamori <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 09:16:19 -0500

85 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Keach Sasamori <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 09:16:19 -0500

91 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 09:46:32 -0500

105 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 09:45:58 -0500

124 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 09:52:41 -0500

139 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 21:34:16 EDT

38 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

Le Dai Tri <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 08:48:59 +0700

67 lines

Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 23:00:39 -0400

153 lines

New Thread

Rejected postings

Rejected postings

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 08:20:50 -0700

80 lines

New Thread

Resharpening of cutters

Resharpening of cutters

Richard MacCutcheon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 10:37:42 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

resistance measurements

Re: resistance measurements

Phillip E. Hinton <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:45:11 EDT

30 lines

New Thread

Resistors

Resistors

James H Moffitt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 19:31:59 EDT

61 lines

Re: Resistors

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 06:33:33 -0400

93 lines

New Thread

Rework Stations/systems

Rework Stations/systems

Eric Lodangco <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 20:18:30 +0800

76 lines

Re: Rework Stations/systems

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 08:42:55 EDT

50 lines

Re: Rework Stations/systems

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 10:22:50 -0400

174 lines

Re: Rework Stations/systems

Thorup, John <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 07:24:44 -0700

49 lines

Re: Rework Stations/systems

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 17:10:29 +0200

49 lines

Re: Rework Stations/systems

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 17:10:29 +0200

59 lines

New Thread

Root Cause and Corrective Action

Root Cause and Corrective Action

Stephen Ayotte <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 10:40:19 -0400

35 lines

Re: Root Cause and Corrective Action

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 09:31:41 -0700

64 lines

Re: Root Cause and Corrective Action

Tony DiMauro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2000 12:44:51 -0700

141 lines

New Thread

Rubberized conveyor

Rubberized conveyor

Ed Popielarski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:13:35 -0700

104 lines

Re: Rubberized conveyor

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 10:21:47 -0700

81 lines

New Thread

Rust on lead cutting edge

Re: Rust on lead cutting edge

MOTLAQY <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 08:40:59 +0300

118 lines

Re: Rust on lead cutting edge

MOTLAQY <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 15:19:51 +0300

114 lines

New Thread

Scoring - Looking for Service Bureau

Scoring - Looking for Service Bureau

John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:33:49 -0700

34 lines

Re: Scoring - Looking for Service Bureau

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 12:50:35 EDT

56 lines

Re: Scoring - Looking for Service Bureau

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 13:16:39 -0400

62 lines

Re: Scoring - Looking for Service Bureau

<Joseph M. Webb> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 13:26:11 -0400

30 lines

Re: Scoring - Looking for Service Bureau

Joseph E. J. Duclos Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 20:21:01 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Hybiske, Tom <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 11:48:38 -0400

73 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 11:07:37 -0500

46 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Muller, Mary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 09:36:51 -0700

86 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Roger M. Stoops <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 16:36:00 +0000

86 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

McMonagle, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 12:52:38 -0400

68 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 12:02:12 -0700

63 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Goldman, Patricia J. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:14:13 -0400

95 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Bill Decray <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:16:42 -0400

135 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:36:38 -0500

119 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Goldman, Patricia J. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:41:06 -0400

155 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Brian Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:30:47 -0400

35 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Hybiske, Tom <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:59:10 -0400

95 lines

Re: Searching for IPC "marking" spec

Howieson, Rick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 10:58:40 -0600

181 lines

New Thread

Selective wave soldering machine

Selective wave soldering machine

tangweidong <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 09:43:43 +0800

32 lines

Re: Selective wave soldering machine

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 06:59:22 -0600

62 lines

Re: Selective wave soldering machine

Ryan Jennens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 09:40:09 -0400

68 lines

Re: Selective wave soldering machine

Scott Mcanall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 11:59:22 EDT

35 lines

New Thread

Shelf life of tantalum capacitors

Shelf life of tantalum capacitors

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 12:04:02 -0400

29 lines

Re: Shelf life of tantalum capacitors

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 09:58:12 -0700

52 lines

Re: Shelf life of tantalum capacitors

Nancy Reynolds/MKT/HQ/KEMET/US <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 18:28:24 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

shorts

shorts

Brian Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 16:45:56 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

signoffTechNet

signoffTechNet

Doug Webb <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 18:22:03 -0700

116 lines

Re: signoffTechNet

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 21:45:41 EDT

37 lines

New Thread

Silicone Confromal Coating

Silicone Confromal Coating

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 06:37:10 -0700

34 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:09:21 EDT

50 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 07:27:06 -0700

75 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Dewey Whittaker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 07:42:47 -0700

118 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:58:03 -0400

85 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Jean-Francois Bissonnette <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 11:18:30 -0400

67 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 18:35:22 +0100

87 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Kasprzak, Bill (esd) USX <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 15:30:48 -0400

82 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Kelly M. Schriver <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2000 06:55:24 -0500

70 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2000 11:12:22 +0200

77 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Alan Brewin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:57:54 +0100

85 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Alan Brewin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 15:13:33 +0100

111 lines

Re: Silicone Confromal Coating

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:20:54 +0200

147 lines

New Thread

silverloaded epoxy vs GHz

silverloaded epoxy vs GHz

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 12:57:08 +0200

37 lines

Re: silverloaded epoxy vs GHz

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 06:08:19 -0400

82 lines

New Thread

sizing vias for current

sizing vias for current

Craig Elison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:41:07 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

SLC infor

SLC infor

Brett Goldstein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 17:49:08 -0400

32 lines

Re: SLC infor

Peter J Codella <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 17:56:57 -0700

62 lines

Re: SLC infor

joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:54:13 -0400

82 lines

New Thread

SMT Components

SMT Components

Ken Bloomquist <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:50:21 -0700

38 lines

Re: SMT Components

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 14:20:40 EDT

66 lines

New Thread

SMT/PTH classification

SMT/PTH classification

Shirley Xiao <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 19:26:57 -0700

36 lines

Re: SMT/PTH classification

Edward J. Valentine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:40:17 -0400

73 lines

New Thread

Solder Bridging

Solder Bridging

Roger Mack <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 14:13:54 -0500

34 lines

Re: Solder Bridging

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 16:22:52 -0400

78 lines

New Thread

solder bumping

solder bumping

Dennis Fall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 15:53:45 -0500

49 lines

Re: solder bumping

Martin Christie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 08:53:00 +0100

82 lines

Re: solder bumping

Ryan Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 10:45:10 -0600

122 lines

New Thread

Solder fillet on high lead Ball

Solder fillet on high lead Ball

Michael Forrester <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:20:49 -0400

35 lines

Solder fillet on high lead Ball

Michael Forrester <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 19:16:05 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Solder Mask

Solder Mask

Jerry Mosur <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:57:25 -0400

35 lines

Re: Solder Mask

Mark Simmons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 08:05:13 -0700

61 lines

Re: Solder Mask

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 17:25:27 +0200

87 lines

Re: Solder Mask

David Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 22:10:11 -0700

56 lines

Solder Mask

Jerry Mosur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 08:55:29 -0400

39 lines

Re: Solder Mask

Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:40:19 +0100

97 lines

Solder Mask

Jerry Mosur <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 17:08:17 -0400

39 lines

Re: Solder Mask

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 08:58:26 +0200

79 lines

Re: Solder Mask

Brent Alcorn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:38:58 GMT

145 lines

Re: Solder Mask

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 14:39:45 +0200

188 lines

Re: Solder Mask

Alan Brewin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:41:51 +0100

126 lines

Re: Solder Mask

Mik Fenner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2000 18:28:08 +0100

67 lines

Re: Solder Mask

David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 18:11:15 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

Solder mask post HASL staining

Solder mask post HASL staining

Denis J. Dionne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 16:50:39 -0400

33 lines

Re: Solder mask post HASL staining

Robert Welch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 17:47:29 -0400

64 lines

New Thread

Solder Non-wetting

Solder Non-wetting

Dave Kell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 10:17:19 -0500

33 lines

Re: Solder Non-wetting

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:31:39 +0200

53 lines

Re: Solder Non-wetting

Virgil Minor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 08:07:38 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

soldermask

soldermask

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:03:50 -0700

28 lines

Re: soldermask

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 13:19:14 +0300

50 lines

Re: soldermask

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 07:33:20 -0700

76 lines

New Thread

Soldermask between pads

Soldermask between pads

Yvon Hache <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 16:43:41 -0300

50 lines

Re: Soldermask between pads

Barbara Burcham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 15:00:32 -0500

82 lines

Re: Soldermask between pads

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 13:28:07 -0700

71 lines

Re: Soldermask between pads

Edward J. Valentine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 22:07:51 -0400

86 lines

New Thread

SPC software packge

SPC software packge

Bojin G. Slavov <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 14:14:49 -0400

40 lines

Re: SPC software packge

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2000 09:43:18 +0200

75 lines

New Thread

Spec/standard comparison

Spec/standard comparison

Franklin D Asbell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2000 10:38:17 -0500

35 lines

Re: Spec/standard comparison

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 09:19:05 -0400

62 lines

Re: Spec/standard comparison

Cash, Alan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 07:03:12 -0700

87 lines

Re: Spec/standard comparison

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 10:29:19 -0400

116 lines

New Thread

Speed of moisture absorbtion

Speed of moisture absorbtion

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 17:00:07 +0200

43 lines

Speed of moisture absorbtion

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 17:00:07 +0200

51 lines

New Thread

Speed of moisture absorption

Re: Speed of moisture absorption

Hinners Hans Civ WRALC/LYPME <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 16:45:07 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

Stacking chips

Stacking chips

Ashok Dhawan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 08:16:23 -0700

82 lines

New Thread

Stamp/mark dye

Stamp/mark dye

Cecilia Alkhagen (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 08:44:42 +0200

49 lines

New Thread

Subj: 0201 & 0402 SMT

Subj: 0201 & 0402 SMT

Hollandsworth, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 10:12:46 -0500

39 lines

Re: Subj: 0201 & 0402 SMT

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:55:01 +0200

73 lines

Re: Subj: 0201 & 0402 SMT

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 09:19:41 +0200

86 lines

Re: Subj: 0201 & 0402 SMT

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 09:19:41 +0200

88 lines

New Thread

Supplier for Large PC Boards

Supplier for Large PC Boards

Joe Barocio <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2000 06:27:38 -0500

31 lines

Re: Supplier for Large PC Boards

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 16:00:39 +0200

63 lines

Re: Supplier for Large PC Boards

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 16:00:39 +0200

72 lines

New Thread

Tapered needles

Tapered needles

Håkan Törnqvist (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 12:51:57 +0200

35 lines

Re: Tapered needles

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 13:04:42 +0200

65 lines

Re: Tapered needles

Lee Whiteman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 08:33:09 -0400

70 lines

Re: Tapered needles

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:46:20 +0200

70 lines

Re: Tapered needles

Noble, Ed <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 13:47:40 -0400

64 lines

Re: Tapered needles

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 18:54:39 +1000

148 lines

New Thread

TechNet Digest - 17 May (#2000-304)

Re: TechNet Digest - 17 May (#2000-304)

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:07:17 -0700

40 lines

Re: TechNet Digest - 17 May (#2000-304)

Thorup, John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 11:23:52 -0700

66 lines

New Thread

Terminating wires, tinned or not?

Terminating wires, tinned or not?

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 15:35:30 +0100

69 lines

Re: Terminating wires, tinned or not?

Richard Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 08:50:26 -0700

73 lines

Re: Terminating wires, tinned or not?

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 11:56:38 -0400

125 lines

Re: Terminating wires, tinned or not?

Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 19:27:53 +0300

96 lines

New Thread

Test..

Test..

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 20:00:13 EDT

24 lines

New Thread

Testing....

Testing....

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:29:29 EDT

26 lines

New Thread

Texas Instrument (and other) BGA's...

Re: Texas Instrument (and other) BGA's...

d. terstegge <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:54:51 +0200

172 lines

Re: Texas Instrument (and other) BGA's...

Kuczynski Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 09:28:40 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

Texas Instrument BGA's...

Texas Instrument BGA's...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 21:44:28 EDT

52 lines

Re: Texas Instrument BGA's...

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 07:52:01 -0700

92 lines

Re: Texas Instrument BGA's...

Jim Kittel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 09:20:56 -0600

104 lines

Re: Texas Instrument BGA's...

Bob Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 10:36:33 -0700

93 lines

Re: Texas Instrument BGA's...

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 14:00:13 EDT

48 lines

Re: Texas Instrument BGA's...

Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 11:44:13 -0700

126 lines

New Thread

Thanks to all on To X-ray or Not.

Thanks to all on To X-ray or Not.

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 07:33:03 -0600

140 lines

New Thread

Thick film lay-out

Thick film lay-out

Anne Ledger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 13:43:23 -0400

33 lines

Re: Thick film lay-out

Hiteshew, Michael <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 14:37:10 -0400

60 lines

Re: Thick film lay-out

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 14:16:15 -0700

62 lines

Re: Thick film lay-out

Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2000 20:34:23 -0500

94 lines

Re: Thick film lay-out

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 08:04:33 -0700

118 lines

Re: Thick film lay-out

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 10:44:09 -0700

137 lines

Re: Thick film lay-out

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 14:10:14 EDT

59 lines

Re: Thick film lay-out

Chuck Brummer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 12:56:03 -0700

77 lines

Re: Thick film lay-out

Creswick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2000 20:31:11 -0500

205 lines

New Thread

Three copies per message?

Three copies per message?

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:06:43 +0100

39 lines

Re: Three copies per message?

Dieselberg, Ron <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 06:46:35 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

Through Hole Wave Solder Mask Application

Through Hole Wave Solder Mask Application

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:50:08 -0400

55 lines

Re: Through Hole Wave Solder Mask Application

McMonagle, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 16:56:35 -0400

103 lines

Re: Through Hole Wave Solder Mask Application

Barmuta, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:46:47 -0700

132 lines

Re: Through Hole Wave Solder Mask Application

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:49:07 +0100

115 lines

Re: Through Hole Wave Solder Mask Application

Matthew Lamkin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 12:49:07 +0100

123 lines

Re: Through Hole Wave Solder Mask Application

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 18:12:42 EDT

79 lines

Re: Through Hole Wave Solder Mask Application

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2000 18:12:42 EDT

87 lines

New Thread

Tip Scrubber

Tip Scrubber

George Gerberick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 15:06:06 -0700

26 lines

Re: Tip Scrubber

McMonagle, Mike <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 07:34:36 -0400

66 lines

New Thread

To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

Barry Gallegos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 14:53:06 -0600

194 lines

Re: To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

Jerry Cupples <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 17:11:47 -0500

124 lines

Re: To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2000 21:07:12 EDT

97 lines

Re: To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 09:05:56 +0200

123 lines

Re: To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

Richard Tilbrook <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 11:36:11 +0100

40 lines

Re: To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

Howieson, Rick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 17:08:32 -0600

156 lines

Re: To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jun 2000 09:11:10 +1000

179 lines

Re: To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 20:17:23 EDT

31 lines

Re: To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jun 2000 11:30:29 +1000

63 lines

Re: To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:20:24 +0300

181 lines

Re: To X-ray or Not to X-ray.

Gabriela Bogdan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:31:58 +0300

86 lines

New Thread

Tombstoning and missing parts on 0805 Resistors

Tombstoning and missing parts on 0805 Resistors

Becerra Alejandro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 12:27:07 -0500

37 lines

Re: Tombstoning and missing parts on 0805 Resistors

Becerra Alejandro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 13:08:31 -0500

74 lines

Re: Tombstoning and missing parts on 0805 Resistors

Tom Braswell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:15:13 -0700

62 lines

Re: Tombstoning and missing parts on 0805 Resistors

Tom Braswell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 14:33:55 -0700

113 lines

Re: Tombstoning and missing parts on 0805 Resistors

Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:40:20 -0400

76 lines

Re: Tombstoning and missing parts on 0805 Resistors

Taheri, Kamran <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2000 15:06:12 -0500

101 lines

New Thread

TPCA 2000 Information Available

TPCA 2000 Information Available

Nick Ban <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2000 11:36:22 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

Tru Chem -SPC software package

Tru Chem -SPC software package

Jeff s Snow <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2000 13:57:54 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Un-subscribe

Un-subscribe

Corey A Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2000 15:47:50 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Unsubscribe

Unsubscribe

Corey A Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 09:50:14 -0500

23 lines

Unsubscribe

Jim Kenny <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:32:54 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

UPDATE : Coming Virus

Re: UPDATE : Coming Virus

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 18:21:39 +1000

80 lines

New Thread

UV Cure Conformal Coating

UV Cure Conformal Coating

Hooper Doug <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 10:25:00 -0400

30 lines

Re: UV Cure Conformal Coating

Mike Moninger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 10:38:58 EDT

38 lines

Re: UV Cure Conformal Coating

Mel Parrish <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2000 11:22:05 -0400

75 lines

Re: UV Cure Conformal Coating

Alan Brewin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2000 09:30:25 +0100

107 lines

New Thread

Virus Alert!

Virus Alert!

Keach Sasamori <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 09:18:59 -0500

44 lines

Re: Virus Alert!

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2000 11:40:12 EDT

147 lines

New Thread

Vision Inspection Technology machine

Vision Inspection Technology machine

Ken Fong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 13:22:11 +0800

31 lines

Re: Vision Inspection Technology machine

Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2000 16:45:27 +1000

60 lines

New Thread

Warpage (Bow and Twist) Causes

Warpage (Bow and Twist) Causes

S. Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 03:17:48 EDT

28 lines

Re: Warpage (Bow and Twist) Causes

Geoff Layhe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 09:19:28 +0100

58 lines

Re: Warpage (Bow and Twist) Causes

Scott Westheimer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 18:51:15 +0800

57 lines

New Thread

Wave Soldering 2512 Resistors

Wave Soldering 2512 Resistors

Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 13:58:21 -0500

63 lines

Re: Wave Soldering 2512 Resistors

David Fish <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2000 21:59:51 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

What is an acid trap?

What is an acid trap?

Takach, Lou J <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 12:35:02 -0400

43 lines

Re: What is an acid trap?

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 10:42:10 -0700

71 lines

Re: What is an acid trap?

Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 15:47:58 EDT

34 lines

Re: What is an acid trap?

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:10:40 -0700

61 lines

Re: What is an acid trap?

Howieson, Rick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:29:43 -0600

93 lines

Re: What is an acid trap?

Phil Crepeau <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 13:38:04 -0700

122 lines

Re: What is an acid trap?

Mike Bailey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2000 14:41:25 -0700

88 lines

New Thread

wirebonding EFO

wirebonding EFO

Ingemar Hernefjord (EMW) <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2000 12:50:36 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

YAY! Keach fixed the Listserver!!

YAY! Keach fixed the Listserver!!

Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 14:52:23 EDT

54 lines

Re: YAY! Keach fixed the Listserver!!

Richard Hamilton <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2000 11:54:23 -0700

80 lines

New Thread

Zero Acceptance Number (c=0) Sampling Plans

Zero Acceptance Number (c=0) Sampling Plans

Sherman Banks <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 14:17:56 -0700

39 lines

Re: Zero Acceptance Number (c=0) Sampling Plans

Lou Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 17:45:53 -0400

80 lines

Re: Zero Acceptance Number (c=0) Sampling Plans

Glenn Pelkey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2000 15:42:27 PDT

79 lines

Re: Zero Acceptance Number (c=0) Sampling Plans

Timothy Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 09:45:29 -0700

53 lines

Re: Zero Acceptance Number (c=0) Sampling Plans

Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 13:11:14 -0400

91 lines

New Thread

[PCB Specifications

Re: [PCB Specifications

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 May 2000 14:48:39 EDT

47 lines

New Thread

[TN] Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers without anyinterruption.

RE: [TN] Please let me post my opinions/questions/answers without anyinterruption.

이민수 차장 전자 연구소연구2 <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2000 17:30:06 +0900

117 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
1996
1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.IPC.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager